{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T04:26:10Z","timestamp":1790310370217,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,17]],"date-time":"2024-06-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1718582400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,17]],"date-time":"2024-06-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1718582400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100017696","name":"Hebei Province Graduate Innovation Funding Project","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["CXZZBS2024124"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["CXZZBS2024124"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100017696","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Major Research plan of National Natural Science Foundation of China","award":["82272578"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["82272578"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Orthop Surg Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A novel Proximal Femoral Bionic Nail (PFBN) has been developed by a research team for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. This study aims to compare the biomechanical properties of the innovative PFBN with those of the conventional Inverted Triangular Cannulated Screw (ITCS) fixation method through biomechanical testing.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Sixteen male femoral specimens preserved in formalin were selected, with the donors\u2019 age at death averaging 56.1\u2009\u00b1\u20096.3 years (range 47\u201364 years), and a mean age of 51.4 years. The femurs showed no visible damage and were examined by X-rays to exclude diseases affecting bone quality such as tumors, severe osteoporosis, and deformities. The 16 femoral specimens were randomly divided into an experimental group (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20098) and a control group (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20098). All femurs were prepared with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, fixed with PFBN in the experimental group and ITCS in the control group. Displacement and stress limits of each specimen were measured through cyclic compression tests and failure experiments, and vertical displacement and strain values under a 600\u00a0N vertical load were measured in all specimens through vertical compression tests.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In the vertical compression test, the average displacement at the anterior head region of the femur was 0.362\u00a0mm for the PFBN group, significantly less than the 0.480\u00a0mm for the ITCS group (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). At the fracture line area, the average displacement for the PFBN group was also lower than that of the ITCS group (0.196\u00a0mm vs. 0.324\u00a0mm, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). The difference in displacement in the shaft area was smaller, but the average displacement for the PFBN group (0.049\u00a0mm) was still significantly less than that for the ITCS group (0.062\u00a0mm, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.016). The situation was similar on the posterior side of the femur. The average displacements in the head area, fracture line area, and shaft area for the PFBN group were 0.300\u00a0mm, 0.168\u00a0mm, and 0.081\u00a0mm, respectively, while those for the ITCS group were 0.558\u00a0mm, 0.274\u00a0mm, and 0.041\u00a0mm, with significant differences in all areas (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). The average strain in the anterior head area for the PFBN group was 4947\u00a0\u03bcm\/m, significantly less than the 1540\u00a0\u03bcm\/m for the ITCS group (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Likewise, in the fracture line and shaft areas, the average strains for the PFBN group were significantly less than those for the ITCS group (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). In the posterior head area, the average strain for the PFBN group was 4861\u00a0\u03bcm\/m, significantly less than the 1442\u00a0\u03bcm\/m for the ITCS group (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). The strain conditions in the fracture line and shaft areas also showed the PFBN group was superior to the ITCS group (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). In cyclic loading experiments, the PFBN fixation showed smaller maximum displacement (1.269\u00a0mm vs. 1.808\u00a0mm, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001), indicating better stability. In the failure experiments, the maximum failure load that the PFBN-fixated fracture block could withstand was significantly higher than that for the ITCS fixation (1817\u00a0N vs. 1116\u00a0N, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The PFBN can meet the biomechanical requirements for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. PFBN is superior in biomechanical stability compared to ITCS, particularly showing less displacement and higher failure resistance in cyclic load and failure experiments. While there are differences in strain performance in different regions between the two fixation methods, overall, PFBN provides superior stability.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-024-04770-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,17]],"date-time":"2024-06-17T03:10:25Z","timestamp":1718593825000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Biomechanical comparison of the therapeutic effect of a novel proximal femoral bionic intramedullary nail and traditional inverted triangle hollow screw on femoral neck fracture"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Yi-Fan","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chuan","family":"Ren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Meng-Xuan","family":"Yao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shu-Guang","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kai","family":"Ding","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hai-Cheng","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wei","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qi","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ying-ze","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"4770_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999.0000000000000066","volume":"476","author":"JM Kazley","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kazley JM, Banerjee S, Abousayed MM. Classifications in brief: Garden classification of femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:441.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"4770_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1458","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2018.04.015","volume":"49","author":"N Veronese","year":"2018","unstructured":"Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury. 2018;49:1458\u201360.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4770_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1003180","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1003180","volume":"17","author":"C Zhang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhang C, Feng J, Wang S, et al. Incidence of and trends in hip fracture among adults in urban China: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003180.","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"4770_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e807","DOI":"10.1016\/S2214-109X(17)30222-X","volume":"5","author":"W Chen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Chen W, Lv H, Liu S, et al. National incidence of traumatic fractures in China: a retrospective survey of 512 187 individuals. Lancet Global Health. 2017;5:e807\u201317.","journal-title":"Lancet Global Health"},{"key":"4770_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6528","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-10531-2","volume":"12","author":"H Lv","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lv H, Zhang X, Wang J, et al. Short-term effects of COVID-19 on the risk of traumatic fractures in China cities. Sci Rep. 2022;12:6528.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"4770_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S78","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02555097","volume":"49","author":"O Simonen","year":"1991","unstructured":"Simonen O, Mikkola T. Senile osteoporosis and femoral neck fractures in long-stay institutions. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991;49:S78\u20139.","journal-title":"Calcif Tissue Int"},{"key":"4770_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-019-1226-6","volume":"14","author":"O Guzon-Illescas","year":"2019","unstructured":"Guzon-Illescas O, Perez Fernandez E, Cresp\u00ed Villarias N, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic hip fracture: incidence, trends, and associated factors. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:1\u20139.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"4770_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1903","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-015-3104-3","volume":"26","author":"B Sobolev","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sobolev B, Sheehan KJ, Kuramoto L, et al. Excess mortality associated with second hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26:1903\u201310.","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"4770_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1007\/s11657-023-01282-2","volume":"18","author":"Z Mohsin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mohsin Z, Javaid MK, Johansen A. Current approaches to secondary prevention after hip fracture in England and Wales\u2014an analysis of trends between 2016 and 2020 using the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Archives Osteoporos. 2023;18:93.","journal-title":"Archives Osteoporos"},{"key":"4770_CR10","first-page":"RC05","volume":"11","author":"A Sharma","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sharma A, Mahajan A, John B. A comparison of the clinico-radiological outcomes with proximal femoral nail (PFN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Clin Diagn Research: JCDR. 2017;11:RC05.","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Research: JCDR"},{"key":"4770_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"810","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2010.03.020","volume":"41","author":"Y Liu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, et al. Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury. 2010;41:810\u20137.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4770_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2019.11.040","volume":"51","author":"SS Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim SS, Kim HJ, Lee CS. Clinical outcomes of PFNA-II in the Asian intertrochanteric fracture patients: comparison of clinical results according to proximal nail protrusion. Injury. 2020;51:361\u20136.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4770_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-018-0749-6","volume":"13","author":"L Nherera","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nherera L, Trueman P, Horner A, et al. Comparison of a twin interlocking derotation and compression screw cephalomedullary nail (InterTAN) with a single screw derotation cephalomedullary nail (proximal femoral nail antirotation): a systematic review and meta-analysis for intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:1\u201310.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"4770_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-021-02665-2","volume":"16","author":"K Ding","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ding K, Yang W, Zhu J, et al. Titanium alloy cannulated screws and biodegradable magnesium alloy bionic cannulated screws for treatment of femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:1\u201310.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"4770_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-023-07110-5","volume":"25","author":"X Fan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Fan X, Zhou Y, Dai S, et al. Bio-mechanical effects of femoral neck system versus cannulated screws on treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25:83.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"4770_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.3944\/AOTT.2014.3159","volume":"48","author":"N Saglam","year":"2014","unstructured":"Saglam N, Kucukdurmaz F, Kivilcim H, et al. Biomechanical comparison of antirotator compression hip screw and cannulated screw fixations in the femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48:196\u2013201.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc"},{"key":"4770_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhou Y, Li Z, Lao K et al. Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review. Front Surg. 2023;10.","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1224559"},{"key":"4770_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-018-03103-5","volume":"139","author":"R Morochovi\u010d","year":"2019","unstructured":"Morochovi\u010d R, Tak\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1 K, Tom\u010dov\u010d\u00edk \u013d, et al. Factors influencing femoral neck fracture healing after internal fixation with dynamic locking plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139:629\u201338.","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"4770_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"030006052110335","DOI":"10.1177\/03000605211033501","volume":"49","author":"Y Chen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chen Y, Li H, Dai L, et al. Imaging observation of percutaneous compression plate use in promoting femoral neck fracture healing. J Int Med Res. 2021;49:03000605211033501.","journal-title":"J Int Med Res"},{"key":"4770_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2021.1932840","volume":"25","author":"M Torabi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Torabi M, Khorramymehr S, Nikkhoo M, et al. The effect of orthopedic screw profiles on the healing time of femoral neck fracture. Comput Methods Biomech BioMed Eng. 2022;25:97\u2013110.","journal-title":"Comput Methods Biomech BioMed Eng"},{"issue":"9","key":"4770_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2245","DOI":"10.1111\/os.13247","volume":"14","author":"Y Wang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Wang Y, Chen W, Zhang L, et al. Finite element analysis of proximal femur bionic nail (PFBN) compared with proximal femoral nail antirotation and InterTan in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(9):2245\u201355.","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"4770_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-023-05696-y","volume":"47","author":"H Zhao","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhao H, Deng X, Liu W, et al. Proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN)-an innovative surgical method for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2023;47(4):1089\u201399.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"4770_CR23","first-page":"1375","volume":"28","author":"ZH Sun","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sun ZH, Chen D, Chu KW, et al. Comparison of clinical data between the proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN) and hip replacement for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024;28:1375\u201383.","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci"},{"key":"4770_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-04112-w","volume":"18","author":"P Chen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chen P, Fan Z, Xu N, et al. A biomechanical investigation of a novel intramedullary nail used to salvage failed internal fixations in intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:632.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"4770_CR25","unstructured":"Lou Y, Hong J, Yu K et al. (2015). Analysis of the therapeutic effect of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws of different diameters in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Chin J Traumatol, (792-5)."},{"key":"4770_CR26","first-page":"994","volume":"29","author":"X He","year":"2016","unstructured":"He X, Xu H, Ji K, et al. Study on the mechanical stability of femoral neck fractures fixed with two cannulated screws. Chin J Traumatol. 2016;29:994\u20131000.","journal-title":"Chin J Traumatol"},{"key":"4770_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2014.12.031","volume":"46","author":"M Panteli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Panteli M, Rodham P, Giannoudis PV. Biomechanical rationale for implant choices in femoral neck fracture fixation in the non-elderly. Injury. 2015;46:445\u201352.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"4770_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2011","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-017-5318-5","volume":"475","author":"D Zhao","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zhao D, Qiu X, Wang B, et al. Epiphyseal arterial network and inferior retinacular artery seem critical to femoral head perfusion in adults with femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Research\u00ae. 2017;475:2011\u201323.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Research\u00ae"},{"key":"4770_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ding K, Zhu Y, Zhang Y et al. Proximal femoral bionic nail\u2014a novel internal fixation system for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11.","DOI":"10.3389\/fbioe.2023.1297507"},{"key":"4770_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"926","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-04415-y","volume":"18","author":"X Cheng","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cheng X, Yang Y, Zhu J, et al. Finite element analysis of basicervical femoral neck fracture treated with proximal femoral bionic nail. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:926.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04770-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04770-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04770-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,17]],"date-time":"2024-06-17T03:12:20Z","timestamp":1718593940000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/josr-online.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04770-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,17]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4770"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-024-04770-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1749-799X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1749-799X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,17]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 May 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 June 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study does not require the approval of the Institutional Review Committee of the Ethics Committee of our hospital.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"359"}}