{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T09:16:53Z","timestamp":1791191813086,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,24]],"date-time":"2023-07-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1690156800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,24]],"date-time":"2023-07-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1690156800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Oral Health"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The accuracy of intraoral scanning plays a crucial role in the workflow of computer-assisted design\/computer-assisted manufacturing. However, data regarding scanning accuracy for inlay preparation designs are lacking. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of the depth of the occlusal cavity and width of the gingival floor of the proximal box on the trueness and precision of intraoral scans for inlay restoration.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Artificial teeth were used in this study. Four types of preparations for mesio-occlusal inlay were performed on each #36 artificial tooth depending on two different depths of the occlusal cavity (1\u00a0mm and 2\u00a0mm) and widths of the gingival floor of the proximal box (1.5\u00a0mm and 2.5\u00a0mm). Artificial teeth were scanned 10 times each with Cerec Primescan AC, and another scan was performed subsequently with a laboratory scanner as a reference (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200910). Standard tessellation language files were analyzed using a three-dimensional analysis software program. Experimental data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni multiple comparison test.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The narrow shallow group had significantly higher deviation values for trueness than the wide deep group (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05). The wide deep group had the lowest average deviation value for trueness and there was no significant difference between the narrow deep and wide shallow groups (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&gt;\u20090.05). For the mean maximum positive deviation, the wide groups had significantly lower values than the narrow groups (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05). Trueness was affected by both the width and depth(\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05), whereas the mean maximum positive deviation was affected by the width (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05). The mean maximum negative deviation was affected by all three factors (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05). Precision was affected by the depth and the interaction between the depth of the occlusal cavity and width of the gingival floor (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The design of different inlay cavity configurations affected the accuracy of the digital intraoral scanner. The highest average deviation for trueness was observed in the narrow shallow group and the lowest in the wide deep group. With regard to precision, the narrow shallow group showed the lowest average deviation, and the narrow deep group showed highest value.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-023-03233-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,24]],"date-time":"2023-07-24T10:02:51Z","timestamp":1690192971000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Yeri","family":"Park","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jae-Hoon","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeong-Kil","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sung-Ae","family":"Son","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"3233_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"590","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2018.06.006","volume":"121","author":"A Goujat","year":"2019","unstructured":"Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, Grosgogeat B. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM inlay\/onlay restorations: a systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):590\u20137.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent."},{"issue":"1","key":"3233_CR2","first-page":"11","volume":"16","author":"A Ender","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning system. Int J Comput Dent. 2013;16(1):11\u201321.","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"3233_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-018-0489-3","volume":"18","author":"R Nedelcu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nystr\u00f6m I, Thor A. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):27.","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"3233_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2020.12.044","volume":"128","author":"SA Son","year":"2022","unstructured":"Son SA, Kim JH, Seo DG, Park JK. Influence of different inlay configurations and distance from the adjacent tooth on the accuracy of an intraoral scan. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(4):680\u2013768.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"6","key":"3233_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.10.013","volume":"124","author":"T Sami","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sami T, Goldstein G, Vafiadis D, Absher T. An in vitro 3D evaluation of the accuracy of 4 intraoral optical scanners on a 6-implant model. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(6):748\u201354.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"3233_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.adaj.2019.10.022","volume":"151","author":"M Zimmermann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zimmermann M, Ender A, Mehl A. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151(2):127\u201335.","journal-title":"J Am Dent Assoc"},{"issue":"9","key":"3233_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13202","volume":"29","author":"Y Ashraf","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ashraf Y, Sabet A, Hamdy A, Ebeid K. Influence of preparation type and tooth geometry on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(9):800\u20134.","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"3233_CR8","unstructured":"International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5725\u20131. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measuring methods and results. Part-I: General principles and definitions International Organization for Standardization, Berlin (1994)."},{"key":"3233_CR9","unstructured":"International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9693\u20131. Dentistry compatibility testing. Part 1: Metal-ceramic systems. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2012. ISO Store Order: OP-184149 (Date: 2017\u201306\u201309)."},{"issue":"5","key":"3233_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.2341\/20-310-L","volume":"46","author":"W Moon","year":"2021","unstructured":"Moon W, Chung SH, Chang J. Effect of deep margin elevation on interfacial gap development of CAD\/CAM Inlays after thermomechanical cycling. Oper Dent. 2021;46(5):529\u201336.","journal-title":"Oper Dent"},{"issue":"3","key":"3233_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13148","volume":"29","author":"R Ammoun","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ammoun R, Suprono MS, Goodare CJ, Oyoyo U, Carrico CK, Kattadiyil MT. Influence of tooth preparation design and scan angulations on the accuracy of two intraoral digital scanners: an in vitro study based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(3):201\u20136.","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"issue":"3","key":"3233_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"400","DOI":"10.2186\/jpr.JPR_D_20_00169","volume":"65","author":"JH Kim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kim JH, Son SA, Lee HJ, Kim JY, Park JK. In vitro analysis of intraoral digital impression of inlay preparation according to tooth location and cavity type. J Prosthodont Res. 2021;65(3):400\u20136.","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"3233_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"826","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12824","volume":"34","author":"JH Kim","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kim JH, Son SA, Lee HJ, Yoo YJ, Hong SJ, Park JK. Influence of adjacent teeth on the accuracy of intraoral scanning systems for class II inlay preparation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(5):826\u201332.","journal-title":"J Esthet Restor Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"3233_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2018.10.025","volume":"123","author":"JM Park","year":"2020","unstructured":"Park JM, Kim JY, Lee KW. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(1):113\u201320.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"3233_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.3390\/ma14020365","volume":"14","author":"SH Shin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shin SH, Yu HS, Cha JY, Kwon JS, Hwang CJ. Scanning accuracy of bracket features and slot base angle in different bracket materials by four intraoral scanners: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(2):365.","journal-title":"Materials (Basel)"},{"key":"3233_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7166","DOI":"10.3390\/app11157166","volume":"11","author":"A Schmidt","year":"2021","unstructured":"Schmidt A, Schlenz MA, Liu H, K\u00e4mpe HS, W\u00f6stmann B. The influence of hard- and software improvement of intraoral scanners on the implant transfer accuracy from 2012 to 2021: an in vitro study. Appl Sci. 2021;11:7166.","journal-title":"Appl Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"3233_CR17","first-page":"17","volume":"25","author":"C Keul","year":"2022","unstructured":"Keul C, G\u00fcth JF. Influence of intraoral conditions on the accuracy of full-arch scans by Cerec Primescan AC: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Int J Comput Dent. 2022;25(1):17\u201325.","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"issue":"5","key":"3233_CR18","first-page":"401","volume":"46","author":"JH Kim","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim SH, Kim WC, Kim HY. Quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression obtained by using an LED blue light in-office CAD\/CAM system. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(5):401\u20137.","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"3233_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1002\/ca.23334","volume":"32","author":"KM Kim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kim KM, Kim JM, Lee YM, Lim YJ, Lee SP. The effect of scanning distance on the accuracy of intra-oral scanners used in dentistry. Clin Anat. 2019;32(3):430\u201343.","journal-title":"Clin Anat"}],"container-title":["BMC Oral Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12903-023-03233-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12903-023-03233-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12903-023-03233-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,17]],"date-time":"2023-12-17T12:01:22Z","timestamp":1702814482000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12903-023-03233-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,24]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3233"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-023-03233-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6831"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6831","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 November 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 July 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 July 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable. None of the human or huma data was used in this study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"515"}}