{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]],"date-time":"2026-01-24T16:39:45Z","timestamp":1769272785621,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745366400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745366400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-024-07040-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T06:49:57Z","timestamp":1745390997000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Is there a role for oral misoprostol in labor induction for prelabor rupture of membranes at term?"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Adi Ashkenazi","family":"Katz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ella","family":"Segal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lior","family":"Kashani-Ligumsky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ariel","family":"Many","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Miriam","family":"Lopian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"7040_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD005302","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD005302.pub3","volume":"1","author":"P Middleton","year":"2017","unstructured":"Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, McBain RD, Crowther CA. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1(1):CD005302. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD005302.pub3. PMID: 28050900; PMCID: PMC6464808.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"7040_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Myhr TL, Wang EE, Weston JA, Willan AR. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(16):1005-10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJM199604183341601. PMID: 8598837.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199604183341601"},{"issue":"4","key":"7040_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1190","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-3291.ijcp20181994","volume":"5","author":"T Ramesh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ramesh T, Panigrahi B, Pranaya P, Bindu PH. Outcome of neonates born to mothers with premature rupture of membranes. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2018;5(4):1190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18203\/2349-3291.ijcp20181994.","journal-title":"Int J Contemp Pediatr"},{"issue":"6","key":"7040_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2004.08.020","volume":"49","author":"A Marowitz","year":"2004","unstructured":"Marowitz A, Hunter H. Management of ruptured membranes at term. J Midwifery Women S Health. 2004;49(6):539\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmwh.2004.08.020.","journal-title":"J Midwifery Women S Health"},{"key":"7040_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 217. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(3):e80-e97. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003700. PMID: 32080050.","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003700"},{"issue":"2","key":"7040_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14563","volume":"161","author":"C Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang C, Jiang H, Kong L, Feng Y, Zhou L. Labor induction in term gravidas with prelabor rupture of membranes and unfavorable cervixes: oxytocin versus vaginal misoprostol. Int J Gynecol &Amp Obstet. 2022;161(2):536\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.14563.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol &Amp Obstet"},{"key":"7040_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lin MG, Nuthalapaty FS, Carver AR, Case AS, Ramsey PS. Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(3):593\u2013601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000172425.56840.57. PMID: 16135593.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000172425.56840.57"},{"key":"7040_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yenuberi H, Mathews J, George A, Benjamin S, Rathore S, Tirkey R, Tharyan P. The efficacy and safety of 25 \u00b5g or 50 \u00b5g oral misoprostol versus 25 \u00b5g vaginal misoprostol given at 4- or 6-hourly intervals for induction of labour in women at or beyond term with live singleton pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;164(2):482\u2013498. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.14970. Epub 2023 Jul 3. PMID: 37401143.","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14970"},{"issue":"4","key":"7040_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD003246","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003246.pub2","volume":"2009","author":"Z Alfirevic","year":"2009","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2009(4):CD003246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD003246.pub2. PMID: 19821304; PMCID: PMC4164045.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"7040_CR10","unstructured":"Comparison of intravenous oxytocin. And vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel in women with unripe cervixes and premature rupture of the membranes."},{"key":"7040_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Granstr\u00f6m L, Ekman G, Ulmsten U. Cervical priming and labor induction with vaginal application of 3\u00a0mg PGE2 in suppositories in term pregnant women with premature rupture of amniotic membranes and unfavorable cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(5):429\u2009\u2013\u200931. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016348709022048. PMID: 3480677.","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348709022048"},{"key":"7040_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wing DA, Paul RH. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks\u2019 gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(1):94\u2009\u2013\u20099. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9378(98)70256-x. PMID: 9704771.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(98)70256-x"},{"key":"7040_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ozden S, Delikara MN, Avci A, Fi\u00e7icioglu C. Intravaginal misoprostol vs. expectant management in premature rupture of membranes with low Bishop scores at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;77(2):109\u2009\u2013\u200915. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0020-7292(02)00030-9. PMID: 12031560.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0020-7292(02)00030-9"},{"key":"7040_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sanchez-Ramos L, Chen AH, Kaunitz AM, Gaudier FL, Delke I. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol in term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(6):909\u2009\u2013\u200912. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0029-7844(97)00113-0. PMID: 9170463.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0029-7844(97)00113-0"},{"key":"7040_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shetty A, Stewart K, Stewart G, Rice P, Danielian P, Templeton A. Active management of term prelabour rupture of membranes with oral misoprostol. BJOG. 2002;109(12):1354-8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2002.02082.x. PMID: 12504970.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2002.02082.x"},{"key":"7040_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lo JY, Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Ruptured membranes at term: randomized, double-blind trial of oral misoprostol for labor induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(4):685-9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0029-7844(02)03157-5. PMID: 12681871.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0029-7844(02)03157-5"},{"issue":"6","key":"7040_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD014484","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD014484","volume":"6","author":"RS Kerr","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kerr RS, Kumar N, Williams MJ, Cuthbert A, Aflaifel N, Haas DM, Weeks AD. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;6(6):CD014484. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD014484. PMID: 34155622; PMCID: PMC8218159.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"3","key":"7040_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmwh.2006.12.012","volume":"52","author":"A Marowitz","year":"2007","unstructured":"Marowitz A, Jordan R. Midwifery management of prelabor rupture of membranes at term. J Midwifery Women S Health. 2007;52(3):199\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmwh.2006.12.012.","journal-title":"J Midwifery Women S Health"},{"key":"7040_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Arvidsson C, Hellborg M, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Preference and acceptability of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in medical abortion with mifepristone. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123(1):87\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.02.019. PMID: 16260342.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2005.02.019"},{"key":"7040_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Butt KD, Bennett KA, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC. Randomized comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for labor induction in term prelabor membrane rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(6):994-9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0029-7844(99)00423-8. PMID: 10576189.","DOI":"10.1016\/s0029-7844(99)00423-8"},{"key":"7040_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Crane JM, Delaney T, Hutchens D. Oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(3):720-4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/s0002-9378(03)00768-3. PMID: 14526301.","DOI":"10.1067\/s0002-9378(03)00768-3"},{"key":"7040_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mozurkewich E, Horrocks J, Daley S, Von Oeyen P, Halvorson M, Johnson M, Zaretsky M, Tehranifar M, Bayer-Zwirello L, Robichaux A 3rd, Droste S, Turner G. MisoPROM study. The MisoPROM study: a multicenter randomized comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):1026-30. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/s0002-9378(03)00845-7. PMID: 14586349.","DOI":"10.1067\/s0002-9378(03)00845-7"},{"key":"7040_CR23","unstructured":"Anjum. Oral misoprostol vs intravenous oxytocin infusion. for Induction of Labor in Prelabor Rupture of Membranes; 2016."},{"key":"7040_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pourali L, Saghafi N, Eslami Hasan Abadi S, Tara F, Vatanchi AM, Motamedi E. Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(2):167\u2013171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443615.2017.1329284. Epub 2017 Aug 8. Erratum in: J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(5):735. PMID: 28784054.","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1329284"},{"issue":"3","key":"7040_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0039-1696642","volume":"38","author":"TS Freret","year":"2021","unstructured":"Freret TS, Chac\u00f3n KM, Bryant AS, Kaimal AJ, Clapp MA. Oxytocin compared to Buccal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor after term Prelabor rupture of membranes. Am J Perinatol. 2021;38(3):224\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0039-1696642. Epub 2019 Sep 6. PMID: 31491801.","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"7040_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9449036","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/9449036","volume":"2022","author":"S Unthanan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Unthanan S, Petcharat K, Prommas S, Smanchat B, Bhamarapravatana K, Suwannarurk K. Sublingual Misoprostol versus Oxytocin to induce labor in term premature rupture of membranes in pregnant women: a randomized single-blind controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:9449036. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2022\/9449036. PMID: 35198639; PMCID: PMC8858716.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"issue":"12","key":"7040_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3507","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-023-01290-0","volume":"30","author":"RHM Ahmed","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ahmed RHM, Sweed MSE, El-Bishry GA, Hassan RK. Oxytocin Versus oral misoprostol for Induction of Labor in pregnant women with term Prelabor rupture of membranes: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Reprod Sci. 2023;30(12):3507\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43032-023-01290-0. Epub 2023 Jul 13. PMID: 37442883; PMCID: PMC10692250.","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"key":"7040_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h217","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h217","volume":"350","author":"Z Alfirevic","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, Welton NJ, Dias S, Jones LV, Navaratnam K, Caldwell DM. Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.h217. PMID: 25656228; PMCID: PMC4353287.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"1","key":"7040_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2407-3","volume":"19","author":"F Morfaw","year":"2019","unstructured":"Morfaw F, Fundoh M, Pisoh C, Ayaba B, Mbuagbaw L, Anderson LN, Thabane L. Misoprostol as an adjunct to oxytocin can reduce postpartum-haemorrhage: a propensity score-matched retrospective chart review in Bamenda-Cameroon, 2015\u20132016. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):257. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-019-2407-3. PMID: 31331275; PMCID: PMC6647290.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"7040_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Romero R, Baumann P, Gomez R, Salafia C, Rittenhouse L, Barberio D, Behnke E, Cotton DB, Mitchell MD. The relationship between spontaneous rupture of membranes, labor, and microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and amniotic fluid concentrations of prostaglandins and thromboxane B2 in term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(6 Pt 1):1654-64; discussion 1664-8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90675-9. PMID: 8317506.","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90675-9"},{"issue":"4","key":"7040_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.4314\/ahs.v15i4.7","volume":"15","author":"LN Onah","year":"2016","unstructured":"Onah LN, Dim CC, Nwagha U, Ozumba BC. Effect of early amniotomy on the outcome of spontaneous labour: a randomized controlled trial of pregnant women in Enugu, south-east Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2016;15(4):1097. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4314\/ahs.v15i4.7.","journal-title":"Afr Health Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"7040_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600903420","volume":"26","author":"MA Ajadi","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ajadi MA, Kuti O, Eo O, Ogunniyi SO, Sule SS. The effect of amniotomy on the outcome of spontaneous labour in uncomplicated pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26(7):631\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443610600903420.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"7040_CR33","volume-title":"Induction of labour: a randomised clinical trial of amniotomy versus amniotomy with oxytocin infusion","author":"P Moldin","year":"1996","unstructured":"Moldin P, Sundell G. Induction of labour: a randomised clinical trial of amniotomy versus amniotomy with oxytocin infusion. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &Amp Gynaecology; 1996."},{"key":"7040_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ashwal E, Livne MY, Benichou JIC, Unger R, Hiersch L, Aviram A, Mani A, Yogev Y. Contemporary patterns of labor in nulliparous and multiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(3):267.e1-267.e9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.035. Epub 2019 Sep 28. Erratum in: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(6):918. doi: 10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.08.030. PMID: 31574290.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.09.035"},{"issue":"6","key":"7040_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e","volume":"116","author":"J Zhang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zhang J, Landy HJ, Ware Branch D, Burkman R, Haberman S, Gregory KD, Hatjis CG, Ramirez MM, Bailit JL, Gonzalez-Quintero VH, Hibbard JU, Hoffman MK, Kominiarek M, Learman LA, Van Veldhuisen P, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1281\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e. PMID: 21099592; PMCID: PMC3660040.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"7040_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001527","volume":"128","author":"T Kawakita","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kawakita T, Reddy UM, Iqbal SN, Landy HJ, Huang CC, Hoffman M, Sciscione AC, Grantz KL. Duration of Oxytocin and rupture of the membranes before diagnosing a failed induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(2):373\u201380. PMID: 27400012; PMCID: PMC4959965.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7040_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bachar, G., Shemesh, D., Farago, N., Siegler, Y., Khatib, N., Ginsberg, Y., \u2026 Vitner,D. (2023). The optimal induction timing in prelabor rupture of membranes: a retrospective study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 36(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2023.2215997","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2023.2215997"},{"issue":"9","key":"7040_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e24923","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000024923","volume":"100","author":"Y Zha","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zha Y, Gong X, Yang C, Deng D, Feng L, Luo A, Wan L, Qiao F, Zeng W, Chen S, Wu Y, Han D, Liu H. Epidural analgesia during labor and its optimal initiation time-points: a real-world study on 400 Chinese nulliparas. Med (Baltim). 2021;100(9):e24923. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000024923. PMID: 33655955; PMCID: PMC7939169.","journal-title":"Med (Baltim)"},{"key":"7040_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(12):CD000331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD000331.pub3. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD000331. doi: 10.1002\/14651858.CD000331.pub4. PMID: 22161362.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000331.pub3"},{"key":"7040_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"103(4), 306\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09733.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09733.x"},{"key":"7040_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Benitz WE, Gould JB, Druzin ML. Antimicrobial prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: estimates of risk reduction based on a critical literature review. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6):e78. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1542\/peds.103.6.e78. PMID: 10353975.","DOI":"10.1542\/peds.103.6.e78"},{"issue":"01","key":"7040_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e262","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1709666","volume":"38","author":"KK Venkatesh","year":"2021","unstructured":"Venkatesh KK, Vladutiu CJ, Glover AV, Strauss RA, Stringer JSA, Stamilio DM, Hughes B, Dotters-Katz S. Is Group B Streptococcus colonization Associated with maternal Peripartum infection in an era of routine Prophylaxis? Am J Perinatol. 2021;38(01):e262\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0040-1709666. Epub 2020 May 23. PMID: 32446262.","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"7040_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-12-166","volume":"12","author":"V Smith","year":"2012","unstructured":"Smith V, Begley CM, Clarke M, Devane D. Professionals\u2019 views of fetal monitoring during labour: a systematic review and thematic analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:166. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2393-12-166. PMID: 23270400; PMCID: PMC3549751.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"7040_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Breen TW, Shapiro T, Glass B, Foster-Payne D, Oriol NE, Analgesia. 77(5), 919\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1213\/00000539-199311000-00008.","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199311000-00008"},{"issue":"5","key":"7040_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1080\/j.0001-6349.2004.00344.x","volume":"83","author":"KM Kuczkowski","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kuczkowski KM. Ambulatory labor analgesia: what does an obstetrician need to know? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(5):415\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/j.0001-6349.2004.00344.x.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"7040_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baaren, G. J. V., Jozwiak, M., Opmeer, B. C., Rengerink, K. O., Benthem, M., Dijksterhuis,M., \u2026 Bloemenkamp, K. W. M. (2013). Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour at term with a foley catheter compared to vaginal prostaglandin e2 gel (probaat trial). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics&Amp Gynaecology, 120(8), 987\u2013995. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12221","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12221"},{"issue":"1","key":"7040_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05611-8","volume":"23","author":"S D\u00f6blin","year":"2023","unstructured":"D\u00f6blin S, Seefeld L, Weise V, Kopp M, Knappe S, Asselmann E, Martini J, Garthus-Niegel S. The impact of mode of delivery on parent-infant-bonding and the mediating role of birth experience: a comparison of mothers and fathers within the longitudinal cohort study DREAM. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):285. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-023-05611-8. PMID: 37098555; PMCID: PMC10127505.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"1","key":"7040_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1080\/03630242.2016.1267687","volume":"58","author":"G Porat-Zyman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Porat-Zyman G, Taubman-Ben-Ari O, Morag I, Kuint J. Maternal mental health over the course of 4 years following childbirth: the contribution of birth circumstances and psycho-social factors. Women Health. 2018;58(1):72\u201391.","journal-title":"Women Health"}],"container-title":["BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-024-07040-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12884-024-07040-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-024-07040-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T06:50:00Z","timestamp":1745391000000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12884-024-07040-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["7040"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-024-07040-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 September 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 December 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 April 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the local ethical review board at Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center approved the study (Approval number MHMC-0025-21). Due to the retrospective nature of this study, the Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center ethics board waived consent to participate.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"The findings from this study were presented as a poster session at the Society for Maternal and Fetal Health Global Congress on September 26th, 2024, in Rome, Italy.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"467"}}