{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,13]],"date-time":"2025-09-13T16:33:02Z","timestamp":1757781182119,"version":"3.32.0"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,23]],"date-time":"2024-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1734912000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,23]],"date-time":"2024-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1734912000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Surg"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-024-02723-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,23]],"date-time":"2024-12-23T05:10:54Z","timestamp":1734930654000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The effectiveness of different flap-raising techniques for mastectomy in reducing the rate of complications: a network meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Saburi","family":"Oyewale","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Azeezat","family":"Ariwoola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Idris","family":"Oyewale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"2723_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-198308000-00016","volume":"198","author":"WA Maddox","year":"1983","unstructured":"Maddox WA, Carpenter JTJ, Laws HL, et al. A randomized prospective trial of radical (Halsted) mastectomy versus modified radical mastectomy in 311 breast cancer patients. Ann Surg. 1983;198:207\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000658-198308000-00016.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"2723_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1016\/s0748-7983(03)00096-9","volume":"29","author":"CJ Pogson","year":"2003","unstructured":"Pogson CJ, Adwani A, Ebbs SR. Seroma following breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol. 2003;29:711\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0748-7983(03)00096-9.","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2723_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9610(98)00093-2","volume":"176","author":"KA Porter","year":"1998","unstructured":"Porter KA, O\u2019Connor S, Rimm E, Lopez M. Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg. 1998;176:8\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9610(98)00093-2.","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2723_CR4","first-page":"111","volume":"38","author":"C YILMAZ KB, \u00d6ZASLAN","year":"2008","unstructured":"Yilmaz KB, \u00d6zaslan C, G\u00fcrer A, et al. Scalpel versus electrocautery dissections: the effect on wound complications and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in wound fluid. Turk J Med Sci. 2008;38:111\u20136.","journal-title":"Turk J Med Sci"},{"key":"2723_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-017-1199-z","volume":"15","author":"YW Chang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chang YW, Kim HS, Jung SP, et al. Comparison of skin-sparing mastectomy using LigaSure\u2122 Small Jaw and electrocautery. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15:129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12957-017-1199-z.","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2723_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.3332\/eCMS.2007.61","volume":"1","author":"M Antonio","year":"2007","unstructured":"Antonio M, Pietra T, Domenico L, et al. Does LigaSure reduce fluid drainage in axillary dissection? A randomized prospective clinical trial. Ecancermedicalscience. 2007;1:61. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3332\/eCMS.2007.61.","journal-title":"Ecancermedicalscience"},{"key":"2723_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1001\/archsurg.143.6.575","volume":"143","author":"A Manouras","year":"2008","unstructured":"Manouras A, Markogiannakis H, Genetzakis M, et al. Modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection using the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system. Arch Surg. 2008;143:575\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archsurg.143.6.575. discussion 581.","journal-title":"Arch Surg"},{"key":"2723_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.2190\/7H41-XEEB-AQYY-0CN6","volume":"16","author":"HD Banta","year":"1986","unstructured":"Banta HD. Medical technology and developing countries: the case of Brazil. Int J Health Serv. 1986;16:363\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2190\/7H41-XEEB-AQYY-0CN6.","journal-title":"Int J Health Serv"},{"key":"2723_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nundy S. (1999) Difficulties of surgery in the developing world: a personal view. Lancet (London, England) 353 Suppl:SI21-3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736(99)90225-8","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(99)90225-8"},{"key":"2723_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-016-0384-4","volume":"5","author":"M Ouzzani","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-016-0384-4.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"2723_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sterne JAC, Savovi\u0107 J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l4898.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898"},{"key":"2723_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. (2020) Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods n\/a: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jrsm.1411","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1411"},{"key":"2723_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71"},{"key":"2723_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.35787\/jimdc.v12i3.919","volume":"12","author":"S Din","year":"2023","unstructured":"Din S, Hussain M, Khan E, et al. Post Mastectomy Seroma Formation: Scalpel V\/S Ligasure Dissection in Modified Radical Mastectomy. J Islam Med Dent Coll. 2023;12:193\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.35787\/jimdc.v12i3.919.","journal-title":"J Islam Med Dent Coll"},{"key":"2723_CR15","first-page":"2388","volume":"12","author":"ASA Helal","year":"2021","unstructured":"Helal ASA, Elrashidi SAM, Abdelwahab Biomy T, Mahmoud Elkilany M JRI. A comparative study of using ligasure versus monopolar electrocautery in breast cancer patients. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2021;12:2388\u201393.","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Dis Res"},{"key":"2723_CR16","unstructured":"Shaikh S, Laghari Aali. Abro S, Efficacy of Electrosurgical Vessel Sealer (LigaSureTM) Devices in Modified Radical Mastectomy in Primary Breast Carcinoma. Group 33:57\u20138."},{"key":"2723_CR17","first-page":"107","volume":"30","author":"MI Zia","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zia MI, Malik S, Anum S, et al. Comparison of outcomes of Ligasure system and conventional electrocautery in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Prof Med J. 2023;30:107\u201312.","journal-title":"Prof Med J"},{"key":"2723_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Irfan S, Sajid R, Iqbal MS. (2023) Comparison of Electrocautery and Ligasure in Terms of Per-Operative Blood Loss in Modified Radical Mastectomy. 14\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.29054\/APMC\/2023.1157","DOI":"10.29054\/APMC\/2023.1157"},{"key":"2723_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.4048\/jbc.2022.25.e29","volume":"25","author":"HS Park","year":"2022","unstructured":"Park HS, Lee J, Kim JY, et al. A Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Postoperative Drainage After Mastectomy Using Electrosurgical Bipolar Systems and Conventional Electro-Cautery. J Breast Cancer. 2022;25:307\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4048\/jbc.2022.25.e29.","journal-title":"J Breast Cancer"},{"key":"2723_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1016\/s0748-7983(96)92190-3","volume":"22","author":"MJ Kerin","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kerin MJ, O\u2019Hanlon DM, Kenny P, et al. Argon-enhanced cutting and coagulation confers advantages over conventional electrocautery for mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol. 1996;22:571\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0748-7983(96)92190-3.","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2723_CR21","unstructured":"Boonsripitayanon M, Vachiraprakarnsakul P, Pisarnturakit P et al. (2020) Comparison of Traditional Electrosurgery System versus Low Thermal Tissue Dissection System for Total Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Assoc Thail 103."},{"key":"2723_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1186\/s13037-018-0155-3","volume":"12","author":"M Faisal","year":"2018","unstructured":"Faisal M, Fathy H, Shaban H, et al. A novel technique of harmonic tissue dissection reduces seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy compared to conventional electrocautery: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Patient Saf Surg. 2018;12:8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13037-018-0155-3.","journal-title":"Patient Saf Surg"},{"key":"2723_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.51253\/pafmj.v71i2.2721","volume":"71","author":"MF Shahid","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shahid MF, Ibrahim T, Muazzam MA, et al. Comparative study of seroma formation in harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery in post modified radical mastectomy. Pakistan Armed Forces Med J. 2021;71:451\u20133.","journal-title":"Pakistan Armed Forces Med J"},{"key":"2723_CR24","first-page":"226","volume":"43","author":"SVS Deo","year":"2002","unstructured":"Deo SVS, Shukla NK, Asthana S, et al. A comparative study of modified radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel and electrocautery. Singap Med J. 2002;43:226\u20138.","journal-title":"Singap Med J"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"2723_CR25","first-page":"105","volume":"34","author":"D Kozomara","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kozomara D, Gali\u0107 G, Brekalo Z, et al. A randomised two-way comparison of mastectomy performed using harmonic scalpel or monopolar diathermy. Coll Antropol. 2010;34(Suppl 1):105\u201312.","journal-title":"Coll Antropol"},{"key":"2723_CR26","first-page":"204","volume":"68","author":"M Rohaizak","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rohaizak M, Khan FJ, Jasmin JS, et al. Ultracision versus electrocautery in performing modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer: a prospective randomized control trial. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68:204\u20137.","journal-title":"Med J Malaysia"},{"key":"2723_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2476","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.2476","volume":"10","author":"A Archana","year":"2018","unstructured":"Archana A, Sureshkumar S, Vijayakumar C, Palanivel C. Comparing the Harmonic Scalpel with Electrocautery in Reducing Postoperative Flap Necrosis and Seroma Formation after Modified Radical Mastectomy in Carcinoma Breast Patients: A Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Control Trail. Cureus. 2018;10:e2476. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.2476.","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"2723_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.4103\/1117-6806.199962","volume":"23","author":"P Mittal","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mittal P, Kumar A, Kaur S, et al. A Comparative Study of the Use of Harmonic Scalpel versus Unipolar Cautery in Modified Radical Mastectomy. Niger J Surg Off Publ Niger Surg Res Soc. 2017;23:20\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/1117-6806.199962.","journal-title":"Niger J Surg Off Publ Niger Surg Res Soc"},{"key":"2723_CR29","first-page":"649","volume":"10","author":"G Sarwar","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sarwar G, Sheikh TH, Nadeem M. Comparison of blood loss between harmonic scalpel and monopolar electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy. PJMHS. 2016;10:649\u201351.","journal-title":"PJMHS"},{"key":"2723_CR30","unstructured":"Pabri S, Gothwal S, Khan F. Comparative Study of Harmonic Scalpel versuss Electrocautery in MRM."},{"key":"2723_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.33545\/surgery.2019.v3.i1c.28","volume":"3","author":"AK Sharma","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sharma AK, Kumar M, Singh A, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing ultrasonic dissector with monopolar electrocautery for dissection in modified radical mastectomy. Int J Surg Sci. 2019;3:149\u201353.","journal-title":"Int J Surg Sci"},{"key":"2723_CR32","first-page":"2","volume":"18","author":"SR Damani","year":"2013","unstructured":"Damani SR, Haider S, Shah SSH. Comparison of modified radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel and electrocautery. J Surg Pakistan. 2013;18:2\u20136.","journal-title":"J Surg Pakistan"},{"key":"2723_CR33","unstructured":"Munir A, Khan R, Bhatti AM et al. Harmonic Scalpel versus Electrocautery: An Experience of Modified Radical Mastectomy at Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital."},{"key":"2723_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1422","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20171154","volume":"4","author":"BN Anandaravi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Anandaravi BN, Nair PP, Aslam MA. A study showing efficacy of harmonic scalpel over electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy. Int Surg J. 2017;4:1422\u20135.","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"key":"2723_CR35","first-page":"221","volume":"68","author":"R Ahmed","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ahmed R, Hussain A, Zill-e-Humayon M, Comparison of mean blood loss using harmonic scalpel and monopolar electrocautry in modified radical mastectomy. Blood Loss Using Harmonic Scalpel And Monopolar Electrocautry. Pakistan Armed Forces Med J. 2018;68:221\u20134.","journal-title":"Pakistan Armed Forces Med J"},{"key":"2723_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1016\/S0960-9776(03)00110-3","volume":"12","author":"H Galatius","year":"2003","unstructured":"Galatius H, Okholm M, Hoffmann J. Mastectomy using ultrasonic dissection: effect on seroma formation. Breast. 2003;12:338\u201341.","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"2723_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.4048\/jbc.2011.14.1.58","volume":"14","author":"KB Yilmaz","year":"2011","unstructured":"Yilmaz KB, Dogan L, Nalbant H, et al. Comparing scalpel, electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector effects: the impact on wound complications and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in wound fluid from mastectomy patients. J Breast Cancer. 2011;14:58.","journal-title":"J Breast Cancer"},{"key":"2723_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1007\/s12262-016-1501-2","volume":"79","author":"RN Chavan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chavan RN, Chikkala B, Mondal P, Sarkar DK. Comparison Study Between Scalpel and Electrocautery, in Causation of Seroma After Modified Radical Mastectomy. Indian J Surg. 2017;79:423\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12262-016-1501-2.","journal-title":"Indian J Surg"},{"key":"2723_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1007\/s10353-013-0231-y","volume":"45","author":"B Anlar","year":"2013","unstructured":"Anlar B, Karaman N, Dogan L, et al. The effect of harmonic scalpel, electrocautery, and scalpel use on early wound complications after modified radical mastectomy. Eur Surg. 2013;45:286\u201390.","journal-title":"Eur Surg"},{"key":"2723_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10055-0047","volume":"2","author":"R Sharma","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sharma R, Singh RN, Singh R. Comparative study of complications following electrocautery dissection vs conventional scalpel\/scissor dissection in modified radical mastectomy. Curr Trends Diagn Treat. 2018;2:98\u2013101.","journal-title":"Curr Trends Diagn Treat"},{"key":"2723_CR41","first-page":"111","volume":"38","author":"ME \u00d6zdo\u011fan","year":"2008","unstructured":"\u00d6zdo\u011fan ME. Scalpel Versus Electrocautery Dissections: The Effect on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid. Turkish J Med Sci. 2008;38:111\u20136.","journal-title":"Turkish J Med Sci"},{"key":"2723_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20230261","volume":"10","author":"R Aheer","year":"2023","unstructured":"Aheer R, Bhangu GS. Comparative study of complications using electrocautery versus conventional scissors for raising flap in modified radical mastectomy. Int Surg J. 2023;10:244\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"key":"2723_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9610(98)00093-2","volume":"176","author":"K Porter","year":"1998","unstructured":"Porter K, O\u2019Connor S, Rimm E, Lopez M. Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg. 1998;176:8\u201311.","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"2723_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1166","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-007-9000-z","volume":"31","author":"CD Rodd","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rodd CD, Velchuru VR, Holly-Archer F, et al. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Mastectomy Techniques. World J Surg. 2007;31:1166\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00268-007-9000-z.","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2723_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"966","DOI":"10.29309\/TPMJ\/2023.30.08.7524","volume":"30","author":"Z Bashir","year":"2023","unstructured":"Bashir Z, Taimur M, Imran M, et al. Frequency of seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy. A comparison between electrocautery and scalpel dissection techniques. Prof Med J. 2023;30:966\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.29309\/TPMJ\/2023.30.08.7524.","journal-title":"Prof Med J"},{"key":"2723_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-013-3369-8","volume":"21","author":"S Khan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Khan S, Khan S, Chawla T, Murtaza G. Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery dissection in modified radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:808\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-013-3369-8.","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2723_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1007\/s12282-023-01460-7","volume":"30","author":"J Watanabe","year":"2023","unstructured":"Watanabe J, Kataoka Y, Koike A, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical energy devices for axillary node dissection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Breast Cancer. 2023;30:531\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12282-023-01460-7.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer"},{"key":"2723_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-024-03381-x","volume":"22","author":"Y Tian","year":"2024","unstructured":"Tian Y, Han L, Ma X, et al. Comparison of the effect of ultrasounic-harmonic scalpel and electrocautery in the treatment of axillary lymph nodes during radical surgery for breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2024;22:91. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12957-024-03381-x.","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2723_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4449","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-023-09892-0","volume":"37","author":"P Gabryel","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gabryel P, Kasprzyk M, Roszak M, et al. Comparison of the LigaSure\u2122 bipolar vessel sealer to monopolar electrocoagulation for thoracoscopic lobectomy and lymphadenectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:4449\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-023-09892-0.","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2723_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1294","DOI":"10.4236\/ijcm.2014.520164","volume":"05","author":"JN Clegg-Lamptey","year":"2014","unstructured":"Clegg-Lamptey JN, Dakubo J. Mastectomy Blood Loss: Can We Predict the Need for Blood Transfusion? Int J Clin Med. 2014;05:1294\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4236\/ijcm.2014.520164.","journal-title":"Int J Clin Med"},{"key":"2723_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.10673","volume":"102","author":"G Maskarinec","year":"2002","unstructured":"Maskarinec G, Nagata C, Shimizu H, Kashiki Y. Comparison of mammographic densities and their determinants in women from Japan and Hawaii. Int J cancer. 2002;102:29\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijc.10673.","journal-title":"Int J cancer"}],"container-title":["BMC Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02723-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02723-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02723-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,23]],"date-time":"2024-12-23T17:03:26Z","timestamp":1734973406000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02723-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,23]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2723"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12893-024-02723-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2482"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1471-2482"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 July 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 December 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 December 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"415"}}