{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,14]],"date-time":"2026-04-14T02:07:27Z","timestamp":1776132447732,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]],"date-time":"2022-03-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1647561600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]],"date-time":"2022-03-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1647561600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Health Serv Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Second opinions have the goal of clarifying uncertainties around diagnosis or management, particularly when healthcare decisions are complex, unpleasant, and carry considerable risks. Second opinions might be particularly useful for people recommended surgery for their back pain as surgery has at best a limited role in the management of back pain.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We conducted a scoping review. Two independent researchers screened PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and CINAHL from inception to May 6th, 2021. Studies of any design published in any language were eligible provided they described a second opinion intervention for people with spinal pain (low back or neck pain with or without radicular pain) either considering surgery or to whom surgery had been recommended. We assessed the methodological quality with the Downs &amp; Black scale. Outcomes were: i) characteristics of second opinion services for people considering or who have been recommended spinal surgery, ii) agreement between first and second opinions in terms of diagnoses, need for surgery and type of surgery, iii) whether they reduce surgery and improve patient outcomes; and iv) the costs and healthcare use associated with these services. Outcomes were presented descriptively.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We screened 6341 records, read 27 full-texts, and included 12 studies (all observational; 11 had poor methodological quality; one had fair). Studies described patient, doctor, and insurance-initiated second opinion services. Diagnostic agreement between first and second opinions varied from 53 to 96%. Agreement for need for surgery between first and second opinions ranged from 0 to 83%. Second opinion services may reduce surgery rates in the short-term, but it is unclear whether these reductions are sustained in the long-term or if patients only delay surgery. Second opinion services may reduce costs and healthcare use (e.g. imaging), but might increase others (e.g. injections).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Second opinion services typically recommend less surgical treatments compared to first opinions and may reduce surgery rates in the short-term, but it is unclear whether these reductions are sustained in the long-term or if patients only delay surgery. There is a need for high-quality randomised trials to determine the value of second opinion services for reducing spinal surgery.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-022-07771-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]],"date-time":"2022-03-18T04:40:34Z","timestamp":1647578434000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Second opinions for spinal surgery: a scoping review"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Giovanni E.","family":"Ferreira","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joshua","family":"Zadro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chang","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ian A.","family":"Harris","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chris G.","family":"Maher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"7771_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mayocp.2014.02.015","volume":"89","author":"VL Payne","year":"2014","unstructured":"Payne VL, Singh H, Meyer AN, Levy L, Harrison D, Graber ML. Patient-initiated second opinions: systematic review of characteristics and impact on diagnosis, treatment, and satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(5):687\u201396.","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc"},{"issue":"5","key":"7771_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.18.5.137","volume":"18","author":"TH Wagner","year":"1999","unstructured":"Wagner TH, Wagner LS. Who gets second opinions? Health Aff (Millwood). 1999;18(5):137\u201345.","journal-title":"Health Aff (Millwood)"},{"issue":"10","key":"7771_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0000000000000567","volume":"54","author":"L Shmueli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shmueli L, Shmueli E, Pliskin JS, et al. Second medical opinion: utilization rates and characteristics of seekers in a general population. Med Care. 2016;54(10):921\u20138.","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"7771_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-021-06207-8","volume":"21","author":"N K\u00f6nsgen","year":"2021","unstructured":"K\u00f6nsgen N, Prediger B, Bora A-M, et al. Analysis of second opinion programs provided by German statutory and private health insurance \u2013 a survey of statutory and private health insurers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):209.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"7771_CR5","unstructured":"HCF. Second opinion service. https:\/\/www.hcf.com.au\/members\/access-medical-resources\/second-opinion-services. Published 2021. Accessed."},{"key":"7771_CR6","unstructured":"BUPA. Best Doctors. https:\/\/www.bupa.com.au\/health-insurance\/best-doctors. Published 2021. Accessed."},{"key":"7771_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meyer AN, Singh H, Graber ML. Evaluation of outcomes from a national patient-initiated second-opinion program. Am J Med. 2015;128(10):1138 e1125\u20131133.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjmed.2015.04.020"},{"issue":"1","key":"7771_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-020-5060-7","volume":"20","author":"J Weyerstra\u00df","year":"2020","unstructured":"Weyerstra\u00df J, Prediger B, Neugebauer E, Pieper D. Results of a patient-oriented second opinion program in Germany shows a high discrepancy between initial therapy recommendation and second opinion. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):237.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"7771_CR9","unstructured":"LSI. Spine Surgery | Global Trends & Opportunities. 2021."},{"issue":"12","key":"7771_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1430","DOI":"10.1111\/imj.14120","volume":"48","author":"IA Harris","year":"2018","unstructured":"Harris IA, Traeger A, Stanford R, Maher CG, Buchbinder R. Lumbar spine fusion: what is the evidence? Intern Med J. 2018;48(12):1430\u20134.","journal-title":"Intern Med J"},{"issue":"10137","key":"7771_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2368","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)30489-6","volume":"391","author":"NE Foster","year":"2018","unstructured":"Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2368\u201383.","journal-title":"Lancet."},{"issue":"4","key":"7771_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"554","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.11.009","volume":"17","author":"R Herzog","year":"2017","unstructured":"Herzog R, Elgort DR, Flanders AE, Moley PJ. Variability in diagnostic error rates of 10 MRI centers performing lumbar spine MRI examinations on the same patient within a 3-week period. Spine J. 2017;17(4):554\u201361.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"10","key":"7771_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc","volume":"34","author":"R Chou","year":"2009","unstructured":"Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Loeser JD. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American pain society clinical practice guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(10):1094\u2013109.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7771_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.25259\/SNI_399_2021","volume":"12","author":"S Gattas","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gattas S, Fote GM, Brown NJ, et al. Second opinion in spine surgery: a scoping review. Surg Neurol Int. 2021;12:436.","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"key":"7771_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2017.10.014","volume":"96","author":"AC Tricco","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tricco AC, Zarin W, Ghassemi M, et al. Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;96:133\u201342.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7771_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1111\/1742-6723.12987","volume":"31","author":"GE Ferreira","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ferreira GE, Traeger AC, Maher CG. Review article: a scoping review of physiotherapists in the adult emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2019;31(1):43\u201357.","journal-title":"Emerg Med Australas"},{"issue":"7","key":"7771_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-0850","volume":"169","author":"AC Tricco","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467\u201373.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"21 Suppl","key":"7771_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S164","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31822ef58f","volume":"36","author":"DR Fourney","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fourney DR, Dettori JR, Hall H, H\u00e4rtl R, McGirt MJ, Daubs MD. A systematic review of clinical pathways for lower back pain and introduction of the Saskatchewan spine pathway. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21 Suppl):S164\u201371.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"6","key":"7771_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.52.6.377","volume":"52","author":"SH Downs","year":"1998","unstructured":"Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):377\u201384.","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"7771_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O'Connor SR, Tully MA, Ryan B, Bradley JM, Baxter GD, McDonough SM. Failure of a numerical quality assessment scale to identify potential risk of bias in a systematic review: a comparison study. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:224\u20134.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13104-015-1181-1"},{"key":"7771_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.82249","volume":"2","author":"NE Epstein","year":"2011","unstructured":"Epstein NE, Hood DC. \"unnecessary\" spinal surgery: a prospective 1-year study of one surgeon's experience. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:83.","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"key":"7771_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"m4825","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m4825","volume":"372","author":"GE Ferreira","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ferreira GE, McLachlan AJ, Lin CC, et al. Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for the treatment of back pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2021;372:m4825.","journal-title":"Bmj."},{"issue":"3","key":"7771_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E178","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31827bf40c","volume":"38","author":"J Fox","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fox J, Haig AJ, Todey B, Challa S. The effect of required physiatrist consultation on surgery rates for back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(3):E178\u201384.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"Suppl 5","key":"7771_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S350","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.103867","volume":"3","author":"FW Gamache","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gamache FW. The value of \"another\" opinion for spinal surgery: a prospective 14-month study of one surgeon's experience. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3(Suppl 5):S350\u20134.","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"issue":"9","key":"7771_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000001329","volume":"41","author":"RM Goodman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Goodman RM, Powell CC, Park P. The impact of commercial health plan prior authorization programs on the utilization of Services for low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(9):810\u20135.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"1","key":"7771_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-017-1712-0","volume":"18","author":"M Lenza","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Staples MP, et al. Second opinion for degenerative spinal conditions: an option or a necessity? A prospective observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):354.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"7771_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S3","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-015-1640-3","volume":"25","author":"E Vialle","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vialle E. Second opinion in spine surgery: a Brazilian perspective. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(Suppl 1):S3\u20136.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7771_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1590\/S1679-45082013000100018","volume":"11","author":"DC Viola","year":"2013","unstructured":"Viola DC, Lenza M, Almeida SL, et al. Spine surgery cost reduction at a specialized treatment center. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013;11(1):102\u20137.","journal-title":"Einstein (Sao Paulo)"},{"issue":"5","key":"7771_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"854","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2018.12.5.854","volume":"12","author":"K Namiranian","year":"2018","unstructured":"Namiranian K, Norris EJ, Jolissaint JG, Patel JB, Lombardi CM. Impact of multidisciplinary spine conferences on surgical planning and perioperative Care in Elective Lumbar Spine Surgeries. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(5):854\u201361.","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"issue":"11","key":"7771_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2660","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06170-3","volume":"28","author":"U Marnitz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Marnitz U, Wagner C. V48 - evaluation of a second opinion procedure for planned spinal surgery - a controlled non-randomized intervention study. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(11):2660\u2013758. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-019-06170-3.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"17","key":"7771_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1016","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002065","volume":"42","author":"V Yanamadala","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yanamadala V, Kim Y, Buchlak QD, et al. Multidisciplinary evaluation leads to the decreased utilization of lumbar spine fusion: an observational cohort pilot study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(17):E1016\u201323.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"7771_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lien BV, Brown NJ, Gattas S, et al. The market landscape of online second opinion services for spine surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11:365\u20135.","DOI":"10.25259\/SNI_577_2020"},{"issue":"Suppl 5","key":"7771_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S353","DOI":"10.4103\/2152-7806.120774","volume":"4","author":"NE Epstein","year":"2013","unstructured":"Epstein NE. Are recommended spine operations either unnecessary or too complex? Evidence from second opinions. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4(Suppl 5):S353\u20138.","journal-title":"Surg Neurol Int"},{"issue":"7","key":"7771_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1521","DOI":"10.1007\/s00432-015-2099-7","volume":"142","author":"D Ruetters","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ruetters D, Keinki C, Schroth S, Liebl P, Huebner J. Is there evidence for a better health care for cancer patients after a second opinion? A systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142(7):1521\u20138.","journal-title":"J Cancer Res Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"7771_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2020-044033","volume":"11","author":"G Greenfield","year":"2021","unstructured":"Greenfield G, Shmueli L, Harvey A, et al. Patient-initiated second medical consultations\u2014patient characteristics and motivating factors, impact on care and satisfaction: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e044033.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"10","key":"7771_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1634\/theoncologist.2016-0429","volume":"22","author":"MA Hillen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hillen MA, Medendorp NM, Daams JG, Smets EMA. Patient-driven second opinions in oncology: a systematic review. Oncologist. 2017;22(10):1197\u2013211.","journal-title":"Oncologist."},{"issue":"5","key":"7771_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002822","volume":"44","author":"BI Martin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N, Spiker WR, Lawrence B, Brodke DS. Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(5):369\u201376.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"11","key":"7771_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1445-2197.2009.05095.x","volume":"79","author":"IA Harris","year":"2009","unstructured":"Harris IA, Dao AT. Trends of spinal fusion surgery in Australia: 1997 to 2006. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79(11):783\u20138.","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"7771_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-028743","volume":"9","author":"M Grotle","year":"2019","unstructured":"Grotle M, Smastuen MC, Fjeld O, et al. Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e028743.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"7771_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04129-4","volume":"22","author":"JR Zadro","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zadro JR, Lewin AM, Kharel P, Naylor J, Maher CG, Harris IA. Physiotherapy utilisation and costs before lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective analysis of workers compensation claims in Australia. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):248.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"15","key":"7771_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1413","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1513721","volume":"374","author":"P Forsth","year":"2016","unstructured":"Forsth P, Olafsson G, Carlsson T, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1413\u201323.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"7771_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"958","DOI":"10.1001\/jamainternmed.2016.1251","volume":"176","author":"C Abdel Shaheed","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abdel Shaheed C, Maher CG, Williams KA, Day R, McLachlan AJ. Efficacy, tolerability, and dose-dependent effects of opioid analgesics for low Back pain: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(7):958\u201368.","journal-title":"JAMA Intern Med"}],"container-title":["BMC Health Services Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12913-022-07771-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12913-022-07771-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12913-022-07771-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]],"date-time":"2022-03-18T04:41:21Z","timestamp":1647578481000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12913-022-07771-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["7771"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-022-07771-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6963"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6963","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 March 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 March 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"358"}}