{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,20]],"date-time":"2026-09-20T03:57:51Z","timestamp":1789876671763,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100009520","name":"Rick Hansen Institute","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Grant #2012-29"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Grant #2012-29"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100009520","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Qual Life Outcomes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-016-0565-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]],"date-time":"2016-11-28T10:42:47Z","timestamp":1480329767000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["\u201cWhen I saw walking I just kind of took it as wheeling\u201d: interpretations of mobility-related items in generic, preference-based health state instruments in the context of spinal cord injury"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Yvonne Anne","family":"Michel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lidia","family":"Engel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kim","family":"Rand-Hendriksen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liv Ariane","family":"Augestad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David GT","family":"Whitehurst","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"565_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.publhealth.21.1.587","volume":"21","author":"PJ Neumann","year":"2000","unstructured":"Neumann PJ, Goldie SJ, Weinstein MC. Preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:587\u2013611.","journal-title":"Annu Rev Public Health"},{"key":"565_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-198903001-00018","volume":"1","author":"D Patrick","year":"1989","unstructured":"Patrick D, Deyo R. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;1:217\u201332.","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"565_CR3","volume-title":"Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies","author":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)","year":"2006","unstructured":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies. Ottawa: CADTH; 2006."},{"key":"565_CR4","volume-title":"Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013","author":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence","year":"2013","unstructured":"National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2013."},{"key":"565_CR5","volume-title":"Guideline for Conducting Economic Evaluations in Health Care","author":"Dutch National Health Care Institute","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dutch National Health Care Institute. Guideline for Conducting Economic Evaluations in Health Care. Diemen: Dutch National Health Care Institute; 2015."},{"key":"565_CR6","volume-title":"Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford university press","author":"M Drummond","year":"2015","unstructured":"Drummond M, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford university press. 2015."},{"key":"565_CR7","first-page":"205","volume":"6","author":"S Hunt","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hunt S. The problem of quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1997;6:205\u201312.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"565_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-375678-7.00505-8","volume-title":"Encyclopedia of Health Economics","author":"J Richardson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Richardson J, McKie J, Bariola E. Multiattribute Utility Instruments and Their Use. In: Culyer A, editor. Encyclopedia of Health Economics. San Diego: Elsevier; 2014. p. 341\u201357."},{"key":"565_CR9","volume-title":"American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.): Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing","author":"AER Association","year":"2014","unstructured":"AER Association. American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.): Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 2014."},{"key":"565_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/S0277-9536(01)00003-X","volume":"54","author":"S Mallinson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Mallinson S. Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:11\u201321.","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"565_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1177\/135581960000500106","volume":"5","author":"P Dolan","year":"2000","unstructured":"Dolan P. Effect of age on health state valuations. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000;5:17\u201321.","journal-title":"J Health Serv Res Policy"},{"key":"565_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1007\/s40258-015-0171-8","volume":"13","author":"SA Kharroubi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kharroubi SA. A Comparison of Japan and U.K. SF-6D health-state valuations using a non-parametric Bayesian method. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13:409\u201320.","journal-title":"Appl Health Econ Health Policy"},{"key":"565_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X14543107","volume":"35","author":"J Richardson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Richardson J, Khan MA, Iezzi A, Maxwell A. Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35:276\u201391.","journal-title":"Med Decis Mak"},{"key":"565_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-008-9317-6","volume":"17","author":"J Moock","year":"2008","unstructured":"Moock J, Kohlmann T. Comparing preference-based quality-of-life measures: results from rehabilitation patients with musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, or psychosomatic disorders. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:485\u201395.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"565_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X09347016","volume":"30","author":"DG Fryback","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fryback DG. Comparison of five health-realted quality of life indexes using item response theory anlysis. Med Decis Mak. 2010;30:5\u201315.","journal-title":"Med Decis Mak"},{"issue":"10","key":"565_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2481","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-016-1297-3","volume":"25","author":"DGT Whitehurst","year":"2016","unstructured":"Whitehurst DGT, Mittmann N, Noonan VK, Dvorak MF, Bryan S. Health state descriptions, valuations and individuals\u2019 capacity to walk : a comparative evaluation of preference-based instruments in the context of spinal cord injury. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(10):2481\u201396.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"565_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e85287","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0085287","volume":"8","author":"T Keeley","year":"2013","unstructured":"Keeley T, Al-Janabi H, Lorgelly P, Coast J. A qualitative assessment of the content validity of the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L and their appropriateness for use in health research. PLoS One. 2013;8:e85287.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"565_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-015-0373-7","volume":"13","author":"LS Matza","year":"2015","unstructured":"Matza LS, Boye KS, Stewart KD, Curtis BH, Reaney M, Landrian AS. A qualitative examination of the content validity of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:192.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"565_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-12-50","volume":"12","author":"D Whitehurst","year":"2014","unstructured":"Whitehurst D, Suryaprakash N, Engel L, Mittmann N, Noonan VK, Dvorak MF, Bryan S. Perceptions of individuals living with spinal cord injury toward preference-based quality of life instruments: a qualitative exploration. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:1.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"565_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-008-9342-5","volume":"17","author":"K Froehlich-Grobe","year":"2008","unstructured":"Froehlich-Grobe K, Andresen EM, Caburnay C, White GW. Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with mobility impairments: an enabled version of the short-form 36 (SF-36E). Qual Life Res. 2008;17:751\u201370.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"565_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(99)90077-1","volume":"80","author":"EM Andresen","year":"1999","unstructured":"Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, Brownson CA. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:877\u201384.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"565_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1682\/JRRD.2004.08.0100","volume":"42","author":"MPJM Dijkers","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dijkers MPJM. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: A review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:87\u2013110.","journal-title":"J Rehabil Res Dev"},{"key":"565_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511819322","volume-title":"The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press","author":"R Tourangeau","year":"2000","unstructured":"Tourangeau R, Rips L, Rasinski K. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press. 2000."},{"key":"565_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.50.1.537","volume":"50","author":"JA Krosnick","year":"1999","unstructured":"Krosnick JA. Survey research. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:537\u201367.","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"key":"565_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2006.12.032","volume":"88","author":"CE Schwartz","year":"2007","unstructured":"Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, Krahn GL. Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:529\u201336.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"565_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.47.2.158","volume":"47","author":"J Donovan","year":"1993","unstructured":"Donovan J, Frankel S, Eyles J. Assessing the need for health status measures. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993;47:158\u201362.","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Community Health"},{"key":"565_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.3109\/07853890109002086","volume":"33","author":"H Sintonen","year":"2001","unstructured":"Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med. 2001;33:328\u201336.","journal-title":"Ann Med"},{"key":"565_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-013-0036-x","volume":"7","author":"J Richardson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Richardson J, Iezzi A, Khan MA, Maxwell A. Validity and reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D multi-attribute utility instrument. Patient. 2014;7:85\u201396.","journal-title":"Patient"},{"key":"565_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1727","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-011-9903-x","volume":"20","author":"M Herdman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727\u201336.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"565_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.3109\/07853890109002092","volume":"33","author":"W Furlong","year":"2001","unstructured":"Furlong W, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. The Health Utilities Index (HUI\u00ae) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33:375\u201384.","journal-title":"Ann Med"},{"key":"565_CR31","volume-title":"Quality of Well Being Self-Administered (QWB-SA) Scale User\u2019s Manual","author":"W Seiber","year":"2008","unstructured":"Seiber W, Groessl E, David K, Ganiats T, Kaplan R. Quality of Well Being Self-Administered (QWB-SA) Scale User\u2019s Manual. 2008. https:\/\/hoap.ucsd.edu\/qwb-info\/QWB-Manual.pdf . Accessed 23 Nov 2016."},{"key":"565_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-6296(01)00130-8","volume":"21","author":"J Brazier","year":"2002","unstructured":"Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271\u201392.","journal-title":"J Health Econ"},{"key":"565_CR33","volume-title":"Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage","author":"J Ritchie","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls C, Ormston R. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage. 2013."},{"key":"565_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1025052609818","volume":"12","author":"C Green","year":"2003","unstructured":"Green C, Kiebert G, Murphy C, Mitchell JD, O\u2019Brien M, Burrell A, Leigh PN. Patients\u2019 health-related quality-of-life and health state values for motor neurone disease\/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:565\u201374.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"565_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"867","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-004-0910-z","volume":"14","author":"Y Asada","year":"2005","unstructured":"Asada Y. Medical technologies, nonhuman aids, human assistance, and environmental factors in the assessment of health states. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:867\u201374.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"565_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1038\/sc.2008.65","volume":"47","author":"BB Lee","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lee BB, Simpson JM, King MT, Haran MJ, Marial O. The SF-36 walk-wheel: a simple modification of the SF-36 physical domain improves its responsiveness for measuring health status change in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:50\u20135.","journal-title":"Spinal Cord"},{"key":"565_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1179\/2045772313Y.0000000159","volume":"32","author":"DGT Whitehurst","year":"2014","unstructured":"Whitehurst DGT, Engel L, Bryan S. Short Form health surveys and related variants in spinal cord injury research: A systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014;32:128\u201338.","journal-title":"J Spinal Cord Med"},{"key":"565_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2012.08.2204","volume":"15","author":"K Stevens","year":"2012","unstructured":"Stevens K, Palfreyman S. The use of qualitative methods in developing the descriptive systems of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluation. Value Health. 2012;15:991\u20138.","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"565_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-015-0119-y","volume":"9","author":"KJ Stevens","year":"2016","unstructured":"Stevens KJ. How well do the generic multi-attribute utility instruments incorporate patient and public views into their descriptive systems? Patient. 2016;9:5\u201313.","journal-title":"Patient"},{"key":"565_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2045","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-015-0926-6","volume":"24","author":"J Richardson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Richardson J, Iezzi A, Khan MA. Why do multi-attribute utility instruments produce different utilities: the relative importance of the descriptive systems, scale and \u2018micro-utility\u2019 effects. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:2045\u201353.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"565_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2014.08.026","volume":"120","author":"J Connell","year":"2014","unstructured":"Connell J, O\u2019Cathain A, Brazier J. Measuring quality of life in mental health: are we asking the right questions? Soc Sci Med. 2014;120:12\u201320.","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"key":"565_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2011.04.006","volume":"14","author":"D Papaioannou","year":"2011","unstructured":"Papaioannou D, Brazier J, Parry G. How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in schizophrenia? A systematic review. Value Health. 2011;14:907\u201320.","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"565_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta18340","volume":"18","author":"J Brazier","year":"2014","unstructured":"Brazier J, Connell J, Papaioannou D, Mukuria C, Mulhern B, Peasgood T, Jones ML, Paisley S, O\u2019Cathain A, Barkham M, Knapp M, Byford S, Gilbody S, Parry G. A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:1\u2013188.","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"565_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1136\/qshc.5.1.9","volume":"5","author":"C Jenkinson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Jenkinson C, Peto V, Coulter A. Making sense of ambiguity : evaluation of internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia. Qual Heal Care. 1996;5:9\u201312.","journal-title":"Qual Heal Care"},{"key":"565_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1017\/S1121189X00001421","volume":"18","author":"RC Kessler","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kessler RC, Aguilar-gaxiola S, Alonso J, Chatterji S, Lee S, Ormel J, \u00dcst\u00fcn TB, Wang PS. World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2009;18:23\u201333.","journal-title":"Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc"}],"container-title":["Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12955-016-0565-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,18]],"date-time":"2018-05-18T10:55:43Z","timestamp":1526640943000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/hqlo.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12955-016-0565-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["565"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-016-0565-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1477-7525"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1477-7525","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,11,28]]},"article-number":"164"}}