{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T18:28:24Z","timestamp":1793989704607,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1743033600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1743033600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Urol"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-025-01746-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T09:05:38Z","timestamp":1743066338000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a single center experience and a review of the literature"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"25","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7696-2404","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dimitrios","family":"Diamantidis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stavros","family":"Lailisidis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nikolaos","family":"Panagiotopoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stavros","family":"Giannopoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chrysostomos","family":"Georgellis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Georgios","family":"Tsakaldimis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christos","family":"Kalaitzis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6173-8736","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stilianos","family":"Giannakopoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"1746_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1397","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.06.020","volume":"180","author":"BV Yanke","year":"2008","unstructured":"Yanke BV, Lallas CD, Pagnani C, McGinnis DE, Bagley DH. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A review of our experience during the last decade. J Urol. 2008;180(4):1397\u2013402.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"1746_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.20.707","volume":"20","author":"DS Dimarco","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dimarco DS, Gettman MT, McGee SM, Chow GK, Leroy AJ, Slezak J, et al. First prize: Long-Term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution. J Endourol. 2006;20(10):707\u201312.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"S1","key":"1746_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2015.0837","volume":"30","author":"R Swearingen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Swearingen R, Ambani S, Faerber GJ, Bloom DA, Wolf JS. Definitive management of failure after pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2016;30(S1):S\u201323. 27.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1746_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12454","volume":"113","author":"M Vannahme","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vannahme M, Mathur S, Davenport K, Timoney AG, Keeley FX. The management of secondary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction\u2013 a comparison of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy. BJU Int. 2014;113(1):108\u201312.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"1746_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1080\/2090598X.2022.2082208","volume":"20","author":"M Elaarag","year":"2022","unstructured":"Elaarag M, Alashi H, Aldeeb M, Khalil I, Al-Qudimat AR, Mansour A, et al. Salvage minimally invasive robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: a systematic review. Arab J Urol. 2022;20(4):204\u201311.","journal-title":"Arab J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1746_CR6","first-page":"518","volume":"111","author":"PA Clavien","year":"1992","unstructured":"Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111(5):518\u201326.","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"3 Part 1","key":"1746_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)62757-5","volume":"160","author":"ME Jabbour","year":"1998","unstructured":"Jabbour ME, Goldfischer ER, Klima WJ, Stravodimos KG, Smith AD. ENDOPYELOTOMY AFTER FAILED PYELOPLASTY: THE LONG-TERM RESULTS. J Urol. 1998;160(3 Part 1):690\u20133.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1746_CR8","first-page":"794","volume":"52","author":"SW Xiong","year":"2020","unstructured":"Xiong SW, Wang J, Zhu WJ, Cheng SD, Zhang L, Li XS, et al. [Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020;52(4):794\u20138.","journal-title":"Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban"},{"issue":"5","key":"1746_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1080\/21681805.2017.1347819","volume":"51","author":"A Hammady","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hammady A, Elbadry MS, Rashed EN, Moussa A, Gamal W, Dawood W, et al. Laparoscopic repyeloplasty after failed open repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a case-matched multi-institutional study. Scandinavian J Urol. 2017;51(5):402\u20136.","journal-title":"Scandinavian J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1746_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2037","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da","volume":"169","author":"CP Sundaram","year":"2003","unstructured":"Sundaram CP, Grubb RL, Rehman J, Yan Y, Chen C, Landman J, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2037\u201340.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1746_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1590\/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0198","volume":"43","author":"F Chiancone","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chiancone F, Fedelini M, Pucci L, Meccariello C, Fedelini P. Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 38 cases. Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43(3):512\u20137.","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1746_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1159\/000503156","volume":"103","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Ouyang W, Xu H, Luan Y, Yang J, Lu Y, et al. Secondary management for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after pyeloplasty: A comparison of Re-Do Robot-Assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urol Int. 2019;103(4):466\u201372.","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"1746_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-008-0266-z","volume":"26","author":"JJ Rassweiler","year":"2008","unstructured":"Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol. 2008;26(6):539\u201347.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1746_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.4103\/ua.ua_38_23","volume":"16","author":"C Mallikarjuna","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mallikarjuna C, Ghouse SM, Madduri VKS, Bendigeri MT, Enganti B, Reddy P, et al. Techniques in minimally invasive transperitoneal pyeloplasty: A compilation. Urol Annals. 2024;16(1):52\u20139.","journal-title":"Urol Annals"},{"issue":"3","key":"1746_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1253","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)65276-7","volume":"167","author":"TW Jarrett","year":"2002","unstructured":"Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY: THE FIRST 100 CASES. J Urol. 2002;167(3):1253\u20136.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6 Part 1","key":"1746_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2308","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000143904.17666.0b","volume":"172","author":"C Eden","year":"2004","unstructured":"Eden C, Gianduzzo T, Chang C, Thiruchelvam N, Jones A, EXTRAPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY, FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION. J Urol. 2004;172(6 Part 1):2308\u201311.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1746_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2005.06.115","volume":"66","author":"MC Ost","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ost MC, Kaye JD, Guttman MJ, Lee BR, Smith AD. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology. 2005;66(5):47\u201351.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"9","key":"1746_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1045","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.0414","volume":"21","author":"A Basiri","year":"2007","unstructured":"Basiri A, Behjati S, Zand S, Moghaddam SMH. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed open surgery. J Endourol. 2007;21(9):1045\u201352.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"12","key":"1746_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1481","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2007.0082","volume":"21","author":"AH Brito","year":"2007","unstructured":"Brito AH, Mitre AI, Srougi M. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary obstruction. J Endourol. 2007;21(12):1481\u20134.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1746_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2008.08.483","volume":"73","author":"EY Shapiro","year":"2009","unstructured":"Shapiro EY, Cho JS, Srinivasan A, Seideman CA, Huckabay CP, Andonian S, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty. Urology. 2009;73(1):115\u20138.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"1","key":"1746_CR21","first-page":"31","volume":"8","author":"P Shadpour","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shadpour P, Haghighi R, Maghsoudi R, Etemedian M. Laparoscopic Redo pyeloplasty after failed open surgery. Urol J. 2011;8(1):31\u20137.","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"1746_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"951","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-016-1951-y","volume":"35","author":"SN Ambani","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ambani SN, Yang DY, Wolf JS. Matched comparison of primary versus salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol. 2017;35(6):951\u20136.","journal-title":"World J Urol"}],"container-title":["BMC Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01746-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01746-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01746-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T09:06:08Z","timestamp":1743066368000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcurol.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01746-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1746"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01746-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-2490"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2490","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 October 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 March 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 March 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study is based on retrospective, de-identified, anonymized data. According to the internal regulation of the Democritus University of Thrace, specifically Law Issue B 4751\/20.08.2024, article 5 (), ethical approval was deemed unnecessary.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"The manuscript does not include any relevant personal information that may reveal the identity of individual patients from which the study data where obtained.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Clinical trial number"}}],"article-number":"58"}}