{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,30]],"date-time":"2026-10-30T20:26:34Z","timestamp":1793391994234,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,16]],"date-time":"2026-01-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1768521600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,25]],"date-time":"2026-02-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771977600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":40,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-026-08646-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,16]],"date-time":"2026-01-16T08:16:46Z","timestamp":1768551406000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Impact of doppler reference chart selection on risk stratification in fetal growth restriction"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Misgav","family":"Rottenstreich","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dahlia","family":"Klein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bryon","family":"DeFrance","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jon FR","family":"Barrett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eran","family":"Ashwal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"8646_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"B2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.010","volume":"223","author":"JG Martins","year":"2020","unstructured":"Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for Maternal-Fetal medicine consult series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces clinical guideline number 3, April 2012). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:B2\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.05.010.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"8646_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e16","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004251","volume":"137","author":"Fetal Growth Restriction","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fetal Growth Restriction. ACOG practice bulletin 227. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(2):e16\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004251.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102154","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogc.2023.05.022","volume":"45","author":"J Kingdom","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kingdom J, Ashwal E, Lausman A, et al. Guideline 442: fetal growth restriction: Screening, Diagnosis, and management in Singleton pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2023;45:102154.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"8646_CR4","first-page":"290","volume":"208","author":"J Unterscheider","year":"2013","unstructured":"Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:290\u2013e1.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.05.024","volume":"213","author":"GR DeVore","year":"2015","unstructured":"DeVore GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:5\u201315.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13319","volume":"43","author":"J Morales-Rosell\u00f3","year":"2014","unstructured":"Morales-Rosell\u00f3 J, Khalil A, Morlando M, et al. Changes in fetal doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:303\u201310.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14822","volume":"45","author":"S Bakalis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bakalis S, Akolekar R, Gallo DM, et al. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery doppler at 30\u201334 weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:409\u201320.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14842","volume":"46","author":"R Akolekar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Gallo DM, et al. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery doppler at 35\u201337 weeks\u2019 gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:82\u201392.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD007529","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD007529.pub4","volume":"6","author":"Z Alfirevic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD007529. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD007529.pub4.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"8646_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13522","volume":"152","author":"N Melamed","year":"2021","unstructured":"Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, et al. FIGO (international federation of gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;152:3\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.13522.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"8646_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.22134","volume":"56","author":"CC Lees","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56:298\u2013312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.22134.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1902","volume":"26","author":"G Acharya","year":"2005","unstructured":"Acharya G, Wilsgaard T, Berntsen GKR, et al. Reference ranges for serial measurements of blood velocity and pulsatility index at the intra-abdominal portion, and fetal and placental ends of the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:162\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.1902.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1990.18.3.165","volume":"18","author":"D Arduini","year":"1990","unstructured":"Arduini D, Rizzo G. Normal values of pulsatility index from fetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses. J Perinat Med. 1990;18:165\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpme.1990.18.3.165.","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"8646_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20157","volume":"53","author":"A Ciobanu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ciobanu A, Wright A, Syngelaki A, et al. Fetal medicine foundation reference ranges for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:465\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20157.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20","volume":"21","author":"AA Baschat","year":"2003","unstructured":"Baschat AA, Gembruch U. The cerebroplacental doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound obstet gynecol off. J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:124\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20.","journal-title":"J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"490","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2002.077","volume":"30","author":"F Bahlmann","year":"2002","unstructured":"Bahlmann F, Reinhard I, Krummenauer F, et al. Blood flow velocity waveforms of the fetal middle cerebral artery in a normal population: reference values from 18 weeks to 42 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med. 2002;30:490\u2013501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/JPM.2002.077.","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"8646_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4088","volume":"30","author":"C Ebbing","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:287\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.4088.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4","volume":"151","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1985","unstructured":"Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements\u2013a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9378(85)90298-4.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021","volume":"181","author":"FP Hadlock","year":"1991","unstructured":"Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181:129\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiology.181.1.1887021.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"8646_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19196","volume":"53","author":"A Khalil","year":"2019","unstructured":"Khalil A, Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, et al. Essential variables for reporting research studies on fetal growth restriction: a Delphi consensus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:609\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.19196.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20380","volume":"56","author":"S Ruiz-Martinez","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ruiz-Martinez S, Papageorghiou AT, Staines-Urias E, et al. Clinical impact of doppler reference charts on management of small-for-gestational-age fetuses: need for standardization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56:166\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.20380.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18809","volume":"51","author":"CA Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2018","unstructured":"Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs CA, De Boer MA, Heymans MW, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:313\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.18809.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.23615","volume":"58","author":"H Wolf","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wolf H, Stampalija T, Lees CC. Fetal cerebral blood-flow redistribution: analysis of doppler reference charts and association of different thresholds with adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58:705\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.23615.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"8646_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Khalil A, Morales-Rosello J, Khan N, et al. Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:606.e1-606.e10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.02.005"},{"key":"8646_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2015-0274","volume":"44","author":"AA Nassr","year":"2016","unstructured":"Nassr AA, Abdelmagied AM, Shazly SAM. Fetal cerebro-placental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and diagnostic performance. J Perinat Med. 2016;44:249\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpm-2015-0274.","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"}],"container-title":["BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12884-026-08646-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-026-08646-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12884-026-08646-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,25]],"date-time":"2026-02-25T10:52:56Z","timestamp":1772016776000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s12884-026-08646-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,16]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["8646"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-026-08646-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2393"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2393","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 January 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 January 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating center in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration (IRB approval #15003; August 24, 2023). Given the retrospective nature of the analysis and de-identification of all patient data, informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. No external funding was received.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"205"}}