{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T12:28:57Z","timestamp":1789734537876,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1706572800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1706572800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Orthop Surg Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To compare modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative disorders in order to assess its safety and effectiveness.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>From January 2016 to January 2021, 74 patients who received single-segment M-TLIF were examined. A total of 74 patients having single-segment PLIF during the same time period were included in a retrospective controlled study using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. The two groups were compared in terms of the fusion rate, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), the visual analogue scale of low back pain (VAS), the perioperative condition, the postoperative complications, and the postoperative neighbouring segment degeneration.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>All patients had surgery satisfactorily and were monitored for at least a year afterwards. The baseline values for the two groups did not significantly differ. The interbody fusion rate between PLIF (98.65%) and M-TLIF (97.30%) was not significantly different. In the follow-up, the M-TLIF group's VAS score for low back and leg pain was lower than that of the PLIF group. The ODI score of the M-TLIF group was lower than that of the PLIF group at 7\u00a0days and 3\u00a0months following surgery. Both groups' post-op VAS and ODI scores for low back and leg pain were much lower than those from before the procedure. In M-TLIF group, the operation time, drainage tube extraction time, postoperative bed rest time and hospital stay time were shorter, and the amount of intraoperative blood loss was less. Compared with those before operation, the height of intervertebral space and intervertebral foramen were significantly increased in both groups during postoperative follow-up (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). The postoperative complications and adjacent segment degeneration of M-TLIF were significantly lower than those of PLIF.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>M-TLIF is a safe and effective treatment for lumbar degenerative disorders, with a high fusion rate and no significant difference between M-TLIF and PLIF. M-TLIF's efficacy and safety are comparable to that of PLIF, particularly in terms of early relief of low back pain and improvement in quality of life following surgery. Therefore, M-TLIF technology can be popularized and applied in clinic.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-024-04531-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T03:02:38Z","timestamp":1706583758000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Comparison of safety and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (M-TLIF) in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Ming","family":"Chen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jianchao","family":"Cui","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Youtao","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhuoyan","family":"Cai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cekai","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hao","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yuan","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhensong","family":"Yao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"4531_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1712490","volume":"56","author":"S Hennemann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hennemann S, de Abreu MR. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021;56(1):9\u201317.","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)"},{"issue":"2","key":"4531_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000902","volume":"33","author":"N Badlani","year":"2020","unstructured":"Badlani N, Yu E, Kreitz T, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(2):62\u20134.","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"key":"4531_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-04038-3","volume":"18","author":"X Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li X, Liu J, Liu Z. Comparison of the results of open PLIF versus UBE PLIF in lumbar spinal stenosis: postoperative adjacent segment instability is lesser in UBE. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:543.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"4531_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2011.02.007","volume":"11","author":"Y Park","year":"2011","unstructured":"Park Y, Ha JW, Lee YT, et al. Cranial facet joint violations by percutaneously placed pedicle screws adjacent to a minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J. 2011;11(4):295\u2013302.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"4531_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.3171\/2020.12.SPINE201888","volume":"35","author":"S Okuda","year":"2021","unstructured":"Okuda S, Nagamoto Y, Takenaka S, et al. Effect of segmental lordosis on early-onset adjacent-segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;35(4):454\u20139.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"4531_CR6","first-page":"125","volume":"26","author":"HMP Briggs","year":"1944","unstructured":"Briggs HMP. Chip fusion of the low back following exploration of the spinal canal. JBJS. 1944;26:125\u201330.","journal-title":"JBJS"},{"issue":"16","key":"4531_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1161","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002534","volume":"43","author":"SL Kunder","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kunder SL, Rijkers K, Caelers I, et al. Lumbar interbody fusion: a historical overview and a future perspective. Spine. 2018;43(16):1161\u20138.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1S","key":"4531_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2016.06.022","volume":"103","author":"P Guigui","year":"2017","unstructured":"Guigui P, Ferrero E. Surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(1S):S11-20.","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"issue":"11","key":"4531_CR9","first-page":"892","volume":"58","author":"MC Wang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wang MC, Yu KY, Zhang JG, et al. Progression and clinical application in unilateral biportal endoscopic. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020;58(11):892\u20136.","journal-title":"Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi"},{"key":"4531_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1142","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199011010-00011","volume":"15","author":"K Abumi","year":"1990","unstructured":"Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Kramer KM, Duranceau J, Oxland T, Crisco JJ. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal stability after graded facetectomies. Spine. 1990;15:1142\u20137.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"4531_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.22603\/ssrr.1.2017-0006","volume":"1","author":"K Matsukawa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Matsukawa K, Yato Y. Lumbar pedicle screw fixation with cortical bone trajectory: a review from anatomical and biomechanical standpoints. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017;1:164\u201373.","journal-title":"Spine Surg Relat Res"},{"key":"4531_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1097\/BSD.0000000000000827","volume":"33","author":"C Morgenstern","year":"2020","unstructured":"Morgenstern C, Yue JJ, Morgenstern R. Full percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the facet-sparing, trans-kambin approach. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33:40\u20135.","journal-title":"Clin Spine Surg"},{"issue":"2020","key":"4531_CR13","first-page":"9016219","volume":"11","author":"Y Huo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Huo Y, Yang D, Ma L, Wang H, Ding W, Yang S. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone cages for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study with 1-year follow-up. Pain Res Manag. 2020;11(2020):9016219.","journal-title":"Pain Res Manag"},{"issue":"12","key":"4531_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1410","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199506020-00014","volume":"20","author":"KH Bridwell","year":"1995","unstructured":"Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Mcenery KW, et al. Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects. Spine. 1995;20(12):1410.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"4531_CR15","volume":"2","author":"DA Delgado","year":"2018","unstructured":"Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, Mc Culloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of digital visual analog scale pain scoring with a traditional paper-based visual analog scale in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2(3): e088.","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev"},{"key":"4531_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2940","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200011150-00017","volume":"25","author":"JCT Fairbank","year":"2000","unstructured":"Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25:2940\u201353.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"9","key":"4531_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4628","DOI":"10.1007\/s12325-021-01875-8","volume":"38","author":"AD Kaye","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kaye AD, Edinoff AN, Temple SN, et al. A comprehensive review of novel interventional techniques for chronic pain:spinal stenosis and degenerative disc disease-MILD percutaneous image guided lumbar decompression, vertiflex interspinous spacer, minuteman G3 interspinous-interlaminar fusion. Adv Ther. 2021;38(9):4628\u201345.","journal-title":"Adv Ther"},{"key":"4531_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e922","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.07.101","volume":"132","author":"K Wasinpongwanich","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wasinpongwanich K, Pongpirul K, Lwin KMM, et al. Full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy: retrospective review of clinical results and complications in 545 international patients. World Neurosurg. 2019;132:e922\u20138.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"4531_CR19","first-page":"3731983","volume":"2017","author":"SH Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee SH, Erken HY, Bae J. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results of mean 46-month follow-up. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3731983.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"4531_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2019.08.016","volume":"20","author":"H Bumann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bumann H, N\u00fcesch C, Loske S, et al. Severity of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis affects pelvic rigidity during walking. Spine J. 2020;20(1):112\u201320.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"11","key":"4531_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1424","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200006010-00016","volume":"25","author":"T Amundsen","year":"2000","unstructured":"Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management: a prospective 10-year study. Spine. 2000;25(11):1424\u201335.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"4531_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d","volume":"32","author":"A Malmivaara","year":"2007","unstructured":"Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, et al. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(1):1\u20138.","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"4531_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.4103\/JISM.JISM_38_19","volume":"7","author":"M Mohan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mohan M, Sawarkar P. Ayurvedic management of Gridhrasi with special respect to sciatica: a case report. J Indian Syst Med. 2019;7(2):131\u20138.","journal-title":"J Indian Syst Med"},{"key":"4531_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9540298","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/9540298","volume":"2016","author":"G Fan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fan G, Wu X, Yu S, et al. Clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in three-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9540298.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"4531_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"808","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.09.227","volume":"121","author":"Y Nagamoto","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nagamoto Y, Okuda S, Matsumoto T. Multiple-repeated adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg. 2019;121:808\u201316.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"1","key":"4531_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2016.10.1.52","volume":"10","author":"AE Kader","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kader AE. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(1):52\u20138.","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"issue":"9","key":"4531_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1078403","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2022.1078403","volume":"17","author":"M Chen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chen M, Yang C, Cai Z, Liu Y, Liu H, Cui J, Yao Z, Chen Y. Lumbar posterior group muscle degeneration: Influencing factors of adjacent vertebral body re-fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;17(9):1078403.","journal-title":"Front Med (Lausanne)"},{"issue":"5","key":"4531_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbo.2017.08.001","volume":"53","author":"TC Martinelli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Martinelli TC, Effgen EA, Brazolino MAN, et al. Evaluation of the discal height gain and lumbar lordosis variation obtained by the techniques of transforaminal and posterior lumbar intersomatic fusion. Rev Bras Ortop. 2018;53(5):527\u201331.","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ortop"},{"issue":"1","key":"4531_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.22603\/ssrr.2018-0022","volume":"3","author":"Y Ishihara","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ishihara Y, Morishita M, Miyaki J, et al. Comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the boomerang-shaped cage with traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2018;3(1):71\u20138.","journal-title":"Spine Surg Relat Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"4531_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2017.04.011","volume":"17","author":"X Cheng","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cheng X, Zhang K, Sun X, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis. Spine J. 2017;17(8):1127\u201333.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"4531_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.3171\/2016.9.SPINE16232","volume":"26","author":"T Matsumoto","year":"2017","unstructured":"Matsumoto T, Okuda S, Maeno T, Yamashita T, Yamasaki R, Sugiura T, Iwasaki M. Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(4):435\u201340.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"4531_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.55095\/achot2010\/023","volume":"77","author":"P Zencica","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zencica P, Chaloupka R, Hlad\u00edkov\u00e1 J, Krbec M. Degenerace prilehl\u00e9ho pohybov\u00e9ho segmentu po lumbosakr\u00e1ln\u00ed f\u00fazi u spondylolist\u00e9z: retrospektivn\u00ed radiologick\u00e1 a klinick\u00e1 anal\u00fdza [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010;77(2):124\u201330.","journal-title":"Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech."},{"issue":"1","key":"4531_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-019-1197-7","volume":"14","author":"CZ Du","year":"2019","unstructured":"Du CZ, Li S, Xu L, Zhou QS, Zhu ZZ, Sun X, Qiu Y. Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):148.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"4531_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2022.02.001","volume":"22","author":"K Takeda","year":"2022","unstructured":"Takeda K, Okada E, Shinozaki Y, Ozaki M, Kono H, Yasuda A, Suzuki S, Tsuji O, Nagoshi N, Yagi M, Fujita N, Ogawa J, Nakamura M, Matsumoto M, Watanabe K. Risk factors for early-onset radiographical adjacent segment disease in patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2022;22(7):1112\u20138.","journal-title":"Spine J"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04531-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04531-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04531-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]],"date-time":"2024-01-30T15:06:52Z","timestamp":1706627212000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/josr-online.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04531-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4531"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04531-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1749-799X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1749-799X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 October 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 January 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 January 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the first affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of traditional Chinese Medicine. All methods are carried out in accordance with institutional guidelines and regulations. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the Ethics Committee of the first affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of traditional Chinese Medicine abandoned the need for informed consent.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Consent to publish was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"95"}}