{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,21]],"date-time":"2026-09-21T16:19:29Z","timestamp":1790007569927,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]],"date-time":"2022-07-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1657670400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]],"date-time":"2022-07-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1657670400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Educ"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Well performed clinical communication is a cornerstone of collaborative care in medicine but may be confounded by inconsistent intentions of the messenger and biased interpretation by the recipient. A comparison of the findings of electronic echocardiography reports with clinician-completed standardised request forms provided an opportunity to assess communication quality.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The study aimed to determine clinician aptitude to complete written echocardiography referral forms by assessing the completeness, appropriateness, accuracy, and coherency of the reported clinical findings, conclusions and requests made on the referral forms. The study explored factors that may influence the quality of communication through this referral medium.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent trans-thoracic echocardiography imaging at Cecilia Makiwane Hospital in East London over 26\u2009months. Paper echocardiography request forms that recorded the requesting clinician\u2019s findings on examination, the provisional clinical diagnosis, and the specific echocardiographic information sought, were compared with the actual findings on echocardiography.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Of 613 request forms reviewed, 97 cases were excluded due to illegibility or because they lacked analysable information or requester details, leaving 516 forms suitable for study. No pathology was found on echocardiography in 31%. Of the murmurs expected from the echocardiography findings, only half were recorded on the request form (sensitivity and positive predictive value both 52%.). Only 35% of request forms that mentioned a mitral systolic murmur gave a working diagnosis of mitral regurgitation and only 38% of request forms that mentioned an aortic systolic murmur considered aortic stenosis. Clinically suspected cardiomyopathy (CMO) had a PPV of 43% and echocardiographic CMO was missed clinically in 41%. Apex beat displacement reported clinically was not associated with echocardiographic LV dilatation in 65% of cases. One-third (34%) of forms reporting murmurs did not request valve function assessment and 17% considering cardiomyopathy did not request left ventricular function assessment.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Echocardiography request forms highlight vulnerabilities in clinical communication. Specifically, important clinical features were missing and more concerningly, included when unlikely to be present. There was a lack of concordance between recorded clinical findings and postulated diagnoses. Clinicians sometimes appeared unclear about the value or appropriateness of the requested assistance. Greater emphasis on teaching examination and communication skills may foster safer and more efficient use of scarce resources.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-022-03602-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]],"date-time":"2022-07-13T06:11:00Z","timestamp":1657692660000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Reasonable requests: echocardiography referral forms as a measure of coherent clinical communication"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"C.","family":"Kotz\u00e9","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Parrish","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"3602_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1257","DOI":"10.1111\/ijcp.12686","volume":"69","author":"P Vermeir","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vermeir P, Vandijck D, Degroote S, Peleman R, Verhaeghe R, Mortier E, et al. Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69(11):1257\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ijcp.12686.","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pract"},{"issue":"1","key":"3602_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.7861\/clinmedicine.19-1-16","volume":"19","author":"E Banham","year":"2019","unstructured":"Banham E, Stevens S. Hindsight bias critically impacts on clinicians\u2019assessment of care qualitiy in retrospective case note review. Clin Med. 2019;19(1):16\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7861\/clinmedicine.19-1-16.","journal-title":"Clin Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"3602_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1093\/ehjci\/jeu299","volume":"16","author":"M Garbi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Garbi M, McDonagh T, Cosyns B, et al. Appropriateness criteria for cardiovascular imaging use in heart failure: report of literature review. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(2):147\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ehjci\/jeu299.","journal-title":"Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging"},{"issue":"1","key":"3602_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1186\/1749-8090-6-94","volume":"6","author":"W Wu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wu W, Luo X, Wang L, Sun X, Jiang Y, Huo S, et al. The accuracy of echocardiography versus surgical and pathological classification of patients with ruptured mitral chordae tendineae: a large study in a Chinese cardiovascular center. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6(1):94. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1749-8090-6-94.","journal-title":"J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"3602_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ahj.2007.10.045","volume":"155","author":"JL Guti\u00e9rrez-Chico","year":"2008","unstructured":"Guti\u00e9rrez-Chico JL, Zamorano G\u00f3mez JL, Rodrigo-L\u00f3pez JL, Mataix L, P\u00e9rez de Isla L, Almer\u00eda-Valera C, et al. Accuracy of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography in the assessment of mitral prolapse. Is transesophageal echocardiography still mandatory? Am Heart J. 2008;155(4):694\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ahj.2007.10.045.","journal-title":"Am Heart J"},{"issue":"9","key":"3602_CR6","first-page":"501","volume":"44","author":"A Khatouri","year":"1995","unstructured":"Khatouri A, Kendoussi M, Elyounassi B, Krami B, Nazzi M, Zbir E, et al. Correlation between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and surgery in mitral stenosis. Ann Cardiol Angeiol. 1995;44(9):501\u20136 Nov.","journal-title":"Ann Cardiol Angeiol"},{"key":"3602_CR7","unstructured":"Caruana M, Fenech A, Tilney T, et al. Requesting of non-urgent adult transthoracic echocardiograms. Online J Clin Audits. 2010;2(4)."},{"issue":"9","key":"3602_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"516","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04926.x","volume":"177","author":"MHN Tattersall","year":"2002","unstructured":"Tattersall MHN, Butow PN, Brown JE, Thompson JF. Improving doctors\u2019 letters. Med J Aust. 2002;177(9):516\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04926.x.","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"issue":"10","key":"3602_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjmed.2010.04.027","volume":"123","author":"S McGee","year":"2010","unstructured":"McGee S. Etiology and diagnosis of systolic murmurs in adults. Am J Mend. 2010;123(10):913\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.amjmed.2010.04.027.","journal-title":"Am J Mend"},{"issue":"5","key":"3602_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1093\/qjmed\/90.5.335","volume":"90","author":"JJVM Murray","year":"1997","unstructured":"Murray JJVM. Assessing diagnosis in heart failure: which features are any use\u00a0? QJM. 1997;90(5):335\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/qjmed\/90.5.335.","journal-title":"QJM."},{"issue":"1","key":"3602_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13019-021-01711-8","volume":"16","author":"JM Njem","year":"2021","unstructured":"Njem JM, Edwin F, Tettey M. Comparison of preoperative trans-thoracic echocardiography with intraoperative findings in patients with congenital heart disease undergoing surgery: a prospective observational study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16(1):1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13019-021-01711-8.","journal-title":"J Cardiothorac Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"3602_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"626","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1525-1497.2000.91119.x","volume":"15","author":"TK Gandhi","year":"2000","unstructured":"Gandhi TK, Sittig DF, Franklin M, Sussman AJ, Fairchild DG, Bates DW. Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(9):626\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1525-1497.2000.91119.x.","journal-title":"J Gen Intern Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"3602_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1177\/1062860609332512","volume":"24","author":"LA Riesenberg","year":"2009","unstructured":"Riesenberg LA, Leitzsch J, Little BW. Systematic review of handoff mnemonics literature. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24(3):196\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1062860609332512.","journal-title":"Am J Med Qual"},{"issue":"1","key":"3602_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehx493.P5437","volume":"38","author":"SKM Gardezi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gardezi SKM, Myerson SG, Prendergast B, et al. Cardiac auscultation in diagnosing valvular heart disease: a comparison between general practitioners and cardiologists. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(1):1155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/eurheartj\/ehx493.P5437.","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"3602_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.5694\/mja13.10520","volume":"199","author":"KV Roberts","year":"2013","unstructured":"Roberts KV, Brown ADH, Maguire GP, Atkinson DN, Carapetis JR. (2013), utility of auscultatory screening for detecting rheumatic heart disease in high-risk children in Australia's Northern Territory. Med J Aust. 2013;199:196\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5694\/mja13.10520.","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"issue":"8635","key":"3602_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(89)90004-4","volume":"1","author":"TW O\u2019Neill","year":"1989","unstructured":"O\u2019Neill TW, Barry M, Smith M, Graham IM. Diagnostic value of the apex beat. Lancet. 1989;1(8635):410\u20131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736(89)90004-4.","journal-title":"Lancet."},{"key":"3602_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.2147\/CEOR.S195597","volume":"11","author":"A Azamar-Alonso","year":"2019","unstructured":"Azamar-Alonso A, Costa AP, Huebner LA, Tarride JE. Electronic referral systems in health care: a scoping review. Clin Outcomes Res. 2019;11:325\u201333 10.21S47\/CEOR.S195597.","journal-title":"Clin Outcomes Res"},{"key":"3602_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6920-7-13","volume":"7","author":"E Keely","year":"2007","unstructured":"Keely E, Myers K, Dojeiji S, Campbell DC. Peer assessment of outpatient consultation letters: feasibility and satisfaction. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6920-7-13.","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Education"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12909-022-03602-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12909-022-03602-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12909-022-03602-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]],"date-time":"2022-07-13T06:11:35Z","timestamp":1657692695000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12909-022-03602-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3602"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12909-022-03602-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6920"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6920","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 August 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 June 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 July 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Ethics committee: Cecilia Makiwane and Frere hospitals research ethics committee.Protocol reference number: fcmhrec\/a088\/2021.Protocol status: approved.Consent was not required from participants. Data sources were reviewed retrospectively. The data was anonymized and access to initial data sources were secured and limited to the authors. The Cecilia Makiwane and Frere hospitals research ethics committee approved the waiver for consent.All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"538"}}