{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,24]],"date-time":"2026-09-24T16:26:34Z","timestamp":1790267194692,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1631577600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1631577600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004731","name":"natural science foundation of zhejiang province","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["LQ18H040009"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["LQ18H040009"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004731","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reprod Biol Endocrinol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background<\/jats:title><jats:p>Sequential embryo transfer has been proposed as a way to\u00a0improve embryo implantation in women for<jats:italic>in vitro<\/jats:italic>fertilization (IVF), but the effect on pregnancy outcomes remains ambiguous. This systematic review was conducted to investigate the efficacy of sequential embryo transfer on IVF outcomes.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title><jats:p>A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect and Wanfang databases. Data were pooled using a random- or fixed-effects model according to study heterogeneity. The results are expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated by the I<jats:sup>2<\/jats:sup>statistic. The study protocol was registered prospectively on INPLASY, ID: INPLASY202180019.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results<\/jats:title><jats:p>Ten eligible studies with 2658 participants compared sequential embryo transfer and cleavage transfer, while four studies with 513 participants compared sequential embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer. The synthesis results showed that the clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the sequential embryo transfer group than in the cleavage embryo transfer group (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.26\u20131.60,<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>&lt; 0.01) for both women who did experience repeated implantation failure (RIF) (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.17\u20132.13,<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>&lt; 0.01) and did not experience RIF (Non-RIF) (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.20\u20131.66,<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>&lt; 0.01). However, sequential embryo transfer showed no significant benefit over blastocyst embryo transfer.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title><jats:p>The current systematic review demonstrates that sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer improve the clinical pregnancy rate over conventional cleavage embryo transfer. For women with adequate embryos, sequential transfer could be attempted following careful consideration. More high-grade evidence from prospective randomized studies\u00a0is warranted.<\/jats:p><\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T06:02:44Z","timestamp":1631599364000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["Sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and IVF outcomes: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Jianeng","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6217-7771","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Chong","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Huanhuan","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yan","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"824_CR1","first-page":"431","volume":"68","author":"F Mitri","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mitri F, Nayot D, Casper RF, et al. Current tools for the optimization of embryo transfer technique for recurrent implantation failure. Minerva Ginecologica. 2016;68(4):431\u201349.","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecologica."},{"issue":"1","key":"824_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jri.2011.04.006","volume":"90","author":"A Fukui","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fukui A, Funamizu A, Yokota M, et al. Uterine and circulating natural killer cells and their roles in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, implantation failure and preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. 2011;90(1):105\u201310.","journal-title":"J Reprod Immunol."},{"issue":"11","key":"824_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1227","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-012-9861-4","volume":"29","author":"A Simon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Simon A, Laufer N. Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(11):1227\u201339.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet."},{"issue":"4","key":"824_CR4","first-page":"333","volume":"38","author":"X Lu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lu X, Liu S, Dong X, et al. Research progress of two-step sequential embryo transfer strategy in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Chin J Reprod Contraception. 2018;38(4):333\u20136.","journal-title":"Chin J Reprod Contraception."},{"issue":"6","key":"824_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"630","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61773-7","volume":"9","author":"F Guerif","year":"2004","unstructured":"Guerif F, Bidault R, Gasnier O, et al. Efficacy of blastocyst transfer after implantation failure. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9(6):630\u20136.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online."},{"issue":"3","key":"824_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2003.08.031","volume":"81","author":"E Levitas","year":"2004","unstructured":"Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Har-Vardi I, et al. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2-3 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(3):567\u201371.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"key":"824_CR7","unstructured":"Cochrane Training: Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 6.2.2021). https:\/\/training.cochrane.org\/handbook\/current. Accessed 2 June 2021."},{"key":"824_CR8","unstructured":"Wells G. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Beyond the Basics. 2014."},{"key":"824_CR9","unstructured":"Core software for Cochrane Reviews: https:\/\/training.cochrane.org\/online-learning\/core-software-cochrane-reviews\/revman. Accessed 2 June 2021."},{"key":"824_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Almog B, Levin I, Wagman I, et al. Interval double transfer improves treatment success in patients with repeated IVF\/ET failures. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25(8):353-7.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-008-9237-y"},{"issue":"11","key":"824_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1023\/B:JARG.0000006708.26464.23","volume":"20","author":"SJ Phillips","year":"2003","unstructured":"Phillips SJ, Dean NL, Buckett WM, et al. Consecutive Transfer of Day 3 Embryos and of Day 5\u20136 Blastocysts Increases Overall Pregnancy Rates Associated with Blastocyst Culture. J Assisted Reprod Genetics. 2003;20(11):461\u20134.","journal-title":"J Assisted Reprod Genetics."},{"key":"824_CR12","first-page":"1","volume":"4","author":"A Wael","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wael A. Ismail Madkour, Bassel Noah, HenaZaheer et al. Does sequential embryo transfer improve pregnancy rate in patients with repeated implantation failure? A randomized control study. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2015;4:1\u20137.","journal-title":"Middle East Fertil Soc J."},{"issue":"1","key":"824_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.10.004","volume":"26","author":"C Fang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fang C, Huang R, Li TT, et al. Day-2 and day-3 sequential transfer improves pregnancy rate in patients with repeated IVF\u2013embryo transfer failure: a retrospective case\u2013control study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(1):30\u20135.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online."},{"issue":"3","key":"824_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1445-5781.2003.00031.x","volume":"2","author":"K Kyono","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kyono K, Fukunaga N, Chiba S, et al. Two-step consecutive transfer of early embryos and blastocysts. Reprod Med Biol. 2010;2(3):133\u20137.","journal-title":"Reprod Med Biol."},{"issue":"3","key":"824_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)61442-3","volume":"13","author":"R Machtinger","year":"2006","unstructured":"Machtinger R, Dor J, Margolin M, et al. Sequential transfer of day 3 embryos and blastocysts after previous IVF failures despite adequate ovarian response. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(3):376\u20139.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online."},{"issue":"3","key":"824_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.07.974","volume":"83","author":"A Sakae Goto","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sakae Goto A, Masahide Shiotani A, Masaru Kitagawa A, et al. Effectiveness of two-step (consecutive) embryo transfer in patients who have two embryos on day 2: Comparison with cleavage-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steri. 2005;83(3):721\u20133.","journal-title":"Fertil Steri."},{"issue":"01","key":"824_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1017\/S096719941100058X","volume":"21","author":"C Yazbeck","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yazbeck C, Jamaa NB, Hazout A, et al. Advantages of the two-step embryo transfer strategy in human IVF\/ICSI cycles. Zygote. 2013;21(01):77\u201383.","journal-title":"Zygote."},{"issue":"3","key":"824_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.4103\/2305-0500.284269","volume":"9","author":"G Kaya","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kaya G, Aly\u00fcr\u00fck B, Cice OSY, et al. Effect of double cleavage stage versus sequential cleavage and blastocyst stage embryo transfer on clinical pregnancy rates. Asian Pacific J Reprod. 2020;9(3):124\u20138.","journal-title":"Asian Pacific J Reprod."},{"key":"824_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"936","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)01549-1","volume":"74","author":"J Ashkenazi","year":"2000","unstructured":"Ashkenazi J, Yoeli R, Orvieto R, et al. Double (consecutive) transfer of early embryos and blastocysts: aims and results. Fertil Sterility. 2000;74:936\u201340.","journal-title":"Fertil Sterility."},{"key":"824_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ensieh Shahrokh Tehraninejad, ElhamRaisi, Fatemeh Bakhtiyari Ghaleh, et al. The sequential embryo transfer compared to blastocyst embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in patients with the three repeated consecutive IVF. A randomized controlled trial. Gynecological Endocrinology.\u00a02019;1-5.","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590.2019.1613639"},{"key":"824_CR21","first-page":"63","volume":"5","author":"D Loutradis","year":"2004","unstructured":"Loutradis D, Drakakis P, Dallianidis K, et al. A double embryo transfer on days 2 and 4 or 5 improves pregnancy outcome in patients with good embryos but repeated failures in IVF or ICSI. Clin Exp Obst Gyn. 2004;5:63\u20136.","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obst Gyn"},{"issue":"6","key":"824_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dml004","volume":"12","author":"H Achache","year":"2006","unstructured":"Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(6):731\u201346.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update."},{"issue":"3","key":"824_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.05.004","volume":"100","author":"M Ruiz-Alonso","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, D\u00edaz-Gimeno P, et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Sterility. 2013;100(3):818\u201324.","journal-title":"Fertil Sterility."},{"issue":"2","key":"824_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.5653\/cerm.2017.44.2.105","volume":"44","author":"SG Stamenov","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stamenov SG, Angelov PD, Angelov CT. Mixed double-embryo transfer: A promising approach for patients with repeated implantation failure. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017;44(2):105\u201310.","journal-title":"Clin Exp Reprod Med."},{"issue":"5","key":"824_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1162","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(03)01178-6","volume":"80","author":"A Mercader","year":"2003","unstructured":"Mercader A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Escudero E, et al. Clinical experience and perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer after coculture of human embryos with human endometrial epithelial cells: a 5-year follow-up study. Fertil Sterility. 2003;80(5):1162\u20138.","journal-title":"Fertil Sterility."},{"key":"824_CR26","unstructured":"Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):89-92."},{"issue":"9","key":"824_CR27","first-page":"754","volume":"37","author":"Z Yiwen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yiwen Z, Rong L. Progress of evaluating and improving endometrial receptivity to cure repeated implantation failure. Chin J Reprod Contracep. 2017;37(9):754\u20138.","journal-title":"Chin J Reprod Contracep."},{"issue":"1","key":"824_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14319","volume":"37","author":"J Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang J, Fei X, Ying Z, et al. Association Between Endometrial\/Subendometrial Vasculature and Embryo Transfer Outcome: A Meta-analysis and Subgroup Analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;37(1):149\u201363.","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med."},{"issue":"5","key":"824_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.05.064","volume":"89","author":"L Zhou","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zhou L, Li R, Rong W, et al. Local injury to the endometrium in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles improves implantation rates. Fertil Sterility. 2008;89(5):1166\u201376.","journal-title":"Fertil Sterility."},{"key":"824_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2032","DOI":"10.18203\/2320-1770.ijrcog20151262","volume":"4","author":"PK Nadkarni","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nadkarni PK, Nadkarni KM, Singh PP, et al. A comparative study of pregnancy outcome of sequential versus day 3 versus only blastocyst (day 6) transfer at a single IVF center over one year. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:2032\u20135.","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"824_CR31","first-page":"1","volume":"17","author":"J Brown","year":"2016","unstructured":"Brown J, Buckingham K, Buckett W, et al. Ultrasoundversus \u2019clini-caltouch\u2019 forcatheterguidanceduringembryotransferinwomen. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;17:1\u201371.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"issue":"5","key":"824_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2017.02.015","volume":"46","author":"L Larue","year":"2017","unstructured":"Larue L, Keromnes G, Massari A, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in IVF. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(5):411\u20136.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod."},{"key":"824_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cozzolino M, Vitagliano A, Troiano G, et al. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: summary of the evidence and new perspectives. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(5):524-42.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.01.015"},{"key":"824_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2263","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.03.028","volume":"95","author":"D Bodri","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bodri D, Colodr\u00f3n, et al. Transvaginalversustransabdominalultrasoundguidanceforembryotransferindonoroocyterecipients:arandomizedclinicaltrial. Fertil. Steril. 2011;95:2263\u20138 2268.e1.","journal-title":"Fertil. Steril"},{"key":"824_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paola RD, Garzon S, Giuliani S, et al.Are we choosing the correct FSH starting dose during controlled ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination cycles? Potential application of a nomogram based on woman's age and markers of ovarian reserve. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(5):1029-35.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-4906-2"},{"key":"824_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tanja, Burnik, Papler, et al. PGR and PTX3 gene expression in cumulus cells from obese and normal weighting women after administration of long-acting recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian stimulation. Arch Gynecol Obstetrics.2019;299(3):863-71.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-018-5031-y"}],"container-title":["Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,9]],"date-time":"2023-01-09T03:58:37Z","timestamp":1673236717000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/rbej.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["824"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1477-7827"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1477-7827","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 September 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 September 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"142"}}