{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T18:12:41Z","timestamp":1790446361161,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":72,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,30]],"date-time":"2021-06-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625011200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,30]],"date-time":"2021-06-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625011200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005296","name":"Universit\u00e4tsklinikum Regensburg","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005296","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Health Serv Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is the only potentially curative treatment option for many patients with hematological disorders but it includes a significant risk of mortality and long-term morbidity. Many patients and their support persons feel overwhelmed when being informed about alloHSCT and may benefit from improvements in consultation style and timing.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To explore, qualitatively, in a sample of hematological cancer patients and their support persons, their preferences for receiving one longer consultation or two shorter consultations when being informed about alloHSCT. Participants\u2019 perceptions of when and how different consultation styles should be offered were also examined.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Semi-structured face-to-face and phone interviews were conducted. A purposeful sampling frame was used. Data were analysed using framework analysis.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Twenty patients and 13 support persons were recruited (consent rate: 96%, response rate: 91%). Most patients (60%) and support persons (62%) preferred two shorter consultations over one longer consultation. This helped them digest and recall the information provided, remember questions they had, involve significant others and search for additional information. Patients would have liked to be offered paper and pen to take notes, take a break after 30\u2009min and have their understanding checked at the end of the first consultation, e.g. using question prompt lists. Some patients and support persons preferred both consultations to happen on the same day to reduce waiting times as well as travel times and costs. Others preferred having a few days in-between both consultations to better help them prepare the second consultation. Participants reported varying preferences for different consultation styles depending on personal and disease-related characteristics, such as age, health literacy level and previous treatment.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study to explore patients\u2019 and their support persons\u2019 preferences for having one longer consultation or two shorter consultations when being informed about alloHSCT. Receiving two shorter consultations may help patients process and recall the information provided and more actively involve their support persons. Clinicians should consider offering patients and their support persons to take a break after 30\u2009min, provide paper and pen as well as question prompt lists.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-021-06632-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,30]],"date-time":"2021-06-30T01:03:02Z","timestamp":1625014982000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["A qualitative study on patients\u2019 and their support persons\u2019 preferences for receiving one longer consultation or two shorter consultations when being informed about allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Anne","family":"Herrmann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ernst","family":"Holler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthias","family":"Edinger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sascha","family":"Eickmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Wolff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"6632_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Girgis A, Sanson-Fisher RW (1995) Breaking bad news: consensus guidelines for medical practitioners. J Clin Oncol 13:2449\u20132456. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/jco.1995.13.9.2449, 9.","DOI":"10.1200\/jco.1995.13.9.2449"},{"key":"6632_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schofield PE, Butow PN, Thompson JF, Tattersall MHN, Beeney LJ, Dunn SM (2003) Psychological responses of patients receiving a diagnosis of cancer. Ann Oncol 14:48\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/annonc\/mdg010, 1.","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdg010"},{"key":"6632_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bester J, Cole CM, Kodish E (2016) The limits of informed consent for an overwhelmed patient: clinicians\u2019 role in protecting patients and preventing overwhelm. AMA J Ethics 18:869\u2013886. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/journalofethics.2016.18.9.peer2-1609, 9.","DOI":"10.1001\/journalofethics.2016.18.9.peer2-1609"},{"key":"6632_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Siminoff LA (2013) Incorporating patient and family preferences into evidence-based medicine. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13:S6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6947-13-s3-s6, S3.","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-13-s3-s6"},{"key":"6632_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stiggelbout AM, Jansen SJT, Otten W, Baas-Thijssen MCM, van Slooten H, van de Velde CJH (2007) How important is the opinion of significant others to cancer patients\u2019 adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making? Support Care Cancer 15:319\u2013325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-006-0149-z, 3.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-006-0149-z"},{"key":"6632_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hall A, Lynagh M, Bryant J, Sanson-Fisher R (2013) Supportive care needs of hematological cancer survivors: a critical review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 88:102\u2013116. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.critrevonc.2013.03.008, 1.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.critrevonc.2013.03.008"},{"key":"6632_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Engert A, Pl\u00fctschow A, Eich HT, Lohri A, D\u00f6rken B, Borchmann P, Berger B, Greil R, Willborn KC, Wilhelm M, Debus J, Eble MJ, S\u00f6kler M, Ho A, Rank A, Ganser A, Tr\u00fcmper L, Bokemeyer C, Kirchner H, Schubert J, Kr\u00e1l Z, Fuchs M, M\u00fcller-Hermelink HK, M\u00fcller RP, Diehl V (2010) Reduced treatment intensity in patients with early-stage Hodgkin\u2019s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 363:640\u2013652. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/nejmoa1000067, 7.","DOI":"10.1056\/nejmoa1000067"},{"key":"6632_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Henig I, Zuckerman T (2014) Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-50 years of evolution and future perspectives. Rambam Maimonides med J 5:. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5041\/rmmj.10162, 5, 4, e0028.","DOI":"10.5041\/rmmj.10162"},{"key":"6632_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gyurkocza B, Rezvani A, Storb RF (2010) Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: the state of the art. Expert Rev Hematol 3:285\u2013299. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1586\/ehm.10.21, 3.","DOI":"10.1586\/ehm.10.21"},{"key":"6632_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ratanatharathorn V, Ayash L, Lazarus HM, Fu J, Uberti JP (2001) Chronic graft-versus-host disease: clinical manifestation and therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 28:121\u2013129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sj.bmt.1703111, 2.","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bmt.1703111"},{"key":"6632_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Filipovich AH (2008) Diagnosis and manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 21:251\u2013257. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.beha.2008.02.008, 2.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.beha.2008.02.008"},{"issue":"21","key":"6632_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4401","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2004.66.155","volume":"22","author":"P Butow","year":"2004","unstructured":"Butow P, Devine R, Boyer M, Pendlebury S, Jackson M, Tattersall MHN. Cancer consultation preparation package: changing patients but not physicians is not enough. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(21):4401\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/d32n7h. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.2004.66.155.","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6632_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.1995.216","volume":"71","author":"PN Butow","year":"1995","unstructured":"Butow PN, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH. Jones QJ: computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation. Br J Cancer. 1995;71(5):1115\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/dhfp9s. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/bjc.1995.216.","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"6632_CR14","volume-title":"Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together","author":"General Medical Council","year":"2008","unstructured":"General Medical Council. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. London: General Medical Council; 2008."},{"key":"6632_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Herrmann A, Sanson-Fisher R, Hall A, Wall L, Zdenkowski N, Waller A (2018) Support persons\u2019 preferences for the type of consultation and the format of information provided when making a cancer treatment decision BMC Res Notes 11:. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13104-018-3552-x, 11, 1.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13104-018-3552-x"},{"key":"6632_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Herrmann A, Sanson-Fisher R, Hall A, Wall L, Zdenkowski N, Waller A (2018) A discrete choice experiment to assess cancer patients\u2019 preferences for when and how to make treatment decisions. Support Care Cancer 26:1215\u20131220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-017-3944-9, 4.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-017-3944-9"},{"key":"6632_CR17","volume-title":"Qualitative research from start to finish","author":"RK Yin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Yin RK. Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press; 2011."},{"key":"6632_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Coyne IT (1997) Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J Adv Nurs 26:623\u2013630. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x, 3.","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x"},{"key":"6632_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Draucker CB, Martsolf DS, Ross R, Rusk TB (2007) Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qual Health Res 17:1137\u20131148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1049732307308450, 8.","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732307308450"},{"key":"6632_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-13-117, 1.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-13-117"},{"key":"6632_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24:105\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nedt.2003.10.001, 2.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nedt.2003.10.001"},{"key":"6632_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Smith J, Firth J (2011) Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Res 18:52\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7748\/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284, 2.","DOI":"10.7748\/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284"},{"key":"6632_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1524\/9783486719550","volume-title":"Qualitative Sozialforschung: Ein Arbeitsbuch","author":"A Przyborski","year":"2014","unstructured":"Przyborski A, Wohlrab-Sahr M. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Ein Arbeitsbuch: De Gruyter; 2014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1524\/9783486719550."},{"key":"6632_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Han Y, Liu Z, Liu J, Yan W, Xia Y, Yue S, Yu J (2020) Antibody-based immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Biomed Res Int 2020:e4956946. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2020\/4956946, 1, e4956948.","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/4956946"},{"key":"6632_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cioce M, Lohmeyer FM, Moroni R, Magini M, Giraldi A, Garau P, Gifuni MC, Savoia V, Celli D, Botti S, Gargiulo G, Bonifazi F, Ciceri F, Serra I, Zega M, Sica S, Bacigalupo A, de Stefano V, Moscato U (2020) Impact of educational interventions on psychological distress during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomised study Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 12:. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4084\/MJHID.2020.067, 12, 1.","DOI":"10.4084\/MJHID.2020.067"},{"key":"6632_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stiff PJ, Miller LA, Mumby P, Kiley K, Batiste R, Porter N, Potocki K, Volle M, Lichtenstein S, Wojtowicz S, Zakrzewski S, Toor A, Rodriguez T (2006) Patients\u2019 understanding of disease status and treatment plan at initial hematopoietic stem cell transplantation consultation. Bone Marrow Transplant 37:479\u2013484. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sj.bmt.1705264, 5.","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bmt.1705264"},{"key":"6632_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"El-Jawahri A, Traeger L, Kuzmuk K, et al (2015) Prognostic understanding, quality of life and mood in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 50:1119\u20131124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/bmt.2015.113, 8.","DOI":"10.1038\/bmt.2015.113"},{"key":"6632_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mumby PB, Hurley C, Samsi M, Thilges S, Parthasarathy M, Stiff PJ (2012) Predictors of non-compliance in autologous hematopoietic SCT patients undergoing out-patient transplants. Bone Marrow Transplant 47:556\u2013561. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/bmt.2011.129, 4.","DOI":"10.1038\/bmt.2011.129"},{"issue":"1","key":"6632_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/hsr2.13","volume":"1","author":"A Herrmann","year":"2018","unstructured":"Herrmann A, Boyle F, Butow P, Hall AE, Zdenkowski N. Exploring women\u2019s experiences with a decision aid for neoadjuvant systemic therapy for operable breast cancer. Health Sci Rep. 2018;1(1):e13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/gjg4v2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hsr2.13.","journal-title":"Health Sci Rep"},{"key":"6632_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rimmer A (2019) My patient wants to record our appointment, what should I do? BMJ 364:l1101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.l1101.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l1101"},{"key":"6632_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Murre JMJ, Dros J (2015) Replication and analysis of Ebbinghaus\u2019 forgetting curve. PLoS One 10:e0120644. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0120644, 7.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0120644"},{"key":"6632_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Eggly S, Hamel LM, Foster TS, Albrecht TL, Chapman R, Harper FWK, Thompson H, Griggs JJ, Gonzalez R, Berry-Bobovski L, Tkatch R, Simon M, Shields A, Gadgeel S, Loutfi R, Ali H, Wollner I, Penner LA (2017) Randomized trial of a question prompt list to increase patient active participation during interactions with black patients and their oncologists. Patient Educ Couns 100:818\u2013826. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pec.2016.12.026, 5.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2016.12.026"},{"key":"6632_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bestvina CM, Polite BN (2017) Implementation of advance care planning in oncology: a review of the literature. J Oncol Pract 13:657\u2013662. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JOP.2017.021246, 10.","DOI":"10.1200\/JOP.2017.021246"},{"key":"6632_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anderson RJ, Bloch S, Armstrong M, Stone PC, Low JTS (2019) Communication between healthcare professionals and relatives of patients approaching the end-of-life: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Palliat Med 33:926\u2013941. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0269216319852007, 8.","DOI":"10.1177\/0269216319852007"},{"key":"6632_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Miller N, Rogers SN (2018) A review of question prompt lists used in the oncology setting with comparison to the patient concerns inventory. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 27:e12489. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ecc.12489, 1.","DOI":"10.1111\/ecc.12489"},{"key":"6632_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Brandes K, Linn AJ, Butow PN, Weert JCM van (2015) The characteristics and effectiveness of question prompt list interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature. Psychooncology 24:245\u2013252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pon.3637, 3.","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.3637"},{"key":"6632_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Auschra C, M\u00f6ller J, Berthod O, Mazheika Y, Borusiak P (2020) Communicating test results in a comprehensible manner: a randomized controlled trial of word usage in doctor-patient communication. Z F\u00fcr Evidenz Fortbild Qual Im Gesundheitswesen 156:40\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.zefq.2020.07.007.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.zefq.2020.07.007"},{"key":"6632_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Caldwell G (2019) The process of clinical consultation is crucial to patient outcomes and safety: 10 quality indicators. Clin Med 19:503\u2013506. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7861\/clinmed.2019-0263, 6.","DOI":"10.7861\/clinmed.2019-0263"},{"key":"6632_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Blease C, Fernandez L, Bell SK, Delbanco T, DesRoches C (2020) Empowering patients and reducing inequities: is there potential in sharing clinical notes? BMJ Qual Saf 29:1\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjqs-2019-010490, 10.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2019-010490"},{"key":"6632_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Holmes-Rovner M, Nelson WL, Pignone M, Elwyn G, Rovner DR, O'Connor AM, Coulter A, Correa-de-Araujo R (2007) Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Rep IPDAS Symp Med Decis Mak 27:599\u2013608. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989x07307272, 5.","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989x07307272"},{"key":"6632_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Volk RJ, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Stacey D, Elwyn G (2013) Ten years of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13:S1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6947-13-s2-s1, S2.","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-13-s2-s1"},{"key":"6632_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD (2004) Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids. Patient Educ Couns 54:265\u2013273. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pec.2003.09.007, 3.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2003.09.007"},{"key":"6632_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lenz M, Buhse S, Kasper J, Kupfer R, Richter T, M\u00fchlhauser I (2012) Decision aids for patients. Dtsch \u00c4rztebl Int 109:401\u2013408. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3238\/arztebl.2012.0401.","DOI":"10.3238\/arztebl.2012.0401"},{"key":"6632_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stacey D, L\u00e9gar\u00e9 F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev https:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.cd001431.pub5.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd001431.pub5"},{"key":"6632_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Elwyn G, Scholl I, Tietbohl C, et al.\u00a0Many miles to go ...: a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:S14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6947-13-S2-S14.","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-13-S2-S14"},{"key":"6632_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"L\u00e9gar\u00e9 F, Ratt\u00e9 S, Gravel K, Graham ID (2008) Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals\u2019 perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 73:526\u2013535. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pec.2008.07.018, 3.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2008.07.018"},{"key":"6632_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E (2008) Preferences for involvement in treatment decision making of patients with cancer: a review of the literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs 12:299\u2013318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejon.2008.03.004, 4.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejon.2008.03.004"},{"issue":"9","key":"6632_CR48","first-page":"688","volume":"16","author":"JA Singh","year":"2010","unstructured":"Singh JA, Sloan JA, Atherton PJ, Smith T, Hack TF, Huschka MM, et al. Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with Cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the control preferences scale. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(9):688\u201396.","journal-title":"Am J Manag Care"},{"key":"6632_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tariman JD, Berry D, Cochrane B, et al (2010) Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 21:1145\u20131151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/annonc\/mdp534, 6.","DOI":"10.1093\/annonc\/mdp534"},{"key":"6632_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cox A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Langridge C, Fallowfield L (2006) Information needs and experiences: an audit of UK cancer patients. Eur J Oncol Nurs 10:263\u2013272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejon.2005.10.007, 4.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejon.2005.10.007"},{"key":"6632_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zucca A, Sanson-Fisher R, Waller A, Carey M., Boadle D. (2017) The first step in ensuring patient-centred quality of care: ask the patient Eur J Cancer Care Engl 26:. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ecc.12435, 26, 1.","DOI":"10.1111\/ecc.12435"},{"key":"6632_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e12871","DOI":"10.1111\/ecc.12871","volume":"27","author":"A Herrmann","year":"2018","unstructured":"Herrmann A, Hall A, Sanson-Fisher R, et al. Not asking cancer patients about their preferences does make a difference. A cross-sectional study examining cancer patients\u2019 preferred and perceived role in decision-making regarding their last important cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer care (Engl). 2018;27:e12871 https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/ghzvzz.","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer care (Engl)"},{"key":"6632_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tirodkar MA, Roth L, Nasso SF, et al (2020) Facilitators and barriers to implementing a patient-centered oncology care model. JCO Oncol Pract https:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/OP.20.00231, 16, 12, e1441, e1450.","DOI":"10.1200\/OP.20.00231"},{"key":"6632_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jiwa M, Meng X (2013) Video consultation use by Australian general practitioners: video vignette study. J Med Internet Res 15:e117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2196\/jmir.2638, 6.","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.2638"},{"issue":"20","key":"6632_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hsdr06200","volume":"6","author":"H Atherton","year":"2018","unstructured":"Atherton H, Brant H, Ziebland S, Bikker A, Campbell J, Gibson A, et al. The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2018;6(20):1\u2013200. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/hsdr06200.","journal-title":"Health Serv Deliv Res"},{"key":"6632_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Johansson AM, Lindberg I, S\u00f6derberg S (2017) Healthcare personnel\u2019s experiences using video consultation in primary healthcare in rural areas. Prim Health Care Res Dev 18:73\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1463423616000347, 01.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1463423616000347"},{"key":"6632_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bidmead E, Marshall A. Covid-19 and the 'new normal': are remote video consultations here to stay? Br Med Bull. 2020;135(1):16\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bmb\/ldaa025.","DOI":"10.1093\/bmb\/ldaa025"},{"issue":"7","key":"6632_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1132","DOI":"10.1093\/jamia\/ocaa072","volume":"27","author":"D Mann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mann D, Chen J, Chunara R, et al. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/ggv4nr. 2020;27(7):1132\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jamia\/ocaa072.","journal-title":"J Am Med Inform Assoc"},{"issue":"8","key":"6632_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/s11920-019-1054-8","volume":"21","author":"I Reinhardt","year":"2019","unstructured":"Reinhardt I, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E, Zielasek J. Use of Telepsychiatry in emergency and crisis intervention: current evidence. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21(8):63. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/ghxrf3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11920-019-1054-8.","journal-title":"Curr Psychiatry Rep"},{"issue":"1","key":"6632_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1258\/1357633001933925","volume":"6","author":"F Mair","year":"2000","unstructured":"Mair F, Whitten P, May C, Doolittle GC. Patients\u2019 perceptions of a telemedicine specialty clinic. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6(1):36\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10\/d8mfzr. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1258\/1357633001933925.","journal-title":"J Telemed Telecare"},{"key":"6632_CR61","unstructured":"Lange K., Kelly K. (2017) Technology assisted psychiatry\u2014 introducing telepsychiatry into an emergency department service."},{"key":"6632_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Joosten E A. G, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, et al (2008) Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 77:219\u2013226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000126073, 4.","DOI":"10.1159\/000126073"},{"key":"6632_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Roberts KJ (2002) Physician-patient relationships, patient satisfaction, and antiretroviral medication adherence among HIV-infected adults attending a public health clinic. AIDS Patient Care STDs 16:43\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/108729102753429398, 1.","DOI":"10.1089\/108729102753429398"},{"key":"6632_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Say RE, Thomson R (2003) The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions\u2014challenges for doctors. Bmj 327:542\u2013545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.542, 7414.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.542"},{"key":"6632_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ (2013) Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med 368:6\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/nejmp1209500, 1.","DOI":"10.1056\/nejmp1209500"},{"key":"6632_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thorne SE, Bultz BD, Baile WF (2005) Is there a cost to poor communication in cancer care?: a critical review of the literature. Psycho Oncol 14:875\u2013884. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pon.947, 10.","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.947"},{"key":"6632_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, Tattersall MHN, Boyer MJ (1997) The dynamics of change: Cancer patients\u2019 preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8:857\u2013863. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/a:1008284006045, 9.","DOI":"10.1023\/a:1008284006045"},{"key":"6632_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vogel BA, Bengel J, Helmes AW (2008) Information and decision making: patients\u2019 needs and experiences in the course of breast cancer treatment. Patient Educ Couns 71:79\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pec.2007.11.023, 1.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2007.11.023"},{"issue":"1","key":"6632_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1177\/1468794109348686","volume":"10","author":"A Holt","year":"2010","unstructured":"Holt A. Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res. 2010;10(1):113\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1468794109348686.","journal-title":"Qual Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"6632_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1177\/1468794112459671","volume":"14","author":"M Bj\u00f8rnholt","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bj\u00f8rnholt M, Gunhild F. Am I rambling?\u2019 On the advantages of interviewing couples together. Qual Res. 2014;14(1):3\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1468794112459671.","journal-title":"Qual Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"6632_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.2307\/351948","volume":"42","author":"G Allan","year":"1980","unstructured":"Allan G. A note on interviewing spouses together. J Marriage Fam. 1980;42(1):205\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/351948.","journal-title":"J Marriage Fam"},{"issue":"11","key":"6632_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1576","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732311415288","volume":"21","author":"B Taylor","year":"2011","unstructured":"Taylor B, De Vocht H. Interviewing separately or as couples? Considerations of authenticity of method. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(11):1576\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1049732311415288.","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"}],"container-title":["BMC Health Services Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12913-021-06632-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12913-021-06632-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12913-021-06632-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,30]],"date-time":"2021-06-30T01:03:07Z","timestamp":1625014987000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12913-021-06632-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,30]]},"references-count":72,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6632"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-021-06632-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6963"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6963","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 April 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 June 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 June 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Participants provided written informed consent before taking part in this study. All methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the ethics committee of the University of Regensburg (approval number: 19\u2013136-101).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their de-identified data.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"None of the authors of the above manuscript has declared any conflict of interest within the last three years which may arise from being named as an author on the manuscript.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"623"}}