{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,27]],"date-time":"2026-06-27T09:09:57Z","timestamp":1782551397784,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":72,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,9]],"date-time":"2021-10-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633737600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,9]],"date-time":"2021-10-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1633737600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Riga Stradi\u0146\u0161 University"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Qual Life Outcomes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title><jats:p>To determine the most frequently utilized functional status assessment instruments for patients with brain tumors, compare their contents, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and their psychometric properties.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A scoping review was conducted to explore possible assessment instruments and summarize the\u00a0evidence.\u00a0A systematic literature search was performed for identification of the frequently used functional assessment tool in clinical trials in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest databases. The content of most used instruments was linked to the ICF categories. The psychometric qualities of these assessment tools were systematically searched and analyzed.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Nine most used assessment tools in clinical trials were identified. The most frequently used assessment instrument is the Karnofsky Performance Scale, which is developed for a\u00a0general assessment of oncological patients. Out of four self-assessment tools, two were disease-specific (EORTC QLQ-BN20 and FACT-Br), EORTC QLQ-C30 has been shown good psychometric properties in patients with brain tumors as well as in patients with various oncological diseases, similar to the SF-36, it is used in patients with brain tumors as well as in patients with various diseases. The Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel Index were two objective assessment tools that described functioning, but two were neuropsychological tests (MMSE and Trial Making Test). Two hundred eighty-three meaningful concepts were identified and linked to 102 most relevant second-level categories covering all components of the ICF. Forty-nine studies reporting psychometric properties of those nine assessment tools were identified, indicating good reliability and validity for all the instruments.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>Nine most frequently utilized functional status assessment instruments for patients with brain tumors represent all components of the ICF and have good psychometric properties. However, the choice of the tool depends on the clinical question posed and the aim of its use.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-021-01863-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,10]],"date-time":"2021-10-10T18:07:46Z","timestamp":1633889266000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Comparison of content and psychometric properties for assessment tools used for brain tumor patients: a scoping review"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Lelde","family":"\u0122iga","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anete","family":"P\u0113tersone","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Silva","family":"\u010caksti\u0146a","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6826-2427","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Guna","family":"B\u0113rzi\u0146a","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"1863_CR1","unstructured":"Statistikas dati par onkolo\u0123iskiem pacientiem, 2010\u20132017. The Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia; 2020."},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s11060-011-0738-7","volume":"107","author":"M Koshy","year":"2012","unstructured":"Koshy M, Villano JL, Dolecek TA, Howard A, Mahmood U, Chmura SJ, et al. Improved survival time trends for glioblastoma using the SEER 17 population-based registries. J Neurooncol. 2012;107(1):207\u201312.","journal-title":"J Neurooncol"},{"issue":"32","key":"1863_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1330","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000001330","volume":"94","author":"X Kong","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kong X, Ma W, Li Y, Wang Y, Guan J, Gao J, et al. Does tenascin have clinical implications in pathological grade of glioma patients?: A systematic meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(32):e1330.","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"issue":"5","key":"1863_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1097\/00002060-200105000-00005","volume":"80","author":"JA Mukand","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mukand JA, Blackinton DD, Crincoli MG, Lee JJ, Santos BB. Incidence of neurologic deficits and rehabilitation of patients with brain tumors. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(5):346\u201350.","journal-title":"Am J Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1007\/s11060-011-0772-5","volume":"107","author":"M Bartolo","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bartolo M, Zucchella C, Pace A, Lanzetta G, Vecchione C, Bartolo M, et al. Early rehabilitation after surgery improves functional outcome in inpatients with brain tumours. J Neurooncol. 2012;107(3):537\u201344.","journal-title":"J Neurooncol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1863_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1386","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(98)90232-5","volume":"79","author":"ME Huang","year":"1998","unstructured":"Huang ME, Cifu DX, Keyser-Marcus L. Functional outcome after brain tumor and acute stroke: a comparative analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(11):1386\u201390.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1097\/00002060-200007000-00003","volume":"79","author":"ME Huang","year":"2000","unstructured":"Huang ME, Cifu DX, Keyser-Marcus L. Functional outcomes in patients with brain tumor after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison with traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(4):327\u201335.","journal-title":"Am J Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"1863_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.14312\/2052-4994.2013-4","volume":"1","author":"FAB Khan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Khan FAB, Rajapaksa I, Ng L. Outcomes of social support programs in brain cancer survivors in an Australian community cohort: a prospective study. J Cancer Res Therapy. 2013;1:24\u201333.","journal-title":"J Cancer Res Therapy"},{"key":"1863_CR9","first-page":"301","volume-title":"Health systems performance assessment debates, methods and empiricism","author":"JAMC Salomon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Salomon JAMC, Chatterji S, Sadana R, \u00dcst\u00fcn TB, Murray JL. Quantifying individual levels of health: definitions, concepts, and measurement issues. In: Murray CJLED, editor. Health systems performance assessment debates, methods and empiricism. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. p. 301\u201318."},{"key":"1863_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peters MDJGC, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2020 version). In: Romataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis; 2020.","DOI":"10.46658\/JBIMES-20-12"},{"issue":"5","key":"1863_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.3109\/09638288.2016.1145258","volume":"41","author":"A Cieza","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, Prodinger B. Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):574\u201383.","journal-title":"Disabil Rehabil"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1080\/16501970510040263","volume":"37","author":"A Cieza","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212\u20138.","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"1863_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-009-9528-5","volume":"18","author":"CB Terwee","year":"2009","unstructured":"Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(8):1115\u201323.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"1863_CR14","unstructured":"M G. Hand book of neurosurgery. 8th edn. New York: Thieme; 2016."},{"key":"1863_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-13-72","volume":"13","author":"D Peus","year":"2013","unstructured":"Peus D, Newcomb N, Hofer S. Appraisal of the Karnofsky Performance Status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:72.","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.critrevonc.2010.01.015","volume":"77","author":"C Terret","year":"2011","unstructured":"Terret C, Albrand G, Moncenix G, Droz JP. Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) or Physical Performance Test (PPT)? That is the question. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;77(2):142\u20137.","journal-title":"Crit Rev Oncol Hematol"},{"key":"1863_CR17","volume-title":"EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual","author":"PAN Fayers","year":"2001","unstructured":"Fayers PAN, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. 3d ed. Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; 2001.","edition":"3d"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1007\/s11060-013-1069-7","volume":"112","author":"B Flechl","year":"2013","unstructured":"Flechl B, Ackerl M, Sax C, Oberndorfer S, Calabek B, Sizoo E, et al. The caregivers\u2019 perspective on the end-of-life phase of glioblastoma patients. J Neurooncol. 2013;112(3):403\u201311.","journal-title":"J Neurooncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.12968\/ijpn.2010.16.1.46180","volume":"16","author":"A Arber","year":"2010","unstructured":"Arber A, Faithfull S, Plaskota M, Lucas C, de Vries K. A study of patients with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers: symptoms and access to services. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2010;16(1):24\u201330.","journal-title":"Int J Palliat Nurs"},{"key":"1863_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"a3006","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a3006","volume":"338","author":"DG Contopoulos-Ioannidis","year":"2009","unstructured":"Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Karvouni A, Kouri I, Ioannidis JP. Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: Systematic review. BMJ. 2009;338:a3006.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cct.2009.02.005","volume":"30","author":"JF Scoggins","year":"2009","unstructured":"Scoggins JF, Patrick DL. The use of patient-reported outcomes instruments in registered clinical trials: evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(4):289\u201392.","journal-title":"Contemp Clin Trials"},{"issue":"7","key":"1863_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1007\/s40520-018-1034-6","volume":"31","author":"M Hopman-Rock","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hopman-Rock M, van Hirtum H, de Vreede P, Freiberger E. Activities of daily living in older community-dwelling persons: a systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(7):917\u201325.","journal-title":"Aging Clin Exp Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2011.12.038","volume":"114","author":"S Laxe","year":"2012","unstructured":"Laxe S, Tschiesner U, Zasler N, Lopez-Blazquez R, Tormos JM, Bernabeu M. What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(6):645\u201350.","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-0674","volume":"43","author":"M Sivan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sivan M, O\u2019Connor RJ, Makower S, Levesley M, Bhakta B. Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(3):181\u20139.","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"1863_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.2340\/16501977-2225","volume":"49","author":"B Prodinger","year":"2017","unstructured":"Prodinger B, O\u2019Connor RJ, Stucki G, Tennant A. Establishing score equivalence of the Functional Independence Measure motor scale and the Barthel Index, utilising the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Rasch measurement theory. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(5):416\u201322.","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"key":"1863_CR26","unstructured":"ICF Research Branch: ICF Research Branch, a cooperation partner within the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (at DIMDI); 2017. https:\/\/www.icf-research-branch.org\/icf-core-sets"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1033","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2010.01.012","volume":"46","author":"MJ Taphoorn","year":"2010","unstructured":"Taphoorn MJ, Claassens L, Aaronson NK, Coens C, Mauer M, Osoba D, et al. An international validation study of the EORTC brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) for assessing health-related quality of life and symptoms in brain cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(6):1033\u201340.","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"1863_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-11-145","volume":"11","author":"YS Shin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Shin YS, Kim JH. Validation of the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) in patients with brain tumors. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:145.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"1863_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-10-54","volume":"10","author":"A Khoshnevisan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Khoshnevisan A, Yekaninejad MS, Ardakani SK, Pakpour AH, Mardani A, Aaronson NK. Translation and validation of the EORTC brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) for use in Iran. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:54.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"issue":"11","key":"1863_CR30","first-page":"588","volume":"48","author":"A Bunevicius","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bunevicius A, Tamasauskas S, Tamasauskas A, Deltuva V. Evaluation of health-related quality of life in Lithuanian brain tumor patients using the EORTC brain cancer module. Medicina (Kaunas). 2012;48(11):588\u201394.","journal-title":"Medicina (Kaunas)"},{"key":"1863_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-11-56","volume":"11","author":"JX Cheng","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cheng JX, Liu BL, Zhang X, Zhang YQ, Lin W, Wang R, et al. The validation of the standard Chinese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in pre-operative patients with brain tumor in China. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:56.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1097\/NCC.0000000000000390","volume":"40","author":"SK Arli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Arli SK, Gurkan A. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-brain questionnaire. Cancer Nurs. 2017;40(3):224\u20139.","journal-title":"Cancer Nurs"},{"issue":"5","key":"1863_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19950301)75:5<1151::AID-CNCR2820750515>3.0.CO;2-Q","volume":"75","author":"MA Weitzner","year":"1995","unstructured":"Weitzner MA, Meyers CA, Gelke CK, Byrne KS, Cella DF, Levin VA. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale. Development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors. Cancer. 1995;75(5):1151\u201361.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1017","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-013-2060-8","volume":"22","author":"N Thavarajah","year":"2014","unstructured":"Thavarajah N, Bedard G, Zhang L, Cella D, Beaumont JL, Tsao M, et al. Psychometric validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy\u2013brain (FACT-Br) for assessing quality of life in patients with brain metastases. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(4):1017\u201328.","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2354.2009.01170.x","volume":"20","author":"N Kontodimopoulos","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kontodimopoulos N, Ntinoulis K, Niakas D. Validity of the Greek EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 for measuring health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011;20(3):354\u201361.","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1097\/COC.0b013e31817e6ec2","volume":"32","author":"A Ozturk","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ozturk A, Sarihan S, Ercan I, Karadag M. Evaluating quality of life and pulmonary function of long-term survivors of non-small cell lung cancer treated with radical or postoperative radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2009;32(1):65\u201372.","journal-title":"Am J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1019","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-007-9210-8","volume":"16","author":"M Nicklasson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nicklasson M, Bergman B. Validity, reliability and clinical relevance of EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13 in patients with chest malignancies in a palliative setting. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(6):1019\u201328.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"1863_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/85.5.365","volume":"85","author":"NK Aaronson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365\u201376.","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"issue":"11","key":"1863_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(96)90130-6","volume":"77","author":"MG Stineman","year":"1996","unstructured":"Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, Tassoni CJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Fiedler R, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(11):1101\u20138.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1191\/026921501676877265","volume":"15","author":"AA Kucukdeveci","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kucukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the functional independence measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(3):311\u20139.","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"10","key":"1863_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(96)90068-4","volume":"77","author":"N Pollak","year":"1996","unstructured":"Pollak N, Rheault W, Stoecker JL. Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(10):1056\u201361.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.sc.3100341","volume":"35","author":"SS Karamehmetoglu","year":"1997","unstructured":"Karamehmetoglu SS, Karacan I, Elbasi N, Demirel G, Koyuncu H, Dosoglu M. The functional independence measure in spinal cord injured patients: comparison of questioning with observational rating. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(1):22\u20135.","journal-title":"Spinal Cord"},{"issue":"12","key":"1863_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(96)90184-7","volume":"77","author":"KJ Ottenbacher","year":"1996","unstructured":"Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(12):1226\u201332.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"5","key":"1863_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1016\/0003-9993(93)90119-U","volume":"74","author":"TA Dodds","year":"1993","unstructured":"Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(5):531\u20136.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.47102\/annals-acadmedsg.V36N1p3","volume":"36","author":"YS Ng","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ng YS, Jung H, Tay SS, Bok CW, Chiong Y, Lim PA. Results from a prospective acute inpatient rehabilitation database: clinical characteristics and functional outcomes using the Functional Independence Measure. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2007;36(1):3\u201310.","journal-title":"Ann Acad Med Singapore"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR46","first-page":"271","volume":"26","author":"BS Tur","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tur BS, Gursel YK, Yavuzer G, Kucukdeveci A, Arasil T. Rehabilitation outcome of Turkish stroke patients: in a team approach setting. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003;26(4):271\u20137.","journal-title":"Int J Rehabil Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1053\/apmr.2001.21525","volume":"82","author":"KM Hall","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazic B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(3):367\u201374.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1080\/16501970600609774","volume":"38","author":"WJ Coster","year":"2006","unstructured":"Coster WJ, Haley SM, Jette AM. Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(4):237\u201342.","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"1863_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1159\/000094850","volume":"22","author":"S Oveisgharan","year":"2006","unstructured":"Oveisgharan S, Shirani S, Ghorbani A, Soltanzade A, Baghaei A, Hosseini S, et al. Barthel index in a Middle-East country: translation, validity and reliability. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(5\u20136):350\u20134.","journal-title":"Cerebrovasc Dis"},{"issue":"8","key":"1863_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"703","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(89)90065-6","volume":"42","author":"S Shah","year":"1989","unstructured":"Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703\u20139.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01274.x","volume":"236","author":"A Roden-Jullig","year":"1994","unstructured":"Roden-Jullig A, Britton M, Gustafsson C, Fugl-Meyer A. Validation of four scales for the acute stage of stroke. J Intern Med. 1994;236(2):125\u201336.","journal-title":"J Intern Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1191\/1352458504ms1056oa","volume":"10","author":"L Nicholl","year":"2004","unstructured":"Nicholl L, Hobart J, Dunwoody L, Cramp F, Lowe-Strong A. Measuring disability in multiple sclerosis: is the Community Dependency Index an improvement on the Barthel Index? Mult Scler. 2004;10(4):447\u201350.","journal-title":"Mult Scler"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"408","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0031-1273728","volume":"50","author":"JD Rollnik","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rollnik JD. The Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI). Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2011;50(6):408\u201311.","journal-title":"Rehabilitation (Stuttg)"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215504cr741oa","volume":"18","author":"C Liu","year":"2004","unstructured":"Liu C, McNeil JE, Greenwood R. Rehabilitation outcomes after brain injury: disability measures or goal achievement? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(4):398\u2013404.","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1191\/0269215506cr917oa","volume":"20","author":"H Houlden","year":"2006","unstructured":"Houlden H, Edwards M, McNeil J, Greenwood R. Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(2):153\u20139.","journal-title":"Clin Rehabil"},{"issue":"6846","key":"1863_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.305.6846.160","volume":"305","author":"JE Brazier","year":"1992","unstructured":"Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O\u2019Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305(6846):160\u20134.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"10","key":"1863_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1812","DOI":"10.1161\/01.STR.27.10.1812","volume":"27","author":"C Anderson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke. 1996;27(10):1812\u20136.","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-013-0442-5","volume":"23","author":"DE Stull","year":"2014","unstructured":"Stull DE, Wasiak R, Kreif N, Raluy M, Colligs A, Seitz C, et al. Validation of the SF-36 in patients with endometriosis. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(1):103\u201317.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20070214","volume":"88","author":"T Steffen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Steffen T, Seney M. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism. Phys Ther. 2008;88(6):733\u201346.","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"1863_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1161\/01.STR.29.1.63","volume":"29","author":"P Dorman","year":"1998","unstructured":"Dorman P, Slattery J, Farrell B, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke. 1998;29(1):63\u20138.","journal-title":"Stroke"},{"issue":"12","key":"1863_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2173","DOI":"10.1089\/neu.2010.1353","volume":"27","author":"MR Guilfoyle","year":"2010","unstructured":"Guilfoyle MR, Seeley HM, Corteen E, Harkin C, Richards H, Menon DK, et al. Assessing quality of life after traumatic brain injury: examination of the short form 36 health survey. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(12):2173\u201381.","journal-title":"J Neurotrauma"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1097\/00001199-199906000-00002","volume":"14","author":"C Paniak","year":"1999","unstructured":"Paniak C, Phillips K, Toller-Lobe G, Durand A, Nagy J. Sensitivity of three recent questionnaires to mild traumatic brain injury-related effects. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(3):211\u20139.","journal-title":"J Head Trauma Rehabil"},{"issue":"5","key":"1863_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1080\/16501970510037573","volume":"37","author":"AH Elhan","year":"2005","unstructured":"Elhan AH, Kutlay S, Kucukdeveci AA, Cotuk C, Ozturk G, Tesio L, et al. Psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(5):306\u201311.","journal-title":"J Rehabil Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3956(75)90026-6","volume":"12","author":"MF Folstein","year":"1975","unstructured":"Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. \u201cMini-mental state\u201d. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189\u201398.","journal-title":"J Psychiatr Res"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"1863_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1017\/S1041610297004754","volume":"9","author":"DW Molloy","year":"1997","unstructured":"Molloy DW, Standish TI. A guide to the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9(Suppl 1):87\u201394.","journal-title":"Int Psychogeriatr"},{"issue":"5","key":"1863_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2010.12.034","volume":"92","author":"J Toglia","year":"2011","unstructured":"Toglia J, Fitzgerald KA, O\u2019Dell MW, Mastrogiovanni AR, Lin CD. The Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in persons with mild subacute stroke: relationship to functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(5):792\u20138.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"issue":"6","key":"1863_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1093\/ageing\/31.6.451","volume":"31","author":"H Blake","year":"2002","unstructured":"Blake H, McKinney M, Treece K, Lee E, Lincoln NB. An evaluation of screening measures for cognitive impairment after stroke. Age Ageing. 2002;31(6):451\u20136.","journal-title":"Age Ageing"},{"issue":"8","key":"1863_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2220","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19800415)45:8<2220::AID-CNCR2820450835>3.0.CO;2-Q","volume":"45","author":"JW Yates","year":"1980","unstructured":"Yates JW, Chalmer B, McKegney FP. Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky performance status. Cancer. 1980;45(8):2220\u20134.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"1863_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1037\/0278-6133.3.2.129","volume":"3","author":"A Grieco","year":"1984","unstructured":"Grieco A, Long CJ. Investigation of the Karnofsky Performance Status as a measure of quality of life. Health Psychol. 1984;3(2):129\u201342.","journal-title":"Health Psychol"},{"issue":"9","key":"1863_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2002","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19840501)53:9<2002::AID-CNCR2820530933>3.0.CO;2-W","volume":"53","author":"V Mor","year":"1984","unstructured":"Mor V, Laliberte L, Morris JN, Wiemann M. The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting. Cancer. 1984;53(9):2002\u20137.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"1863_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.1984.2.3.187","volume":"2","author":"CC Schag","year":"1984","unstructured":"Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2(3):187\u201393.","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1863_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-4679(199407)50:4<596::AID-JCLP2270500416>3.0.CO;2-S","volume":"50","author":"JP O'Donnell","year":"1994","unstructured":"O\u2019Donnell JP, Macgregor LA, Dabrowski JJ, Oestreicher JM, Romero JJ. Construct validity of neuropsychological tests of conceptual and attentional abilities. J Clin Psychol. 1994;50(4):596\u2013600.","journal-title":"J Clin Psychol"}],"container-title":["Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12955-021-01863-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12955-021-01863-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12955-021-01863-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,10]],"date-time":"2023-11-10T19:46:01Z","timestamp":1699645561000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/hqlo.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12955-021-01863-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,9]]},"references-count":72,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1863"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-021-01863-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1477-7525"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1477-7525","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 September 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 September 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 October 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate."}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"234"}}