{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T20:40:18Z","timestamp":1792788018663,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784678400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1792108800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":86,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Western Norway University Of Applied Sciences","id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/05phns765","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Nurs"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A clinical feedback system (CFS) has been implemented in routine outpatient follow-up to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs), enabling stoma care nurses (SCNs) to address patients\u2019 needs as they adjust to life with an ostomy. This study aimed to explore SCNs\u2019 experiences of using a CFS in routine outpatient follow-up within specialist healthcare services.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study had an exploratory, inductive qualitative design. Semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted with fourteen SCNs at outpatient clinics in four hospitals. Data were analysed using Reflexive thematic analysis.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      An overarching theme,\n                      <jats:italic>Clinical feedback system as a tool for personalised and holistic follow-up care<\/jats:italic>\n                      , was developed with three themes: (1) Providing and receiving information as preparation for consultation; (2) Seamless use of clinical feedback system during consultations; and (3) Shared language and use of visual features. SCNs experienced the use of the CFS as a valuable tool for promoting personalised and holistic follow-up care. They described the CFS as supporting preparation, providing structure to consultations, and enhancing patient involvement. The CFS was experienced as useful for mapping, assessing, and evaluating patients\u2019 adaptation processes, particularly in identifying areas of concern. SCNs described using the tool seamlessly within their existing practice while exercising clinical judgement. They experienced the visual features and the development of a shared, mutually understood language as facilitating meaningful dialogue during consultations. Although perceptions of its usefulness varied, SCNs emphasised that the CFS allowed flexibility and autonomy, enabling them to adapt its use to their consultation style and patients\u2019 individual needs.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study showed that SCNs experienced the CFS as more than a tool for assessing patient function and adaptation and described how it shaped the way they conducted follow-up consultations. The SCNs perceived that meaningful use in routine practice supported their work in tailoring holistic follow-up care to individual patients. These findings suggest that the use of a CFS in routine ostomy care has the potential to facilitate person-centred dialogue and support person-centred care. This study highlights an emerging, forward-looking nursing role in which digital tools are integrated into everyday practice to enhance personalised care. Developing structured training programmes for SCNs is essential to support the effective use of the CFS in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to inform the development, content, delivery, and effects of such programmes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical trial number<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Not applicable.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12912-026-05100-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]],"date-time":"2026-07-22T03:07:15Z","timestamp":1784689635000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Stoma care nurses\u2019 experiences using a clinical feedback system in routine outpatient follow-up: a qualitative study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"25","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5313-6743","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lill Anette","family":"Juvik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6300-9086","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"John Roger","family":"Andersen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2909-3629","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Julia","family":"Kittscha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4797-063X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kirsten Lerum","family":"Indreb\u00f8","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-1257-9644","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anne Marie","family":"Sandvoll","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"5100_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5959","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.16722","volume":"32","author":"N Panattoni","year":"2023","unstructured":"Panattoni N, Mariani R, Spano A, Leo AD, Iacorossi L, Petrone F, et al. Nurse specialist and ostomy patient: competence and skills in the care pathway: a scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2023;32:5959\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jocn.16722.","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"5100_CR2","unstructured":"NORILCO. NORILCO utvikler stomiskole. https:\/\/www.norilco.no\/aktuelt\/norilco-utvikler-stomiskole\/ Accesed 10 July 2025."},{"key":"5100_CR3","volume-title":"Wound, ostomy and continence nurses society core curriculum: ostomy management","author":"J Carmel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Carmel J, Colwell J, Goldberg M. Wound, ostomy and continence nurses society core curriculum: ostomy management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2021.","edition":"2"},{"key":"5100_CR4","first-page":"34","volume":"60","author":"APA Torquato Lopes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Torquato Lopes APA, Decesaro MDN. The adjustments experienced by persons with an ostomy: an integrative review of the literature. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014;60:34\u201342.","journal-title":"Ostomy Wound Manage"},{"key":"5100_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1111\/iwj.13018","volume":"16","author":"S Ayaz-Alkaya","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ayaz-Alkaya S. Overview of psychosocial problems in individuals with stoma: a review of literature. Int Wound J. 2019;16:243\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/iwj.13018.","journal-title":"Int Wound J"},{"key":"5100_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2020","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.5988","volume":"31","author":"MA Farahani","year":"2022","unstructured":"Farahani MA, Sargolzaei MS, Shariatpanahi S, Dehkordi AH, Dalvand P, Heidari-Beni F. The prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with ostomy: a systematic review and meta\u2010analysis. Psychooncology. 2022;31:2020\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pon.5988.","journal-title":"Psychooncology"},{"key":"5100_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-023-09532-2","volume":"23","author":"S Lin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lin S, Yin G, Chen L. The sexuality experience of stoma patients: a meta ethnography of qualitative research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:489. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-023-09532-2.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"5100_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3111","DOI":"10.1111\/jocn.15840","volume":"30","author":"A Alenezi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Alenezi A, McGrath I, Kimpton A, Livesay K. Quality of life among ostomy patients: a narrative literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30:3111\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jocn.15840.","journal-title":"J Clin Nurs"},{"key":"5100_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1097\/WON.0000000000000895","volume":"49","author":"J Kittscha","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kittscha J, Fairbrother G, Bliokas V, Wilson V. Adjustment to an ostomy: an integrative literature review. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2022;49:439\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/WON.0000000000000895.","journal-title":"J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs"},{"key":"5100_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-019-1261-3","volume":"18","author":"KL Indreb\u00f8","year":"2020","unstructured":"Indreb\u00f8 KL, Aasprang A, Olsen TE, Andersen JR. A new model of patient-reported outcome monitoring with a clinical feedback system in ostomy care: rationale, description and evaluation protocol. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18:12. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-019-1261-3.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"5100_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119536604","volume-title":"Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions","author":"JPT Higgins","year":"2019","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. Newark: Wiley; 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9781119536604.","edition":"2"},{"key":"5100_CR12","unstructured":"Nasjonalt servicemilj\u00f8 for medisinske kvalitetsregiste. Pasientrapporterte data. https:\/\/www.kvalitetsregistre.no\/registerdrift\/pasientrapporterte-data\/ Accessed 10 July 2025."},{"key":"5100_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.2147\/PROM.S156291","volume":"10","author":"J Field","year":"2019","unstructured":"Field J, Holmes MM, Newell D. PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? a narrative review. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019;10:233\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/PROM.S156291.","journal-title":"Patient Relat Outcome Meas"},{"key":"5100_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD011589","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD011589.pub2","volume":"10","author":"C Gibbons","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gibbons C, Porter I, Gon\u00e7alves-Bradley DC, Stoilov S, Ricci-Cabello I, Tsangaris, et al. Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;10:CD011589. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD011589.pub2.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"5100_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1007\/s10488-022-01236-9","volume":"50","author":"K Rognstad","year":"2023","unstructured":"Rognstad K, Wentzel-Larsen T, Neumer S-P, Kj\u00f8bli J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement feedback systems in treatment for common mental health disorders. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023;50:269\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10488-022-01236-9.","journal-title":"Adm Policy Ment Health"},{"key":"5100_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4","volume":"29","author":"C Graupner","year":"2021","unstructured":"Graupner C, Kimman ML, Mul S, Slok AHM, Claessens D, Kleijnen J, et al. Patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators associated with the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cancer care: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:573\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-020-05695-4.","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"5100_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1597","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-021-03003-z","volume":"31","author":"R Campbell","year":"2022","unstructured":"Campbell R, Ju A, King MT, Rutherford C. Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Qual Life Res. 2022;31:1597\u2013620. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-021-03003-z.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"5100_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2013-002524","volume":"23","author":"MB Boyce","year":"2014","unstructured":"Boyce MB, Browne JP, Greenhalgh J. The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:508\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjqs-2013-002524.","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"key":"5100_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0061-6","volume":"2","author":"J Greenhalgh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Greenhalgh J, Gooding K, Gibbons E, Dalkin S, Wright J, Valderas J, et al. How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018;2:42. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-018-0061-6.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"5100_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1002\/jmrs.421","volume":"68","author":"H Nguyen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nguyen H, Butow P, Dhillon H, Sundaresan P. A review of the barriers to using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient\u2010reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care. J Med Radiat Sci. 2021;68:186\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jmrs.421.","journal-title":"J Med Radiat Sci"},{"key":"5100_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-020-4939-7","volume":"20","author":"B Nic Giolla Easpaig","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nic Giolla Easpaig B, Tran Y, Bierbaum M, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, et al. What are the attitudes of health professionals regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology practice? A mixed-method synthesis of the qualitative evidence. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-020-4939-7.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"5100_CR22","unstructured":"Olsen T, Lerum KI, Lindam A, Skogmo LG, Dagsland V. Norwegian professional recommedndation on the follow-up of patients with ostomy. Bergen: The Norwegian Association of Nurses in Ostomy and Continence Care; 2020. https:\/\/www.nsf.no\/sites\/default\/files\/groups\/subject_group\/2024-09\/sisk-recommendations-english-version.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2025."},{"key":"5100_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtv.2024.04.006","volume":"33","author":"G Bozkul","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bozkul G, Senol Celik S, Nur Arslan H. Nursing interventions for the self-efficacy of ostomy patients: a systematic review. J Tissue Viability. 2024;33:165\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jtv.2024.04.006.","journal-title":"J Tissue Viability"},{"key":"5100_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-023-00573-z","volume":"7","author":"KL Indreb\u00f8","year":"2023","unstructured":"Indreb\u00f8 KL, Aasprang A, Olsen TE, Andersen JR. Experiences and results from using a novel clinical feedback system in routine stoma care nurse follow-up of patients with an ostomy: a longitudinal study. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023;7:27. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-023-00573-z.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"5100_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-025-03916-z","volume":"4","author":"LA Juvik","year":"2025","unstructured":"Juvik LA, Andersen JR, Indreb\u00f8 KL, Sandvoll AM. Patients\u2019 experiences with the routine use of a clinical feedback system prior to consultations in ostomy care: a qualitative study. Qual Life Res. 2025;4:1473\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-025-03916-z.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"5100_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-025-00900-6","volume":"9","author":"LA Juvik","year":"2025","unstructured":"Juvik LA, Andersen JR, Indreb\u00f8 KL, Sandvoll AM. Person-centred ostomy care: a qualitative study of patients\u2019 experiences with routine use of a clinical feedback system during consultations. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025;9:61. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-025-00900-6.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"5100_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0267030","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0267030","volume":"17","author":"L Carfora","year":"2022","unstructured":"Carfora L, Foley CM, Hagi-Diakou P, Lesty PJ, Sandstrom ML, Ramsey I, et al. Patients\u2019 experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0267030. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0267030.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"5100_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-024-02827-9","volume":"30","author":"OL Aiyegbusi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Aiyegbusi OL, Cruz Rivera S, Roydhouse J, Kamudoni P, Alder Y, Anderson N, et al. Recommendations to address respondent burdens associated with patient-reported outcome assessments. Nat Med. 2024;30:650\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41591-024-02827-9.","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"key":"5100_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3299","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03772-3","volume":"33","author":"L Haverman","year":"2024","unstructured":"Haverman L, Luijten MAJ, Blackford AL, Absolom K, Basch EM, van Rossum MAJ, et al. Truth and dare: patients dare to tell the truth when using PROMs in clinical practice. Qual Life Res. 2024;33:3299\u2013307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-024-03772-3.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"5100_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S4","DOI":"10.12968\/bjon.2022.31.16.S4","volume":"31","author":"TM Bowles","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bowles TM, Moses C, Perry-Woodford ZL. The voice of ostomates: an exploration of stoma care in England. Brit J Nurs. 2022;31:S4\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12968\/bjon.2022.31.16.S4.","journal-title":"Brit J Nurs"},{"key":"5100_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","volume":"19","author":"A Tong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042.","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"5100_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.2147\/PROM.S300604","volume":"12","author":"KL Indreb\u00f8","year":"2021","unstructured":"Indreb\u00f8 KL, Aasprang A, Olsen TE, Andersen JR. Psychometric properties of new subscales of the ostomy adjustment scale: a cross-sectional study. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2021;12:65\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/PROM.S300604.","journal-title":"Patient Relat Outcome Meas"},{"key":"5100_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1097\/WON.0000000000000041","volume":"41","author":"KL Indreb\u00f8","year":"2014","unstructured":"Indreb\u00f8 KL, Andersen JR, Natvig GK. The ostomy adjustment scale\u2019s translation to the Norwegian language with validation and reliability testing. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2014;41:357\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/WON.0000000000000041.","journal-title":"J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs"},{"key":"5100_CR34","first-page":"50","volume":"62","author":"KL Indreb\u00f8","year":"2016","unstructured":"Indreb\u00f8 KL, Natvig GK, Andersen JR. A cross-sectional study to determine whether adjustment to an ostomy can predict health-related and\/or overall quality of life. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016;62:50\u20139.","journal-title":"Ostomy Wound Manage"},{"key":"5100_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1037\/h0090996","volume":"28","author":"ME Olbrisch","year":"1983","unstructured":"Olbrisch ME. Development and validation of the ostomy adjustment scale. Rehab Psychol. 1983;28:3\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0090996.","journal-title":"Rehab Psychol"},{"key":"5100_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S55","DOI":"10.1016\/S0021-9681(87)80033-4","volume":"40","author":"EC Nelson","year":"1987","unstructured":"Nelson EC. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP chart method and preliminary findings. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:S55\u201363.","journal-title":"J Chronic Dis"},{"key":"5100_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2","volume-title":"Thematic analysis: a practical guide","author":"V Braun","year":"2022","unstructured":"Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2022."},{"key":"5100_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1093\/postmj\/qgae181","volume":"101","author":"B Wen","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wen B, Zhang G, Zhan C, Chen C, Yi H. The 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: a modern ethical framework for medical research. Postgrad Med J. 2025;101:371\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/postmj\/qgae181.","journal-title":"Postgrad Med J"},{"key":"5100_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0147-1767(85)90062-8","volume-title":"Naturalistic inquiry","author":"YS Lincoln","year":"1985","unstructured":"Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Los Angeles: Sage; 1985."},{"key":"5100_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102283","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejon.2023.102283","volume":"63","author":"L Lombi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lombi L, Alfieri S, Brunelli C. Why should I fill out this questionnaire?A qualitative study of cancer patients\u2019 perspectives on the integration of e-PROMs in routine clinical care. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023;63:102283. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejon.2023.102283.","journal-title":"Eur J Oncol Nurs"},{"key":"5100_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-023-00561-3","volume":"7","author":"LB Mikkelsen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mikkelsen LB, Wedderkopp N, Mose LS. Patient experiences with patient-reported outcome measures: an interview study of patients undergoing total hip\u2013 and knee arthroplasty. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023;7:19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-023-00561-3.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"5100_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1002\/acr.24019","volume":"72","author":"J Primdahl","year":"2020","unstructured":"Primdahl J, Jensen DV, Meincke RH, Jensen KV, Ziegler C, Nielsen SW, et al. Patients\u2019 views on the routine collection of patient-reported outcomes in rheumatology outpatient care: a multicenter focus group study. Arthritis Care Res. 2020;72:1331\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acr.24019.","journal-title":"Arthritis Care Res"},{"key":"5100_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E273","DOI":"10.1097\/NCC.0000000000000738","volume":"43","author":"S Thestrup Hansen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Thestrup Hansen S, Kjerholt M, Friis Christensen S, Brodersen J, H\u00f8lge-Hazelton B. I Am sure that they use my PROM data for something important. a qualitative study about patients\u2019 experiences from a hematologic outpatient clinic. Cancer Nurs. 2020;43:E273\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/NCC.0000000000000738.","journal-title":"Cancer Nurs"},{"key":"5100_CR44","unstructured":"McCormack B, McCance T, Bulley C, Brown D, McMillan A, Martin S. Fundamentals of person-centred healthcare practice Wiley; Hoboken:2021."},{"key":"5100_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-019-0170-x","volume":"4","author":"CT Mejdahl","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mejdahl CT, Schougaard LMV, Hjollund NH, Riiskj\u00e6r E, Lomborg K. Patient-reported outcome measures in the interaction between patient and clinician; a multi-perspective qualitative study. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4:3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-019-0170-x.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"5100_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e067044","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-067044","volume":"12","author":"EM van der Willik","year":"2022","unstructured":"van der Willik EM, Milders J, Bart JAJ, Bos WJW, van Ittersum FJ, ten Dam MAGJ, et al. Discussing results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients and healthcare professionals in routine dialysis care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e067044. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2022-067044.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"5100_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2611","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03728-7","volume":"33","author":"M Anderson","year":"2024","unstructured":"Anderson M, van Kessel R, Wood E, Stokes A, Fistein J, Porter I, et al. Understanding factors impacting patient-reported outcome measures of integration in routine clinical practice: an umbrella review. Qual Life Res. 2024;33:2611\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-024-03728-7.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"5100_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-018-1045-1","volume":"16","author":"H Wheat","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wheat H, Horrell J, Valderas JM, Close J, Fosh B, Lloyd H. Can practitioners use patient reported measures to enhance person-centred coordinated care in practice? a qualitative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16:223. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-018-1045-1.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"5100_CR49","volume-title":"Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches","author":"JW Creswell","year":"2025","unstructured":"Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2025.","edition":"5"},{"key":"5100_CR50","unstructured":"National Research Ethics Committees. Helseforskningslovens saklige virkeomr\u00e5de. https:\/\/www.forskningsetikk.no\/retningslinjer\/med-helse\/helseforskningslovens-saklige-virkeomrade\/ Accessed 20 July 202."}],"container-title":["BMC Nursing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12912-026-05100-1","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12912-026-05100-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12912-026-05100-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,16]],"date-time":"2026-10-16T14:22:21Z","timestamp":1792160541000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12912-026-05100-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5100"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12912-026-05100-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6955"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6955","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 July 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 July 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 July 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was ethically reviewed and approved by the local data protection officers at F\u00f8rde Hospital Trust, Bergen Hospital Trust, Stavanger University Hospital, and Fonna Hospital Trust (eProtocol reference 5056). According to the Norwegian Health Research Act, this study does not fall within the scope requiring ethical approval from the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics [\n                      \n                      ]. All participants received written information about the study\u2019s purpose, anonymity, confidentiality, data security, and their right to withdraw at any time without consequences. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the commencement of the interviews.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Three patient representatives, recruited by F\u00f8rde Hospital Trust, were involved in the development and refinement of the interview guide.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Patient and public involvement","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"988"}}