{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T14:22:02Z","timestamp":1793283722908,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,5]],"date-time":"2023-01-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672876800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,5]],"date-time":"2023-01-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672876800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"the Science and Technology Department of Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province","award":["2020-NCZDSY-009"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2020-NCZDSY-009"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Orthop Surg Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>External fixators (EFs) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are two effective methods for open tibial fractures. However, both methods have advantages and disadvantages, and the optimal surgical approach remains controversial. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare EF with IMN to evaluate their efficacy and safety.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A systematic study of the literature was conducted in relevant studies published in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang and Weipu from database inception to April 2022. All eligible literature was critically appraised for methodological quality via the Cochrane's collaboration tool. The primary outcome measurements included postoperative superficial infection, postoperative deep infection, union time, delayed union, malunion, nonunion, and hardware failure.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Nine RCTs involving 733 cases were included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that cases in the IMN group had a significantly lower postoperative superficial infection rate [risk ratio (RR)\u2009=\u20092.84; 95% confidence interval (CI)\u2009=\u20091.83 to 4.39; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.00001)] and malunion rate (RR\u2009=\u20093.05; 95% CI\u2009=\u20092.06 to 4.52; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.00001) versus EF, but IMN had a significantly higher hardware failure occurrence versus EF (RR\u2009=\u20090.38; 95% CI\u2009=\u20090.17 to 0.83; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.02). There were no significant differences in the postoperative deep infection rate, union time, delayed union rate or nonunion rate between the two groups (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&gt;\u20090.05).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Compared to EF, IMN had a significantly lower risk of postoperative superficial infection and malunion in patients with open tibial fractures. Meanwhile, IMN did not prolong the union time and increased the risk of the deep infection rate, delayed union rate and nonunion rate but had a higher hardware failure rate. The reanalysis of union time showed that it was significantly shorter in the IMN group than in the EF group after excluding the study with significant heterogeneity during sensitivity analysis. Therefore, IMN is recommended as a preferred method of fracture fixation for patients with open tibial fractures, but more attention should be given to the problem of hardware failure.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-022-03490-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,5]],"date-time":"2023-01-05T13:04:03Z","timestamp":1672923843000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Comparing external fixators and intramedullary nailing for treating open tibia fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Jun","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lifeng","family":"Xie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Li","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guicheng","family":"Gao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ping","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dejun","family":"Chu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dewei","family":"Qiu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jun","family":"Tao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"3490_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"526","DOI":"10.1080\/17453670710015535","volume":"79","author":"RJ Weiss","year":"2008","unstructured":"Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Ehlin A, Al Dabbagh Z, Stark A, Jansson KA. Decreasing incidence of tibial shaft fractures between 1998 and 2004: information based on 10,627 Swedish inpatients. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:526\u201333.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"3490_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-1383(98)00125-9","volume":"29","author":"CM Court-Brown","year":"1998","unstructured":"Court-Brown CM, Rimmer S, Prakash U, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of open long bone fractures. Injury. 1998;29:529\u201334.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"3490_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greco T, Cianni L, Polichetti C, Inverso M, Maccauro G, Perisano C. Uncoated vs. antibiotic-coated tibia nail in open diaphyseal tibial fracture (42 according to AO Classification): a single center experience. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:7421582.","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/7421582"},{"key":"3490_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Perisano C, Greco T, Polichetti C, Inverso M, Maccauro G. Antibiotic-coated nail in open tibial fracture: a retrospective case series. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021;6.","DOI":"10.3390\/jfmk6040097"},{"key":"3490_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-003-0476-3","volume":"27","author":"G Hosny","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hosny G, Fadel M. Ilizarov external fixator for open fractures of the tibial shaft. Int Orthop. 2003;27:303\u20136.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"3490_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-007-0332-9","volume":"127","author":"M Inan","year":"2007","unstructured":"Inan M, Halici M, Ayan I, Tuncel M, Karaoglu S. Treatment of type IIIA open fractures of tibial shaft with Ilizarov external fixator versus unreamed tibial nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:617\u201323.","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"3490_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.72B5.2211760","volume":"72","author":"CM Court-Brown","year":"1990","unstructured":"Court-Brown CM, Wheelwright EF, Christie J, McQueen MM. External fixation for type III open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:801\u20134.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"3490_CR8","first-page":"244","volume":"19","author":"GP Whitelaw","year":"1990","unstructured":"Whitelaw GP, Cimino WG, Segal D. The treatment of open tibial fractures using nonreamed flexible intramedullary fixation. Orthop Rev. 1990;19:244\u201356.","journal-title":"Orthop Rev"},{"key":"3490_CR9","unstructured":"Greco T, Vitiello R, Cazzato G, Cianni L, Malerba G, Maccauro G, et al. Intramedullary antibiotic coated nail in tibial fracture: a systematic review. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2020;34:63\u20139."},{"key":"3490_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1097\/SAP.0b013e31803403c8","volume":"59","author":"C Rohde","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rohde C, Greives MR, Cetrulo C, Lerman OZ, Levine JP, Hazen A. Gustilo grade IIIB tibial fractures requiring microvascular free flaps: external fixation versus intramedullary rod fixation. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59:14\u20137.","journal-title":"Ann Plast Surg"},{"key":"3490_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12753","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-30716-y","volume":"8","author":"Q Fu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fu Q, Zhu L, Lu J, Ma J, Chen A. External fixation versus unreamed tibial intramedullary nailing for open tibial fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12753.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"3490_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-014-0075-6","volume":"9","author":"X Xu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Xu X, Li X, Liu L, Wu W. A meta-analysis of external fixator versus intramedullary nails for open tibial fracture fixation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:75.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"3490_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1177\/1457496915586649","volume":"105","author":"F Zhang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhang F, Zhu Y, Li W, Chen W, Tian Y, Zhang Y. Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing is a better alternative than External Fixator for Gustilo grade IIIB Tibial Fractures based on a meta-analysis. Scand J Surg. 2016;105:117\u201324.","journal-title":"Scand J Surg"},{"key":"3490_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fang X, Jiang L, Wang Y, Zhao L. Treatment of Gustilo grade III tibial fractures with unreamed intramedullary nailing versus external fixator: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18:Ra49\u201356.","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.882610"},{"key":"3490_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2018.10.016","volume":"10","author":"S Garg","year":"2019","unstructured":"Garg S, Khanna V, Goyal MP, Joshi N. Unreamed intra-medullary nail versus half pin external fixator in grade III [A & B] open tibia fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10:941\u20138.","journal-title":"J Clin Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"3490_CR16","unstructured":"Kyengera DK, O'Hara NN, Slobogean GP, Howe AL, Blachut PA, O'Brien PJ, et al. Unreamed intramedullary nailing versus external fixation for the treatment of open tibial shaft fractures in Uganda: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2022."},{"key":"3490_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"896","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.19.00563","volume":"102","author":"BT Haonga","year":"2020","unstructured":"Haonga BT, Liu M, Albright P, Challa ST, Ali SH, Lazar AA, et al. Intramedullary nailing versus external fixation in the treatment of open tibial fractures in Tanzania results of a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102:896\u2013905.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"3490_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"d5928","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","volume":"343","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2011","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Altman DG, G\u00f8tzsche PC, J\u00fcni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The cochrane collaboration\u2019s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3490_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197658040-00004","volume":"58","author":"RB Gustilo","year":"1976","unstructured":"Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:453\u20138.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"3490_CR20","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org."},{"key":"3490_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","volume":"21","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2002","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539\u201358.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"3490_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557\u201360.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3490_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holbrook JL, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders R. Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft: Ender nailing versus external fixation: a randomized, prospective comparison. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1231\u20138.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198971080-00017"},{"key":"3490_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tornetta P, 3rd, Bergman M, Watnik N, Berkowitz G, Steuer J. Treatment of grade-IIIb open tibial fractures: a prospective randomised comparison of external fixation and non-reamed locked nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:13\u20139.","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.76B1.8300656"},{"key":"3490_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1097\/00005373-199508000-00029","volume":"39","author":"YK Tu","year":"1995","unstructured":"Tu YK, Lin CH, Su JI, Hsu DT, Chen RJ. Unreamed interlocking nail versus external fixator for open type III tibia fractures. J Trauma. 1995;39:361\u20137.","journal-title":"J Trauma"},{"key":"3490_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-199801000-00001","volume":"12","author":"MB Henley","year":"1998","unstructured":"Henley MB, Chapman JR, Agel J, Harvey EJ, Whorton AM, Swiontkowski MF. Treatment of type II, IIIA, and IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft: a prospective comparison of unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails and half-pin external fixators. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:1\u20137.","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"3490_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mohseni MA, Soleimanpour J, Mohammadpour H, Shahsavari A. AO tubular external fixation vs. unreamed intramedullary nailing in open grade IIIA-IIIB tibial shaft fractures: a single-center randomized clinical trial. Pak J Biol Sci. 2011;14:490\u20135.","DOI":"10.3923\/pjbs.2011.490.495"},{"key":"3490_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gristina AG, Costerton JW. Bacterial adherence to biomaterials and tissue: the significance of its role in clinical sepsis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:264\u201373.","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198567020-00014"},{"key":"3490_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12653","volume":"12","author":"J Li","year":"2020","unstructured":"Li J, Wang Q, Lu Y, Feng Q, He X, Li MdZ, et al. Relationship between time to surgical debridement and the incidence of infection in patients with open tibial fractures. Orthop Surg. 2020;12:524\u201332.","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"key":"3490_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-019-1479-0","volume":"14","author":"B Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang B, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Hu B, Sun L, Ren C, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:456.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"3490_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2020.10.078","volume":"52","author":"CA Donnelley","year":"2021","unstructured":"Donnelley CA, von Kaeppler EP, Roberts HJ, Haonga B, Shearer DW, Morshed S. Monoplanar external fixation of comminuted open tibial shaft fractures predicts loss of alignment by one year compared to a statically locked intramedullary SIGN nail. Injury. 2021;52:982\u20137.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"3490_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200702000-00004","volume":"15","author":"MR Bong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bong MR, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Egol KA. Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:97\u2013106.","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"3490_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schandelmaier P, Krettek C, Rudolf J, Kohl A, Katz BE, Tscherne H. Superior results of tibial rodding versus external fixation in grade 3B fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997:164\u201372.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199709000-00024"},{"key":"3490_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Whittle AP, Wester W, Russell TA. Fatigue failure in small diameter tibial nails. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995:119\u201328.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199506000-00013"},{"key":"3490_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hutson JJ, Zych GA, Cole JD, Johnson KD, Ostermann P, Milne EL, et al. Mechanical failures of intramedullary tibial nails applied without reaming. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995:129\u201337.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199506000-00014"},{"key":"3490_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/S0736-0266(00)00020-6","volume":"19","author":"J Lin","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lin J, Lin SJ, Chen PQ, Yang SH. Stress analysis of the distal locking screws for femoral interlocking nailing. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:57\u201363.","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-022-03490-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13018-022-03490-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-022-03490-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,5]],"date-time":"2023-01-05T13:07:00Z","timestamp":1672924020000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/josr-online.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13018-022-03490-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,5]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3490"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-022-03490-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1749-799X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1749-799X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 August 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 December 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 January 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"13"}}