{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T04:51:05Z","timestamp":1791521465491,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,22]],"date-time":"2024-08-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724284800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,22]],"date-time":"2024-08-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1724284800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Nanchang Science and Technology Support Plan Fund Project","award":["2021KJZCH"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2021KJZCH"]}]},{"name":"Science and Technology Plan of Jiangxi Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine","award":["SZYYB20233144"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SZYYB20233144"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Surg"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-024-02516-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,23]],"date-time":"2024-08-23T15:33:13Z","timestamp":1724427193000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Meta-analysis of robotic-assisted NOSE versus traditional TWSR in colorectal cancer surgery: postoperative outcomes and efficacy"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Shixiong","family":"Zhan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhicheng","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Haitao","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Xia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tian","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhenda","family":"Wan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"14","key":"2516_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3837","DOI":"10.7150\/ijbs.64077","volume":"17","author":"A Fan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fan A, et al. Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: current achievements and future perspective. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(14):3837\u201349.","journal-title":"Int J Biol Sci"},{"issue":"12","key":"2516_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1038\/s41575-019-0189-8","volume":"16","author":"N Keum","year":"2019","unstructured":"Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(12):713\u201332.","journal-title":"Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol"},{"issue":"9","key":"2516_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2003","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.17972","volume":"92","author":"W Luo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Luo W, Wu M, Chen Y. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92(9):2003\u201317.","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2516_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.2478\/raon-2021-0026","volume":"55","author":"J Grosek","year":"2021","unstructured":"Grosek J, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a case-control study. Radiol Oncol. 2021;55(4):433\u20138.","journal-title":"Radiol Oncol"},{"key":"2516_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106196","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2021.106196","volume":"97","author":"S Wang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wang S, et al. The natural orifice specimen extraction surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of efficacy and long-term oncological outcomes. International Journal of Surgery. 2022;97:106196.","journal-title":"International Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-012-0938-y","volume":"17","author":"ME Franklin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Franklin ME, Liang S, Russek K. Natural orifice specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: transanal and transvaginal approaches. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(1):63\u20137.","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-012-2440-z","volume":"27","author":"ME Franklin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Franklin ME, Liang S, Russek K. Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):127\u201332.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2516_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"2516_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-010-9491-z","volume":"25","author":"A Stang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603\u20135.","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2516_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","volume":"5","author":"SP Hozo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"2516_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","volume":"14","author":"X Wan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wan X, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2516_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvs.2019.05.037","volume":"71","author":"GA Antoniou","year":"2020","unstructured":"Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Smith CT. A guide on meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes using aggregate data in vascular and endovascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(3):1002\u20135.","journal-title":"J Vasc Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2516_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ygyno.2021.02.024","volume":"161","author":"C Huang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Huang C, et al. Enrichment and detection method for the prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;161(2):613\u201320.","journal-title":"Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"2516_CR14","first-page":"Ed000142","volume":"10","author":"M Cumpston","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cumpston M, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10(10):Ed000142.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"4","key":"2516_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.698","volume":"20","author":"P Macaskill","year":"2001","unstructured":"Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2001;20(4):641\u201354.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"18","key":"2516_CR16","first-page":"6665","volume":"26","author":"A Aslaner","year":"2022","unstructured":"Aslaner A, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted resection alone and with natural orifice specimen extraction for rectal cancer by using Da Vinci Xi. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(18):6665\u201370.","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-020-01967-9","volume":"18","author":"G Gao","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gao G, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2020;18(1):192.","journal-title":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology"},{"key":"2516_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1092128","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1092128","volume":"10","author":"J Houqiong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Houqiong J, et al. Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment. Frontiers in Surgery. 2023;10:1092128.","journal-title":"Frontiers in Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.7719","volume":"99","author":"J Kang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kang J, et al. Transanal specimen extraction in robotic rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2012;99(1):133\u20136.","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2516_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1153751","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2023.1153751","volume":"13","author":"L Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li L, et al. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional robotic resection for patients with colorectal neoplasms. Frontiers in Oncology. 2023;13:1153751.","journal-title":"Frontiers in Oncology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12848","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-69830-1","volume":"10","author":"D Liu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liu D, et al. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):12848.","journal-title":"Scientific Reports"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-08260-6","volume":"36","author":"S Xu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Xu S, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic NOSE for sigmoid and rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(1):222\u201335.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2516_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.07.043","volume":"82","author":"L Zhang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhang L, et al. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center case series. Int J Surg. 2020;82:95\u20139.","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2516_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.21147\/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.05.10","volume":"32","author":"Z Lu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lu Z, et al. Safety and survival outcomes of transanal natural orifice specimen extraction using prolapsing technique for patients with middle- to low-rectal cancer. Chin J Cancer Res. 2020;32(5):654\u201364.","journal-title":"Chin J Cancer Res"},{"key":"2516_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5939","DOI":"10.2147\/CMAR.S209194","volume":"11","author":"S Zhou","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhou S, et al. Comparison of short-term and survival outcomes for transanal natural orifice specimen extraction with conventional mini-laparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:5939\u201348.","journal-title":"Cancer Manag Res"},{"key":"2516_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6204264","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/6204264","volume":"2020","author":"J He","year":"2020","unstructured":"He J, et al. The Comparison of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction versus Mini-Laparotomy Specimen Extraction for Colorectal Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes. J Oncol. 2020;2020:6204264.","journal-title":"J Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2516_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-020-01934-8","volume":"406","author":"J Lin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lin J, et al. Meta-analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(2):283\u201399.","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"2516_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.27235","volume":"127","author":"Q He","year":"2023","unstructured":"He Q, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with sigmoid colon\/high rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2023;127(7):1160\u20136.","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"11","key":"2516_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-020-02282-x","volume":"24","author":"CC Cheng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cheng CC, et al. Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward? Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(11):1197\u2013205.","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2516_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2010.11.014","volume":"202","author":"T Akiyoshi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Akiyoshi T, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):259\u201364.","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"2516_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5318","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5611-0","volume":"31","author":"T Braunschmid","year":"2017","unstructured":"Braunschmid T, et al. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(12):5318\u201326.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"4","key":"2516_CR32","first-page":"364","volume":"23","author":"JW Chen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chen JW, et al. Risk factors of anastomotic leakage after robotic surgery for low and mid rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020;23(4):364\u20139.","journal-title":"Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi"},{"issue":"2","key":"2516_CR33","first-page":"Cd014909","volume":"2","author":"MA Willis","year":"2023","unstructured":"Willis MA, et al. Preoperative combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation for preventing complications in elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;2(2):Cd014909.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"12","key":"2516_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"300060521106594","DOI":"10.1177\/03000605211065942","volume":"49","author":"X Tan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tan X, et al. Retrospective study of active drainage in the management of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(12):3000605211065942.","journal-title":"J Int Med Res"},{"issue":"9","key":"2516_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2022.05.009","volume":"29","author":"G Grigoriadis","year":"2022","unstructured":"Grigoriadis G, et al. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Colorectal Resection for Deep Endometriosis: A 50 Case Series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(9):1054\u201362.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-023-03083-w","volume":"21","author":"SP Ye","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ye SP, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2023;21(1):196.","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"44","key":"2516_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16707","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v20.i44.16707","volume":"20","author":"M Hisada","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hisada M, et al. Complete laparoscopic resection of the rectum using natural orifice specimen extraction. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(44):16707\u201313.","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2516_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5197","DOI":"10.18632\/aging.202440","volume":"13","author":"H Li","year":"2021","unstructured":"Li H, et al. High expression of vinculin predicts poor prognosis and distant metastasis and associates with influencing tumor-associated NK cell infiltration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(4):5197\u2013225.","journal-title":"Aging (Albany NY)"},{"issue":"3","key":"2516_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-010-0396-5","volume":"34","author":"M Hioki","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hioki M, et al. Predictive factors improving survival after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. World J Surg. 2010;34(3):555\u201362.","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2516_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1097\/SLE.0b013e318274b719","volume":"23","author":"HP Huynh","year":"2013","unstructured":"Huynh HP, et al. Plastic freezer bags: a cost-effective method to protect extraction sites in laparoscopic colorectal procedures? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(5):464\u20137.","journal-title":"Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.21037\/qims-23-966","volume":"14","author":"X Lu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lu X, et al. Preoperative metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET\/CT are associated with TNM stage and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024;14(1):462\u201375.","journal-title":"Quant Imaging Med Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2516_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1097\/RLU.0000000000000438","volume":"39","author":"HJ Jo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jo HJ, et al. Prediction of survival and cancer recurrence using metabolic volumetric parameters measured by 18F-FDG PET\/CT in patients with surgically resected rectal cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39(6):493\u20137.","journal-title":"Clin Nucl Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-013-1134-x","volume":"399","author":"D Courtney","year":"2014","unstructured":"Courtney D, et al. Clinical review: surgical management of locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014;399(1):33\u201340.","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-021-07894-6","volume":"21","author":"Y Yuan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yuan Y, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable radically locally advanced colon cancer: a potential improvement to overall survival and decrease to multivisceral resection. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):179.","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"6","key":"2516_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0808268","volume":"360","author":"J Tol","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tol J, et al. Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(6):563\u201372.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2516_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2407-12-356","volume":"12","author":"A Stein","year":"2012","unstructured":"Stein A, et al. Treatment with bevacizumab and FOLFOXIRI in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: presentation of two novel trials (CHARTA and PERIMAX) and review of the literature. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:356.","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"5","key":"2516_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2003","DOI":"10.1002\/cnr2.2003","volume":"7","author":"S Muhammad","year":"2024","unstructured":"Muhammad S, et al. Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024;7(5):e2003.","journal-title":"Cancer Rep (Hoboken)"},{"issue":"1","key":"2516_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-022-01737-2","volume":"22","author":"Z Li","year":"2022","unstructured":"Li Z, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):286.","journal-title":"BMC Surg"}],"container-title":["BMC Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02516-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02516-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02516-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,23]],"date-time":"2024-08-23T15:36:45Z","timestamp":1724427405000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02516-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,22]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2516"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02516-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2482"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2482","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 January 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 July 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 August 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"No ethical approval and patient consent are required because all analyses were based on previous published studies.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"238"}}