{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T02:30:38Z","timestamp":1793241038833,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]],"date-time":"2024-03-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709769600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]],"date-time":"2024-03-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1709769600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Musculoskelet Disord"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The two major reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) designs are the Grammont design and the lateralized design. Even if the lateralized design is biomechanically favored, the classic Grammont prosthesis continues to be used. Functional and subjective patient scores as well as implant survival described in the literature so far are comparable to the lateralized design. A pure comparison of how the RSA design influences outcome in patients has not yet been determined. The aim of this study was a comparison focused on patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We analyzed registry data from 696 CTA patients prospectively collected between 2012 and 2020 in two specialized orthopedic centers up to 2\u00a0years post-RSA with the same follow-up time points (6,12 24\u00a0months). Complete teres minor tears were excluded. Three groups were defined: group 1 (inlay, 155\u00b0 humeral inclination, 36\u2009+\u20092\u00a0mm eccentric glenosphere (n\u2009=\u200950)), group 2 (inlay, 135\u00b0 humeral inclination, 36\u2009+\u20094\u00a0mm lateralized glenosphere (n\u2009=\u2009141)) and group 3 (onlay, 145\u00b0 humeral inclination,\u2009+\u20093\u00a0mm lateralized base plate, 36\u2009+\u20092\u00a0mm eccentric glenosphere (n\u2009=\u200935)) We compared group differences in clinical outcomes (e.g., active and passive range of motion (ROM), abduction strength, Constant-Murley score (CS)), radiographic evaluations of prosthetic position, scapular anatomy and complications using mixed models adjusted for age and sex.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The final analysis included 226 patients. The overall adjusted <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>-value of the CS for all time-points showed no significant difference (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.466). Flexion of group 3 (mean, 155\u00b0\u00a0(SD 13)) was higher than flexion of group 1 (mean, 142\u00b0 (SD 18) and 2 (mean, 132\u00b0 (SD 18) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Values for abduction of group 3 (mean, 145\u00b0 (SD 23)) were bigger than those of group 1 (mean, 130\u00b0 (SD 22)) and group 2 (mean, 118\u00b0 (SD 25)) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Mean external rotation for group 3 (mean, 41\u00b0 (SD 23)) and group 2 (mean, 38\u00b0 (SD 17)) was larger than external rotation of group 1 (mean, 24\u00b0 (SD 16)) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001); a greater proportion of group 2 (78%) and 3 (69%) patients reached L3 level on internal rotation compared to group 1 (44%) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.003). Prosthesis position measurements were similar, but group 3 had significantly less scapular notching (14%) versus 24% (group 2) and 50% (group 1) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.001).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Outcome scores of different RSA designs for CTA revealed comparable results. However, CTA patients with a lateralized and distalized RSA configuration were associated with achieving better flexion and abduction with less scapular notching. A better rotation was associated with either of the lateralized RSA designs in comparison with the classic Grammont prosthesis.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Level of Evidence<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Therapeutic study, Level III.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-024-07312-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]],"date-time":"2024-03-07T06:01:53Z","timestamp":1709791313000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy \u2013 the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Florian","family":"Freislederer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Philipp","family":"Moroder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Laurent","family":"Audig\u00e9","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tim","family":"Schneller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yacine","family":"Ameziane","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Raphael","family":"Trefzer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan-Philipp","family":"Imiolczyk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Markus","family":"Scheibel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"7312_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 (254):92\u20136. Epub 1990\/05\/01.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199005000-00014"},{"issue":"3","key":"7312_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.86B3.14024","volume":"86","author":"F Sirveaux","year":"2004","unstructured":"Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D, Huquet D, Walch G, Mole D. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(3):388\u201395. Epub 2004\/05\/06.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"issue":"9","key":"7312_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2425","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1757-y","volume":"469","author":"E Baulot","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baulot E, Sirveaux F, Boileau P. Grammont\u2019s idea: The story of Paul Grammont\u2019s functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(9):2425\u201331. Epub 2011\/01\/07.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"10","key":"7312_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2011.08.049","volume":"21","author":"CM Jobin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jobin CM, Brown GD, Bahu MJ, Gardner TR, Bigliani LU, Levine WN, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy: the clinical effect of deltoid lengthening and center of rotation medialization. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(10):1269\u201377. Epub 2011\/11\/08.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"7312_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1253","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2016.11.043","volume":"26","author":"B Mollon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mollon B, Mahure SA, Roche CP, Zuckerman JD. Impact of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 476 shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(7):1253\u201361. Epub 2017\/01\/24.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"7312_CR6","first-page":"1476","volume":"87","author":"CM Werner","year":"2005","unstructured":"Werner CM, Steinmann PA, Gilbart M, Gerber C. Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(7):1476\u201386. Epub 2005\/07\/05.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"7312_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2010.08.001","volume":"20","author":"MA Zumstein","year":"2011","unstructured":"Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(1):146\u201357. Epub 2010\/12\/08.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"24","key":"7312_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5868","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10245868","volume":"10","author":"A Berton","year":"2021","unstructured":"Berton A, Gulotta LV, Longo UG, De Salvatore S, Piergentili I, Bandini B, et al. Medialized versus lateralized center of rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(24):5868.","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"7312_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1244","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.00775","volume":"90","author":"D Cuff","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cuff D, Pupello D, Virani N, Levy J, Frankle M. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(6):1244\u201351. Epub 2008\/06\/04.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"issue":"8","key":"7312_CR10","first-page":"1697","volume":"87","author":"M Frankle","year":"2005","unstructured":"Frankle M, Siegal S, Pupello D, Saleem A, Mighell M, Vasey M. The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(8):1697\u2013705. Epub 2005\/08\/09.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"11","key":"7312_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2099","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2018.07.007","volume":"27","author":"JK Helmkamp","year":"2018","unstructured":"Helmkamp JK, Bullock GS, Amilo NR, Guerrero EM, Ledbetter LS, Sell TC, et al. The clinical and radiographic impact of center of rotation lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(11):2099\u2013107.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"7312_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2349","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-019-04365-3","volume":"43","author":"JD Werthel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Werthel JD, Walch G, Vegehan E, Deransart P, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Valenti P. Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice. Int Orthop. 2019;43(10):2349\u201360. Epub 2019\/06\/30.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"11","key":"7312_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2410","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2022.05.002","volume":"31","author":"G Larose","year":"2022","unstructured":"Larose G, Fisher ND, Gambhir N, Alben MG, Zuckerman JD, Virk MS, et al. Inlay versus onlay humeral design for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(11):2410\u201320. Epub 2022\/06\/08.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"7312_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1007\/s11678-020-00599-5","volume":"15","author":"A L\u00e4dermann","year":"2020","unstructured":"L\u00e4dermann A, Collin P, Denard PJ. Range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: which combinations of humeral stem and glenosphere work best? Obere Extremit\u00e4t. 2020;15(3):172\u20138.","journal-title":"Obere Extremit\u00e4t"},{"key":"7312_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2349","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-019-04365-3","volume":"43","author":"JDWG Werthel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Werthel JDWG, Vegehan E, Deransart P, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Valenti P. Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a descriptive analysis of different implants in current practice. Int Orthop. 2019;43:2349\u201360.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"1","key":"7312_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232596712110639","DOI":"10.1177\/23259671211063922","volume":"10","author":"SH Cho","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cho SH, Lee HJ, Aldhafian OR, Kim YS. Comparison of lateralized versus medialized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(1):23259671211063920. Epub 2022\/01\/11.","journal-title":"Orthop J Sports Med."},{"issue":"2","key":"7312_CR17","first-page":"117","volume":"2","author":"MD Gruber","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gruber MD, Kirloskar KM, Werner BC, L\u00e4dermann A, Denard PJ. Factors associated with internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a Narrative review. JSES Rev Rep Techniq. 2022;2(2):117\u201324.","journal-title":"JSES Rev Rep Techniq"},{"issue":"1","key":"7312_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.4103\/0973-6042.150226","volume":"9","author":"G Samitier","year":"2015","unstructured":"Samitier G, Alentorn-Geli E, Torrens C, Wright TW. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Part 1: Systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2015;9(1):24\u201331. Epub 2015\/02\/25.","journal-title":"Int J Shoulder Surg."},{"key":"7312_CR19","unstructured":"Constant CR. Age related recovery of shoulder function after injury. Thesis, University College. 1986"},{"issue":"6","key":"7312_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"717","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2007.02.123","volume":"16","author":"MK Gilbart","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gilbart MK, Gerber C. Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):717\u201321.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg."},{"issue":"3","key":"7312_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/S1836-9553(11)70045-5","volume":"57","author":"JD Breckenridge","year":"2011","unstructured":"Breckenridge JD, McAuley JH. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). J Physiother. 2011;57(3):197. Epub 2011\/08\/17.","journal-title":"J Physiother."},{"issue":"4","key":"7312_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0025","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.OA.19.00025","volume":"4","author":"H Durchholz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Durchholz H, Salomonsson B, Moroder P, Lambert S, Page R, Audige L, et al. Core set of radiographic parameters for shoulder arthroplasty monitoring: criteria defined by an International Delphi consensus process. JB JS Open Access. 2019;4(4):e0025. Epub 2020\/02\/12.","journal-title":"JB JS Open Access."},{"issue":"2","key":"7312_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbi.2008.08.010","volume":"42","author":"PA Harris","year":"2009","unstructured":"Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)\u2014a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377\u201381.","journal-title":"J Biomed Inform"},{"issue":"25","key":"7312_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3083","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3697","volume":"28","author":"PC Austin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083\u2013107.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"7312_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2015.07.020","volume":"25","author":"C Torrens","year":"2016","unstructured":"Torrens C, Guirro P, Santana F. The minimal clinically important difference for function and strength in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(2):262\u20138. Epub 2015\/10\/01.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"7312_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2021.07.022","volume":"31","author":"F Freislederer","year":"2022","unstructured":"Freislederer F, Toft F, Audig\u00e9 L, Marzel A, Endell D, Scheibel M. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1\u20133: does the design make a difference? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(2):341\u201351. Epub 2021\/08\/28.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg."},{"issue":"9","key":"7312_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2558","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-011-1775-4","volume":"469","author":"P Boileau","year":"2011","unstructured":"Boileau P, Moineau G, Roussanne Y, O\u2019Shea K. Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(9):2558\u201367. Epub 2011\/02\/03.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"7312_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-015-2976-3","volume":"40","author":"D Katz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Katz D, Valenti P, Kany J, Elkholti K, Werthel J-D. Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up. Int Orthopaed. 2016;40(1):99\u2013108.","journal-title":"Int Orthopaed."},{"issue":"9","key":"7312_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2550","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-011-1844-8","volume":"469","author":"P Valenti","year":"2011","unstructured":"Valenti P, Sauzieres P, Katz D, Kalouche I, Kilinc AS. Do less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses increase motion and reduce notching? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(9):2550\u20137. Epub 2011\/03\/16.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"7312_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"468","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2014.08.015","volume":"24","author":"GS Athwal","year":"2015","unstructured":"Athwal GS, MacDermid JC, Reddy KM, Marsh JP, Faber KJ, Drosdowech D. Does bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty decrease scapular notching? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(3):468\u201373. Epub 2014\/12\/03.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"key":"7312_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1097\/BLO.0b013e31803d0f57","volume":"458","author":"S Guti\u00e9rrez","year":"2007","unstructured":"Guti\u00e9rrez S, Levy JC, Lee WEI, Keller TS, Maitland ME. Center of rotation affects abduction range of motion of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthopaed Related Res\u00ae. 2007;458:78\u201382.","journal-title":"Clin Orthopaed Related Res\u00ae."},{"issue":"6","key":"7312_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1339","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-018-3850-x","volume":"42","author":"A L\u00e4dermann","year":"2018","unstructured":"L\u00e4dermann A, Denard PJ, Boileau P, Farron A, Deransart P, Walch G. What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Int Orthopaed. 2018;42(6):1339\u201346.","journal-title":"Int Orthopaed."},{"issue":"4","key":"7312_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2017.10.016","volume":"27","author":"G Merolla","year":"2018","unstructured":"Merolla G, Walch G, Ascione F, Paladini P, Fabbri E, Padolino A, et al. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(4):701\u201310. Epub 2018\/01\/02.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"7312_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3615","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-015-4526-0","volume":"473","author":"JW Giles","year":"2015","unstructured":"Giles JW, Langohr DGG, Johnson JA, Athwal GS. Implant design variations in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty influence the required deltoid force and resultant joint load. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res\u00ae. 2015;473(11):3615\u201326.","journal-title":"Clin Orthopaed Rel Res\u00ae."},{"issue":"11","key":"7312_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1889","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2016.04.011","volume":"25","author":"MT Wong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wong MT, Langohr GDG, Athwal GS, Johnson JA. Implant positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has an impact on acromial stresses. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(11):1889\u201395. Epub 2016\/07\/05.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"7312_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-017-3710-0","volume":"42","author":"F Hess","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hess F, Zettl R, Smolen D, Knoth C. Anatomical reconstruction to treat acromion fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthopaed. 2018;42(4):875\u201381.","journal-title":"Int Orthopaed."},{"issue":"12","key":"7312_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2556","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2020.03.036","volume":"29","author":"G Haidamous","year":"2020","unstructured":"Haidamous G, L\u00e4dermann A, Frankle MA, Gorman RA 2nd, Denard PJ. The risk of postoperative scapular spine fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increased with an onlay humeral stem. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(12):2556\u201363. Epub 2020\/07\/28.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"1, Supplement","key":"7312_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2004.09.030","volume":"14","author":"M Harman","year":"2005","unstructured":"Harman M, Frankle M, Vasey M, Banks S. Initial glenoid component fixation in \u201creverse\u201d total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(1, Supplement):S162\u20137.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg."},{"issue":"4","key":"7312_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2018.08.033","volume":"28","author":"DC Patterson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Patterson DC, Chi D, Parsons BO, Cagle PJ Jr. Acromial spine fracture after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(4):792\u2013801. Epub 2018\/12\/01.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"7312_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2019.05.023","volume":"29","author":"E Franceschetti","year":"2020","unstructured":"Franceschetti E, Ranieri R, Giovanetti de Sanctis E, Palumbo A, Franceschi F. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145 degrees curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(1):58\u201367. Epub 2019\/08\/12.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg."},{"issue":"6","key":"7312_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"972","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2014.10.018","volume":"24","author":"GD Langohr","year":"2015","unstructured":"Langohr GD, Giles JW, Athwal GS, Johnson JA. The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(6):972\u20139. Epub 2014\/12\/31.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"7312_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2011.07.034","volume":"21","author":"HB Henninger","year":"2012","unstructured":"Henninger HB, Barg A, Anderson AE, Bachus KN, Burks RT, Tashjian RZ. Effect of lateral offset center of rotation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(9):1128\u201335. Epub 2011\/11\/01.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"7312_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2014.11.040","volume":"24","author":"O Costantini","year":"2015","unstructured":"Costantini O, Choi DS, Kontaxis A, Gulotta LV. The effects of progressive lateralization of the joint center of rotation of reverse total shoulder implants. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(7):1120\u20138. Epub 2015\/01\/21.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"73 Suppl 1","key":"7312_CR44","first-page":"S5","volume":"2015","author":"HD Routman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Routman HD, Flurin PH, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD, Hamilton MA, Roche CP. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis design classification system. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2013;2015(73 Suppl 1):S5-14. Epub 2015\/12\/04.","journal-title":"Bull Hosp Jt Dis"},{"issue":"1","key":"7312_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2017.07.020","volume":"27","author":"P Collin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Collin P, Liu X, Denard PJ, Gain S, Nowak A, Ladermann A. Standard versus bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(1):59\u201364. Epub 2017\/10\/04.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"7312_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2015.05.041","volume":"24","author":"S Greiner","year":"2015","unstructured":"Greiner S, Schmidt C, Herrmann S, Pauly S, Perka C. Clinical performance of lateralized versus non-lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(9):1397\u2013404. Epub 2015\/07\/15.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"7312_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s11678-020-00594-w","volume":"15","author":"P Raiss","year":"2020","unstructured":"Raiss P, Neumann R. Bipolar lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for avoidance of scapular notching. Obere Extremit\u00e4t. 2020;15(3):207\u201312.","journal-title":"Obere Extremit\u00e4t"},{"issue":"2","key":"7312_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jseint.2021.10.009","volume":"6","author":"JP Imiolczyk","year":"2022","unstructured":"Imiolczyk JP, Audige L, Harzbecker V, Moroder P, Scheibel M. Metallic humeral and glenoid lateralized implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy and primary osteoarthritis. JSES Int. 2022;6(2):221\u20138. Epub 2022\/03\/08.","journal-title":"JSES Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"7312_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-021-04024-6","volume":"143","author":"NM Engel","year":"2023","unstructured":"Engel NM, Holschen M, Schorn D, Witt KA, Steinbeck J. Results after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without subscapularis repair: a prospective-randomized trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(1):255\u201364. Epub 2021\/07\/09.","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"7312_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sart.2020.11.013","volume":"31","author":"TS Polisetty","year":"2021","unstructured":"Polisetty TS, Baessler AM, Levy JC, Badman BL. Onlay versus inlay reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparison of radiographic and clinical outcomes. Sem Arthroplasty: JSES. 2021;31(2):202\u20138.","journal-title":"Sem Arthroplasty: JSES."},{"issue":"1","key":"7312_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.4055\/cios22084","volume":"15","author":"HJ Lee","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lee HJ, Yoon CY, Kim YS. Comparison of clinical performance of inlay versus onlay humerus implants in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2023;15(1):135\u201344. Epub 2023\/02\/14.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"7312_CR52","first-page":"158","volume":"75","author":"ISN Kalouche","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kalouche ISN, Wahegaonker A, Sauzieres P, Katz D, Valenti P. Reverse shuolder arthroplasty: does reduced medialisation improve radiological and clinical results? Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75(2):158\u201366.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Belg"},{"issue":"6","key":"7312_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2010.538354","volume":"81","author":"LF de Wilde","year":"2010","unstructured":"de Wilde LF, Poncet D, Middernacht B, Ekelund A. Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(6):719\u201326. Epub 2010\/11\/30.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"issue":"2","key":"7312_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2021.07.022","volume":"31","author":"F Freislederer","year":"2022","unstructured":"Freislederer F, Toft F, Audige L, Marzel A, Endell D, Scheibel M. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1\u20133: does the design make a difference? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(2):341\u201351. Epub 2021\/08\/28.","journal-title":"J Shoulder Elbow Surg."},{"key":"7312_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1090","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20151120-06","volume":"38","author":"JJSY Streit","year":"2015","unstructured":"Streit JJSY, Gobezie R. Medialized versus lateralized Center of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2015;38:e1090\u2013103.","journal-title":"Orthopedics"}],"container-title":["BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12891-024-07312-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12891-024-07312-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12891-024-07312-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]],"date-time":"2024-03-07T07:04:22Z","timestamp":1709795062000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12891-024-07312-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["7312"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-024-07312-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2474"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2474","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 December 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 February 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 March 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was performed in accordance with the standards of the Ethics Committee of Zurich (Kantonale Ethikkommission [KEK], Stampfenbachstrasse 121, CH-8090 Zurich, Switzerland; KEK-ZH-Nr. 2014\u20130483), Institutional Board Committee at Charit\u00e9 Universitaetsmedizin Berlin (Ethikausschuss am Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charit\u00e9platz 1, DE-10117 Berlin, Germany; Antragsnr. EA2\/173\/18) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.All patients provided written informed consent prior to patient enrolment \/ data collection and use of their data for research purposes.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"Florian Freislederer is a paid consultant of Stryker Inc.Philipp Moroder is a paid consultant of and receives royalties from Arthrex Inc.Markus Scheibel is a paid consultant of and receives royalties from Stryker Inc.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"204"}}