{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,18]],"date-time":"2026-10-18T08:57:33Z","timestamp":1792313853957,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":69,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]],"date-time":"2025-11-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764374400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,24]],"date-time":"2025-12-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766534400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":25,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Oral Health"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-025-07391-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]],"date-time":"2025-11-29T08:15:27Z","timestamp":1764404127000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Biomechanical evaluation of prosthetic framework materials in subperiosteal implants: a finite element analysis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"25","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-2242-8277","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"B\u00fc\u015franur","family":"Demir","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2286-4657","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ipek","family":"Caglar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"7391_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;CD003815.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003815.pub4"},{"key":"7391_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1016\/S0901-5027(88)80047-X","volume":"17","author":"JI Cawood","year":"1988","unstructured":"Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17:232\u20136.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"7391_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1502","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2021.02.014","volume":"50","author":"P Carosi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Carosi P, Lorenzi C, Lio F, Laureti M, Ferrigno N, Arcuri C. Short implants (\u2264 6 mm) as an alternative treatment option to maxillary sinus lift. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;50:1502\u201310.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"7391_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"938","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2017.02.002","volume":"46","author":"MY Mommaerts","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mommaerts MY. Additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46:938\u201340.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"7391_CR5","volume":"1","author":"M Cerea","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cerea M, Dolcini GA. Custom-made direct metal laser sintering titanium subperiosteal implants: a retrospective clinical study on 70 patients. Biomed Res Int. 2018;1:5420391.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"7391_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2018.08.001","volume":"48","author":"MY Mommaerts","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mommaerts MY. Evolutionary steps in the design and biofunctionalization of the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant \u2018AMSJI\u2019 for the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:108\u201314.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"7391_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1563\/1548-1336-35.1.5","volume":"35","author":"ER Kusek","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kusek ER. The use of laser technology (Er; cr: YSGG) and stereolithography to aid in the placement of a subperiosteal implant: case study. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35:5\u201311.","journal-title":"J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"7391_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/s10006-022-01044-3","volume":"27","author":"G Dimitroulis","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dimitroulis G, Gupta B, Wilson I, Hart C. The atrophic edentulous alveolus: a preliminary study on a new generation of subperiosteal implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;27:69\u201378.","journal-title":"Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"7391_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13005-017-0151-3","volume":"13","author":"NC Gellrich","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gellrich NC, Rahlf B, Zimmerer R, Pott PC, Rana M. A new concept for implant-borne dental rehabilitation: how to overcome the biological weak-spot of conventional dental implants? Head Face Med. 2017;13:1\u20135.","journal-title":"Head Face Med"},{"key":"7391_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/ccr3.8135","volume":"11","author":"M Arshad","year":"2023","unstructured":"Arshad M, Khoramshahi N, Shirani G. Additively custom-made 3D-printed subperiosteal implants for the rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla (a case report). Clin Case Rep. 2023;11:e8135.","journal-title":"Clin Case Rep"},{"key":"7391_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"658","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2017.11.008","volume":"47","author":"M Mounir","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mounir M, Atef M, Abou-Elfetouh A, Hakam MM. Titanium and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) patient-specific sub-periosteal implants: two novel approaches for rehabilitation of the severely atrophic anterior maxillary ridge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:658\u201364.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"7391_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-022-02228-9","volume":"22","author":"AMA Mohamed","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mohamed AMA, Askar MG, El Homossany ME-MB. Stresses induced by one piece and two-piece dental implants in All-on-4\u00ae implant supported prosthesis under simulated lateral occlusal loading: nonlinear finite element analysis study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:196.","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"7391_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13532","volume":"32","author":"W Yu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Yu W, Chen S, Ma L, Ma X, Xu X. Biomechanical analysis of different framework design, framework material and bone density in the edentulous mandible with fixed implant-supported prostheses: a three\u2010dimensional finite element study. J Prosthodont. 2023;32:309\u201317.","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"7391_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13306","volume":"29","author":"BE Pjetursson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pjetursson BE, Valente NA, Strasding M, Zwahlen M, Liu S, Sailer I. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal\u2010ceramic single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:199\u2013214.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"7391_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1078","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13654","volume":"31","author":"B Zeller","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zeller B, St\u00f6ckli S, Zaugg LK, Astasov Frauenhoffer M, Hauser Gerspach I, Waltimo T, et al. Biofilm formation on metal alloys, zirconia and polyetherketoneketone as implant materials in vivo. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31:1078\u201386.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"7391_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-024-04142-8","volume":"24","author":"A Aboelfadl","year":"2024","unstructured":"Aboelfadl A, Keilig L, Ebeid K, Ahmed MAM, Nouh I, Refaie A, Bourauel C. Biomechanical behavior of implant retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla using different materials: a finite element study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:455.","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"7391_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2022.02.018","volume":"127","author":"W Yu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yu W, Li X, Ma X, Xu X. Biomechanical analysis of inclined and cantilever design with different implant framework materials in mandibular complete-arch implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127:783.e1-10.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"7391_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2011.12.007","volume":"40","author":"M Schmitter","year":"2012","unstructured":"Schmitter M, Mueller D, Rues S. Chipping behavior of all-ceramic crowns with zirconia framework and CAD\/CAM manufactured veneer. J Dent. 2012;40:154\u201362.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"7391_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-025-05486-5","volume":"25","author":"SD Hazir","year":"2025","unstructured":"Hazir SD, Sozen YI, Guncu MB, Canay RS. Biomechanical behavior of titanium, cobalt-chromium, zirconia, and PEEK frameworks in implant-supported prostheses: a dynamic finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:97.","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"7391_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-024-04328-0","volume":"24","author":"G Deste G\u00f6kay","year":"2024","unstructured":"Deste G\u00f6kay G, Oyar P, G\u00f6k\u00e7imen G, Durkan R. Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:545.","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"7391_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4700","DOI":"10.1016\/j.msec.2013.07.027","volume":"33","author":"JFS Junior","year":"2013","unstructured":"Junior JFS, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, de Carvalho PS. Stress analysis in bone tissue around single implants with different diameters and veneering materials: a 3-D finite element study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33:4700\u201314.","journal-title":"Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl"},{"key":"7391_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/dj12080241","volume":"12","author":"G Gasparini","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gasparini G, Todaro M, De Angelis P, Boniello R, Saponaro G, Rella E, et al. Clinical outcomes of CAD-CAM subperiosteal implants for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws. Dent J Basel. 2024;12:241.","journal-title":"Dent J Basel"},{"key":"7391_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1563\/aaid-joi-D-24-00045","volume":"50","author":"A Ren\u00e7ber K\u0131z\u0131lkaya","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ren\u00e7ber K\u0131z\u0131lkaya A, Sa\u011fs\u00f6z A, D\u00fcndar S, Bozo\u011flan A, D\u00fcger N, \u00d6zcan EC. Mandibular fixed prosthesis with a 3D-printed subperiosteal implant: a case report. J Oral Implantol. 2024;50:391\u20136.","journal-title":"J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"7391_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s41205-019-0055-x","volume":"6","author":"C Mangano","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mangano C, Bianchi A, Mangano FG, Dana J, Colombo M, Solop I, et al. Custom-made 3D printed subperiosteal titanium implants for the prosthetic restoration of the atrophic posterior mandible of elderly patients: a case series. 3D Print Med. 2020;6:1\u201314.","journal-title":"3D Print Med"},{"key":"7391_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15390","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-94980-1","volume":"11","author":"A Carnicero","year":"2021","unstructured":"Carnicero A, Pel\u00e1ez A, Restoy-Lozano A, Jacquott I, Perera R. Improvement of an additively manufactured subperiosteal implant structure design by finite elements based topological optimization. Sci Rep. 2021;11:15390.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"7391_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics12102531","volume":"12","author":"A Nemtoi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nemtoi A, Covrig V, Nemtoi A, Stoica G, Vatavu R, Haba D, et al. Custom-made direct metal laser sintering titanium subperiosteal implants in oral and maxillofacial surgery for severe bone-deficient patients: a pilot study. Diagnostics. 2022;12:2531.","journal-title":"Diagnostics"},{"key":"7391_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3542","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10163542","volume":"10","author":"C Van den Borre","year":"2021","unstructured":"Van den Borre C, Rinaldi M, De Neef B, Loomans NA, Nout E, Van Doorne L, et al. Radiographic evaluation of bone remodeling after additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implantation (AMSJI) in the maxilla: a one-year follow-up study. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3542.","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"7391_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2024.01.003","volume":"53","author":"LA Vaira","year":"2024","unstructured":"Vaira LA, Biglio A, Favro A, Salzano G, Abbate V, Lechien JR, et al. Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior mandible with additively manufactured custom-made subperiosteal implants: a cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;53:533\u201340.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"7391_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1755","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.89411","volume":"20","author":"M Ayhan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ayhan M, Cankaya AB. Custom-made subperiosteal implants: a finite element analysis on monoblock and dual implant systems in atrophic maxilla. Int J Med Sci. 2023;20:1755\u201362.","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"key":"7391_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/biomedicines12081773","volume":"12","author":"R Zieli\u0144ski","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zieli\u0144ski R, Ko\u0142kowska A, Sowi\u0144ski J, Konieczny B, Kozakiewicz M, Simka W. Workflow for maxilla\/mandible individual [Mai(\u00ae)] implant by Integra Implants: how individual implants are manufactured. Biomedicines. 2024;12:1773.","journal-title":"Biomedicines"},{"key":"7391_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.91620","volume":"21","author":"A Kundakcioglu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kundakcioglu A, Ayhan M. Evaluation of different subperiosteal implant thicknesses on mechanical strength and stress on bone by finite element analysis. Int J Med Sci. 2024;21:1672\u201380.","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"key":"7391_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijom.2021.05.011","volume":"51","author":"E De Moor","year":"2022","unstructured":"De Moor E, Huys SE, van Lenthe GH, Mommaerts MY, Vander Sloten J. Mechanical evaluation of a patient-specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) using finite-element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;51:405\u201311.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"7391_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2595","DOI":"10.7150\/ijms.93225","volume":"21","author":"A Kundakcioglu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kundakcioglu A, Gedik B. Comparison of screws with different diameters in subperiosteal implant application with finite element analysis. Int J Med Sci. 2024;21:2595\u2013602.","journal-title":"Int J Med Sci"},{"key":"7391_CR34","first-page":"S1010","volume":"20","author":"V Ronsivalle","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ronsivalle V, Giudice PL, Santonocito S, Bocchieri S, Giudice R, Battaglia S, et al. Finite element method of subperiosteal implants: a systematic review on Biomechanical performance and stress distribution. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025;20:S1010\u20135182.","journal-title":"J Craniomaxillofac Surg"},{"key":"7391_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1016\/j.msec.2016.07.059","volume":"69","author":"CLB Bhering","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bhering CLB, Mesquita MF, Kemmoku DT, Noritomi PY, Consani RLX, Bar\u00e3o AR. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a prototyping-guided 3D-FEA study. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;69:715\u201325.","journal-title":"Mater Sci Eng C"},{"key":"7391_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"581","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.5369","volume":"30","author":"KS Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee KS, Shin SW, Lee SP, Kim JE, Kim JH, Lee J, et al. Comparative evaluation of a four-implant-supported polyetherketoneketone framework prosthesis: a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on cone beam computed tomography and computer-aided design. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30:581\u20135.","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"7391_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"657","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2002.130613.x","volume":"13","author":"G Tepper","year":"2002","unstructured":"Tepper G, Haas R, Zechner W, Krach W, Watzek G. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:657\u201365.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"7391_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1016\/S0300-5712(02)00065-9","volume":"30","author":"S \u015eahin","year":"2002","unstructured":"\u015eahin S, Cehreli MC, Yal\u00e7\u0131n E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses\u2014a review. J Dent. 2002;30:271\u201382.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"7391_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101290","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jormas.2022.09.011","volume":"124","author":"N Alt\u0131parmak","year":"2023","unstructured":"Alt\u0131parmak N, Polat S, Onat S. Finite element analysis of the Biomechanical effects of titanium and Cfr-peek additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) on maxilla. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;124:101290.","journal-title":"J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"7391_CR40","first-page":"e124","volume":"25","author":"DN Tomruk\u00e7u","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tomruk\u00e7u DN, K\u00f6se TE. Assesment of accessory branches of canalis sinuosus on CBCT images. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;25(1):e124.","journal-title":"Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal"},{"key":"7391_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1568","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2024.07.008","volume":"40","author":"G Oberoi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Oberoi G, Kornfellner E, Aigner DA, Unger E, Schwentenwein M, Bomze D, Moscato F, et al. Design and optimization of a novel patient-specific subperiosteal implant additively manufactured in yttria-stabilized zirconia. Dent Mater. 2024;40:1568\u201374.","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"7391_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.9987","volume":"38","author":"HG Kele\u015f","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kele\u015f HG, Karaca \u00c7. Comparison of stress distribution among standard dental implants placed in grafted bone, zygomatic implants, and subperiosteal implants in the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 3D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023;38:347\u201356.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"7391_CR43","unstructured":"Lekholm U. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. 1th ed. Quintessence; 1985. pp. 199\u2013209."},{"key":"7391_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compbiomed.2017.04.015","volume":"86","author":"Z G\u00fcmr\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc","year":"2017","unstructured":"G\u00fcmr\u00fck\u00e7\u00fc Z, Korkmaz YT, Korkmaz FM. Biomechanical evaluation of implant-supported prosthesis with various tilting implant angles and bone types in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study. Comput Biol Med. 2017;86:47\u201354.","journal-title":"Comput Biol Med"},{"key":"7391_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2005.01162.x","volume":"17","author":"AN Natali","year":"2006","unstructured":"Natali AN, Pavan PG, Ruggero AL. Analysis of bone\u2013implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:67\u201374.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"7391_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2004.12.019","volume":"93","author":"M Sevimay","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kilicarslan MA, Eskitascioglu G. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:227\u201334.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"7391_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2002.130315.x","volume":"13","author":"G Menicucci","year":"2002","unstructured":"Menicucci G, Mossolov A, Mozzati M, Lorenzetti M, Preti G. Tooth\u2013implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:334\u201341.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"7391_CR48","first-page":"571","volume":"15","author":"Y Ciftci","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ciftci Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:571\u201382.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"7391_CR49","volume-title":"Wheeler\u2019s dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion","author":"S Nelson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nelson S. Wheeler\u2019s dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 9th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009.","edition":"9"},{"key":"7391_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pellegrino G, Karaban M, Scalchi V. ve ark. Finite element analysis of functionally loaded subperiosteal implants evaluated on a realistic model reproducing severe atrophic jaws. Methods Protoc. 2025;8:8.","DOI":"10.3390\/mps8010008"},{"key":"7391_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1142","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-025-06426-z","volume":"25","author":"MA El-Sawy","year":"2025","unstructured":"El-Sawy MA, El-Khatib B, Borg HS, et al. Biomechanical effects of digitally constructed titanium, modified polyetheretherketone, and polyetherketoneketone subperiosteal implants on atrophied maxilla: a finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:1142.","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"7391_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1016\/j.msec.2014.02.021","volume":"38","author":"MB Ferreira","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ferreira MB, Colombo EM, de Almeida EO, Consani RL, de Souza Neto MD, Mesquita MF. Non-linear 3D finite element analysis of full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;38:306\u201314.","journal-title":"Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl"},{"key":"7391_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2008.02.015","volume":"36","author":"HL Huang","year":"2008","unstructured":"Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, Tu MG, Ko CC, Shen YW. Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study. J Dent. 2008;36:409\u201317.","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"7391_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7466","DOI":"10.3390\/ma16237466","volume":"16","author":"R Zielinski","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zielinski R, Kosior P, Zi\u00f3\u0142kowski P, et al. Finite element analysis of subperiosteal implants in edentulism\u2014on the basis of the MaI Implant\u00ae by integra Implants\u00ae. Materials. 2023;16:7466.","journal-title":"Materials"},{"key":"7391_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2174\/1874210602115010392","volume":"15","author":"V Van Dam","year":"2021","unstructured":"Van Dam V, Vanhooymissen E, De Moor R, et al. Applications of finite element in implant dentistry and oral rehabilitation. Open Dentistry J. 2021;15:1\u201314.","journal-title":"Open Dentistry J"},{"key":"7391_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jobcr.2014.11.008","volume":"4","author":"S Trivedi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Trivedi S. Finite element analysis: a boon to dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2014;4:200\u20133.","journal-title":"J Oral Biol Craniofac Res"},{"key":"7391_CR57","first-page":"165","volume":"1","author":"T Sugiura","year":"2000","unstructured":"Sugiura T, Horiuchi K, Sugimura M, Tsutsumi S. Evaluation of threshold stress for bone resorption around screws based on vivo strain measurement of miniplate. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2000;1:165\u201370.","journal-title":"J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact"},{"key":"7391_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02550.x","volume":"23","author":"I Naert","year":"2012","unstructured":"Naert I, Duyck J, Vandamme K. Occlusal overload and bone\/implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:95\u2013107.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"7391_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(08)60259-0","volume":"100","author":"L Baggi","year":"2008","unstructured":"Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:422\u201331.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"7391_CR60","first-page":"115","volume":"15","author":"K Ak\u00e7a","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ak\u00e7a K, \u00c7ehreli MC, \u0130plik\u00e7io\u011flu H. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:115\u201321.","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"7391_CR61","first-page":"331","volume":"38","author":"S Kilic","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kilic S, Caglar I. Investigation of stress distribution between two different implant concepts in implant-supported maxillary prostheses with different framework materials: a finite element study. Int J Prosthodont. 2025;38:331\u20138.","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"7391_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-1747955","volume":"17","author":"FR Vieira","year":"2023","unstructured":"Vieira FR, Bitencourt SB, Rosa C, Vieira AB, Dos Santos DM, Goiato MC. Influence of different restoring materials on stress distribution in prosthesis on implants: a review of finite element studies. Eur J Dent. 2023;17:1\u20136.","journal-title":"Eur J Dent"},{"key":"7391_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-020-00267-x","volume":"6","author":"E Ye\u011fin","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ye\u011fin E, Atala MH. Comparison of CAD\/CAM manufactured implant-supported crowns with different analyses. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6:69.","journal-title":"Int J Implant Dent"},{"key":"7391_CR64","first-page":"6255","volume":"15","author":"BE Pjetursson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Br\u00e4gger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years: I. Implant-supported FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:6255\u201342.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"7391_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-849X.2011.00714.x","volume":"20","author":"SM Dogus","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dogus SM, Kurtz KS, Watanabe I, Griggs JA. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw\u2010retained three\u2010unit fixed cantilevered prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2011;20:348\u201354.","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"7391_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0285421","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0285421","volume":"18","author":"E Epifania","year":"2023","unstructured":"Epifania E, di Lauro AE, Ausiello P, Garcia-Godoy F, Mendes Tribst JP. Effect of crown stiffness and prosthetic screw absence on the stress distribution in implant-supported restoration: a 3D finite element analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0285421.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"7391_CR67","volume":"1","author":"B Ebadian","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ebadian B, Fathi A, Tabatabaei S. Stress distribution in 5-unit fixed partial dentures with a pier abutment and rigid and nonrigid connectors with two different occlusal schemes: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Dent. 2023;1:2023:3347197.","journal-title":"Int J Dent"},{"key":"7391_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.3390\/prosthesis6020017","volume":"6","author":"C del Barletta","year":"2024","unstructured":"del Barletta C, Gracia Rodr\u00edguez J, Fidalgo Valverde G, S\u00e1nchez Lasheras F. Extensometry study of the most appropriate position and arrangement of stress-breaker bridges with pier abutment. Prosthesis. 2024;6:216\u201334.","journal-title":"Prosthesis"},{"key":"7391_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1038","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-025-06387-3","volume":"25","author":"B Deniz","year":"2025","unstructured":"Deniz B, Yurttutan ME. Biomechanical evaluation of conventional, zygomatic, zygomatic bone anchored subperiosteal and maxilla anchored subperiosteal implants applied totally edentulous maxilla: finite element stress analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:1038.","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"}],"container-title":["BMC Oral Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12903-025-07391-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12903-025-07391-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12903-025-07391-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,24]],"date-time":"2025-12-24T09:02:25Z","timestamp":1766566945000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s12903-025-07391-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]]},"references-count":69,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["7391"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-025-07391-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6831"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6831","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 July 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 November 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 November 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was reviewed and approved by the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan University during the meeting held on October 10, 2024 (Decision No: 2024\/265). Written informed consent was obtained from the participant included in the study. All procedures were carried out in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"1929"}}