{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,18]],"date-time":"2026-06-18T21:35:36Z","timestamp":1781818536340,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]],"date-time":"2024-04-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1712534400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]],"date-time":"2024-04-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1712534400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Uterine rupture in pregnant women can lead to serious adverse outcomes. This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of patients with complete uterine rupture.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Data from 33 cases of surgically confirmed complete uterine rupture at Chenzhou No.1 People\u2019s Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In total, 31,555 pregnant women delivered in our hospital during the study period. Of these, approximately 1\u2030 (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200933) had complete uterine rupture. The average gestational age at complete uterine rupture was 31<jats:sup>+4<\/jats:sup>\u00a0weeks (13<jats:sup>+1<\/jats:sup>\u201340<jats:sup>+3<\/jats:sup>\u00a0weeks), and the average bleeding volume was 1896.97\u00a0ml (200\u20136000\u00a0ml). Twenty-six patients (78.79%) had undergone more than two deliveries. Twenty-five women (75.76%) experienced uterine rupture after a cesarean section, two (6.06%) after fallopian tube surgery, one (3.03%) after laparoscopic cervical cerclage, and one (3.03%) after wedge resection of the uterine horn, and Fifteen women (45.45%) presented with uterine rupture at the original cesarean section incision scar. Thirteen patients (39.39%) were transferred to our hospital after their initial diagnosis. Seven patients (21.21%) had no obvious symptoms, and only four patients (12.12%) had typical persistent lower abdominal pain. There were 13 cases (39.39%, including eight cases\u2009\u2265\u200928\u00a0weeks old) of fetal death in utero and two cases (6.06%, both full term) of severe neonatal asphyxia. The rates of postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy were 66.67%, 63.64%, and 21.21%. Maternal death occurred in one case (3.03%).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The site of the uterine rupture was random, and was often located at the weakest point of the uterus. There is no effective means for detecting or predicting the weakest point of the uterus. Rapid recognition is key to the treatment of uterine rupture.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-024-06394-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]],"date-time":"2024-04-08T08:02:56Z","timestamp":1712563376000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Clinical analysis of complete uterine rupture during pregnancy"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Jing","family":"Xie","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xuefang","family":"Lu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miao","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"6394_CR1","unstructured":"Xie Xing, Kong Beihua, Duan Tao. Obstetrics and gynecology. 9th ed. Beijing: people\u2019s health press, 2018:212\u2013213"},{"issue":"6","key":"6394_CR2","first-page":"363","volume":"54","author":"L Zhe","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhe L, Huixia Y, Hong X, et al. National multicenter survey on the status of uterine rupture and analysis of outcomes. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019;54(6):363\u20138.","journal-title":"Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"6394_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andrea Tinelli, Loannis P. Kosmas, Jose Tony Carugno, et at. Uterine rupture during pregnancy: The URIDA (uterine rupture international data acquisition) study[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2021,1(157):76\u201384,\u00a0DOI:https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/IJGO.13810","DOI":"10.1002\/IJGO.13810"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR4","first-page":"118","volume":"27","author":"Z Jian-Ping","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jian-Ping Z, Juhua W. Diagnosis and treatment of uterine rupture. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2011;27(2):118\u201320.","journal-title":"Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics"},{"issue":"12","key":"6394_CR5","first-page":"926","volume":"36","author":"C Tiantian","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tiantian C, Chunrong L, Yijun L, Meng C, Xinghui L. Analysis of clinical characteristics of 86 cases of complete uterine rupture[J]. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020;36(12):926\u201330.","journal-title":"Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.04.035","volume":"227","author":"M Perdue","year":"2022","unstructured":"Perdue M, Felder L, Berghella V. First-trimester uterine rupture: a case report and systematic review of the literature [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):209\u201317.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"6394_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina56110574","volume":"56","author":"E Savukyne","year":"2020","unstructured":"Savukyne E, Bykovaite\u00b7stankeviciene R, Machtejeviene E, et al. Symptomatic uterine rupture: a fifteen year review [J]. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(11):574.","journal-title":"Medicina (Kaunas)"},{"issue":"25","key":"6394_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5155","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2021.1875435","volume":"35","author":"N Sharon","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sharon N, Maymon R, Pekar-Zlotin M, et al. Midgestational prelabor spontaneous uterine rupture: a systematic review [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):5155\u201360.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"key":"6394_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1849121","volume":"4","author":"A Vimercati","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vimercati A, Dellino M, Crupano FM, Gargano G, Cicinelli E. Ultrasonic Assessment Of Cesarean Section Scar To Vesicovaginal Fold Distance: An Instrument To Estimate Pre-Labor Uterine Rupture Risk. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Medicine. 2021;4:1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2020.1849121.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"3","key":"6394_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1007\/s13224-014-0551-2","volume":"65","author":"A Singh","year":"2015","unstructured":"Singh A, Shrivastava C. Uterine rupture: still a harsh reality![J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015;65(3):158\u201361.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol India"},{"issue":"8","key":"6394_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1024","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13579","volume":"98","author":"I Al-Zirqi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Vangen S. Maternal outcome after complete uterine rupture[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(8):1024\u201331.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.04.010","volume":"219","author":"I Al-Zirqi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Vangen S. Infant outcome after complete uterine rupture[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):109-e1-e8.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6394_CR13","first-page":"333","volume-title":"Midwifery","author":"L Xinghui","year":"2018","unstructured":"Xinghui L, Jing He, Hongbo Qi. Midwifery. Beijing: People\u2019s Health Publishing Co; 2018. p. 333\u20137."},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.18663","volume":"317","author":"HT Li","year":"2017","unstructured":"Li HT, Luo S, Trasande L, et al. Geographic Variations and Temporal Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates in China, 2008\u20132014. JAMA. 2017;317(1):69\u201376.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"6394_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liang J, Mu Y, Li X, et al. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: Observational study of nearly seven million health facility births.BMJ,2018,360(5):k817","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.k817"},{"issue":"7","key":"6394_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12639","volume":"94","author":"LB Colmorn","year":"2015","unstructured":"Colmorn LB, Petersen KB, Jakobsson M, et al. The Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study: a study of complete uterine rupture, abnormally invasive placenta, peripartum hysterectomy, and severe blood loss at delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(7):734\u201344.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"6394_CR17","first-page":"920","volume":"31","author":"N Aziz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aziz N, Yousfani S. Analysis of uterine rupture at university teaching hospital Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31(4):920\u20134.","journal-title":"Pak J Med Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"6394_CR18","first-page":"412","volume":"28","author":"K Qingling","year":"2019","unstructured":"Qingling K, Yang Z, Lei F, et al. Analysis of complete uterine rupture in middle and late pregnancy. Progress of modern obstetrics and gynecology. 2019;28(6):412\u20135.","journal-title":"Progress of modern obstetrics and gynecology"},{"issue":"20","key":"6394_CR19","first-page":"4591","volume":"33","author":"Xu Meilong","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meilong Xu. Clinical analysis of 82 cases of uterine rupture in pregnancy. China Maternal and Child Health. 2018;33(20):4591\u20134.","journal-title":"China Maternal and Child Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"6394_CR20","first-page":"331","volume":"49","author":"B Xiaoxia","year":"2014","unstructured":"Xiaoxia B, Zhengping W, Xiaofu Y. Clinical analysis of 67 cases of uterine rupture. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;49(5):331\u20135.","journal-title":"Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-03811-8","volume":"21","author":"Y Zhou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhou Y, Mu Y, Chen P, et al. The incidence, risk factors and maternal and foetal outcomes of uterine rupture during different birth policy periods: an observational study in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):360.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"6394_CR22","first-page":"648","volume-title":"Williams Obstetrics [M]","author":"Y Huixia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Huixia Y, Hongbo C, Qintian Z, et al. Williams Obstetrics [M]. 25th ed. Beijing: People\u2019s Health Publishing House; 2020. p. 648\u20139.","edition":"25"},{"issue":"7","key":"6394_CR23","first-page":"662","volume":"33","author":"Wu Suqin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Suqin Wu, Ying W, Zhiming S, et al. Risk factor analysis of mode of delivery for second pregnancy in scarred uterus. Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2017;33(7):662\u20134.","journal-title":"Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340601089768","volume":"86","author":"IM Usta","year":"2007","unstructured":"Usta IM, Hamdi MA, Musa AA, et al. Pregnancy outcome in patients with previous uterine rupture[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(2):172\u20136.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"3","key":"6394_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1111\/ajo.12497","volume":"57","author":"CY Liao","year":"2017","unstructured":"Liao CY, Tse J, Sung SY, et al. Cornual wedge resection for interstitial pregnancy and postoperative outcome[J]. Aust N Z JObstet Gynaecol. 2017;57(3):342\u20135.","journal-title":"Aust N Z JObstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"6394_CR26","first-page":"517","volume":"96","author":"AM Propst","year":"2000","unstructured":"Propst AM, Liberman RF, Harlow BL, et al. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk[J]. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(4):517\u201320.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR27","first-page":"266","volume":"96","author":"FW Jansen","year":"2000","unstructured":"Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study[J]. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(2):266\u201370.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"6394_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"A Vimercati, P Greco, G Loverro, Pl Lopalco, V Pansini, L Selvaggi. Maternal Complications After Caesarean Section In Hiv-Infected Women. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Repr Biol (90) 2000:73\u201376","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(99)00229-8"},{"issue":"2","key":"6394_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1159\/000089144","volume":"61","author":"S Tsuji","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tsuji S, Takahashi K, Imaoka I, et al. MRI evaluation of the uterine structure after myomectomy[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;61(2):106\u201310.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR30","first-page":"13","volume":"34","author":"L Chaoxia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chaoxia L, Danqing C. Timing and mode of delivery after uterine trauma. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;34(1):13\u20135.","journal-title":"Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"issue":"17","key":"6394_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2848","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1671343","volume":"34","author":"S Cunningham","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cunningham S, Algeo CE, Defranco EA. Influence of inter pregnancy interval on uterine rupture[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(17):2848\u201353.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"6394_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2180","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/17.8.2180","volume":"17","author":"U Hasbargen","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hasbargen U, Margarita SM, Peter H, et al. Uterine dehiscence in a nullipara, diagnosed by MRI, following use of unipolar electrocautery during laparoscopic myomectomy[J]. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(8):2180\u20132.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"6394_CR33","first-page":"93","volume":"33","author":"F Kui-lin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kui-lin F, WeiShe Z. Repregnancy in elderly women with scarred uterus. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2017;33(1):93\u20136.","journal-title":"Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics"},{"issue":"23","key":"6394_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.4274\/JTGGA.GALENOS.2022.2022-1-2","volume":"3","author":"G Gitas","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gitas G, Alkatout I, Ertan KA, et al. Risk factor analysis in women who underwent trial of labor after cesarean section: a multicenter study in Germany[J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2022;3(23):137\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4274\/JTGGA.GALENOS.2022.2022-1-2.","journal-title":"J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc"},{"issue":"21","key":"6394_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1186\/S12884-021-03817-2","volume":"1","author":"G Gitas","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gitas G, Proppe L, Ertan AK, et al. Influence of the second stage of labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes in vaginal births after caesarean section: a multicenter study in Germany[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;1(21):356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/S12884-021-03817-2.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"6394_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2010,116(2Ptl):450\u2013463","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251"},{"key":"6394_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Antonio Simone Lagan\u00e0, Antonella Cromi, Roberto Tozzi, et al. Uterine scar healing after cesarean section: managing an old surgery in an evidence-based Environment[J]. Journal of Investigative Surgery,2019,8(32):770\u2013772,\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08941939.2018.1465145","DOI":"10.1080\/08941939.2018.1465145"}],"container-title":["BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-024-06394-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12884-024-06394-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-024-06394-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]],"date-time":"2024-04-08T08:06:37Z","timestamp":1712563597000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12884-024-06394-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6394"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-024-06394-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 September 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 March 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 April 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First People\u2019s Hospital of Chenzhou City (Approval No.\u8bba2024006). The informed consent requirement was waived by the Ethics Committee of the First People\u2019s Hospital of Chenzhou City because of the retrospective study design.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"255"}}