{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T02:03:08Z","timestamp":1784253788781,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":79,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,20]],"date-time":"2026-05-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779235200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784246400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":58,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001871","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["DOI 10.54499\/2021.05232.BD"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["DOI 10.54499\/2021.05232.BD"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Ethics"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Healthcare providers (HCPs) play a pivotal role in shaping access to and ethical deliberation around fertility preservation. While fertility preservation due to oncological and non-oncological diseases is widely accepted, its use for other reasons, such as career development, gender transition, or military deployment, raises ethical and professional questions. This study aimed to explore the attitudes of HCPs in Portugal towards fertility preservation across different indications and to identify professional factors associated with variations in perceived support.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We conducted a cross-sectional observational study using an anonymous online questionnaire administered via Lime Survey between October 2024 and March 2025. A total of 298 HCPs working in Portugal were recruited through judgment sampling. Data on HCPs\u2019 level of agreement with the use of fertility preservation for eight indications, as well as on their sociodemographic and professional characteristics, were collected. Descriptive analyses and bivariate comparisons were performed to explore levels of support and associated factors.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Support for fertility preservation was highest for cancer (96.3%), infertility (93.3%), benign diseases (91.3%), prevention of genetic diseases (86.3%), and age-related fertility loss (79.8%). In contrast, lower levels of support were observed for gender transition (50.7%), career development (44.3%), and active military service or deployment (41.9%), with approximately one-third of participants expressing neither agree nor disagree positions. Attitudes towards these ethically more contested indications were significantly associated with professional characteristics, including involvement with peers and patients, occupation group, working setting, and years of experience.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>HCPs in Portugal show strong support for fertility preservation in diseases contexts but reveal ambivalence regarding its use for gender transition, career development, and military purposes. This variability reflects ongoing attitudinal uncertainty and suggests that professional experience and clinical context may influence ethical positioning. Targeted educational and ethical reflection initiatives may help support HCPs in addressing the ethical, social, and technical complexities associated with fertility preservation across different contexts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-026-01477-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,20]],"date-time":"2026-05-20T06:23:23Z","timestamp":1779258203000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Attitudes of healthcare providers towards fertility preservation in Portugal: perceived support across indications and their ethical implications"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"27","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5543-9326","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alla","family":"Tirsina","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Susana","family":"Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cl\u00e1udia","family":"de Freitas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"8","key":"1477_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0284099","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0284099","volume":"18","author":"JF Aderaldo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Aderaldo JF, Rodrigues de Albuquerque BHD, de C\u00e2mara MTF, de Medeiros Garcia Torres M, Lanza DCF. Main topics in assisted reproductive market: A scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(8):e0284099. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0284099.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"1477_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anderson RA, Amant F, Braat D, D\u2019Angelo A, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, Demeestere I, Dwek S, Frith L, Lambertini M, Maslin C, et al. ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;4hoaa052. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa052.","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa052"},{"key":"1477_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1108\/9781787564831","volume-title":"Egg freezing, fertility and reproductive choice: Negotiating responsibility, hope and modern motherhood","author":"K Baldwin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Baldwin K. Egg freezing, fertility and reproductive choice: Negotiating responsibility, hope and modern motherhood. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2019."},{"key":"1477_CR4","unstructured":"European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and Fertility Europe. A policy audit on fertility. Analysis of 9 EU countries. 2017. Available from: https:\/\/fertilityeurope.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/EPAF_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2025."},{"issue":"4","key":"1477_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1111\/jorc.12079","volume":"40","author":"SD Miller","year":"2014","unstructured":"Miller SD, Li Y, Meyers KE, Caplan A, Miller VA, Ginsberg JP. Fertility preservation in paediatric nephrology: results of a physician survey. J Ren Care. 2014;40(4):257\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jorc.12079.","journal-title":"J Ren Care"},{"issue":"12","key":"1477_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1579","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13984","volume":"99","author":"F Nawroth","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nawroth F, Sch\u00fcring AN, von Wolff M. The indication for fertility preservation in women with Turner syndrome should not only be based on the ovarian reserve but also on the genotype and expected future health status. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(12):1579\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13984.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"1477_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmz026","volume":"25","author":"S Baram","year":"2019","unstructured":"Baram S, Myers SA, Yee S, Librach CL. Fertility preservation for transgender adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(6):694\u2013716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmz026.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"1","key":"1477_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-019-3901-z","volume":"19","author":"B Speller","year":"2019","unstructured":"Speller B, Sissons A, Daly C, Facey M, Kennedy E, Metcalfe K, Baxter NN. An evaluation of oncofertility decision support resources among breast cancer patients and health care providers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-019-3901-z.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"1477_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-022-06616-y","volume":"307","author":"N S\u00e4nger","year":"2023","unstructured":"S\u00e4nger N, Menabrito M, Di Spiezo Sardo A, Estadella J, Verguts J. Fertility preservation counselling for women with endometriosis: a European online survey. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(1):73\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-022-06616-y.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"1477_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoad012","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoad012","volume":"2023","author":"P Santulli","year":"2023","unstructured":"Santulli P, Blockeel C, Bourdon M, Coticchio G, Campbell A, De Vos M, et al. Fertility preservation in women with benign gynaecological conditions. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023(2):hoad012. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoad012.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"1477_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jadohealth.2018.08.025","volume":"64","author":"D Chen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chen D, Kolbuck VD, Sutter ME, Tishelman AC, Quinn GP, Nahata L, Knowledge. Practice Behaviors, and Perceived Barriers to Fertility Care Among Providers of Transgender Healthcare. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(2):226\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jadohealth.2018.08.025.","journal-title":"J Adolesc Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"1477_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.02.006","volume":"115","author":"A Cobo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cobo A, Garc\u00eda-Velasco JA, Remoh\u00ed J, Pellicer A. Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation for both medical and nonmedical reasons. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(5):1091\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.02.006.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"1477_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2024.01.003","volume":"121","author":"D Cimadomo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cimadomo D, Cobo A, Galliano D, Fiorentino G, Marconetto A, Zuccotti M, Rienzi L. Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation, an evolving practice requiring a new mindset: societal, technical, clinical aspects and basic science-driven evolutions. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(4):555\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2024.01.003.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"1477_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"624","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa320","volume":"36","author":"M Johnston","year":"2021","unstructured":"Johnston M, Richings NM, Leung A, Sakkas D, Catt S. A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA, Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(6):624\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa320.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"9","key":"1477_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1935","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01541-7","volume":"36","author":"S Nasab","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nasab S, Shah JS, Nurudeen K, Jooya ND, Abdallah ME, Sibai BM. Physicians\u2019 attitudes towards using elective oocyte cryopreservation to accommodate the demands of their career. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(9):1935\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-019-01541-7.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"1477_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1186\/s40504-019-0092-7","volume":"15","author":"P Tozzo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tozzo P, Fassina A, Nespeca P, Spigarolo G, Caenazzo L. Understanding social oocyte freezing in Italy: a scoping survey on university female students\u2019 awareness and attitudes. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2019;15(1):3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40504-019-0092-7.","journal-title":"Life Sci Soc Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"1477_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.12.030","volume":"121","author":"Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Planned oocyte cryopreservation to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2024;121(4):604\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.12.030.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"05\/06","key":"1477_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1701633","volume":"37","author":"AE Martini","year":"2019","unstructured":"Martini AE, Doyle JO. Fertility preservation before deployment: oocyte and sperm freezing in members of the active duty military. Semin Reprod Med. 2019;37(05\/06):232\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0040-1701633.","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"1477_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1186\/1742-4755-11-37","volume":"11","author":"J Kocourkova","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kocourkova J, Burcin B, Kucera T. Demographic relevancy of increased use of assisted reproduction in European countries. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):37. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1742-4755-11-37.","journal-title":"Reprod Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"1477_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13573","volume":"98","author":"A Alteri","year":"2019","unstructured":"Alteri A, Pisaturo V, Nogueira D, D\u2019Angelo A. Elective egg freezing without medical indications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(5):647\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13573.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"5","key":"1477_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"558","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmae009","volume":"30","author":"A Hirsch","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hirsch A, Hirsh Raccah B, Rotem R, Hyman JH, Ben-Ami I, Tsafrir A. Planned oocyte cryopreservation: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2024;30(5):558\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmae009.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"5","key":"1477_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.07.201","volume":"100","author":"B Hodes-Wertz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1343\u2013e13491342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.07.201.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"1477_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13763","volume":"99","author":"BP Jones","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jones BP, Kasaven L, L\u2019Heveder A, Jalmbrant M, Green J, Makki M, Odia R, Norris G, Bracewell Milnes T, Saso S, et al. Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross-sectional survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(3):324\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13763.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"1477_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1889","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-024-07654-4","volume":"310","author":"S Klipstein","year":"2024","unstructured":"Klipstein S, Kelly L, Lalwani S. No guarantees: planned oocyte cryopreservation, not quite an insurance policy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;310(4):1889\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-024-07654-4.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"1477_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dafopoulos K. Advantages of cryopreservation for fertility preservation due to age-related fertility loss. Glob Reprod Health. 2024;9(3): e0084. Available from: https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/grh\/fulltext\/2024\/06010\/advantages_of_cryopreservation_for_fertility.6.aspx","DOI":"10.1097\/GRH.0000000000000084"},{"issue":"1","key":"1477_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmr040","volume":"18","author":"L Schmidt","year":"2012","unstructured":"Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, Nyboe Andersen A. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(1):29\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmr040.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"1477_CR27","first-page":"59","volume":"5","author":"KA Harwood","year":"2015","unstructured":"Harwood KA. On the ethics of social egg freezing and fertility preservation for nonmedical reasons. Med Bioeth. 2015;5:59\u201367.","journal-title":"Med Bioeth"},{"issue":"1","key":"1477_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-025-01216-2","volume":"26","author":"S Surendran","year":"2025","unstructured":"Surendran S, Toh HJ, Voo TC, De Foo C, Dunn M. A scoping review of the ethical issues in gender-affirming care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals. BMC Med Ethics. 2025;26(1):54. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12910-025-01216-2.","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"1477_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1177\/09685332221108571","volume":"22","author":"J Dadiya","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dadiya J. Medical need and medicalisation in funding assisted reproduction: A right to health analysis. Med Law Int. 2022;22(3):249\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09685332221108571.","journal-title":"Med Law Int"},{"key":"1477_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mertes H, Pennings G. Ethical considerations of fertility preservation. Female and male fertility preservation. Springer; 2022. pp. 627\u201340.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-47767-7_46"},{"issue":"12","key":"1477_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4568","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.17472","volume":"33","author":"DYB Cheong","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cheong DYB, Pereira TLB, Huang Z, Shorey S. Navigating Uncharted Waters: A Mixed Studies Systematic Review of Elective Female Fertility Preservation for Women. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(12):4568\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jocn.17472.","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"issue":"12","key":"1477_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1959","DOI":"10.1007\/s10147-024-02614-z","volume":"29","author":"M Ono","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ono M, Takai Y, Harada M, Horie A, Dai Y, Kikuchi E, Miyachi M, Yamamoto T, Fujii N, Kajiyama H. Out-of-pocket fertility preservation expenses: data from a Japanese nationwide multicenter survey. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024;29(12):1959\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10147-024-02614-z.","journal-title":"Int J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1477_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0094","DOI":"10.1097\/grh.0000000000000094","volume":"9","author":"R Kennedy","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kennedy R. Education in reproductive medicine. Glob Reprod Health. 2024;9(4):e0094. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/grh.0000000000000094.","journal-title":"Glob Reprod Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"1477_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1007\/s11019-017-9805-y","volume":"21","author":"J S\u00e1ndor","year":"2018","unstructured":"S\u00e1ndor J, Vicsek L, Bauer Z. Let us talk about eggs! Professional resistance to elective egg vitrification and gendered medical paternalism. Med Health Care Philos. 2018;21(3):311\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11019-017-9805-y.","journal-title":"Med Health Care Philos"},{"key":"1477_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-96-4158-1_3","volume-title":"Ethical Assemblages of Artificial Intelligence: Controversies, Uncertainties, and Networks","author":"H Machado","year":"2025","unstructured":"Machado H, Silva S. The Evolving Scenarios of Artificial Intelligence in Assisted Reproductive Technologies. In: Machado H, Silva S, editors. Ethical Assemblages of Artificial Intelligence: Controversies, Uncertainties, and Networks. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2025. pp. 73\u2013114."},{"key":"1477_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbms.2017.08.001","volume":"5","author":"R Klitzman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Klitzman R. Gatekeepers for infertility treatment? Views of ART providers concerning referrals by non-ART providers. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018;5:17\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbms.2017.08.001.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Soc Online"},{"issue":"5","key":"1477_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmaf014","volume":"31","author":"A Tirsina","year":"2025","unstructured":"Tirsina A, de Freitas C, Silva S. Awareness and attitudes toward fertility preservation among healthcare providers: a scoping review of quantitative evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2025;31(5):497\u2013511. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmaf014.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"1477_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lazzari E, Compans M-C, Beaujouan E. Changing childbearing age norms in Europe in times of fertility postponement. SocArXiv. 2022. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31235\/osf","DOI":"10.31235\/osf.io\/xbheq"},{"issue":"9","key":"1477_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2495","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-024-03210-w","volume":"41","author":"I Alon","year":"2024","unstructured":"Alon I, Bussod I, Golan OC, Ravitsky V. Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of fertility preservation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024;41(9):2495\u2013514. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-024-03210-w.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"1477_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-026-01393-8","volume":"27","author":"S Aleksandrova-Yankulovska","year":"2026","unstructured":"Aleksandrova-Yankulovska S, Orzechowski M, Hancke K, Bundschu K, Steger F. Ethical analysis of the European normative framework on fertility preservation. BMC Med Ethics. 2026;27(1):38. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12910-026-01393-8.","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"issue":"8","key":"1477_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1602","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2013.139","volume":"108","author":"E Adams","year":"2013","unstructured":"Adams E, Hill E, Watson E. Fertility preservation in cancer survivors: a national survey of oncologists\u2019 current knowledge, practice and attitudes. Br J Cancer. 2013;108(8):1602\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/bjc.2013.139.","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"1477_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-019-0459-x","volume":"17","author":"N Esfandiari","year":"2019","unstructured":"Esfandiari N, Litzky J, Sayler J, Zagadailov P, George K, DeMars L. Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019;17(1):16. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12958-019-0459-x.","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"1477_CR43","unstructured":"Statistics Portugal. Portuguese Classification of Occupations 2010. 2010. Available from: https:\/\/www.ine.pt\/xportal\/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_publicacoes&PUBLICACOESpub_boui=108021532&PUBLICACOESmodo=2"},{"key":"1477_CR44","unstructured":"World Health Organization. Classifying health workers: mapping occupations to the international standard classification. World Health Organization. 2019. Available from: https:\/\/cdn.who.int\/media\/docs\/default-source\/health-workforce\/dek\/classifying-health-workers.pdf"},{"key":"1477_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412961288.n44","volume-title":"Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks","author":"TH Taylor","year":"2010","unstructured":"Taylor TH. Ceiling effect. Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2010. pp. 133\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781412961288.n44."},{"issue":"2","key":"1477_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1089\/jayao.2015.0055","volume":"5","author":"D Barlevy","year":"2016","unstructured":"Barlevy D, Wangmo T, Elger BS, Ravitsky V. Attitudes, Beliefs, and Trends Regarding Adolescent Oncofertility Discussions: A Systematic Literature Review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2016;5(2):119\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/jayao.2015.0055.","journal-title":"J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol"},{"key":"1477_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4419-6518-9_30","volume":"156","author":"CA Knapp","year":"2010","unstructured":"Knapp CA, Quinn GP. Healthcare provider perspectives on fertility preservation for cancer patients. Cancer Treat Res. 2010;156:391\u2013401. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4419-6518-9_30.","journal-title":"Cancer Treat Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"1477_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13551","volume":"98","author":"C Lampic","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lampic C, Wettergren L. Oncologists\u2019 and pediatric oncologists\u2019 perspectives and challenges for fertility preservation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(5):598\u2013603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13551.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"1477_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpag.2016.04.005","volume":"29","author":"JF Taylor","year":"2016","unstructured":"Taylor JF, Ott MA. Fertility Preservation after a Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Adolescents\u2019, Parents\u2019, and Providers\u2019 Perspectives, Experiences, and Preferences. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29(6):585\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpag.2016.04.005.","journal-title":"J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol"},{"key":"1477_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Petmesidou M, Pavolini E, Guill\u00e9n AM. South European healthcare systems under harsh austerity: a progress\u2013regression mix? South Eur Soc Politics. 2014;19(3): 331\u2013352. Available from: https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13608746.2014.949994","DOI":"10.1080\/13608746.2014.949994"},{"key":"1477_CR51","volume-title":"Hist\u00f3ria do Servi\u00e7o Nacional de Sa\u00fade em Portugal: a sa\u00fade e a for\u00e7a de trabalho, do estado novo aos nossos dias","author":"R Varela","year":"2019","unstructured":"Varela R, Guedes R, Huws U, Play S, Leys C, Kennedy P. Hist\u00f3ria do Servi\u00e7o Nacional de Sa\u00fade em Portugal: a sa\u00fade e a for\u00e7a de trabalho, do estado novo aos nossos dias. Lisbon: \u00c2ncora Editora; 2019."},{"key":"1477_CR52","unstructured":"Assembleia da Rep\u00fablica. Lei n.\u00ba 32\/2025, de 27 de mar\u00e7o. Promo\u00e7\u00e3o dos direitos das pessoas com endometriose ou com adenomiose atrav\u00e9s do refor\u00e7o do seu acesso a cuidados de sa\u00fade e da cria\u00e7\u00e3o de um regime de faltas justificadas ao trabalho e \u00e0s aulas, alterando o C\u00f3digo do Trabalho. Di\u00e1rio da Rep\u00fablica, S\u00e9rie I - n.\u00ba 61; 27-03-2025. Available from: https:\/\/diariodarepublica.pt\/dr\/detalhe\/lei\/32-2025-912653920"},{"issue":"2","key":"1477_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dev308","volume":"31","author":"L Yu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yu L, Peterson B, Inhorn MC, Boehm JK, Patrizio P. Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility awareness and oocyte cryopreservation among obstetrics and gynecology resident physicians. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):403\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dev308.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"10","key":"1477_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e47956","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.47956","volume":"15","author":"U Lahoti","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lahoti U, Pajai S, Shegekar T, Juganavar A. Exploring the Landscape of Social Egg Freezing: Navigating Medical Advancements, Ethical Dilemmas, and Societal Impacts. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e47956. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.47956.","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"issue":"9","key":"1477_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2013.07.004","volume":"41","author":"G Pennings","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pennings G. Ethical aspects of social freezing. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013;41(9):521\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2013.07.004.","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"issue":"5","key":"1477_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.01.007","volume":"28","author":"D Stoop","year":"2014","unstructured":"Stoop D, van der Veen F, Deneyer M, Nekkebroeck J, Tournaye H. Oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion (AGE) is a preventive intervention, neither social nor nonmedical. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(5):548\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.01.007.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"3","key":"1477_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1097\/MPH.0b013e3182068047","volume":"33","author":"MA Arafa","year":"2011","unstructured":"Arafa MA, Rabah DM. Attitudes and practices of oncologists toward fertility preservation. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011;33(3):203\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MPH.0b013e3182068047.","journal-title":"J Pediatr Hematol Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1477_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13615","volume":"98","author":"KA Rodriguez-Wallberg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Twenty years of development in fertility preservation of women and girls and the challenges that remain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(5):543\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13615.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"1477_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1074","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez062","volume":"34","author":"M van den Berg","year":"2019","unstructured":"van den Berg M, Baysal \u00d6, Nelen W, Braat DDM, Beerendonk CCM, Hermens R. Professionals\u2019 barriers in female oncofertility care and strategies for improvement. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(6):1074\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dez062.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"1477_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1096","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.5063","volume":"28","author":"GP Quinn","year":"2019","unstructured":"Quinn GP, Bowman Curci M, Reich RR, Gwede CK, Meade CD, Vadaparampil ST. Impact of a web-based reproductive health training program: ENRICH (Educating Nurses about Reproductive Issues in Cancer Healthcare). Psycho-oncology. 2019;28(5):1096\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pon.5063.","journal-title":"Psycho-oncology"},{"issue":"11","key":"1477_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1907","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2016.05.013","volume":"99","author":"ST Vadaparampil","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vadaparampil ST, Gwede CK, Meade C, Kelvin J, Reich RR, Reinecke J, Bowman M, Sehovic I, Quinn GP. ENRICH: A promising oncology nurse training program to implement ASCO clinical practice guidelines on fertility for AYA cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(11):1907\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pec.2016.05.013.","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"10","key":"1477_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3447","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-018-4217-y","volume":"26","author":"E Takeuchi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Takeuchi E, Kato M, Miyata K, Suzuki N, Shimizu C, Okada H, Matsunaga N, Shimizu M, Moroi N, Fujisawa D, et al. The effects of an educational program for non-physician health care providers regarding fertility preservation. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(10):3447\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-018-4217-y.","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"1477_CR63","unstructured":"Matos J, Rodrigues I, Rodrigues CV. Guia sobre sa\u00fade e leis trans em Portugal: Recursos e procedimentos. Rede ex Aequo. 2023. Available from: https:\/\/rea.pt\/imgs\/uploads\/guia-trans.pdf"},{"issue":"23","key":"1477_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2421","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare12232421","volume":"12","author":"S Kynigopoulou","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kynigopoulou S, Matsas A, Tsarna E, Christopoulou S, Panagopoulos P, Bakas P, Christopoulos P. Egg Cryopreservation for Social Reasons-A Literature Review. Healthc (Basel). 2024;12(23):2421. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/healthcare12232421.","journal-title":"Healthc (Basel)"},{"issue":"8","key":"1477_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1205","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-015-0500-8","volume":"32","author":"H Mertes","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mertes H. Does company-sponsored egg freezing promote or confine women\u2019s reproductive autonomy? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(8):1205\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-015-0500-8.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"1477_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cruz SG, Ferreira MMF. Perce\u00e7\u00e3o da cultura organizacional em institui\u00e7\u00f5es p\u00fablicas de sa\u00fade com diferentes modelos de gest\u00e3o. Revista de Enfermagem Refer\u00eancia. 2012;3(6): 103\u2013112. Available from: https:\/\/rr.esenfc.pt\/rr\/index.php?module=rr\u2316=publicationDetails&pesquisa=&id_artigo=2282&id_revista=9&id_edicao=41","DOI":"10.12707\/RIII1123"},{"issue":"4","key":"1477_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.12712\/rpca.v11i4.1001","volume":"11","author":"PJDF Louren\u00e7o","year":"2017","unstructured":"Louren\u00e7o PJDF, Massano-Cardoso I, Matos FRN, Nodari CH. Cultura organizacional e qualidade em servi\u00e7os em institui\u00e7\u00e3o de sa\u00fade p\u00fablica portuguesa. Rev Pensam Contemp Adm. 2017;11(4):120\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12712\/rpca.v11i4.1001.","journal-title":"Rev Pensam Contemp Adm"},{"key":"1477_CR68","unstructured":"Assembleia da rep\u00fablica. Lei n\u00ba 17\/2016 de 20 de Junho. Alarga o \u00e2mbito dos benefici\u00e1rios das t\u00e9cnicas de procria\u00e7\u00e3o medicamente assistida, procedendo \u00e0 segunda altera\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 Lei n.\u00ba 32\/2006, de 26 de julho (procria\u00e7\u00e3o medicamente assistida). S\u00e9rie I - n.\u00ba 116. 2016, 1903\u20131904. 2016. Available from: https:\/\/diariodarepublica.pt\/dr\/detalhe\/lei\/17-2016-74738646"},{"key":"1477_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"939809","DOI":"10.3389\/feduc.2022.939809","volume":"7","author":"AS Pandit","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pandit AS. Contemporary learning techniques for healthcare professionals: A narrative review. Front Educ. 2022;7:939809. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/feduc.2022.939809.","journal-title":"Front Educ"},{"issue":"4","key":"1477_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1097\/ceh.0000000000000111","volume":"36","author":"V Curran","year":"2016","unstructured":"Curran V, Fleet L, Simmons K, Ravalia M, Snow P. Exploratory Study of Rural Physicians\u2019 Self-Directed Learning Experiences in a Digital Age. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016;36(4):284\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ceh.0000000000000111.","journal-title":"J Contin Educ Health Prof"},{"issue":"1","key":"1477_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-14-134","volume":"14","author":"B Lloyd","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lloyd B, Pfeiffer D, Dominish J, Heading G, Schmidt D, McCluskey A. The New South Wales Allied Health Workplace Learning Study: barriers and enablers to learning in the workplace. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6963-14-134.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"1477_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e4388","DOI":"10.2196\/mhealth.4388","volume":"3","author":"R Patel","year":"2015","unstructured":"Patel R, Green W, Shahzad MW, Larkin C. Use of mobile clinical decision support software by junior doctors at a UK teaching hospital: identification and evaluation of barriers to engagement. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015;3(3):e4388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/mhealth.4388.","journal-title":"JMIR mHealth uHealth"},{"issue":"19","key":"1477_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1994","DOI":"10.1200\/jco.2018.78.1914","volume":"36","author":"K Oktay","year":"2018","unstructured":"Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility Preservation in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(19):1994\u20132001. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/jco.2018.78.1914.","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"8","key":"1477_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.1038\/bmt.2013.13","volume":"48","author":"AW Loren","year":"2013","unstructured":"Loren AW, Brazauskas R, Chow EJ, et al. Physician perceptions and practice patterns regarding fertility preservation in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48(8):1091\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/bmt.2013.13.","journal-title":"Bone Marrow Transpl"},{"issue":"4","key":"1477_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1089\/jayao.2024.0011","volume":"13","author":"A Kayiira","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kayiira A, McLaughlin S, John JN, et al. Future Fertility Among Pediatric Cancer Patients: Experiences and Perspectives of Health Workers in a Low-Resource Setting. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2024;13(4):637\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/jayao.2024.0011.","journal-title":"J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1477_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2054","DOI":"10.1002\/pbc.25163","volume":"61","author":"M Terenziani","year":"2014","unstructured":"Terenziani M, Spinelli M, Jankovic M, et al. Practices of pediatric oncology and hematology providers regarding fertility issues: a European survey. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(11):2054\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pbc.25163.","journal-title":"Pediatr Blood Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"1477_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1080\/17446651.2024.2347265","volume":"19","author":"C Sabbadin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sabbadin C, Marin L, Manso J, et al. Transition from pediatrics to adult health care in girls with turner syndrome. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2024;19(3):229\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17446651.2024.2347265.","journal-title":"Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab"},{"issue":"10","key":"1477_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2831","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-024-03270-y","volume":"41","author":"Y Shan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shan Y, Xu C, Cai J, et al. Behavior, attitude, perception, and knowledge regarding fertility preservation among Chinese pediatric oncologists: a survey in China. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024;41(10):2831\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-024-03270-y.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"1477_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.12703\/r\/10-55","volume":"10","author":"C Doungkamchan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Doungkamchan C, Orwig KE. Recent advances: fertility preservation and fertility restoration options for males and females. Fac Rev. 2021;10:55. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12703\/r\/10-55.","journal-title":"Fac Rev"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12910-026-01477-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12910-026-01477-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12910-026-01477-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T01:05:50Z","timestamp":1784250350000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s12910-026-01477-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,20]]},"references-count":79,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1477"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12910-026-01477-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6939"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6939","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 March 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 May 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the the Institute of Public Health of the University of Porto and the Data Protection Officer (process n.o CE23240). The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"133"}}