{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T05:27:09Z","timestamp":1790400429769,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,2]],"date-time":"2023-11-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698883200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,2]],"date-time":"2023-11-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698883200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["32270911"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["32270911"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Transl Med"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widely used as an embryo selection technique in in vitro fertilization (IVF), but its effectiveness and potential beneficiary populations are unclear.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent their first oocyte retrieval cycles at CITIC-Xiangya between January 2016 and November 2019, and the associated fresh and thawed embryo transfer cycles up to November 30, 2020. PGT-A (PGT-A group) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)\/IVF (non-PGT-A group) cycles were included. The numbers of oocytes and embryos obtained were unrestricted. In total, 60,580 patients were enrolled, and baseline data were matched between groups using 1:3 propensity score matching. Sensitivity analyses, including propensity score stratification and traditional multivariate logistic regression, were performed on the original unmatched cohort to check the robustness of the overall results. Analyses were stratified by age, body mass index, ovarian reserve\/responsiveness, and potential indications to explore benefits in subgroups. The primary outcome was cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The other outcomes included live birth rate (LBR), pregnancy loss rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy complications, low birth weight rate, and neonatal malformation rate.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In total, 4195 PGT-A users were matched with 10,140 non-PGT-A users. A significant reduction in CLBR was observed in women using PGT-A (27.5% vs. 31.1%; odds ratio (OR)\u2009=\u20090.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78\u20130.91; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). However, women using PGT-A had higher first-transfer pregnancy (63.9% vs. 46.9%; OR\u2009=\u20092.01, 95% CI 1.81\u20132.23; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090<jats:italic>.<\/jats:italic>001) and LBR (52.6% vs. 34.2%, OR\u2009=\u20092.13, 95% CI 1.92\u20132.36; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090<jats:italic>.<\/jats:italic>001) rates and lower rates of early miscarriage (12.8% vs. 20.2%; OR\u2009=\u20090.58, 95% CI 0.48\u20130.70; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001), preterm birth (8.6% vs 17.3%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001), and low birth weight (4.9% vs. 19.3%; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Moreover, subgroup analyses revealed that women aged\u2009\u2265\u200938\u00a0years, diagnosed with recurrent pregnancy loss or intrauterine adhesions benefited from PGT-A, with a significant increase in first-transfer LBR without a decrease in CLBR.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>PGT-A does not increase and decrease CLBR per oocyte retrieval cycle; nonetheless, it is effective in infertile populations with specific indications. PGT-A reduces complications associated with multiple gestations.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12967-023-04641-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,2]],"date-time":"2023-11-02T17:02:49Z","timestamp":1698944569000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Exploring the efficacy and beneficial population of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy start from the oocyte retrieval cycle: a real-world study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"21","author":[{"given":"Shujuan","family":"Ma","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jingnan","family":"Liao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shuoping","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaoyi","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Berthold","family":"Hocher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jing","family":"Tan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yueqiu","family":"Tan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Liang","family":"Hu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fei","family":"Gong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0865-9526","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pingyuan","family":"Xie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3877-2546","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ge","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"4641_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1186\/s13048-017-0318-3","volume":"10","author":"N Gleicher","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gleicher N, Orvieto R. Is the hypothesis of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still supportable? A review. J Ovarian Res. 2017;10(1):21. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13048-017-0318-3.","journal-title":"J Ovarian Res"},{"issue":"12","key":"4641_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2617","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/den400","volume":"23","author":"MA Fritz","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fritz MA. Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now? Hum Reprod. 2008;23(12):2617\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/den400.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"4641_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa067744","volume":"357","author":"S Mastenbroek","year":"2007","unstructured":"Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(1):9\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa067744.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"4641_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1016\/j.molmed.2020.11.009","volume":"27","author":"N Gleicher","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gleicher N, Patrizio P, Brivanlou A. preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy\u2014a castle built on sand. Trends Mol Med. 2021;27(8):731\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.molmed.2020.11.009.","journal-title":"Trends Mol Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"4641_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2802","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu277","volume":"29","author":"F Fiorentino","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fiorentino F, Bono S, Biricik A, et al. Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(12):2802\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deu277.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"3","key":"4641_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1095\/biolreprod.112.106211","volume":"88","author":"X Yin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yin X, Tan K, Vajta G, et al. Massively parallel sequencing for chromosomal abnormality testing in trophectoderm cells of human blastocysts. Biol Reprod. 2013;88(3):69. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1095\/biolreprod.112.106211.","journal-title":"Biol Reprod"},{"issue":"5","key":"4641_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.03.011","volume":"107","author":"C Rubio","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidies in advanced maternal age: a randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(5):1122\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.03.011.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"4641_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.01.002","author":"Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology","year":"2018","unstructured":"Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Electronic address: practice committees of the american society for reproductive medicine and the society for assisted reproductive technology the use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.01.002.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"4641_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346","volume":"112","author":"S Munn\u00e9","year":"2019","unstructured":"Munn\u00e9 S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(6):1071-1079.e7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"11","key":"4641_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2547","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-022-02612-y","volume":"39","author":"SA Roberts","year":"2022","unstructured":"Roberts SA, Wilkinson J, Vail A, Brison DR. Does PGT-A improve assisted reproduction treatment success rates: what can the UK register data tell us? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(11):2547\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-022-02612-y.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"5","key":"4641_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004962","volume":"140","author":"X Cheng","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cheng X, Zhang Y, Deng H, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy with comprehensive chromosome screening in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140(5):769\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004962.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"8","key":"4641_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1939","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02227-9","volume":"38","author":"M Simopoulou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Maziotis E, et al. PGT-A: who and when? \u0391 systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(8):1939\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02227-9.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"3","key":"4641_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004295","volume":"137","author":"EM Dahdouh","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dahdouh EM. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(3):528\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000004295.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4641_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa021","author":"F Carvalho","year":"2020","unstructured":"ESHRE PGT Consortium Steering Committee, Carvalho F, Coonen E, et al. ESHRE PGT consortium good practice recommendations for the organisation of PGT. Hum Reprod Open. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa021.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"issue":"12","key":"4641_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2340","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez229","volume":"34","author":"T Sato","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(12):2340\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dez229.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"10","key":"4641_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2356","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa161","volume":"35","author":"MJ Haviland","year":"2020","unstructured":"Haviland MJ, Murphy LA, Modest AM, et al. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using a matched propensity score design. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(10):2356\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa161.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"8","key":"4641_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2339","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deab117","volume":"36","author":"SJ Bhatt","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bhatt SJ, Marchetto NM, Roy J, Morelli SS, McGovern PG. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(8):2339\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deab117.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"22","key":"4641_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2047","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa2103613","volume":"385","author":"J Yan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, et al. Live Birth with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(22):2047\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa2103613.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"4641_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu303","volume":"30","author":"E Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lee E, Illingworth P, Wilton L, Chambers GM. The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in all 24 chromosomes (PGD-A): systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):473\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deu303.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"4641_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2019.00642","volume":"10","author":"Y Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li Y, Li X, Yang X, et al. Cumulative live birth rates in low prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria: an analysis of 26,697 cycles of in vitro fertilization\/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:642. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fendo.2019.00642.","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol"},{"issue":"11","key":"4641_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gim.2022.08.008","volume":"24","author":"P Xie","year":"2022","unstructured":"Xie P, Liu P, Zhang S, et al. Segmental aneuploidies with 1 Mb resolution in human preimplantation blastocysts. Genet Med. 2022;24(11):2285\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.gim.2022.08.008.","journal-title":"Genet Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"4641_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.006","volume":"43","author":"S Zhou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhou S, Xie P, Zhang S, et al. Complex mosaic blastocysts after preimplantation genetic testing: prevalence and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(2):215\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.006.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"1","key":"4641_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.11.013","volume":"115","author":"JMN Duffy","year":"2021","unstructured":"Duffy JMN, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya S, et al. Standardizing definitions and reporting guidelines for the infertility core outcome set: an international consensus development study. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(1):201\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.11.013.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"9","key":"4641_CR24","first-page":"836","volume":"27","author":"Q Sun","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sun Q, Huang G, Sun H. CSRM consensus on key indicators for quality control in IVF laboratory. J Reprod Med. 2018;27(9):836\u201351.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"4641_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.06.015","volume":"35","author":"ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine","year":"2017","unstructured":"ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(5):494\u2013510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.06.015.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"5","key":"4641_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1701","DOI":"10.1111\/1475-6773.12182","volume":"49","author":"MM Garrido","year":"2014","unstructured":"Garrido MM, Kelley AS, Paris J, et al. Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Serv Res. 2014;49(5):1701\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1475-6773.12182.","journal-title":"Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"22","key":"4641_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x","volume":"1","author":"M Caliendo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Caliendo M, Kopeinig S. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econom Surv. 2008;1(22):31\u201372.","journal-title":"J Econom Surv"},{"issue":"84","key":"4641_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.3982\/ECTA11293","volume":"2","author":"A Abadie","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abadie A, Imbens G. Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica. 2016;2(84):781\u2013807.","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"3","key":"4641_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1080\/00273171.2011.568786","volume":"46","author":"PC Austin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Austin PC. An Introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399\u2013424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00273171.2011.568786.","journal-title":"Multivariate Behav Res"},{"issue":"9403","key":"4641_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)15268-3","volume":"363","author":"WHO Expert Consultation","year":"2004","unstructured":"WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363(9403):157\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(03)15268-3.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"4641_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1452","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005","volume":"105","author":"C Alviggi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, et al. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1452\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"4641_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"952","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.08.002","volume":"102","author":"Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop Group","year":"2014","unstructured":"Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop Group. Improving the reporting of clinical trials of infertility treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):952-959.e15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.08.002.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"9","key":"4641_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.3390\/genes11090973","volume":"11","author":"YX Zhang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhang YX, Chen JJ, Nabu S, et al. The pregnancy outcome of mosaic embryo transfer: a prospective multicenter study and meta-analysis. Genes. 2020;11(9):973. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/genes11090973.","journal-title":"Genes"},{"issue":"12","key":"4641_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajhg.2021.11.002","volume":"108","author":"A Capalbo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Capalbo A, Poli M, Rienzi L, et al. Mosaic human preimplantation embryos and their developmental potential in a prospective, non-selection clinical trial. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108(12):2238\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajhg.2021.11.002.","journal-title":"Am J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"5","key":"4641_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1212","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.11.041","volume":"115","author":"M Viotti","year":"2021","unstructured":"Viotti M, Victor AR, Barnes FL, et al. Using outcome data from one thousand mosaic embryo transfers to formulate an embryo ranking system for clinical use. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(5):1212\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.11.041.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"4641_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmz050","volume":"26","author":"M Popovic","year":"2020","unstructured":"Popovic M, Dhaenens L, Boel A, Menten B, Heindryckx B. Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate diagnostic dilemma. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):313\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmz050.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"12","key":"4641_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2735","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac224","volume":"37","author":"RT Scott","year":"2022","unstructured":"Scott RT, de Ziegler D, Pirtea P, Jalas C. Limits imposed by the experimental design of a large prospective non-inferiority study on PGT-A invalidate many of the conclusions. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(12):2735\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deac224.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"4641_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey327","volume":"34","author":"AR Victor","year":"2019","unstructured":"Victor AR, Griffin DK, Brake AJ, et al. Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(1):181\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey327.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"7","key":"4641_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1342","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey106","volume":"33","author":"M Popovic","year":"2018","unstructured":"Popovic M, Dheedene A, Christodoulou C, et al. Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate challenge of preimplantation genetic testing? Hum Reprod. 2018;33(7):1342\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey106.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"4641_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajhg.2020.03.005","volume":"106","author":"L Girardi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Girardi L, Serdarogullari M, Patassini C, et al. Incidence, origin, and predictive model for the detection and clinical management of segmental aneuploidies in human embryos. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106(4):525\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajhg.2020.03.005.","journal-title":"Am J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"5","key":"4641_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1222","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.01.011","volume":"105","author":"S Zhang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhang S, Luo K, Cheng D, et al. Number of biopsied trophectoderm cells is likely to affect the implantation potential of blastocysts with poor trophectoderm quality. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1222-1227.e4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.01.011.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"4641_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.11.013","volume":"107","author":"SA Neal","year":"2017","unstructured":"Neal SA, Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, et al. High relative deoxyribonucleic acid content of trophectoderm biopsy adversely affects pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(3):731-736.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.11.013.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"4641_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002798","volume":"132","author":"FJR Hermans","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hermans FJR, Schuit E, Bekker MN, et al. Cervical pessary after arrested preterm labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):741\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002798.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"13","key":"4641_CR44","first-page":"1","volume":"68","author":"JA Martin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019;68(13):1\u201347.","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"4641_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9378(00)70350-4","author":"BM Sibai","year":"2000","unstructured":"Sibai BM, Hauth J, Caritis S, et al. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations national institute of child health and human development network of maternal-fetal medicine units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9378(00)70350-4.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"4641_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1203\/00006450-200211000-00011","volume":"52","author":"AI Scher","year":"2002","unstructured":"Scher AI, Petterson B, Blair E, et al. The risk of mortality or cerebral palsy in twins: a collaborative population-based study. Pediatr Res. 2002;52(5):671\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1203\/00006450-200211000-00011.","journal-title":"Pediatr Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"4641_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1186\/1755-8166-5-24","volume":"5","author":"Z Yang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, et al. Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet. 2012;5(1):24. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1755-8166-5-24.","journal-title":"Mol Cytogenet"},{"issue":"3","key":"4641_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"017","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa017","volume":"2020","author":"E Coonen","year":"2020","unstructured":"ESHRE PGT-SR\/PGT-A Working Group, Coonen E, Rubio C, et al. ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the detection of structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(3):017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa017.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"issue":"6","key":"4641_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.08.033","volume":"108","author":"R Mazzilli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mazzilli R, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, et al. Effect of the male factor on the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection combined with preimplantation aneuploidy testing: observational longitudinal cohort study of 1219 consecutive cycles. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):961-972.e3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.08.033.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"4641_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1017\/S0967199422000119","volume":"30","author":"R Polese","year":"2022","unstructured":"Polese R, Scarselli F, Dale B, Minasi MG, Greco E. Can sperm quality influence embryo development and its ploidy? Analysis of 811 blastocysts obtained from different sperm sources. Zygote. 2022;30(5):648\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0967199422000119.","journal-title":"Zygote"},{"issue":"3","key":"4641_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.11.023","volume":"38","author":"D Kubicek","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kubicek D, Hornak M, Horak J, et al. Incidence and origin of meiotic whole and segmental chromosomal aneuploidies detected by karyomapping. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(3):330\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.11.023.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"1","key":"4641_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1038\/s41525-021-00246-0","volume":"6","author":"O T\u0161uiko","year":"2021","unstructured":"T\u0161uiko O, Vanneste M, Melotte C, et al. Haplotyping-based preimplantation genetic testing reveals parent-of-origin specific mechanisms of aneuploidy formation. NPJ Genom Med. 2021;6(1):81. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41525-021-00246-0.","journal-title":"NPJ Genom Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"4641_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2047","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01584-w","volume":"36","author":"N Tarozzi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tarozzi N, Nadalini M, Lagalla C, Coticchio G, Zac\u00e0 C, Borini A. Male factor infertility impacts the rate of mosaic blastocysts in cycles of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(10):2047\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-019-01584-w.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"3","key":"4641_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01673-w","volume":"37","author":"S Kahraman","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kahraman S, Sahin Y, Yelke H, et al. High rates of aneuploidy, mosaicism and abnormal morphokinetic development in cases with low sperm concentration. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(3):629\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-019-01673-w.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"10","key":"4641_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.3390\/genes11101151","volume":"11","author":"L Rodrigo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rodrigo L, Clemente-C\u00edscar M, Campos-Galindo I, Peinado V, Sim\u00f3n C, Rubio C. Characteristics of the IVF cycle that contribute to the incidence of mosaicism. Genes. 2020;11(10):1151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/genes11101151.","journal-title":"Genes"}],"container-title":["Journal of Translational Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12967-023-04641-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12967-023-04641-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12967-023-04641-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,2]],"date-time":"2023-11-02T17:04:21Z","timestamp":1698944661000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12967-023-04641-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,2]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4641"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12967-023-04641-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1479-5876"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1479-5876","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 April 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 October 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 November 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya (LLSC2022034).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"All authors agreed to the publication of this study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"779"}}