{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T19:56:57Z","timestamp":1790884617013,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1631577600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1631577600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Negative childbirth experience may affect mother wellbeing and health. However, it is rarely evaluated in studies comparing methods of induction of labor (IoL).<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title><jats:p>To compare women\u2019s experience of IoL according to the method, considering the mediating role of interventions and complications of delivery.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>We used data from the MEDIP prospective population-based cohort, including all women with IoL during one month in seven French perinatal networks. The experience of IoL, assessed at 2\u2009months postpartum, was first compared between cervical ripening and oxytocin, and secondarily between different cervical ripening methods. Mediation analyses were used to measure the direct and indirect effects of cervical ripening on maternal experience, through delivery with interventions or complications.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Findings<\/jats:title><jats:p>The response rate was 47.8% (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20091453\/3042). Compared with oxytocin (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009541), cervical ripening (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009910) was associated less often with feelings that labor went \u2018as expected\u2019 (adjusted risk ratio for the direct effect 0.78, 95%CI [0.70\u20130.88]), length of labor was \u2018acceptable\u2019 (0.76[0.71\u20130.82]), \u2018vaginal discomfort\u2019 was absent (0.77[0.69\u20130.85]) and with lower global satisfaction (0.90[0.84\u20130.96]). Interventions and complications mediated between 6 and 35% of the total effect of cervical ripening on maternal experience. Compared to the dinoprostone insert, maternal experience was not significantly different with the other prostaglandins. The balloon catheter was associated with less pain.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Cervical ripening was associated with a less positive experience of childbirth, whatever the method, only partly explained by interventions and complications of delivery.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Counselling and support of women requiring cervical ripening might be enhanced to improve the experience of IoL.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-04076-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T14:02:51Z","timestamp":1631628171000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":22,"title":["Methods of induction of labor and women\u2019s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Pauline","family":"Blanc-Petitjean","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Corinne","family":"Dupont","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bruno","family":"Carbonne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marina","family":"Salom\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fran\u00e7ois","family":"Goffinet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Camille Le","family":"Ray","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"for the MEDIP study group","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Catherine","family":"Crenn-Hebert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adrien","family":"Gaudineau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","family":"Perrotte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pierre","family":"Raynal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elodie","family":"Clouqueur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ga\u00ebl","family":"Beucher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Catherine","family":"Deneux-Tharaux","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pierre-Yves","family":"Ancel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"4076_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e231","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2010.10.004","volume":"27","author":"J Goberna-Tricas","year":"2011","unstructured":"Goberna-Tricas J, Ban\u00fas-Gim\u00e9nez MR, Palacio-Tauste A, Linares-Sancho S. Satisfaction with pregnancy and birth services: the quality of maternity care services as experienced by women. Midwifery. 2011;27(6):e231\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2010.10.004.","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"4076_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2017.05.004","volume":"51","author":"L Henriksen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, Lukasse M, Bidens study group. Factors related to a negative birth experience - a mixed methods study. Midwifery. 2017;51:33\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2017.05.004.","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"1","key":"4076_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-0903-2","volume":"16","author":"A Smarandache","year":"2016","unstructured":"Smarandache A, Kim THM, Bohr Y, Tamim H. Predictors of a negative labour and birth experience based on a national survey of Canadian women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-016-0903-2.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"5","key":"4076_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340500345378","volume":"85","author":"U Waldenstr\u00f6m","year":"2006","unstructured":"Waldenstr\u00f6m U, Rudman A, Hildingsson I. Intrapartum and postpartum care in Sweden: women\u2019s opinions and risk factors for not being satisfied. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(5):551\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016340500345378.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"4076_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01200.x","volume":"109","author":"K Gottvall","year":"2002","unstructured":"Gottvall K, Waldenstr\u00f6m U. Does a traumatic birth experience have an impact on future reproduction? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(3):254\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01200.x.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4076_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12072","volume":"92","author":"HT St\u00f8rksen","year":"2013","unstructured":"St\u00f8rksen HT, Garthus-Niegel S, Vangen S, Eberhard-Gran M. The impact of previous birth experiences on maternal fear of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(3):318\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12072.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"4076_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1007\/s00737-018-0921-3","volume":"22","author":"AF Bell","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bell AF, Rubin LH, Davis JM, Golding J, Adejumo OA, Carter CS. The birth experience and subsequent maternal caregiving attitudes and behavior: a birth cohort study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019;22(5):613\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00737-018-0921-3.","journal-title":"Arch Womens Ment Health"},{"key":"4076_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.04.014","volume":"39","author":"AF Bell","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bell AF, Andersson E. The birth experience and women\u2019s postnatal depression: a systematic review. Midwifery. 2016;39:112\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2016.04.014.","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"6","key":"4076_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01393.x","volume":"109","author":"I Hildingsson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hildingsson I, R\u00e5destad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenstr\u00f6m U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(6):618\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2002.01393.x.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4076_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e001570","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2012-001570","volume":"3","author":"C Doyle","year":"2013","unstructured":"Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1):e001570. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2012-001570.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"4076_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0169132","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0169132","volume":"12","author":"JE Handelzalts","year":"2017","unstructured":"Handelzalts JE, Waldman Peyser A, Krissi H, Levy S, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y. Indications for emergency intervention, mode of delivery, and the childbirth experience. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0169132.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"4076_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2016.10.002","volume":"43","author":"P Carquillat","year":"2016","unstructured":"Carquillat P, Boulvain M, Guittier M-J. How does delivery method influence factors that contribute to women\u2019s childbirth experiences? Midwifery. 2016;43:21\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2016.10.002.","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"issue":"10","key":"4076_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.002","volume":"46","author":"B Blondel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Blondel B, Coulm B, Bonnet C, Goffinet F, le Ray C, National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys. Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(10):701\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.09.002.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"4076_CR14","unstructured":"Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep Cent Dis Control Prev Natl Cent Health Stat Natl Vital Stat Syst. 2017;66(1)."},{"key":"4076_CR15","unstructured":"European Perinatal Health Report 2010 - Euro-Peristat. https:\/\/www.europeristat.com\/reports\/european-perinatal-health-report-2010.html."},{"key":"4076_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD003246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD003246.pub2.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003246.pub2"},{"issue":"feb05 10","key":"4076_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h217","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h217","volume":"350","author":"Z Alfirevic","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Dias S, Jones LV, et al. Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350(feb05 10):h217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.h217.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"3","key":"4076_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13456","volume":"123","author":"W Chen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(3):346\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.13456.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"4076_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1111\/ppe.12569","volume":"33","author":"P Blanc-Petitjean","year":"2019","unstructured":"Blanc-Petitjean P, Carbonne B, Deneux-Tharaux C, Salom\u00e9 M, Goffinet F, le Ray C, et al. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: a population-based study using coarsened exact matching. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33(5):313\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ppe.12569.","journal-title":"Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4076_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.049","volume":"222","author":"V De Vivo","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Vivo V, et al. Early amniotomy after cervical ripening for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(4):320\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.049.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4076_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-11-84","volume":"11","author":"EL Mozurkewich","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mozurkewich EL, Chilimigras JL, Berman DR, Perni UC, Romero VC, King VJ, et al. Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11(1):84. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2393-11-84.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"7","key":"4076_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14135","volume":"100","author":"D Di Mascio","year":"2021","unstructured":"Di Mascio D, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with dinoprostone compared with cervical balloon: a retrospective, international study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(7):1313\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14135.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"13","key":"4076_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1673","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15397","volume":"125","author":"F Dos Santos","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dos Santos F, Drymiotou S, Antequera Martin A, Mol BW, Gale C, Devane D, et al. Development of a core outcome set for trials on induction of labour: an international multistakeholder Delphi study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125(13):1673\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.15397.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"4076_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"P4","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-16-S1-P4","volume":"16","author":"N Medley","year":"2015","unstructured":"Medley N, et al. Outcomes reported in trials of methods for the induction of labour. Trials. 2015;16:P4 1745\u20136215-16-S1-P4.","journal-title":"Trials"},{"issue":"9453","key":"4076_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)17670-8","volume":"365","author":"PM Rothwell","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: \u2018to whom do the results of this trial apply?\u2019. Lancet Lond Engl. 2005;365(9453):82\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"issue":"2","key":"4076_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.11.006","volume":"47","author":"P Blanc-Petitjean","year":"2018","unstructured":"Blanc-Petitjean P, Salom\u00e9 M, Dupont C, Crenn-Hebert C, Gaudineau A, Perrotte F, et al. Labour induction practices in France: a population-based declarative survey in 94 maternity units. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(2):57\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.11.006.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"key":"4076_CR27","first-page":"555","volume":"47","author":"P Blanc-Petitjean","year":"2019","unstructured":"Blanc-Petitjean P, et al. Overview of induction of labor practices in France. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019;47:555\u201361.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol"},{"key":"4076_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1111\/birt.12310","volume":"45","author":"A Jay","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jay A, Thomas H, Brooks F. In labor or in limbo? The experiences of women undergoing induction of labor in hospital: Findings of a qualitative study. Birth Berkeley Calif. 2018;45:64\u201370.","journal-title":"Birth Berkeley Calif"},{"issue":"1","key":"4076_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.03.004","volume":"123","author":"A Shetty","year":"2005","unstructured":"Shetty A, Burt R, Rice P, Templeton A. Women\u2019s perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour--a questionnaire-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123(1):56\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.03.004.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"10","key":"4076_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12211","volume":"92","author":"J Henderson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Henderson J, Redshaw M. Women\u2019s experience of induction of labor: a mixed methods study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(10):1159\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.12211.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"4076_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.016","volume":"217","author":"CV Ananth","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ananth CV, Schisterman EF. Confounding, causality, and confusion: the role of intermediate variables in interpreting observational studies in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(2):167\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.04.016.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"4076_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwu278","volume":"181","author":"QC Nguyen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nguyen QC, Osypuk TL, Schmidt NM, Glymour MM, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ. Practical guidance for conducting mediation analysis with multiple mediators using inverse odds ratio weighting. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(5):349\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/aje\/kwu278.","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"26","key":"4076_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4567","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.5864","volume":"32","author":"EJ Tchetgen Tchetgen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ. Inverse odds ratio-weighted estimation for causal mediation analysis. Stat Med. 2013;32(26):4567\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.5864.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"4076_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"983","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15691","volume":"126","author":"CV Ananth","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ananth CV. Proportion mediated in a causal mediation analysis: how useful is this measure? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;126:983.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"4076_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.12.032","volume":"210","author":"M Beckmann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Beckmann M, Thompson R, Miller Y, Prosser SJ, Flenady V, Kumar S. Measuring women\u2019s experience of induction of labor using prostaglandin vaginal gel. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:189\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.12.032.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"4076_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2018.08.018","volume":"67","author":"J Akuamoah-Boateng","year":"2018","unstructured":"Akuamoah-Boateng J, Spencer R. Woman-centered care: Women\u2019s experiences and perceptions of induction of labor for uncomplicated post-term pregnancy: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Midwifery. 2018;67:46\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2018.08.018.","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"4076_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.midw.2018.10.013","volume":"69","author":"R Coates","year":"2019","unstructured":"Coates R, Cupples G, Scamell A, McCourt C. Women\u2019s experiences of induction of labour: qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Midwifery. 2019;69:17\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.midw.2018.10.013.","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"4076_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107. Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(386\u2013397).","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5"},{"key":"4076_CR39","unstructured":"Induction of Labour. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists https:\/\/www.rcog.org.uk\/en\/guidelines-research-services\/guidelines\/induction-of-labour\/."},{"issue":"9","key":"4076_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1501","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14028","volume":"123","author":"TP Bernardes","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bernardes TP, Broekhuijsen K, Koopmans CM, Boers KE, van Wyk L, Tajik P, et al. Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(9):1501\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14028.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4076_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1258","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001154","volume":"126","author":"NR Miller","year":"2015","unstructured":"Miller NR, Cypher RL, Foglia LM, Pates JA, Nielsen PE. Elective induction of labor compared with expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(6):1258\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001154.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4076_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.046","volume":"221","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Caughey AB. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(4):304\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.02.046.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4076_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566","volume":"379","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, et al. Labor induction versus expectant Management in low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"4076_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x","volume":"116","author":"CE Pennell","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O\u2019Neill MJ, McCleery S, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116(11):1443\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4076_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-13-25","volume":"13","author":"A Henry","year":"2013","unstructured":"Henry A, Madan A, Reid R, Tracy SK, Austin K, Welsh A, et al. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):25. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2393-13-25.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"}],"container-title":["BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-021-04076-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12884-021-04076-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-021-04076-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,8]],"date-time":"2023-11-08T19:53:37Z","timestamp":1699473217000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12884-021-04076-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4076"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-021-04076-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 December 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 July 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 September 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The MEDIP protocol was registered in the ClinicalTrial database (22\/06\/2015, No. NCT02477085) and approved by the Patient Protection Committee of Ile de France 1 in May 2015 (CPPIDF1\u20132015-May-DAP 21bis). The CCTIRS (No.15.609) and the CNIL (MMS\/VCS\/AR1510301) authorized the use of the data for this study. Informed consent was obtained from all women included in the cohort. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"All authors have read and approved the content, and agree to submit the manuscript for consideration for publication in your journal.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and\/or discussion reported in this paper.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"621"}}