{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T14:31:46Z","timestamp":1792074706824,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,3]],"date-time":"2022-09-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1662163200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,3]],"date-time":"2022-09-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1662163200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To evaluate the outcomes and risk factors for trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) failure in patients in China.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Consecutive patients who had a previous cesarean delivery (CD) and attempted TOLAC were included from 2014 to 2020. Patients who successfully delivered were classified into the TOLAC success group. Patients who attempted TOLAC but had a repeat CD due to medical issues were classified into the TOLAC failure group. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the risk factors for TOLAC failure.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In total, 720 women who had a previous CD and attempted TOLAC were identified and included. The success rate of TOLAC was 84.2%(606\/720). Seven patients were diagnosed with uterine rupture, none of whom underwent hysterectomy. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the induction of labor (OR\u2009=\u20092.843, 95% CI: 1.571\u20135.145, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) was positively associated with TOLAC failure, but the thickness of the lower uterine segment (LUS) (OR\u2009=\u20090.215, 95% CI: 0.103\u20130.448, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) was negatively associated with TOLAC failure.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This study suggested that TOLAC was effective in decreasing CD rates in the Chinese population. The induction of labor was positively associated with TOLAC failure, but the thickness of the LUS was negatively associated with TOLAC failure. Our findings need to be confirmed in larger samples with patients of different ethnicities.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-022-05005-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,3]],"date-time":"2022-09-03T08:02:47Z","timestamp":1662192167000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Outcomes and risk factors for failed trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in women with one previous cesarean section: a Chinese population-based study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Xiaobo","family":"He","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qiaona","family":"Dai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaoli","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Junjun","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jie","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"5005_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"L4680","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4680","volume":"366","author":"HT Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li HT, Xue M, Hellerstein S, Cai Y, Gao Y, Zhang Y, et al. Association of China\u2019s universal two child policy with changes in births and birth related health factors: national, descriptive comparative study. BMJ. 2019;366:L4680.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"5005_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1186\/s12916-020-01714-7","volume":"18","author":"J Yan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yan J, Wang L, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang H, He Y, et al. The trend of caesarean birth rate changes in China after \u2018universal two-child policy\u2019 era: a population-based study in 2013\u20132018. BMC Med. 2020;18:249.","journal-title":"BMC Med"},{"key":"5005_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1620","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14057","volume":"123","author":"X Liu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Liu X, Lynch CD, Cheng WW, Landon MB. Lowering the high rate of caesarean delivery in China: an experience from Shanghai. BJOG. 2016;123:1620\u20138.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5005_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2639-2","volume":"19","author":"H Fan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fan H, Gu H, You H, Xu X, Kou Y, Yang N. Social determinants of delivery mode in Jiangsu. China BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:473.","journal-title":"China BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"5005_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0000000000000101","volume":"58","author":"B Sabol","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sabol B, Denman MA, Guise JM. Vaginal birth after cesarean: an effective method to reduce cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58:309\u201319.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5005_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1370\/afm.544","volume":"4","author":"J Zweifler","year":"2006","unstructured":"Zweifler J, Garza A, Hughes S, Stanich MA, Hierholzer A, Lau M. Vaginal birth after cesarean in California: before and after a change in guidelines. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:228\u201334.","journal-title":"Ann Fam Med"},{"key":"5005_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","volume":"133","author":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No","year":"2019","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e110\u201327.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"121\u20132","key":"5005_CR8","first-page":"127","volume":"83","author":"LM Leeman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Leeman LM, King VJ. Increasing patient access to VBAC: new NIH and ACOG recommendations. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(121\u20132):127.","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"5005_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2021.1916451.1-7","author":"S Parveen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Parveen S, Rengaraj S, Chaturvedula L. Factors associated with the outcome of TOLAC after one previous caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443615.2021.1916451.1-7.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"5005_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-04004-z","volume":"21","author":"Y Mi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mi Y, Qu P, Guo N, Bai R, Gao J, Ma Z, et al. Evaluation of factors that predict the success rate of trial of labor after the cesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:527.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"5005_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.12.010","volume":"245","author":"G Levin","year":"2020","unstructured":"Levin G, Mankuta D, Yossef E, Yahalomy SZ, Meyer R, Elchalal U, Yagel S, Rottenstreich A. Trial of labor after cesarean in older women who never delivered vaginally. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;245:89\u201393.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol."},{"key":"5005_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Levin G, Rosenbloom JI, Yagel S, Bart Y, Meyer R. Prediction of successful preterm vaginal birth after cesarean among women who never delivered vaginally. Arch\u00a0\u00a0Gynecol\u00a0Obstet. 2022;305(5):1143-9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06222-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06222-4"},{"key":"5005_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.01.232","volume":"220","author":"BS Harris","year":"2019","unstructured":"Harris BS, Heine RP, Park J, Faurot KR, Hopkins MK, Rivara AJ, et al. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean\u00a0accurate? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220:492.e1-e7.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"5005_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"995","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05492-8","volume":"301","author":"A Takeya","year":"2020","unstructured":"Takeya A, Adachi E, Takahashi Y, Kondoh E, Mandai M, Nakayama T. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in Japan: rates and complications. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301:995\u20131001.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5005_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Levin G, Tsur A, Tenenbaum L, Mor N, Zamir M, Meyer R. 2021 Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean for labor dystocia by sonographic estimated fetal weight. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.13946","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13946"},{"key":"5005_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Levin G, Tsur A, Tenenbaum L, Mor N, Zamir M, Meyer R. 2021 Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean among grand-multiparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-021-06311-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-021-06311-4"},{"issue":"7","key":"5005_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1801","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04630-9","volume":"32","author":"HH Chill","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chill HH, Karavani G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Lipschuetz M, Shimonovitz T, Cohen N, Shveiky D. Urinary bladder injury during cesarean delivery: risk factors and the role of retrograde bladder filling. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1801\u20136.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J."},{"issue":"3","key":"5005_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1001192","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001192","volume":"9","author":"CA Crowther","year":"2012","unstructured":"Crowther CA, Dodd JM, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS, Birth After Caesarean Study Group. Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001192.","journal-title":"PLoS Med."},{"key":"5005_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.009","volume":"59","author":"V Tanos","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tanos V, Toney ZA. Uterine scar rupture - prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:115\u201331.","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"5005_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/S1526-9523(03)00088-6","volume":"48","author":"N O'Brien-Abel","year":"2003","unstructured":"O\u2019Brien-Abel N. Uterine rupture during VBAC trial of labor: risk factors and fetal response. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003;48:249\u201357.","journal-title":"J Midwifery Womens Health"},{"key":"5005_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Holmgren CM. Uterine rupture associated with VBAC. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(4):978-87. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31826fd9b0.","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31826fd9b0"},{"key":"5005_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","volume":"351","author":"MB Landon","year":"2004","unstructured":"Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581\u20139.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"5005_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thapsamuthdechakorn A, Sekararithi R, Tongsong T. Factors associated with successful trial of labor after cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. J Pregnancy. 2018;2018:6140982. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2018\/6140982.","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/6140982"},{"issue":"320","key":"5005_CR24","first-page":"e1","volume":"201","author":"E Bujold","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, Brunet S, Gauthier RJ. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(320):e1-6.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"5005_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0828-8774","volume":"223","author":"J Schmitz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schmitz J, Stepan H, Schrey-Petersen S, Hoffmann J. Does lower uterine segment thickness measurement improve birth planning after previous cesarean section? Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2019;223:350\u20138.","journal-title":"Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol"},{"key":"5005_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05811-z","volume":"303","author":"E Spiegel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Spiegel E, Weintraub AY, Aricha-Tamir B, Ben-Harush Y, Hershkovitz R. The use of sonographic myometrial thickness measurements for the prediction of time from induction of labor to delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303:891\u20136.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"5005_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.07.023","volume":"87","author":"S Sen","year":"2004","unstructured":"Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;87:215\u20139.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"5005_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12423","volume":"41","author":"O Naji","year":"2013","unstructured":"Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, et al. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(6):672\u20138.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"5005_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2689-5","volume":"19","author":"A Wingert","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wingert A, Hartling L, Sebastianski M, Johnson C, Featherstone R, Vandermeer B, et al. Clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates: systematic review & meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:529.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"2","key":"5005_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12508","volume":"121","author":"HE Knight","year":"2014","unstructured":"Knight HE, Gurol-Urganci I, van der Meulen JH, Mahmood TA, Richmond DH, Dougall A, Cromwell DA. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. BJOG. 2014;121(2):183\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12508.","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-022-05005-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12884-022-05005-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-022-05005-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,3]],"date-time":"2022-09-03T08:04:11Z","timestamp":1662192251000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12884-022-05005-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,3]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5005"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-022-05005-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 November 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 August 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 September 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethnic Committee of the Ningbo Women and Children\u2019s Hospital(approval number: EC2017-003). All data were collected from the electronic medical record system in the department of Obstetrics Medicine Center. Data were anonymized and de-identified before analysis.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"676"}}