{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,24]],"date-time":"2026-07-24T06:05:25Z","timestamp":1784873125593,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]],"date-time":"2020-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599264000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]],"date-time":"2020-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599264000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"VOCO\u00ae GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany"},{"name":"DENTAURUM GmbH & Co. KG, Ispringen, Germany"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Head Face Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Bond failure during fixed orthodontic treatment is a frequently occurring problem. As bracket rebonding is associated with reduced shear bond strength, the aim of the present investigation is to analyse the effect of different innovative rebonding systems to identify optimised rebonding protocols for orthodontic patient care.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Metallic brackets were bonded to the frontal enamel surfaces of 240 bovine lower incisors embedded in resin bases. Teeth were randomly divided into two major experimental groups: in group 1 a hydrophilic primer (Assure\u2122 PLUS) was compared to commonly used orthodontic adhesives (Transbond XT\u2122, BrackFix\u00ae, Grengloo\u2122) and a zero control. In group 2 different rebonding systems were analysed using a hydrophilic primer (Assure\u2122 PLUS), a methyl methacrylate-consisting primer (Plastic Conditioner) and a conventional adhesive (Transbond XT\u2122). All teeth were tested for shear bond strength according to the DIN-13990 standard, the Adhesive Remnant Index and enamel fracture rate.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The hydrophilic primer enhanced shear bond strength at first bonding (Assure\u2122 PLUS 20.29\u2009\u00b1\u20094.95\u2009MPa vs. Transbond XT\u2122 18.45\u2009\u00b1\u20092.57\u2009MPa; BrackFix\u00ae 17\u2009\u00b1\u20095.2\u2009MPa; Grengloo\u2122 19.08\u2009\u00b1\u20093.19\u2009MPa; Meron 8.7\u2009\u00b1\u20093.9\u2009MPa) and second bonding (Assure\u2122 PLUS 16.76\u2009\u00b1\u20093.71\u2009MPa vs. Transbond XT\u2122 13.06\u2009\u00b1\u20093.19\u2009MPa). Using Plastic Conditioner did not seem to improve shear bond strength at rebonding (13.57\u2009\u00b1\u20092.94). When enamel etching was left out, required shear bond strength could not be achieved (Plastic Conditioner + Assure\u2122 PLUS 8.12\u2009\u00b1\u20093.34\u2009MPa; Plastic Conditioner: 3.7\u2009\u00b1\u20091.95\u2009MPa). Hydrophilic priming systems showed decreased ARI-scores (second bonding: 2.63) and increased enamel fracture rates (first bonding: 55%; second bonding 21,05%).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Based on the present study we found that rebonding strength could be compensated by the use of hydrophilic priming systems. The additional use of a methyl methacrylate-consisting primer does not seem to enhance shear bond strength. No etching approaches resulted in non-sufficient bond strength.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13005-020-00233-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]],"date-time":"2020-09-05T07:02:41Z","timestamp":1599289361000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Analysing the potential of hydrophilic adhesive systems to optimise orthodontic bracket rebonding"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Isabel","family":"Knaup","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Antonia","family":"B\u00f6ddeker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katrin","family":"Tempel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eva","family":"Weber","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jenny Rosa","family":"Bartz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcia Viviane","family":"R\u00fcckbeil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rog\u00e9rio Bastos","family":"Craveiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yvonne","family":"Wagner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Wolf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"233_CR1","first-page":"435","volume":"70","author":"SE Bishara","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:435\u201341.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.2319\/081817-559.1","volume":"88","author":"D Stasinopoulos","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stasinopoulos D, Papageorgiou SN, Kirsch F, Daratsianos N, J\u00e4ger A, Bourauel C. Failure patterns of different bracket systems and their influence on treatment duration: a retrospective cohort study. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:338\u201347.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1093\/ortho\/28.1.59","volume":"28","author":"RA Linklater","year":"2001","unstructured":"Linklater RA, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study to investigate bond strengths of different tooth types. J Orthod. 2001;28:59\u201365.","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2016.02.013","volume":"150","author":"R Mohammed","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mohammed R, Abass S, Abubakr N, Mohammed Z. Comparing orthodontic bond failures of light-cured composite resin with chemical-cured composite resin: a 12-month clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016;150:290\u20134.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.2319\/112414837.1","volume":"86","author":"L O\u2019Dywer","year":"2016","unstructured":"O\u2019Dywer L, Littlewood S, Rahman S, Spencer R, Barber S, Russell J. A multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare a self-ligating bracket with a conventional bracket in a UK population: part 1: treatment efficiency. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:142\u20138.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1067\/mod.2002.126401","volume":"122","author":"U Adolfsson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Adolfsson U, Larsson E, Ogaard B. Bond failure of a no-mix adhesive during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2002;122:277\u201381.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1093\/ortho\/25.4.283","volume":"25","author":"S Sunna","year":"1998","unstructured":"Sunna S, Rock W. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod. 1998;25:283\u20137.","journal-title":"Br J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.2319\/021616-136.1","volume":"87","author":"T Roelofs","year":"2017","unstructured":"Roelofs T, Merkens N, Roelofs J, Bronkhorst E, Breuning H. A retrospective survey of the causes of bracket- and tube-bonding failures. Angle Orthod. 2017;87:111\u20137.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1034","DOI":"10.2319\/122613-946.1","volume":"84","author":"M Jung","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jung M. Survival analysis of brackets and tubes: a twelve-month assessment. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:1034\u201340.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1179\/14653121141308","volume":"38","author":"M Nazir","year":"2011","unstructured":"Nazir M, Walsh T, Mandall N, Matthew S, Fox D. Banding versus bonding of first permanent molars: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. J Orthod. 2011;38:81\u20139.","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1179\/14653121042867","volume":"37","author":"P Banks","year":"2010","unstructured":"Banks P, Elton V, Jones Y, Rice P, Derwent S, Odondi L. The use of fixed appliances in the UK: a survey of specialist orthodontists. J Orthod. 2010;37:43\u201355.","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR12","first-page":"113","volume":"52","author":"E Mizrahi","year":"1982","unstructured":"Mizrahi E. Study, success and failure of banding and bonding. A clinical study. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:113\u20137.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(96)70064-1","volume":"110","author":"L Trimpeneers","year":"1996","unstructured":"Trimpeneers L, Dermaut L. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;110:547\u201350.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"633","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(03)00198-7","volume":"123","author":"V Cacciafesta","year":"2003","unstructured":"Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini M, De Angelis M, Scribante A, Klersy C. Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:633\u201340.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2005.02.035","volume":"131","author":"M Oztoprak","year":"2007","unstructured":"Oztoprak M, Isik F, Sayinsu K, Arun T, Aydemir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with 4 adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;131:238\u201342.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2975","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-018-2692-7","volume":"23","author":"N Daratsianos","year":"2019","unstructured":"Daratsianos N, Sch\u00fctz B, Reimann S, Weber A, Papageorgiou SN, J\u00e4ger A, et al. The influence of enamel sandblasting on the shear bond strengthand fractography of the bracket-adhesive-enamel complex testedin vitro by the DIN 13990:2017-04 standard. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:2975\u201385.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"233_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2005.10.003","volume":"129","author":"K Skidmore","year":"2006","unstructured":"Skidmore K, Brook K, Thomson W, Harding W. Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129:230\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR18","first-page":"e550","volume":"9","author":"N Gupta","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gupta N, Kumar D, Palla A. Evaluation of the effect of three innovative recyling methods on the shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets-an in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e550\u20135.","journal-title":"J Clin Exp Dent"},{"key":"233_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1093\/ortho\/28.3.231","volume":"28","author":"A Basudan","year":"2001","unstructured":"Basudan A, Al-Emran S. The effects of in-office reconditioning on the morphology of slots and bases of stainless steel brackets and on the shear\/peel bond strength. J Orthod. 2001;28:231\u20136.","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjq128","volume":"34","author":"S Ryf","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ryf S, Flury S, Palaniappan S, Lussi A, van Meerbeek B, Zimmerli B. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:25\u201332.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjp128","volume":"32","author":"A Nicol\u00e1s","year":"2010","unstructured":"Nicol\u00e1s A, Vicente A, Bravo L. The in vitro effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength with different enamel conditioning procedures. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:291\u20136.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1067\/mod.2000.104810","volume":"118","author":"C Chung","year":"2000","unstructured":"Chung C, Fadem B, Levitt H, Mante F. Effects of two adhesion boosters on the shear bond strength of new and rebonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;118:295\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/15.2.125","volume":"15","author":"D Regan","year":"1993","unstructured":"Regan D, LeMasney B, van Noort R. The tensile bond strength of new and rebonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:125\u201335.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kilponen L, Lassila L, Tolvanen M, Varrela J, Vallittu PK. Effect of Removal of Enamel on Rebonding Strength of Resin Composite to Enamel. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1818939. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2016\/1818939.","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/1818939"},{"key":"233_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.2319\/020207-53.1","volume":"78","author":"J Noble","year":"2008","unstructured":"Noble J, Karaiskos NE, Wiltshire WA. In vivo bonding of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel using an adhesion promotor. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:357\u201360.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3757","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044","volume":"28","author":"K Van Landuyt","year":"2007","unstructured":"Van Landuyt K, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3757\u201385.","journal-title":"Biomaterials."},{"key":"233_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2004.08.022","volume":"129","author":"A Vicente","year":"2006","unstructured":"Vicente A, Bravo L, Romero M, Ort\u00edz A, Canteras M. Effects of 3 adhesion promoters on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;129:390\u20135.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/0109-5641(92)90067-M","volume":"8","author":"N Nakabayashi","year":"1992","unstructured":"Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater. 1992;8:125\u201330.","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"233_CR29","first-page":"199","volume":"31","author":"T Gon\u00e7alves","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gon\u00e7alves T, KN T, de Oliveira J, Gama L, Bortolini S, Philippi A. Surface treatments to improve the repair of acrylic and bis-acryl provisional materials. Am J Dent. 2018;31:199\u2013204.","journal-title":"Am J Dent"},{"key":"233_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2014.02.019","volume":"112","author":"L Perea","year":"2014","unstructured":"Perea L, Matinlinna J, Tolvanen M, Lassila L, Vallittu P. Monomer priming of denture teeth and its effects on the bond strength of composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:257\u201366.","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"233_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1080\/14653125.2017.1296636","volume":"44","author":"W Wan Abdul Razak","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wan Abdul Razak W, Sherriff M, Bister D, Seehra J. Bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to prefabricated acrylic teeth. J Orthod. 2017;44:105\u20139.","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR32","first-page":"109","volume":"26","author":"P Miles","year":"2010","unstructured":"Miles P. Indirect bonding--do custom bases need a plastic conditioner? A randomised clinical trial. Aust Orthod J. 2010;26:109\u201312.","journal-title":"Aust Orthod J"},{"key":"233_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1089\/photob.2019.4704","volume":"38","author":"T Knaup","year":"2020","unstructured":"Knaup T, Korbmacher-Steiner H, Braun A, Wenzler J, Knaup I, Stein S. Effects of 445-nm diode laser-assisted Debonding of metallic brackets on shear bond strength and enamel surface morphology. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020;38:160\u20136.","journal-title":"Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg"},{"key":"233_CR34","volume-title":"DIN 13990:2017\u201304, dentistry\u2014testmethods for shear bond strength of adhesives for orthodontic attachments","author":"Deutsches Institut f\u00fcr Normung e. V","year":"2017","unstructured":"Deutsches Institut f\u00fcr Normung e. V. DIN 13990:2017\u201304, dentistry\u2014testmethods for shear bond strength of adhesives for orthodontic attachments. 2017."},{"key":"233_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(05)81604-X","volume":"98","author":"S Bishara","year":"1990","unstructured":"Bishara S, Trulove T. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;98:263\u201373.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.2307\/2531545","volume":"43","author":"D Edwards","year":"1987","unstructured":"Edwards D, Berry JJ. The efficiency of simulation-based multiple comparisons. Biometrics. 1987;43:913\u201328.","journal-title":"Biometrics."},{"key":"233_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1080\/0301228X.1975.11743666","volume":"2","author":"I Reynolds","year":"1974","unstructured":"Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1974;2:171\u20138.","journal-title":"Br J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02165904","volume":"42","author":"P Diedrich","year":"1981","unstructured":"Diedrich P. Die Verbundfestigkeit verschiedener orthodontischer Adh\u00e4sive zum konditionierten Schmelz und zur Bracketbasis. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1981;42:305\u201320.","journal-title":"Fortschr Kieferorthop"},{"key":"233_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1186\/1746-160X-10-51","volume":"28","author":"C Reicheneder","year":"2014","unstructured":"Reicheneder C, Hofrichter B, Faltermeier A, Proff P, Lippold C, Kirschneck C. Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process. Head Face Med. 2014;28:51. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1746-160X-10-51.","journal-title":"Head Face Med"},{"key":"233_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"446","DOI":"10.1007\/s00056-016-0054-0","volume":"77","author":"M Wolf","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wolf M, Schulte U, K\u00fcpper K, Bourauel C, Keilig L, Papageorgiou SN, et al. Post-treatment changes in permanent retention. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77:446\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00056-016-0054-0.","journal-title":"J Orofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1186\/s13005-016-0117-x","volume":"12","author":"M Schauseil","year":"2016","unstructured":"Schauseil M, Bl\u00f6cher S, Hellak A, Roggendorf M, Stein S, Korbmacher-Steiner H. Shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new premixed self-etching with a reference total-etch adhesive. Head Face Med. 2016;12:19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13005-016-0117-x.","journal-title":"Head Face Med"},{"key":"233_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.4103\/2278-0203.156027","volume":"4","author":"L Eslamian","year":"2015","unstructured":"Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Tavakol P, Tavakol A, Amini N, Lynch E. Effect of multiple debonding sequences on shear bond strength of new stainless steel brackets. J Orthod Sci. 2015;4:37\u201341.","journal-title":"J Orthod Sci"},{"key":"233_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ortho.2019.06.006","volume":"17","author":"R Hadrous","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hadrous R, Bouserhal J, Osman E. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: an in vitro study. Int Orthod. 2019;17:461\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR44","first-page":"e739","volume":"10","author":"R Naseh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Naseh R, Afshari M, Shafiei F, Rahnamoon N. Shear bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces using a universal bonding resin. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10:e739\u201345.","journal-title":"J Clin Exp Dent"},{"key":"233_CR45","first-page":"e749","volume":"9","author":"A Tayebi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tayebi A, Fallahzadeh F, Morsaghian M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets to aged composite using three primers. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9:e749\u201355.","journal-title":"J Clin Exp Dent"},{"key":"233_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.4103\/jos.JOS_25_17","volume":"6","author":"W Wongsamut","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wongsamut W, Satrawaha S, Wayakanon K. Surface modification for bonding between amalgam and orthodontic brackets. J Orthod Sci. 2017;6:129\u201335.","journal-title":"J Orthod Sci"},{"key":"233_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.2319\/032414-224.1","volume":"85","author":"S Suliman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Suliman S, Trojan T, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: a quantitative analysis in vitro. Angle Orthod. 2015;85:651\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2319\/032414-224.1.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1186\/1746-160X-10-37","volume":"10","author":"J Janiszewska-Olszowska","year":"2014","unstructured":"Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Tandecka K, Szatkiewicz T, Sporniak-Tutak K, Grocholewicz K. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of adhesive remnants and enamel loss resulting from debonding orthodontic molar tubes. Head Face Med. 2014;10:37. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1746-160X-10-37.","journal-title":"Head Face Med"},{"key":"233_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjq110","volume":"33","author":"D R\u00fcger","year":"2011","unstructured":"R\u00fcger D, Harzer W, Krisjane Z, Tausche E. Shear bond strength after multiple bracket bonding with or without repeated etching. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:521\u20137.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(96)70164-6","volume":"109","author":"F Egan","year":"1996","unstructured":"Egan F, Alexander S, Cartwright G. Bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;109:64\u201370.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2005.06.025","volume":"131","author":"M Hajrassie","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hajrassie M, Khier S. In-vivo and in-vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;131:384\u201390.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"233_CR52","first-page":"141","volume":"71","author":"K Pickett","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pickett K, Sadowsky P, Jacobson A, Lacefield W. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:141\u20138.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"233_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2004.09.015","volume":"127","author":"T Eliades","year":"2005","unstructured":"Eliades T, Bourauel C. Intraoral aging of orthodontic materials: the picture we miss and its clinical relevance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;127:403\u201312.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"}],"container-title":["Head &amp; Face Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13005-020-00233-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13005-020-00233-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13005-020-00233-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,4]],"date-time":"2021-09-04T23:30:18Z","timestamp":1630798218000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/head-face-med.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13005-020-00233-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"alternative-id":["233"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13005-020-00233-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1746-160X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1746-160X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 March 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 September 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 September 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This article does not report on any studies with human participants or animals that were performed by any of the authors.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"20"}}