{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,17]],"date-time":"2026-04-17T03:27:35Z","timestamp":1776396455163,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761782400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1761782400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100015539","name":"Australian Government","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Not available"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Not available"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100015539","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Health Qual Life Outcomes"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-025-02429-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T00:53:39Z","timestamp":1761785619000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Developing items for inclusion in a new pain-specific patient-reported outcome measure for pelvic floor surgery: a mixed-methods study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Sheymonti S.","family":"Hoque","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Susannah","family":"Ahern","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Helen E.","family":"O\u2019Connell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rasa","family":"Ruseckaite","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"2429_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-021-00547-7","volume":"15","author":"M Motamedi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Motamedi M, Carter SM, Degeling C. Women\u2019s experiences of and perspectives on transvaginal mesh surgery for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: A quality systematic review. Patient. 2022;15(2):157\u201369.","journal-title":"Patient"},{"key":"2429_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"975829","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2022.975829","volume":"10","author":"B Wang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wang B, Chen Y, Zhu, et al. Global burden and trends of pelvic organ prolapse associated with aging women: an observational trend study from 1990 to 2019. Front Public Health. 2022;10:975829.","journal-title":"Front Public Health"},{"key":"2429_CR3","unstructured":"Ahern S, Lasetter C, Tapley K et al. The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry Annual Report. Published February 15, 2024. Accessed 1 March, 2025. https:\/\/apfpr.org.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/APFPR23_Report_Web_V-1.1.pdf"},{"issue":"3","key":"2429_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000083","volume":"20","author":"GE Dunn","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dunn GE, Hansen BL, Egger MJ, et al. Changed women: the long-term impact of vaginal mesh complications. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(3):131\u20136.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2429_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1186\/s12905-021-01192-w","volume":"21","author":"C Shi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Shi C, Zhao Y, Hu Q, Gong R, Yin Y, Xia Z. Clinical analysis of pain after transvaginal mesh surgery in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. BMC Women\u2019s Health. 2021;21(1):46.","journal-title":"BMC Women\u2019s Health"},{"key":"2429_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2256-y","volume":"25","author":"AN Gyang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gyang AN, Feranec JB, Patel RC, Lambu GM. Managing chronic pelvic pain following reconstructive pelvic surgery with transvaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;25:313\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"2429_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100514","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cont.2022.100514","volume":"1","author":"SE Koops","year":"2022","unstructured":"Koops SE, Schreuder HW, Heydanus L, Zanten F. De novo pain and relief of pain after abdominal synthetic mesh implants. Continence. 2022;1(4):100514.","journal-title":"Continence"},{"key":"2429_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"MacCraith E, Cunnane EM, Joyce M et al. Comparison of synthetic mesh erosion and chronic pain rates after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32:573\u201380.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04612-x"},{"issue":"7","key":"2429_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15441","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05425-w","volume":"34","author":"M Ralphsmith","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ralphsmith M, Ahern S, Dean J, O\u2019Connell HE, Ruseckaite R. Development of a conceptual framework for a new patient-reported outcome measure for pain in women following surgery for pelvic floor disorders: a qualitative study. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(7):15441\u201350.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"2429_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-02679-w","volume":"38","author":"N Mangir","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mangir N, Roman S, Chapple CR, MacNeil S. Complications related to use of mesh implants in surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: infection or inflammation? World J Urol. 2020;38(1):73\u201380.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2429_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1007\/s11427-023-2508-x","volume":"67","author":"Z Zhang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhang Z, Guo J, Tian W, et al. Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh repair in a cohort with a minimum of 10-year follow-up. Sci China Life Si. 2024;67(5):1061\u20138.","journal-title":"Sci China Life Si"},{"key":"2429_CR12","unstructured":"US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims. Published. December 2009. Accessed 20 October, 2024. https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/regulatory-information\/search-fda-guidance-documents\/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-development-support-labeling-claims"},{"issue":"9","key":"2429_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2325","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-022-05126-4","volume":"33","author":"M Ralphsmith","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ralphsmith M, Ahern S, Dean J, Ruseckaite R. Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(9):2325\u201334.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"2429_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104454","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpain.2023.12.011","volume":"25","author":"SS Hoque","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hoque SS, Ahern S, O\u2019Connell HE, Romero L, Ruseckaite R. Comparing patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a scoping review. J Pain. 2024;25(6):104454.","journal-title":"J Pain"},{"key":"2429_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"785134","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.785134","volume":"13","author":"AA Alhazmi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Alhazmi AA, Kaufmann A. Phenomenological qualitative methods applied to the analysis of cross-cultural experience in novel educational social contexts. Front Psychol. 2022;13:785134.","journal-title":"Front Psychol"},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"2429_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S66","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2007.00269.x","volume":"10","author":"ML Rothman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rothman ML, Beltran P, Cappelleri JC, Lipscomb L, Teschendorf B. Patient-reported outcomes: conceptual issues. Value Health. 2007;10(Suppl 2):S66\u201375.","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"2429_CR17","unstructured":"Qualtrics USA, Published. 2005. Accessed 21 October, 2024. https:\/\/www.qualtrics.com"},{"key":"2429_CR18","unstructured":"Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD et al. October,. The RAND\/UCLA Appropriateness Method User\u2019s Manual. Published 2001. Accessed 22 2024. https:\/\/www.rand.org\/content\/dam\/rand\/pubs\/monograph_reports\/2011\/MR1269.pdf"},{"key":"2429_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"561103","DOI":"10.3389\/fpubh.2020.00457","volume":"8","author":"M Niederberger","year":"2020","unstructured":"Niederberger M, Spranger J. Delphi technique in health sciences: a map. Front Public Health. 2020;8:561103.","journal-title":"Front Public Health"},{"issue":"1","key":"2429_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-022-07657-4","volume":"22","author":"R Ruseckaite","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ruseckaite R, Maharaj AD, Dean J, et al. Preliminary development of recommendations for the inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical quality registries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):276.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"2429_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/brb3.898","volume":"8","author":"LR Hepworth","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hepworth LR, Rowe FJ. Using delphi methodology in the development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for stroke survivors with visual impairment. Brain Behav. 2018;8(2):e00898.","journal-title":"Brain Behav"},{"issue":"4","key":"2429_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1159\/000516599","volume":"90","author":"D Carrozzino","year":"2021","unstructured":"Carrozzino D, Patierno C, Guidi J, et al. Clinimetric criteria for patient-reported outcome measures. Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(4):222\u201332.","journal-title":"Psychother Psychosom"},{"issue":"1","key":"2429_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1186\/s40359-025-02820-y","volume":"13","author":"D Carrozzino","year":"2025","unstructured":"Carrozzino D, Christensen KS, Guiducci S, Marangoni A, Romanazzo S, Cosci F. The assessment of psychological well-being in systemic sclerosis: a clinimetric validation. BMC Psychol. 2025;13(1):498.","journal-title":"BMC Psychol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2429_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15979","volume":"131","author":"K Aibel","year":"2023","unstructured":"Aibel K, Moldwin R. Validation of the \u2018pelvic pain map\u2019: a new self-assessment tool for chronic pelvic pain localisation. BJU Int. 2023;131(6):763\u20139.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"2429_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/1609406917733847","volume":"16","author":"LS Nowell","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1\u201313.","journal-title":"Int J Qual Methods"},{"issue":"1","key":"2429_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-1","volume":"5","author":"RB Akin","year":"2005","unstructured":"Akin RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5(1):1\u201312.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2429_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1136\/emermed-2021-211390","volume":"39","author":"T Lines","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lines T, Burdick C, Dewez X, et al. Nature and extent of selection bias resulting from convenience sampling in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2022;39(4):325\u201330.","journal-title":"Emerg Med J"},{"issue":"2","key":"2429_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc","volume":"126","author":"CJ Pannucci","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619\u201325.","journal-title":"Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2429_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1177\/08901171211037531","volume":"36","author":"R Levi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Levi R, Ridberg R, Akers M, Seligman H. Survey fraud and the integrity of web-based survey research. Am J Health Promot. 2022;36(1):18\u201320.","journal-title":"Am J Health Promot"},{"issue":"4","key":"2429_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01569.x","volume":"32","author":"J Greatorex","year":"2000","unstructured":"Greatorex J, Dexter T. An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1016\u201324.","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"}],"container-title":["Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12955-025-02429-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12955-025-02429-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12955-025-02429-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]],"date-time":"2025-10-30T00:53:40Z","timestamp":1761785620000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/hqlo.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12955-025-02429-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2429"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-025-02429-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1477-7525"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1477-7525","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 September 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 October 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (Australia). The study was approved by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee, Melbourne, Australia (phases 1 and 2 project ID: 35901; phase 3 project ID: 38254). In phases 1 and 2, written and verbal informed consent were obtained from all study participants. In phase 3, an implied consent process was utilised, where it was assumed that panel members consented to participate by continuing in the first and second rounds of the Delphi survey.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Consent for publication of de-identified data was obtained from all participants.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"The authors have no conflicts of interest.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"110"}}