{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,11]],"date-time":"2023-05-11T04:38:47Z","timestamp":1683779927107},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,9]],"date-time":"2023-05-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1683590400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,9]],"date-time":"2023-05-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1683590400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Women's Health"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>\nThe absorption of uterine distention fluid during hysteroscopic endometrial resection can cause volumeoverload, which can lead to coagulation dysfunction, acute left heart failure and pulmonary oedema in patients. The effects of spinal anaesthesia and intravenous general anaesthesia on the absorption of normal saline as uterine distention fluid during hysteroscopic surgery remain unclear. The aim of this clinical trial was toobserve the effects of spinal anaesthesia and intravenous general anaesthesia on the absorption of normal saline in patients undergoing hysteroscopic endometrial resection.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 126 patients undergoing elective hysteroscopic endometrial resection were divided into a spinal anaesthesia group (s group) and a propofol-fentanyl intravenous anaesthesia group (PF group), with 63 cases in each group, and both groups were divided into a short-term group (S<jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub> group and PF<jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub> group) and a long-term group (S<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub> group and PF<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub> group) according to the operation time. The primary outcome was the absorption of normal saline, and the secondary outcomes included the perioperative SBP, DBP, HR and SpO<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub> and postoperative haematocrit values, and the incidence of postoperative complications.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The volume of saline absorbed was significantly increased in the S<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub> and PF<jats:sub>2<\/jats:sub> groups compared with the S<jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub> and PF<jats:sub>1<\/jats:sub> groups (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the amount of normal saline absorbed and the operation time (<jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.895,<jats:italic> P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). The postoperative haematocrit value was slightly lower than that before the operation in all four groups (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05), and there were no differences in the incidences of urinary retention, sinus bradycardia or hypotension between groups (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&gt;\u20090.05).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>There was no difference in the effects of spinal anaesthesia and intravenous general anaesthesia on the absorption of normal saline during hysteroscopic endometrial resection, and the absorption of normal saline increased accordingly with the extension of operation time.\n<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-023-02404-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,10]],"date-time":"2023-05-10T07:31:40Z","timestamp":1683703900000},"update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Effects of spinal anaesthesia and intravenous general anaesthesia on the absorption of normal salinein patients undergoing hysteroscopic endometrial resection: an observational study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Wuchang","family":"Fu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xue","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hongchun","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ting","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fangjun","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"2404_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1210","volume":"224","author":"V Masciullo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Masciullo V, Trivellizzi N, Zannoni G, Catena U, Moroni R, Fanfani F, et al. Prognostic impact of hysteroscopic resection of endometrial atypical hyperplasia-endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia and early-stage cancer in combination with megestrol acetate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(4):408\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2020.12.1210.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2404_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1159\/000499914","volume":"84","author":"HJ Shin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shin HJ, Na HS, Han JY, Hwang JW. A comparison of hemostatic properties between monopolar and bipolar hysteroscopic surgery using rotational thromboelastometry: a randomized trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(6):568\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000499914.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"issue":"3","key":"2404_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.108997","volume":"184","author":"M Goldenberg","year":"2001","unstructured":"Goldenberg M, Cohen SB, Etchin A, Mashiach S, Seidman DS. A randomized prospective comparative study of general versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(3):273\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mob.2001.108997.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2404_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.06.023","volume":"38","author":"EE Moharram","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moharram EE, El Attar AM, Kamel MA. The impact of anesthesia on hemodynamic and volume changes in operative hysteroscopy: a bioimpedance randomized study. J Clin Anesth. 2017;38:59\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinane.2016.06.023.","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"issue":"4","key":"2404_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1273","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.01.083","volume":"91","author":"A Berg","year":"2009","unstructured":"Berg A, Sandvik L, Langebrekke A, Istre O. A randomized trial comparing monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis, Versapoint) using saline, in hysteroscopic surgery. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(4):1273\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.01.083.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"2404_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.12.024","volume":"200","author":"ME Bergeron","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bergeron ME, Beaudet C, Bujold E, Rh\u00e9aume C, Ouellet P, Laberge P. Glycine absorption in operative hysteroscopy: the impact of anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(3):331.e1-5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.12.024.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2404_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.22074\/IJFS.2020.134704","volume":"15","author":"F Genovese","year":"2021","unstructured":"Genovese F, Di Guardo F, Monteleone MM, D\u2019Urso V, Colaleo FM, Leanza V, et al. Hysteroscopy as an investigational operative procedure in primary and secondary infertility: a systematic review. Int J Fertil Steril. 2021;15(2):80\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22074\/IJFS.2020.134704.","journal-title":"Int J Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"11","key":"2404_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1935","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.05.003","volume":"28","author":"S Ilnitsky","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ilnitsky S, McClure A, Vilos G, Vilos A, AbuRafea B, Vinden C, et al. Complication rates after endometrial ablation in ontario: a cohort analysis of 76446 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(11):1935-1940.e4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.05.003.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2404_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.05.003","volume":"113","author":"ME Bergeron","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bergeron ME, Ouellet P, Bujold E, Cote M, Rh\u00e9aume C, Lapointe D, et al. The impact of anesthesia on glycine absorption in operative hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(4):723\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmig.2021.05.003.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2404_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2010.01244.x","volume":"36","author":"AM Darwish","year":"2010","unstructured":"Darwish AM, Hassan ZZ, Attia AM, Abdelraheem SS, Ahmed YM. Biological effects of distension media in bipolar versus monopolar resectoscopic myomectomy: a randomized trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(4):810\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2010.01244.x.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"2404_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2021.1971176","volume":"16","author":"A Vil\u00e0Famada","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vil\u00e0Famada A, Cos Plans R, Costa Canals L, Rojas Torrijos M, Rodr\u00edguez Vicente A, Bainac AA. Outcomes of surgical hysteroscopy: 25 years of observational study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;16:1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01443615.2021.1971176.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"2404_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjae.2021.03.001","volume":"21","author":"H Elahmedawy","year":"2021","unstructured":"Elahmedawy H, Snook NJ. Complications of operative hysteroscopy: an anaesthetist\u2019s perspective. BJA Educ. 2021;21(7):240\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjae.2021.03.001.","journal-title":"BJA Educ"},{"key":"2404_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S249619","volume":"12","author":"N Al-Husban","year":"2020","unstructured":"Al-Husban N, Aloweidi A, Ababneh O. The impact of spinal anesthesia and use of oxytocin on fluid absorption in patients undergoing operative hysteroscopy\ufeff: results from a prospective controlled study. Int J Womens Health. 2020;12:359\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/IJWH.S249619.","journal-title":"Int J Womens Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"2404_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2110","DOI":"10.1080\/07853890.2021.1998596","volume":"53","author":"H Cai","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cai H, Wu X, Chen X, Chen W. Comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study. Ann Med. 2021;53(1):2110\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07853890.2021.1998596.","journal-title":"Ann Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"2404_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.009","volume":"29","author":"PM McGurgan","year":"2015","unstructured":"McGurgan PM, McIlwaine P. Complications of hysteroscopy and how to avoid them. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(7):982\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.009.","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"}],"container-title":["BMC Women's Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12905-023-02404-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12905-023-02404-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12905-023-02404-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,10]],"date-time":"2023-05-10T07:33:14Z","timestamp":1683703994000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12905-023-02404-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,9]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2404"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12905-023-02404-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6874"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6874","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 January 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 April 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 May 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This observational clinical study was approved by the ethics committee of Nanchong Central Hospital Affiliated to North Sichuan Medical College (IRB2022.002) and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ExternalRef removed; Principal investigator: Wuchang Fu, Date of registration: 09\/02\/2022, Registration number: ChiCTR2200056605) prior to patient enrolment. All procedures performed in this study followed ethical standards of research and the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants received oral and written information about the observational study prior to inclusion and signed informed consent.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"240"}}