{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T16:39:31Z","timestamp":1768927171190,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,27]],"date-time":"2021-08-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630022400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,27]],"date-time":"2021-08-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1630022400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Orthop Surg Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common problem. When surgical treatment is required, the intervention is typically decompression without fusion. Successful return-to-work (RTW) is a standard expectation with these limited procedures. Occasionally, the size or location of the disc herniation suggests the need for fusion, but the inability to RTW is a significant concern in these cases. The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of lumbar fusion, as compared to decompression alone, will substantially diminish RTW in patients with lumbar disc herniation.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This is a longitudinal cohort study using prospectively collected data from the Quality and Outcomes Database (QOD). Patients with LDH, eligible to RTW (not retired, a student, or on disability) with complete 12-month follow-up data, were identified. Standard demographic and surgical variables, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and RTW status at 3 and 12 months were collected.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Of the 5062 patients identified, 4560 (90%) had decompression alone and 502 (10%) had a concurrent fusion. Age and gender were similar in the two groups. The fusion group had worse back pain (NRS 6.52 vs. 5.96) and less leg pain (6.31 vs. 7.01) at baseline compared to the no fusion group. Statistically significant improvement in all PROs was seen in both groups. RTW at 3 months post-op was seen in 85% of decompression cases and 66% of cases with supplemental fusion. At 12 months post-op, RTW increased to 93% and 82%, respectively.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The need for fusion in LDH cases is unusual, seen in only 10% of cases in this series. The addition of fusion decreased the RTW rate from 85 to 66% at 3 months and from 93 to 82% at 12 months post-op. While the difference is significant, the ultimate deterioration in RTW may be less than anticipated. A reasonable RTW rate can still be expected in the rare patient who requires fusion as part of their treatment for LDH.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-021-02682-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,27]],"date-time":"2021-08-27T05:02:57Z","timestamp":1630040577000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Return to work in patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing fusion"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Lauren A.","family":"Protzer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Steven D.","family":"Glassman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Praveen V.","family":"Mummaneni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mohamad","family":"Bydon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Erica F.","family":"Bisson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mladen","family":"Djurasovic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7685-9036","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Leah Y.","family":"Carreon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"2682_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2007-993174","volume":"69","author":"K Kitze","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kitze K, Winkler D, Gunther L, et al. Preoperative predictors for the return to work of herniated disc patients. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2008;69(1):7\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-2007-993174.","journal-title":"Zentralbl Neurochir"},{"issue":"4","key":"2682_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.101B4.BJJ-2018-1184.R1","volume":"101-B","author":"OR Fjeld","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fjeld OR, Gr\u00f8vle L, Helgeland J, Sm\u00e5stuen MC, Solberg TK, Zwart JA, et al. Complications, reoperations, readmissions, and length of hospital stay in 34 639 surgical cases of lumbar disc herniation. Bone Joint J. 2019 Apr;101-B(4):470\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.101B4.BJJ-2018-1184.R1.","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"4","key":"2682_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-019-04309-x","volume":"43","author":"BB Carlson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Carlson BB, Albert TJ. Lumbar disc herniation: what has the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial taught us? Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):853\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-019-04309-x.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"4","key":"2682_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"975","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-018-4255-6","volume":"43","author":"R Harper","year":"2019","unstructured":"Harper R, Klineberg E. The evidence-based approach for surgical complications in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):975\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-018-4255-6.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"2","key":"2682_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bsd.0000180991.98751.95","volume":"19","author":"I Satoh","year":"2006","unstructured":"Satoh I, Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Ohwada T, Fuji T, Yoshikawa H. Indication of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006, Apr;19(2):104\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.bsd.0000180991.98751.95.","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"key":"2682_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang, J, Dailey, A, et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2014. 21:48-53, 1, DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2014.4.SPINE14271.","DOI":"10.3171\/2014.4.SPINE14271"},{"issue":"6","key":"2682_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31814d4e1b","volume":"21","author":"PG Whang","year":"2008","unstructured":"Whang PG, Lim MR, Sasso RC, Skelton A, Brown ZB, Greg Anderson D, et al. Financial incentives for lumbar surgery: a critical analysis of physician reimbursement for decompression and fusion procedures. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Aug;21(6):381\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BSD.0b013e31814d4e1b.","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord Tech"},{"issue":"22 Suppl 1","key":"2682_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S106","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000579","volume":"39","author":"AL Asher","year":"2014","unstructured":"Asher AL, Speroff T, Dittus RS, Parker SL, Davies JM, Selden N, et al. The national neurosurgery quality and outcomes database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care. Spine. 2014;39(22 Suppl 1):S106\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000579.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"22S","key":"2682_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S117","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000552","volume":"39","author":"MJ McGirt","year":"2014","unstructured":"McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Asher AL, Norvell D, Sherry N, Devin CJ. Role of prospective registries in defining the value and effectiveness of spine care. Spine. 2014;39(22S):S117\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000000552.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"2682_CR10","unstructured":"McCaffery M, Beebe A. Pain: a clinical manual for nursing practice. Baltimore: V.V. Mosby Company; 1993."},{"key":"2682_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2940","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200011150-00017","volume":"25","author":"JC Fairbank","year":"2000","unstructured":"Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine. 2000;25:2940\u201352.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"8","key":"2682_CR12","first-page":"271","volume":"66","author":"JC Fairbank","year":"1980","unstructured":"Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O\u2019Brien JP. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66(8):271\u20133.","journal-title":"Physiotherapy"},{"key":"2682_CR13","first-page":"1","volume":"24","author":"M Atarod","year":"2019","unstructured":"Atarod M, Mirzamohammadi E, Ghandehari H, Mehrdad R, Izadi N. Predictive factors for return to work after lumbar discectomy. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;24:1\u20136.","journal-title":"Int J Occup Saf Ergon"},{"issue":"2","key":"2682_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.3171\/2015.10.SPINE15455","volume":"25","author":"K Than","year":"2016","unstructured":"Than K, Curran J, Resnick D, et al. How to predict return to work after lumbar discectomy: answers from the NeuroPoint-SD registry. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(2):181\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2015.10.SPINE15455.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"CN_suppl_1","key":"2682_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1093\/neurosurgery\/15.CN_suppl_1.343","volume":"15","author":"F Murphey","year":"1968","unstructured":"Murphey F. Sources and patterns of pain in disc disease. Clin Neurosurg. 1968;15(CN_suppl_1):343\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/neurosurgery\/15.CN_suppl_1.343.","journal-title":"Clin Neurosurg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2682_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-198813060-00018","volume":"13","author":"PA Vaughan","year":"1988","unstructured":"Vaughan PA, Malcolm BW, Maistrelli GL. Results of L4-L5 disc excision alone versus disc excision and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Jun;13(6):690\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-198813060-00018.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"4","key":"2682_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200002150-00010","volume":"25","author":"T Takeshima","year":"2000","unstructured":"Takeshima T, Kambara K, Miyata S, Ueda Y, Tamai S. Clinical and radio- graphic evaluation of disc excision for lumbar disc herniation with and without posterolateral fusion. Spine. 2000;25(4):450\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200002150-00010.","journal-title":"Spine."},{"key":"2682_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199905010-00007","volume":"24","author":"P Donceel","year":"1999","unstructured":"Donceel P, Du Bois M, Lahaye D. Return to work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:872\u20136.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"22","key":"2682_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2346","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199911150-00010","volume":"24","author":"E Carragee","year":"1999","unstructured":"Carragee E, Han M, et al. Activity restrictions after posterior lumbar disectomy. A prospective study of outcomes of 152 cases with no post-operative restrictions. Spine. 1999;24(22):2346\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-199911150-00010.","journal-title":"Spine."},{"key":"2682_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1019","DOI":"10.2147\/JPR.S132862","volume":"10","author":"H Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang H, Wang T, Wang Q, Ding W. Incidence and risk factors of persistent low back pain following posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for lumbar disc herniation. J Pain Res. 2017;10:1019\u201325.","journal-title":"J Pain Res"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-021-02682-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13018-021-02682-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-021-02682-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,27]],"date-time":"2021-08-27T05:03:07Z","timestamp":1630040587000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/josr-online.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13018-021-02682-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,27]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2682"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-021-02682-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1749-799X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1749-799X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 August 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 August 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the University of Louisville Institutional Review Board for Collection data for the Database (HSPPO#11.0246) and this analysis (HSPPO#18.1234); and the Norton Healthcare Office of Research Administration Board for Collection data for the Database (RO#11.n0113) and this analysis (RO#18.N0388)\/.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers\u2019 bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"534"}}