{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T14:04:45Z","timestamp":1791813885103,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":102,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]],"date-time":"2025-05-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1746662400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]],"date-time":"2025-05-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1746662400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003130","name":"Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["1S49923N"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["1S49923N"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003130","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003130","name":"Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["1S49923N"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["1S49923N"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003130","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-025-07586-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]],"date-time":"2025-05-08T07:23:10Z","timestamp":1746688990000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Peripartum fetal Doppler sonography and perinatal outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"25","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0892-1931","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bram","family":"Packet","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ann-Sophie","family":"Page","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan","family":"Bosteels","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jute","family":"Richter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"7586_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.06.004","volume":"30","author":"D Ayres-De-Campos","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ayres-De-Campos D. Introduction: Why is intrapartum foetal monitoring necessary - Impact on outcomes and interventions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;30:3\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.06.004.","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/J.IJGO.2015.06.020","volume":"131","author":"D Ayres-De-Campos","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ayres-De-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.IJGO.2015.06.020.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7586_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Devane D, Lalor JG, Daly S, Mcguire W, Cuthbert A, Smith V. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;2017(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD005122.pub5","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD005122.pub5"},{"issue":"3","key":"7586_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17542","volume":"52","author":"LN Bligh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bligh LN, Alsolai AA, Greer RM, Kumar S. Cerebroplacental ratio thresholds measured within 2 weeks before birth and risk of Cesarean section for intrapartum fetal compromise and adverse neonatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(3):340\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.17542.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7586_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dall\u2019Asta A, Ghi T, Rizzo G, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio assessment in early labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol. 2019;53(4):481\u2013487. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.19113","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19113"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22134","volume":"56","author":"CC Lees","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):298\u2013312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.22134.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.032","volume":"222","author":"JM Turner","year":"2020","unstructured":"Turner JM, Mitchell MD, Kumar SS. The physiology of intrapartum fetal compromise at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(1):17\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.032.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00512-2","volume":"109","author":"D Kassanos","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kassanos D, Siristatidis C, Vitoratos N, Salamalekis E, Creatsas G. The clinical significance of Doppler findings in fetal middle cerebral artery during labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;109(1):45\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0301-2115(02)00512-2.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"7586_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Strand KM, Torp H, Husby AE, Salvesen K\u00c5B, Nyrnes SA. Continuous fetal cerebral blood flow monitoring during labor: A feasibility study. Early Hum Dev. 2023;182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2023.105791","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2023.105791"},{"key":"7586_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S\u00fctterlin MW, Seelbach-G\u00f6bel B, Oehler MK, Heupel M, Dietl J. Doppler Ultrasonographic Evidence of Intrapartum Brain-Sparing Effect in Fetuses with Low Oxygen Saturation According to Pulse Oximetry.; 1999.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70462-X"},{"issue":"7","key":"7586_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1785","DOI":"10.3390\/biomedicines11071785","volume":"11","author":"A Kajdy","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kajdy A, Sys D, Modzelewski J, et al. Evidence of Placental Aging in Late SGA, Fetal Growth Restriction and Stillbirth\u2014A Systematic Review. Biomedicines. 2023;11(7):1785. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/biomedicines11071785.","journal-title":"Biomedicines"},{"key":"7586_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dall\u2019asta A, Kumar S. Prelabor and intrapartum Doppler ultrasound to predict fetal compromise. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3(6S):100479. 10.1016\/j","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajogmf.2021.100479"},{"key":"7586_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n160","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ. 2021;372: n160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n160.","journal-title":"The BMJ"},{"key":"7586_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Riley RD, Moons KGM, Snell KIE, et al. A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies. BMJ (Online). 2019;364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.k4597","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.k4597"},{"issue":"9","key":"7586_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050600852510","volume":"19","author":"G Ghosh","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ghosh G, Breborowicz A, Brazert M, et al. Evaluation of third trimester uterine artery flow velocity indices in relationship to perinatal complications. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006;19(9):551\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767050600852510.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2075-3021","volume":"45","author":"M La Verde","year":"2024","unstructured":"La Verde M, Torella M, Ronsini C, et al. The association between fetal Doppler and uterine artery blood volume flow in term pregnancies: a pilot study. Ultraschall Med. 2024;45(2):184\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-2075-3021.","journal-title":"Ultraschall Med"},{"key":"7586_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021","volume":"75","author":"J McGowan","year":"2016","unstructured":"McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"18","key":"7586_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3068","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1458834","volume":"32","author":"D Morano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Morano D, Scutiero G, Iannone P, et al. Correlation between umbilical arterial pH values and fetal vertebral artery Doppler waveforms at the beginning of the second stage of labor: a pilot prospective study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2019;32(18):3068\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2018.1458834.","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.042","volume":"210","author":"T Prior","year":"2014","unstructured":"Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, Kumar S. Umbilical venous flow rate in term fetuses: Can variations in flow predict intrapartum compromise? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):61.e1-61.e8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.042.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14758","volume":"46","author":"T Prior","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prior T, Paramasivam G, Bennett P, Kumar S. Are fetuses that fail to achieve their growth potential at increased risk of intrapartum compromise? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(4):460\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.14758.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"7586_CR21","first-page":"547","volume":"49","author":"L Eslamian","year":"2011","unstructured":"Eslamian L, Tooba K. ORIGINAL REPORT Doppler Findings in Intrapartum Fetal Distress. Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(8):547\u201350.","journal-title":"Acta Med Iran"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6420","volume":"34","author":"GS Ghosh","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ghosh GS, Fu J, Olofsson P, Gudmundsson S. Pulsations in the umbilical vein during labor are associated with increased risk of operative delivery for fetal distress. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(2):177\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.6420.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7586_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1080\/01443619866769","volume":"18","author":"S \u00d6zden","year":"1998","unstructured":"\u00d6zden S, Fi\u00e7icio\u01e7lu C, G\u00fcner R, Ario\u01e7lu P, Oral \u00d6. Comparison of the intrapartum analysis of Doppler blood flow velocity waveform of the umbilical artery and fetal heart rate tracing for the prediction of perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 1998;18(5):445\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443619866769.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore)"},{"key":"7586_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2017.02.006","volume":"54","author":"L Dunn","year":"2017","unstructured":"Dunn L, Sherrell H, Kumar S. Review: Systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Placenta. 2017;54:68\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.placenta.2017.02.006.","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"issue":"8","key":"7586_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08398.x","volume":"106","author":"T Farrell","year":"1999","unstructured":"Farrell T, Chien PFW, Gordon A. Intrapartum umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review. BJOG. 1999;106(8):783\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08398.x.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.07.027","volume":"165","author":"RK Morris","year":"2012","unstructured":"Morris RK, Say R, Robson SC, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Systematic review and meta-analysis of middle cerebral artery Doppler to predict perinatal wellbeing. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2012;165(2):141\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2012.07.027.","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"key":"7586_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Perkovic-Kepeci S, Cirkovic A, Milic N, et al. Doppler Indices of the Uterine, Umbilical and Fetal Middle Cerebral Artery in Diabetic versus Non-Diabetic Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Lithuania). 2023;59(8). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/medicina59081502","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina59081502"},{"key":"7586_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Novillo-Del \u00c1lamo B, Mart\u00ednez-Varea A, Satorres-P\u00e9rez E, et al. Cerebroplacental Ratio as a Predictive Factor of Emergency Cesarean Sections for Intrapartum Fetal Compromise: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm13061724","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13061724"},{"issue":"3","key":"7586_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18809","volume":"51","author":"CA Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2018","unstructured":"Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, De Boer MA, Heymans MW, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(3):313\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.18809.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7586_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.06.033","volume":"242","author":"D Moreta","year":"2019","unstructured":"Moreta D, Vo S, Eslick GD, Benzie R. Re-evaluating the role of cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2019;242:17\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2019.06.033.","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.16359","volume":"128","author":"CA Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, van Osch IR, Heymans MW, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. BJOG. 2021;128(2):226\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.16359.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"7586_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-020-01542-z","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-020-01542-z"},{"key":"7586_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Moons KGM, de Groot JAH, Bouwmeester W, et al. Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist. PLoS Med. 2014;11(10). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/JOURNAL.PMED.1001744","DOI":"10.1371\/JOURNAL.PMED.1001744"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20173","volume":"53","author":"M Fiolna","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fiolna M, Kostiv V, Anthoulakis C, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio in women undergoing induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):473\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20173.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7586_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20853","volume":"54","author":"M Fiolna","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fiolna M, Machuca M, Karampitsakos T, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by serum placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 in women undergoing induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(5):604\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20853.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.016","volume":"208","author":"T Prior","year":"2013","unstructured":"Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, Kumar S. Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: A prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(2):124.e1-124.e6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.11.016.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"7586_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1263","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000292","volume":"123","author":"T Prior","year":"2014","unstructured":"Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, Kumar S. Prediction of fetal compromise in labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1263\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000292.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009","volume":"158","author":"JA Hayden","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, C\u00f4t\u00e9 P, Bombardier C. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):280\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"7586_CR39","unstructured":"Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG, Jpt H. Chapter 10: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses. Cochrane; 2023. www.training.cochrane.org\/handbook."},{"key":"7586_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Inthout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-14-25","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-25"},{"key":"7586_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S2045796021000664","volume":"30","author":"P Cuijpers","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cuijpers P, Griffin JW, Furukawa TA. The lack of statistical power of subgroup analyses in meta-analyses: A cautionary note. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021;30: e78. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S2045796021000664.","journal-title":"Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci"},{"key":"7586_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.05.036","volume":"227","author":"N Fratelli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fratelli N, Mazzoni G, Maggi C, Gerosa V, Lojacono A, Prefumo F. Cerebroplacental ratio before induction of labour in normally grown fetuses at term and intrapartum fetal compromise. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2018;227:78\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.05.036.","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4978-z","volume":"299","author":"FM Stumpfe","year":"2019","unstructured":"Stumpfe FM, Kehl S, Pretscher J, et al. Correlation of short-term variation and Doppler parameters with adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk fetuses at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(2):411\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-018-4978-z.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7586_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dall\u2019Asta A, Frusca T, Rizzo G, et al. Assessment of the cerebroplacental ratio and uterine arteries in low-risk pregnancies in early labour for the prediction of obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biol. 2024;295:18\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.02.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.02.002"},{"issue":"7","key":"7586_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1318","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1752657","volume":"35","author":"MSN Lam","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lam MSN, Chaemsaithong P, Kwan AHW, et al. Prelabor short-term variability in fetal heart rate by computerized cardiotocogram and maternal fetal doppler indices for the prediction of labor outcomes. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2022;35(7):1318\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2020.1752657.","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17669","volume":"131","author":"S Moungmaithong","year":"2024","unstructured":"Moungmaithong S, Lam MSN, Kwan AHW, et al. Prediction of labour outcomes using prelabour computerised cardiotocogram and maternal and fetal Doppler indices: A prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2024;131(4):472\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17669.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"20","key":"7586_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3367","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2018.1463984","volume":"32","author":"A Abdallah","year":"2019","unstructured":"Abdallah A, Eldorf A, Sallam S, et al. Nuchal cord: impact of umbilical artery Doppler indices on intrapartum and neonatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2019;32(20):3367\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2018.1463984.","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4462-1","volume":"296","author":"I Atabay","year":"2017","unstructured":"Atabay I, Kose S, Cagliyan E, Baysal B, Yucesoy E, Altunyurt S. A prospective cohort study on the prediction of fetal distress and neonatal status with arterial and venous Doppler measurements in appropriately grown term fetuses. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(4):721\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-017-4462-1.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7586_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016","volume":"228","author":"N Chainarong","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chainarong N, Petpichetchian C. The relationship between intrapartum cerebroplacental ratio and adverse perinatal outcomes in term fetuses. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2018;228:82\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2018.06.016.","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"21","key":"7586_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3511","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1135124","volume":"29","author":"CA de Campos Prado","year":"2016","unstructured":"de Campos Prado CA, Araujo J\u00fanior E, Duarte G, et al. Predicting success of labor induction in singleton term pregnancies by combining maternal and ultrasound variables. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2016;29(21):3511\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/14767058.2015.1135124.","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"8","key":"7586_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340903100347","volume":"88","author":"D Karcaaltincaba","year":"2009","unstructured":"Karcaaltincaba D, Akdag D, Kandemir O, Yalvac S, Guven ESG, Haberal A. Is there any relation between development of persistent non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern and acutely increased uterine artery vascular flow resistance during dinoprostone use in prolonged pregnancies? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(8):894\u2013900. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016340903100347.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-011-1913-y","volume":"285","author":"M Krapp","year":"2012","unstructured":"Krapp M, K\u00fchn A, Baumann K, Gembruch U. Reproducibility of fetal ductus venosus blood flow velocity waveforms during first stage of labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(1):87\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-011-1913-y.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"7586_CR53","unstructured":"Abitbol MM, Rochelson B, Castillo I, Taylor U, Udomrice I, Wang HP. Continuous Monitoring of Doppler Umbilical Artery Wave-forms in Labor. J Mat-Fetal Invest. 1992;2(1):45\u201349. www.zbmed.de"},{"key":"7586_CR54","unstructured":"Arduini D, Rizzo G, Caforio L, Romanini C. Umbilical Artery Velocimetry versus Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring as labor Admission tests. J Mat-Fetal Invest. 1992;2(1):37\u201339. www.zbmed.de"},{"key":"7586_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619409027837","volume":"14","author":"G Ayida","year":"1994","unstructured":"Ayida G, Spencer JAD. Prediction in early labour of subsequent operative delivery for fetal distress. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore). 1994;14:244\u20139.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore)"},{"issue":"3","key":"7586_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1996.24.3.199","volume":"24","author":"S Chua","year":"1996","unstructured":"Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Kurup A, Anandakumar C, Selemat N, Ratnam SS. Search for the most predictive tests of fetal well-being in early labor. J Perinat Med. 1996;24(3):199\u2013206.","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13469","volume":"153","author":"T G\u00fcnay","year":"2021","unstructured":"G\u00fcnay T, Bilir RA, Hocao\u011flu M, B\u00f6r ED, \u00d6zdamar \u00d6, Turgut A. The role of abnormal cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse fetal outcome in pregnancies with scheduled induction of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;153(2):287\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.13469.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"7586_CR58","first-page":"248","volume":"81","author":"GR Howarth","year":"1992","unstructured":"Howarth GR, Pattinson RC, Kirsten G, Truter H, Odendaal HJ. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise. S Afr Med J. 1992;81(5):248\u201350.","journal-title":"S Afr Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mefs.2012.11.004","volume":"18","author":"EM Kamal","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kamal EM. Could adverse perinatal outcome be predicted from intrapartum umbilical vessels Doppler in women with abnormal cardiotocography? Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2013;18(4):268\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mefs.2012.11.004.","journal-title":"Middle East Fertil Soc J"},{"issue":"9","key":"7586_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00741.x","volume":"84","author":"H Lam","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lam H, Leung WC, Lee CP, Lao TT. The use of fetal Doppler cerebroplacental blood flow and amniotic fluid volume measurement in the surveillance of postdated pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(9):844\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2005.00741.x.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR61","first-page":"10","volume":"77","author":"P Malcus","year":"1991","unstructured":"Malcus P, Gudmundsson S, Marsal K, Ho Hon K, Vengadasalam D, Ratnam SS. Umbilical Artery Doppler Velocimetry as a Labor Admission Test. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(1):10\u20135.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"25","key":"7586_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8571","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2021.1989401","volume":"35","author":"J Morales-Rosell\u00f3","year":"2022","unstructured":"Morales-Rosell\u00f3 J, Loscalzo G, Gallego A, Jakait\u0117 V, Perales-Mar\u00edn A. Which is the best ultrasound parameter for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome within 1 day of delivery? Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2022;35(25):8571\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2021.1989401.","journal-title":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.20953\/1726-1678-2023-1-12-18","volume":"22","author":"M Moussa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Moussa M, Shaaban A, Attia M, et al. Prognostic value of the middle cerebral to umbilical artery Doppler ratio in the prediction of outcomes in post-term pregnancy. Voprosy Ginekologii, Akusherstva i Perinatologii. 2023;22(1):12\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.20953\/1726-1678-2023-1-12-18.","journal-title":"Voprosy Ginekologii, Akusherstva i Perinatologii"},{"issue":"3","key":"7586_CR64","first-page":"377","volume":"80","author":"D Ogunyemi","year":"1992","unstructured":"Ogunyemi D, Stanley R, Lynch C, Edwards D, Fukushima T. Umbilical Artery Velocimetry in Predicting Perinatal Outcome With Intrapartum Fetal Distress. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(3):377\u201380.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7586_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sarno AP, Ock Ahn M, Brar HS, Phelan JP, Platt LD. Intrapartum Doppler velocimetry, amniotic fluid volume, and fetal heart rate as predictors of subsequent fetal distress I. An initial report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(6 Pt 1):1508\u20131514.","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(89)90914-9"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12951.x","volume":"100","author":"DA Somerset","year":"1993","unstructured":"Somerset DA, Murrills AJ, Wheeler T. Screening for fetal distress in labour using the umbilical artery blood velocity waveform. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100(1):55\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12951.x.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7586_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2007.070","volume":"35","author":"N Szunyogh","year":"2007","unstructured":"Szunyogh N, Mikus J, Zubor P, Visnovsky J, Danko J. Ductus venosus Doppler measurement during labor. J Perinat Med. 2007;35(5):403\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/JPM.2007.070.","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"7586_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tairy D, Bar J, Tamayev L, Mizrachi Y, Barda G, Volpert E. Fetal doppler role in predicting non-reassuring fetal heart tracing in patients undergoing induction of labor. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ; 2023:5455.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.11.788"},{"issue":"6","key":"7586_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13786.x","volume":"99","author":"S Yagel","year":"1992","unstructured":"Yagel S, Anteby E, Lavy Y, et al. Fetal middle cerebral artery blood flow during normal active labour and in labour with variable decelerations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99(6):483\u20135.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"7586_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2903","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.06.015","volume":"47","author":"S Zhou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhou S, Guo H, Feng D, Han X, Liu H, Li M. Middle Cerebral Artery\u2013to\u2013Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index Ratio and Cerebroplacental Ratio Independently Predict Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Pregnancies at Term. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021;47(10):2903\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.06.015.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"7586_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lu J, Jiang J, Zhou Y, Chen Q. Prediction of non-reassuring fetal status and umbilical artery acidosis by the maternal characteristic and ultrasound prior to induction of labor. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-021-03972-6","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-021-03972-6"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23698","volume":"58","author":"A Bhide","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bhide A, Acharya G, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): use of Doppler velocimetry in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(2):331\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.23698.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"7586_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.07.070","volume":"301","author":"J Morales-Rosell\u00f3","year":"2024","unstructured":"Morales-Rosell\u00f3 J, Khalil A. Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise at the end of pregnancy; is Doppler, and not weight, that matters. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2024;301:102\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.07.070.","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"key":"7586_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ali S, Heuving S, Kawooya MG, et al. Prognostic accuracy of antenatal Doppler ultrasound for adverse perinatal outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-049799","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2021-049799"},{"key":"7586_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rane BM, Malau-Aduli BS, Alele F, O\u2019Brien C. Prognostic Accuracy of Antenatal Doppler Ultrasound Measures in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes for Pregnancies Complicated by Diabetes: A Systematic Review. AJOG Global Reports. 2023;3(3). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xagr.2023.100241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xagr.2023.100241"},{"issue":"3","key":"7586_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"184","DOI":"10.1177\/1742271X211048213","volume":"30","author":"C Elmes","year":"2022","unstructured":"Elmes C, Phillips R. Systematic review evaluating the efficacy of the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in saving babies lives. Ultrasound. 2022;30(3):184\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1742271X211048213.","journal-title":"Ultrasound"},{"issue":"3","key":"7586_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.12411","volume":"42","author":"C Dahlb\u00e4ck","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dahlb\u00e4ck C, Pihlsg\u00e5rd M, Gudmundsson S. Abnormal ductus venosus pulsatility index in the absence of concurrent umbilical vein pulsations does not indicate worsening fetal condition. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(3):322\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.12411.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1996.07040262.x","volume":"7","author":"S Gudmundsson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Gudmundsson S, Tulzer G, Huhta JC, Marsal K. Venous Doppler in the fetus with absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7(4):262\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1996.07040262.x.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7586_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"488.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.003","volume":"203","author":"T Tongsong","year":"2010","unstructured":"Tongsong T, Tongprasert F, Srisupundit K, Luewan S. Venous Doppler studies in low-output and high-output hydrops fetalis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(5):488.e1-488.e6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.003.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1994.04040279.x","volume":"4","author":"G Tulzer","year":"1994","unstructured":"Tulzer G, Gudmundsson S, Wood DC, Cohen AW, Weiner S, Huhta JC. Doppler in non-immune hydrops fetalis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994;4(4):279\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1994.04040279.x.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"7586_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000490","volume":"30","author":"E Kalafat","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kalafat E, Khalil A. Clinical significance of cerebroplacental ratio. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30(6):344\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000490.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"7586_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"728","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14560","volume":"102","author":"J Savchenko","year":"2023","unstructured":"Savchenko J, Asp M, Blomberg M, et al. Key outcomes in childbirth: Development of a perinatal core outcome set for management of labor and delivery at or near term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;102(6):728\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14560.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.01.006","volume":"144","author":"C Le Ray","year":"2009","unstructured":"Le Ray C, Zeitlin J, Jarreau PH, Br\u00e9art G, Goffinet F. The influence of level of care on admission to neonatal care for babies of low-risk nullipara. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2009;144(1):21\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2009.01.006.","journal-title":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology"},{"issue":"16","key":"7586_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1657","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2015.3656","volume":"313","author":"LA Stewart","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, et al. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data: The PRISMA-IPD statement. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2015;313(16):1657\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2015.3656.","journal-title":"JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"key":"7586_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Broeze KA, Opmeer BC, Bachmann LM, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies in obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-9-22","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-9-22"},{"key":"7586_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Baracaldo-Santamar\u00eda D, Feliciano-Alfonso JE, Ramirez-Grueso R, Rojas-Rodr\u00edguez LC, Dominguez-Dominguez CA, Calderon-Ospina CA. Making Sense of Composite Endpoints in Clinical Research. J Clin Med. 2023;12(13). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm12134371","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12134371"},{"issue":"6","key":"7586_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22060","volume":"55","author":"A Sotiriadis","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sotiriadis A, Chatzakis C, Odibo AO. The use and abuse of meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(6):719\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.22060.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7769","key":"7586_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c3920","volume":"341","author":"G Cordoba","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cordoba G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S, Bae H, G\u00f8tzsche PC. Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: Systematic review. BMJ (Online). 2010;341(7769):381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.c3920.","journal-title":"BMJ (Online)"},{"key":"7586_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2020.11.017","volume":"131","author":"P Jia","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jia P, Lin L, Kwong JSW, Xu C. Many meta-analyses of rare events in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were underpowered. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;131:113\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2020.11.017.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"8","key":"7586_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1016\/S1473-3099(22)00364-4","volume":"22","author":"S Zhou","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhou S, Shen C. Statistical concerns for meta-analysis of rare events and small sample sizes. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(8):1111\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1473-3099(22)00364-4.","journal-title":"Lancet Infect Dis"},{"issue":"2","key":"7586_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1140","volume":"6","author":"D Langan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Langan D, Higgins JPT, Simmonds M. An empirical comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in 12894 meta-analyses. Res Synth Methods. 2015;6(2):195\u2013205. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jrsm.1140.","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"issue":"10","key":"7586_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1156","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17480","volume":"130","author":"HT Myrhaug","year":"2023","unstructured":"Myrhaug HT, Kaasen A, Pay ASD, et al. Umbilical cord blood acid\u2013base analysis at birth and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2023;130(10):1156\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.17480.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR93","first-page":"e52","volume":"26","author":"Committee Opinion No","year":"2015","unstructured":"Committee Opinion No. 644: The Apgar Score. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;26(4):e52\u20135.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.021","volume":"131","author":"GH Visser","year":"2015","unstructured":"Visser GH, Ayres-De-Campos D. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Adjunctive technologies. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):25\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.021.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"9244","key":"7586_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1844","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)03246-3","volume":"356","author":"PM Bossuyt","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bossuyt PM, Lijmer JG, Mol BW. Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient. Lancet. 2000;356(9244):1844\u20137.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"7586_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ruiz-Martinez S, Papageorghiou AT, Staines-Urias E, Villar J, Gonzalez De Ag\u00fcero R, Oros D. Clinical impact of Doppler reference charts on management of small-for-gestational-age fetuses: need for standardization. Ultras Obst Gynecol. 2020;56(2):166\u2013172. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20380","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20380"},{"issue":"4","key":"7586_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20102","volume":"53","author":"D Oros","year":"2019","unstructured":"Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines-Urias E, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):454\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20102.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.14467","volume":"102","author":"J Cornette","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cornette J, van der Stok CJ, Reiss IKM, et al. Perinatal mortality and neonatal and maternal outcome per gestational week in term pregnancies: A registry-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023;102(1):82\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.14467.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"7586_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2010.05.010","volume":"86","author":"JJ Kurinczuk","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kurinczuk JJ, White-Koning M, Badawi N. Epidemiology of neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(6):329\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.earlhumdev.2010.05.010.","journal-title":"Early Hum Dev"},{"issue":"9","key":"7586_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E2334830","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.34830","volume":"6","author":"G Murzakanova","year":"2023","unstructured":"Murzakanova G, R\u00e4is\u00e4nen S, Jacobsen AF, Yli BM, Tingleff T, Laine K. Trends in Term Intrapartum Stillbirth in Norway. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(9):E2334830. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2023.34830.","journal-title":"JAMA Netw Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"7586_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1159\/000499881","volume":"117","author":"C Gale","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gale C, McGuire W, Juszczak E. Randomised Controlled Trials for Informing Perinatal Care. Neonatology. 2020;117(1):8\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000499881.","journal-title":"Neonatology"},{"issue":"10426","key":"7586_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(23)02228-6","volume":"403","author":"M Rial-Crestelo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rial-Crestelo M, Lubusky M, Parra-Cordero M, et al. Term planned delivery based on fetal growth assessment with or without the cerebroplacental ratio in low-risk pregnancies (RATIO37): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2024;403(10426):545\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(23)02228-6.","journal-title":"The Lancet"}],"container-title":["BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-025-07586-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12884-025-07586-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-025-07586-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]],"date-time":"2025-05-08T07:23:15Z","timestamp":1746688995000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12884-025-07586-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]]},"references-count":102,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["7586"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-025-07586-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 January 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 April 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 May 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Non-applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"545"}}