{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T12:05:39Z","timestamp":1774958739922,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["81401269"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["81401269"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reprod Biol Endocrinol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-016-0188-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,30]],"date-time":"2016-08-30T06:55:21Z","timestamp":1472540121000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":59,"title":["Which one has a better obstetric and perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancy, IVF\/ICSI or FET?: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"J.","family":"Zhao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Q.","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Y. P.","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"188_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.05.019","volume":"98","author":"A Maheshwari","year":"2012","unstructured":"Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:368\u201377.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"188_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.04.014","volume":"170","author":"VS Talaulikar","year":"2013","unstructured":"Talaulikar VS, Arulkumaran S. Maternal, perinatal and long-term outcomes after assisted reproductive techniques (ART): implications for clinical practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170:13\u20139.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"188_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.05.019","volume":"102","author":"R Weinerman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Weinerman R, Mainigi M. Why we should transfer frozen instead of fresh embryos: the translational rationale. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:10\u20138.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"188_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0032-1311525","volume":"30","author":"A Pinborg","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pinborg A. To transfer fresh or thawed embryos? Semin Reprod Med. 2012;30:230\u20135.","journal-title":"Semin Reprod Med"},{"key":"188_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"822","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu032","volume":"20","author":"E Bloise","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bloise E, Feuer SK, Rinaudo PF. Comparative intrauterine development and placental function of ART concept: implications for human reproductive medicine and animal breeding. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:822\u201339.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"188_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1095\/biolreprod.113.110411","volume":"90","author":"MA Mainigi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mainigi MA, Olalere D, Burd I, Sapienza C, Bartolomei M, Coutifaris C. Periimplantation hormonal milieu: elucidating mechanisms of abnormal placentation and fetal growth. Biol Reprod. 2014;90:1\u20139.","journal-title":"Biol Reprod"},{"key":"188_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1851","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq124","volume":"25","author":"J Mouzon De","year":"2010","unstructured":"De Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1851\u201362.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"188_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34482-6","volume":"32","author":"JK Min","year":"2010","unstructured":"Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, Gysler M, Hemmings R, Cheung AP, et al. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363\u201377.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"188_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2008.01.007","volume":"102","author":"JOINT SOGC-CFAS","year":"2008","unstructured":"JOINT SOGC-CFAS. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102:203\u201316.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"188_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138542","volume":"9","author":"I Wada","year":"1994","unstructured":"Wada I, Macnamee MC, Wick K, Bradfield JM, Brinsden PR. Birth characteristics and perinatal outcome of babies conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:543\u20136.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"188_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1699","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deq117","volume":"25","author":"M Wikland","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wikland M, Hardarson T, Hillensjo T, Westin C, Westlander G, Wood M, et al. Obstetric outcomes after transfer of vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1699\u2013707.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"188_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-010-9470-z","volume":"27","author":"A Aflatoonian","year":"2010","unstructured":"Aflatoonian A, Mansoori Moghaddam F, Mashayekhy M, Mohamadian F. Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:695\u2013700.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"188_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1650","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.12.033","volume":"83","author":"YA Wang","year":"2005","unstructured":"Wang YA, Sullivan EA, Black D, Dean J, Bryant J, Chapman M. Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1650\u20138.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"188_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2227","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den254","volume":"10","author":"F Belva","year":"2008","unstructured":"Belva F, Henriet S, van den Abbeel E, Camus M, Devroey P, van der Elst J, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008;10:2227\u201338.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"188_CR15","unstructured":"Wells G, SBOD. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of non-randomised Studies in Meta-analysis. In: Proceedings or the Third Symposium on Systematic Reviews beyond the Basics. Improving Quality and Impact, Oxford: 3\u20135 July 2000."},{"key":"188_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.09.025","volume":"101","author":"O Ishihara","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ishihara O, Araki R, Kuwahara A, Itakura A, Saito H, Adamson GD. Impact of frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:128\u201333.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"188_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1320","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2009.05.091","volume":"94","author":"A Pinborg","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pinborg A, Loft A, Henningsen AA, Nyboe RS, Andersen A. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: The Danish National Cohort Study 1995\u20132006. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1320\u20137.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"188_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2545","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/det272","volume":"28","author":"U-B Wennerholm","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wennerholm U-B, Henningsen A-KA, Romundstad LB, Bergh C, Pinborg A, Skjaerven R, et al. Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2545\u201353.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"188_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des036","volume":"27","author":"A Sazonova","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sazonova A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Wennerholm U-B, Bergh C. Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved\/ thawed embryos. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1343\u201350.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"188_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dms044","volume":"19","author":"A Pinborg","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Soderstrom-Anttila V, et al. Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:87\u2013104.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"188_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu027","volume":"20","author":"J Evans","year":"2014","unstructured":"Evans J, Hannan NJ, Edgell TA, Vollenhoven BJ, Lutjen PJ, Osianlis T, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer: backing clinical decisions with scientific and clinical evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:808\u201321.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"188_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"548","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.05.049","volume":"95","author":"S Kansal Kalra","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kansal Kalra S, Ratcliffe SJ, Milman L, Gracia CR, Coutifaris C, Barnhart KT. Perinatal morbidity after in vitro fertilization is lower with frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:548\u201353.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"key":"188_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep376","volume":"25","author":"DL Healy","year":"2010","unstructured":"Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, Jaques A, Rushford D, Garrett C, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria. Australia Hum Reprod. 2010;25:265\u201374.","journal-title":"Australia Hum Reprod"},{"key":"188_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1330","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep046","volume":"24","author":"DJ Amor","year":"2009","unstructured":"Amor DJ, Xu JX, Halliday JL, Francis I, Healy DL, Breheny S, et al. Pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have low levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) leading to a high rate of false-positive results in first trimester screening for Down syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1330\u20138.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"188_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den150","volume":"23","author":"W Shih","year":"2008","unstructured":"Shih W, Rushford DD, Bourne H, Garrett C, McBain JC, Healy DL, et al. Factors affecting low birth weight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1644\u201353.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12958-016-0188-3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,24]],"date-time":"2017-06-24T17:38:15Z","timestamp":1498325895000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/rbej.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12958-016-0188-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,30]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["188"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12958-016-0188-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1477-7827"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1477-7827","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,8,30]]},"article-number":"51"}}