{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T20:11:37Z","timestamp":1773173497535,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,18]],"date-time":"2025-03-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742256000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,18]],"date-time":"2025-03-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742256000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Women's Health"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-025-03643-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,18]],"date-time":"2025-03-18T05:09:31Z","timestamp":1742274571000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison of concomitant hysterectomy and uterine preservation for pelvic floor reconstruction using transvaginal mesh in the treatment of POP: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"25","author":[{"given":"Jicheng","family":"Lou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Feng","family":"Guo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"3643_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1617","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1","volume":"28","author":"SA de Oliveira","year":"2017","unstructured":"de Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Gir\u00e3o MJBC, Roque MT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1617\u201330.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"3643_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","volume":"89","author":"AL Olsen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3643_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.02023.x","volume":"116","author":"B Feiner","year":"2009","unstructured":"Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C. Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG. 2009;116(1):15\u201324.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"3643_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1016\/j.maturitas.2022.07.013","volume":"165","author":"G Capobianco","year":"2022","unstructured":"Capobianco G, Sechi I, Muresu N, Saderi L, Piana A, Farina M, et al. Native tissue repair (NTR) versus transvaginal mesh interventions for the treatment of anterior vaginal prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2022;165:104\u201312.","journal-title":"Maturitas"},{"issue":"2","key":"3643_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2021.01.031","volume":"60","author":"MJ Sun","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sun MJ, Chuang YL, Lau HH, Lo TS, Su TH. The efficacy and complications of using transvaginal mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse in Taiwan: A 10-year review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;60(2):187\u201392.","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3643_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.04.029","volume":"158","author":"TA de Boer","year":"2011","unstructured":"de Boer TA, Slieker-Ten Hove MC, Burger CW, Kluivers KB, Vierhout ME. The prevalence and factors associated with previous surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and\/or urinary incontinence in a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;158(2):343\u20139.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3643_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2010.01145.x","volume":"50","author":"R Vanspauwen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Vanspauwen R, Seman E, Dwyer P. Survey of current management of prolapse in Australia and new Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(3):262\u20137.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"3643_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.07.035","volume":"213","author":"BM Ridgeway","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ridgeway BM. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):802\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"3643_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","volume":"24","author":"R Gutman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gutman R, Maher C. Uterine-preserving POP surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1803\u201313.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"3643_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1111\/luts.12408","volume":"14","author":"KH Huang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Huang KH, Chen WH, Yang TH, Wu LY, Chang YW, Chuang FC. Comparison of prolift, Perigee-Apogee, prosima, and elevate transvaginal mesh systems in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: clinical outcomes of a long-term observational study. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2022;14(1):47\u201356.","journal-title":"Low Urin Tract Symptoms"},{"issue":"1","key":"3643_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1513-1","volume":"23","author":"LC Chu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chu LC, Chuang FC, Kung FT, Huang KH. Comparison of short-term outcomes following pelvic reconstruction with perigee and apogee systems: hysterectomy or not? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(1):79\u201384.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3643_CR12","first-page":"3074","volume":"6","author":"LB Xia","year":"2012","unstructured":"Xia LB, Xue XX, Zhang QR, Wang Q. The efficacy of prolift in the treatment of POP. Chin J Clin. 2012;6:3074\u201375.","journal-title":"Chin J Clin"},{"key":"3643_CR13","first-page":"1050","volume":"12","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Wang D, Pan CQ, Ma Y, Zhang L. Comparison of the therapeutic effectiveness and impact to life quality of uterus-reserved or hysterectomized total pelvic floor reconstruction. J Pract Obstet Gynecol. 2012;12:1050\u201353.","journal-title":"J Pract Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3643_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1830-z","volume":"24","author":"GP McLennan","year":"2013","unstructured":"McLennan GP, Sirls LT, Killinger KA, Nikolavsky D, Boura JA, Fischer MC, et al. Perioperative experience of pelvic organ prolapse repair with the prolift and elevate vaginal mesh procedures. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(2):287\u201394.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"3643_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318298b381","volume":"19","author":"LT Sirls","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sirls LT, McLennan GP, Killinger KA, Boura JA, Fischer M, Nagaraju P, et al. Exploring predictors of mesh exposure after vaginal prolapse repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(4):206\u20139.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"3643_CR16","first-page":"48","volume":"33","author":"H Yang","year":"2014","unstructured":"Yang H, Han L, Yu XH. Clinical efficacy of uterus conservation and hysterectomy in pelvic reconstructive surgery. Chin J Mod Med. 2014;33:48\u201353.","journal-title":"Chin J Mod Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"3643_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000180","volume":"21","author":"EJ Stanford","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stanford EJ, Moore RD, Roovers JP, VanDrie DM, Giudice TP, Lukban JC, et al. Elevate and uterine preservation: Two-Year results. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(4):205\u201310.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"3643_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2630-z","volume":"26","author":"LY Huang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Huang LY, Chu LC, Chiang HJ, Chuang FC, Kung FT, Huang KH. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with prolift\u2122 mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(7):1013\u201320.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"3643_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9438","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-27765-8","volume":"21","author":"CR Ker","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ker CR, Lin KL, Loo ZX, Juan YS, Long CY. Comparison of UpholdTM vaginal mesh procedure with hysterectomy or uterine preservation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Sci Rep. 2018;21(1):9438.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"3643_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2019.11.006","volume":"59","author":"YL Li","year":"2020","unstructured":"Li YL, Chang YW, Yang TH, Wu LY, Chuang FC, Kung FT, et al. Mesh-related complications in single-incision transvaginal mesh (TVM) and laparoscopic abdominal sacrocolpopexy (LASC). Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(1):43\u201350.","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3643_CR21","first-page":"71","volume":"03","author":"Q Li","year":"2022","unstructured":"Li Q, Lin XY, Liu TH, Li XW, Fan MZ, Zhao RR. Medium- and long-term efficacy of transvaginal mesh pelvic floor reconstruction. J Shandong Uni. 2022;03:71\u20136.","journal-title":"J Shandong Uni"},{"issue":"2","key":"3643_CR22","first-page":"CD012079","volume":"2","author":"C Maher","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD012079.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"3643_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2011.01647.x","volume":"38","author":"KH Huang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Huang KH, Chuang FC, Fu HC, Kung FT. Polypropylene mesh as an alternative option for uterine preservation in pelvic reconstruction in patients with uterine prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38(1):97\u2013101.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"3643_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e4701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","volume":"209","author":"NB Korbly","year":"2013","unstructured":"Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, Richardson ML, Book NM, Yip S, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):e4701\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"3643_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1917","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04913-9","volume":"33","author":"L He","year":"2022","unstructured":"He L, Feng D, Zha X, Liao XY, Gong ZL, Gu DQ, et al. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(7):1917\u201325.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3643_CR26","first-page":"217","volume":"24","author":"D Barski","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barski D, Otto T, Gerullis H. Systematic review and classification of complications after anterior, posterior, apical, and total vaginal mesh implantation for prolapse repair. Surg Technol Int. 2014;24:217\u201324.","journal-title":"Surg Technol Int"},{"issue":"6","key":"3643_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e6781","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.07.049","volume":"199","author":"RU Margulies","year":"2008","unstructured":"Margulies RU, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Fenner DE, McGuire EJ, Clemens JQ, Delancey JO. Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):e6781\u20134.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3643_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1265-3","volume":"22","author":"J an-Kim","year":"2011","unstructured":"an-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Prevalence and risk factors for mesh erosion after laparoscopic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(2):205\u201312.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"3643_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2294-5","volume":"25","author":"TH Su","year":"2014","unstructured":"Su TH, Lau HH, Huang WC, Hsieh CH, Chang RC, Su CH. Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: results of a cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):901\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"3643_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1542-9","volume":"22","author":"CM Maher","year":"2011","unstructured":"Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(11):1445\u201357.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"3643_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.13654","volume":"44","author":"M Kinjo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kinjo M, Yoshimura Y, Kitagawa Y, Okegawa T, Nutahara K. Sexual activity and quality of life in Japanese pelvic organ prolapse patients after transvaginal mesh surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(7):1302\u20137.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"3643_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2008.01.013","volume":"139","author":"D De Vita","year":"2008","unstructured":"De Vita D, Araco F, Gravante G, Sesti F, Piccione E. Vaginal reconstructive surgery for severe pelvic organ prolapses: a \u2018uterine-sparing\u2019 technique using polypropylene prostheses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(2):245\u201351.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"9","key":"3643_CR33","first-page":"669","volume":"50","author":"CJ Jeng","year":"2005","unstructured":"Jeng CJ, Yang YC, Tzeng CR, Shen J, Wang LR. Sexual functioning after vaginal hysterectomy or transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension for uterine prolapse: a comparison. J Reprod Med. 2005;50(9):669\u201374.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"3643_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0520-8","volume":"19","author":"V Dietz","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dietz V, Huisman M, de Jong JM, Heintz PM, van der Vaart CH. Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(6):747\u201352.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"7","key":"3643_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1111\/iju.13984","volume":"26","author":"SG Gonocruz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gonocruz SG, Hayashi T, Tokiwa S, Sawada Y, Okada Y, Yoshio Y, Krisna R, Kitagawa Y, Shimizu Y, Nomura M. Transvaginal surgery using self-cut mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: 3-year clinical outcomes. Int J Urol. 2019;26(7):731\u20136.","journal-title":"Int J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3643_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13520","volume":"98","author":"NK Mattsson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mattsson NK, Karjalainen P, Tolppanen AM, Heikkinen AM, Jalkanen J, H\u00e4rkki P, et al. Methods of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in a nationwide cohort (FINPOP 2015). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(4):451\u20139.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"10069","key":"3643_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)32572-7","volume":"11","author":"JR Morling","year":"2017","unstructured":"Morling JR, McAllister DA, Agur W, Fischbacher CM, Glazener CM, Guerrero K, Hopkins L, Wood R. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997\u20132016: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2017;11(10069):629\u201340.","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["BMC Women's Health"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12905-025-03643-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12905-025-03643-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12905-025-03643-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,21]],"date-time":"2025-04-21T03:52:47Z","timestamp":1745207567000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12905-025-03643-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,18]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3643"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12905-025-03643-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6874"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6874","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 November 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 February 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 March 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 April 2025","order":4,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Update","order":5,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The original online version of this article was revised: the sequence of \u201cThe Central Hospital of Wuhan\u201d and \u201cTongji Medical College\u201d has been inadvertently reversed in the affiliations and  has been updated.","order":6,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable because this study is a review article and a meta-analysis.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"124"}}