{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,5]],"date-time":"2026-11-05T21:13:45Z","timestamp":1793913225517,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]],"date-time":"2025-12-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766102400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]],"date-time":"2025-12-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766102400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Urol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive technique for managing renal and upper ureteral stones. Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) facilitate instrument access and reduce intrarenal pressure, but their impact on stone-free rates (SFR) remains debated. Suction ureteral access sheaths (S-UAS) offer improved flexibility and can be connected to suction devices, enhancing stone fragment removal. This study aims to compare the outcomes of traditional UAS and S-UAS in RIRS.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Chimei Medical Center from January 2022 to December 2024, including 104 patients who underwent RIRS with either traditional UAS (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200953) or S-UAS (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200951). Baseline characteristics, operative time, stone-free rates (SFR), postoperative complications, and the need for auxiliary procedures were analyzed. Stone-free was defined as absence of residual fragments\u2009&gt;\u20094\u00a0mm (and &gt;\u20092\u00a0mm for stricter assessment) on KUB. Subgroup analyses assessed the impact of stone size, location, and number on outcomes.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Immediate clinically acceptable SFR was significantly higher in the S-UAS group (82.0%) compared to the traditional UAS group (60.4%) (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.016). At one month, no significant difference was observed between the groups. The S-UAS group required fewer auxiliary procedures (5.9% vs. 22.6%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.015) and demonstrated a higher SFR for lower calyx stones (81.8% vs. 55.2%,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.046). Operative time, hospital stay, and complication rates were similar between groups.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The S-UAS facilitates efficient stone dust evacuation, improves immediate clinically acceptable SFRs, and reduces auxiliary procedure rates without increasing complications. These findings support its use in RIRS, particularly in select stone characteristics. Prospective studies with larger cohorts and standardized imaging follow-up are warranted to validate these results.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical trial number<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>not applicable.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-025-01976-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]],"date-time":"2025-12-19T12:32:17Z","timestamp":1766147537000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Comparative study of ureteral access sheath versus suction access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Ting-Yi","family":"Chiang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kau-Han","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chia-Chih","family":"Hsieh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhi-Hao","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steven K.","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Allen W.","family":"Chiu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"1976_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.07.041","volume":"69","author":"C T\u00fcrk","year":"2016","unstructured":"T\u00fcrk C, Pet\u0159\u00edk A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475\u201382.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1976_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15836","volume":"131","author":"G Zeng","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zeng G, Traxer O, Zhong W, Osther P, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, et al. International alliance of urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int. 2023;131(2):153\u201364.","journal-title":"BJU Int."},{"key":"1976_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2024.102724","volume":"74","author":"W Zhu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhu W, Liu S, Cao J, Wang H, Liang H, Jiang K, et al. Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;74:102724.","journal-title":"EClinicalMedicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"1976_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-024-03275-2","volume":"409","author":"L Wang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wang L, Zhou Z, Gao P, Yang Y, Ding Q, Wu Z. Comparison of traditional and suctioning ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal calculi. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024;409(1):81.","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"1976_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2020.0933","volume":"35","author":"\u00d8 Ulvik","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ulvik \u00d8, Harneshaug JR, Gjengst\u00f8 P. What do we mean by stone free, and how accurate are urologists in predicting stone-free status following ureteroscopy? J Endourol. 2021;35(7):961\u20136.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1976_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.5414\/CN106787","volume":"76","author":"LA Deters","year":"2011","unstructured":"Deters LA, Jumper CM, Steinberg PL, Pais VM. Jr. Evaluating the definition of stone free status in contemporary urologic literature. Clin Nephrol. 2011;76(5):354\u20137.","journal-title":"Clin Nephrol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1976_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.16765","volume":"136","author":"S Moretto","year":"2025","unstructured":"Moretto S, Quar\u00e0 A, Zorzi F, Bravo-Balado A, Madden A, Cabrera J, et al. Stone dust in endourology: a systematic review of its definition, management, and clinical impact. BJU Int. 2025;136(2):185\u201397.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"1976_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-025-05579-4","volume":"43","author":"MC Chan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chan MC, Gauhar V, Koh SH, Panthier F, Ventimiglia E, De Coninck V. Direct-in-scope suction with a 5.1Fr large working channel ureteroscope: what stone dust size for effective evacuation during laser lithotripsy? An in vitro analysis by PEARLS and section of EAU endourology. World J Urol. 2025;43(1):198.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1976_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-025-01710-7","volume":"53","author":"A Madden","year":"2025","unstructured":"Madden A, Altez C, Pe\u00f1a Lueza J, Cabrera J, Quar\u00e0 A, Moretto S, et al. Size matters: an in vitro evaluation of flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheaths. Urolithiasis. 2025;53(1):94.","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"10","key":"1976_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics14101034","volume":"14","author":"SKK Yuen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Yuen SKK, Traxer O, Wroclawski ML, Gadzhiev N, Chai CA, Lim EJ, et al. Scoping review of experimental and clinical evidence and its influence on development of the suction ureteral access sheath. Diagnostics. 2024;14(10):1034.","journal-title":"Diagnostics"},{"issue":"6","key":"1976_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"975","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2024.05.010","volume":"10","author":"V Gauhar","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gauhar V, Traxer O, Castellani D, Sietz C, Chew BH, Fong KY. Could use of a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath be a potential game-changer in retrograde intrarenal surgery? Outcomes at 30 days from a large, prospective, multicenter, real-world study by the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Section. Eur Urol Focus. 2024;10(6):975\u201382.","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"key":"1976_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2017.07.042","volume":"111","author":"J Huang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Huang J, Xie D, Xiong R, Deng X, Huang C, Fan D, et al. The application of suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent pressure control in treating upper urinary tract calculi on patients with a solitary kidney. Urology. 2018;111:44\u20137.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1976_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-018-2049-9","volume":"51","author":"C Du","year":"2019","unstructured":"Du C, Song L, Wu X, Deng X, Yang Z, Zhu X, et al. A study on the clinical application of a patented perfusion and suctioning platform and ureteral access sheath in the treatment of large ureteral stones below L4 level. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019;51(2):207\u201313.","journal-title":"Int Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"12","key":"1976_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1293","DOI":"10.1159\/000521373","volume":"106","author":"X Deng","year":"2022","unstructured":"Deng X, Xie D, Huang X, Huang J, Song L, Du C. Suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with automatic control of renal pelvic pressure versus mini PCNL for the treatment of 2-3-cm kidney stones in patients with a solitary kidney. Urol Int. 2022;106(12):1293\u20137.","journal-title":"Urol Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"1976_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2024.0283","volume":"39","author":"W Chen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chen W, Lu K, Liu C, Weng J, Gao R. A feasibility study on the efficacy and safety of a novel tip-flexible suction ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating kidney stones\u2009\u2265\u200930\u00a0mm. J Endourol. 2024;39(2):135\u201345.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1976_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.21037\/tau-20-1218","volume":"10","author":"H Chen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chen H, Zhu Z, Cui Y, Li Y, Chen Z, Yang Z, et al. Suctioning semirigid ureteroscopic lithotomy versus minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a retrospective study. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(3):1056\u201363.","journal-title":"Transl Androl Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1976_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1407","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-023-04363-6","volume":"41","author":"C Giulioni","year":"2023","unstructured":"Giulioni C, Castellani D, Somani BK, Chew BH, Tailly T, Keat WOL, et al. The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients. World J Urol. 2023;41(5):1407\u201313.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"1976_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/1806-9282.20241033","volume":"70","author":"M Uslu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Uslu M, Yildirim \u00dc, Ezer M, Arslan \u00d6E, Ya\u015far H, Sarica K. Comparison of tip-bendable aspiration-assisted and standard access sheaths in the treatment of lower calyceal stones. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2024;70(12):e20241033.","journal-title":"Rev Assoc Med Bras"},{"issue":"1","key":"1976_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-023-01347-x","volume":"23","author":"H Liang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Liang H, Liang L, Lin Y, Yu Y, Xu X, Liang Z, et al. Application of tip-bendable ureteral access sheath in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: an initial experience of 224 cases. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):175.","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1976_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-023-04697-1","volume":"42","author":"Y Yu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Yu Y, Chen Y, Zhou X, Li X, Liu W, Cheng X, et al. Comparison of novel flexible and traditional ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery. World J Urol. 2024;42(1):7.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"10","key":"1976_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1757","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2009.1547","volume":"23","author":"O Negrete-Pulido","year":"2009","unstructured":"Negrete-Pulido O, Gutierrez-Aceves J. Management of infectious complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1757\u201362.","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"1976_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/9354714","volume":"2022","author":"X Qian","year":"2022","unstructured":"Qian X, Liu C, Hong S, Xu J, Qian C, Zhu J, et al. Application of suctioning ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones decreases the risk of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Int J Clin Pract. 2022;2022:9354714.","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pract"},{"key":"1976_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/nrdp.2016.8","volume":"2","author":"SR Khan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, Gambaro G, Canales BK, Doizi S, et al. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16008.","journal-title":"Nat Rev Dis Primers"}],"container-title":["BMC Urology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01976-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01976-4","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01976-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]],"date-time":"2025-12-19T12:32:17Z","timestamp":1766147537000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01976-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1976"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12894-025-01976-4","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-6739619\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1471-2490"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-2490","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 October 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 December 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chi Mei Medical Center (IRB No. 11405-020). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 2013 Declaration of Helsinki.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"303"}}