{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]],"date-time":"2026-07-25T22:08:09Z","timestamp":1785017289312,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748649600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748649600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Orthop Surg Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>In medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in young patients who fail conservative treatment, clinical equipoise exists between three surgical strategies: (1) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), (2) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and (3) medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of three surgical strategies, using a probabilistic Markov model from the Ontario public payer perspective in Canada.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A probabilistic Markov model was developed to perform a cost-utility analysis comparing TKA, UKA, and HTO. The base case simulated a 45-year-old Canadian cohort with unilateral medial knee OA over a lifetime horizon. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life months (QALMs), discounted lifetime costs (1.5% annually), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and net monetary benefit (NMB), reported in 2023 Canadian dollars (CAD, $). A willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $4,166.67\/QALM was applied. Model uncertainty was assessed via 3,000 iterations of probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Scenario analyses using sex-specific mortality rates were also conducted.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Mean costs were $9,157 (TKA), $9,238 (HTO), and $9,419 (UKA). UKA produced the highest QALMs (290.53), followed by TKA (277.02) and HTO (270.88). HTO was absolutely dominated, as it was both more costly and less effective than TKA. Among undominated strategies, UKA yielded an ICER of $19.46\/QALM compared to TKA. UKA also had the highest NMB ($1,201,112), outperforming TKA ($1,145,110) and HTO ($1,119,411). UKA was the most cost-effective option in 55.27% of probabilistic simulations, followed by TKA (23.83%) and HTO (20.90%). Scenario analyses with sex-specific mortality showed similar trends.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>UKA is the most cost-effective surgical strategy from a public payer perspective for young patients with medial knee OA. At a WTP of $4,166.67\/QALM, UKA balances long-term durability and economic value better than TKA or HTO.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Level of evidence<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Level III, Model-based economic evaluation.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-025-05960-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T02:50:09Z","timestamp":1748659809000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis in young patients: a Canadian public payer perspective"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"20","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7041-3562","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pakpoom","family":"Ruangsomboon","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0848-7162","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Onlak","family":"Ruangsomboon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-3220-1114","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Davis","family":"Tam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1829-6885","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bheeshma","family":"Ravi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4571-9655","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Seper","family":"Ekhtiari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3783-8205","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel","family":"Pincus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-0600-6626","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sebastian","family":"Tomescu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"5960_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.2519\/jospt.2017.7286","volume":"47","author":"IN Ackerman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ackerman IN, Kemp JL, Crossley KM, Culvenor AG, Hinman RS. Hip and knee osteoarthritis affects younger people, too. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47:67\u201379.","journal-title":"J Orthop Sports Phys Ther"},{"key":"5960_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roos EM. Joint injury causes knee osteoarthritis in young adults. Curr Opin Rheumatol [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2025 Mar 27];17:195. Available from: https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/co-rheumatology\/abstract\/2005\/03000\/joint_injury_causes_knee_osteoarthritis_in_young.16.aspx","DOI":"10.1097\/01.bor.0000151406.64393.00"},{"key":"5960_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S245","DOI":"10.21037\/atm.2019.06.68","volume":"7","author":"M DeRogatis","year":"2019","unstructured":"DeRogatis M, Anis HK, Sodhi N, Ehiorobo JO, Chughtai M, Bhave A, et al. Non-operative treatment options for knee osteoarthritis. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:S245.","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"key":"5960_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.berh.2012.03.005","volume":"26","author":"AD Woolf","year":"2012","unstructured":"Woolf AD, Erwin J, March L. The need to address the burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26:183\u2013224.","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol"},{"key":"5960_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E253","DOI":"10.1503\/cjs.003419","volume":"64","author":"Y Lebedeva","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lebedeva Y, Churchill L, Marsh J, MacDonald SJ, Giffin JR, Bryant D. Wait times, resource use and health-related quality of life across the continuum of care for patients referred for total knee replacement surgery. Can J Surg J Can Chir. 2021;64:E253\u201364.","journal-title":"Can J Surg J Can Chir"},{"key":"5960_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bedenbaugh AV, Bonafede M, Marchlewicz EH, Lee V, Tambiah J. Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among US Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Compared with Controls. Clin Outcomes Res CEOR. 2021;13:421\u201335.","DOI":"10.2147\/CEOR.S302289"},{"key":"5960_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.02.010","volume":"28","author":"D Fu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fu D, Li G, Chen K, Zhao Y, Hua Y, Cai Z. Comparison of high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:759\u201365.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"5960_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1302\/2058-5241.6.200102","volume":"6","author":"DJ McCormack","year":"2021","unstructured":"McCormack DJ, Puttock D, Godsiff SP. Medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a review of surgical options. EFORT Open Rev. 2021;6:113\u20137.","journal-title":"EFORT Open Rev"},{"key":"5960_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)32531-5","volume":"393","author":"JT Evans","year":"2019","unstructured":"Evans JT, Walker RW, Evans JP, Blom AW, Sayers A, Whitehouse MR. How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and National registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet Lond Engl. 2019;393:655\u201363.","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"key":"5960_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.52312\/jdrs.2022.786","volume":"33","author":"P Ruangsomboon","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ruangsomboon P, Paugchawee J, Narkbunnam R, Chareancholvanich K, Pornrattanamaneewong C. The factors influencing the component sizes in Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33:505\u201312.","journal-title":"Jt Dis Relat Surg"},{"key":"5960_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2017.1367577","volume":"89","author":"HR Mohammad","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mohammad HR, Strickland L, Hamilton TW, Murray DW. Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review. Acta Orthop. 2018;89:101\u20137.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"5960_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2045","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-017-3517-z","volume":"41","author":"P Ruangsomboon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ruangsomboon P, Chareancholvanich K, Harnroongroj T, Pornrattanamaneewong C. Survivorship of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy in the elderly: two to ten years of follow up. Int Orthop. 2017;41:2045\u201352.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"5960_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2018.03.023","volume":"33","author":"AV Lombardi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lombardi AV, Kolich MT, Berend KR, Morris MJ, Crawford DA, Adams JB. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: is it as good as a primary result?? J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:S105\u20138.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"5960_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1271","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2017.08.060","volume":"24","author":"CJ Wilson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wilson CJ, Theodoulou A, Damarell RA, Krishnan J. Knee instability as the primary cause of failure following total knee arthroplasty (TKA): A systematic review on the patient, surgical and implant characteristics of revised TKA patients. Knee. 2017;24:1271\u201381.","journal-title":"Knee"},{"key":"5960_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Brian Leung HW, Bruce Tang YH. Outcome of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy and conversion knee arthroplasty in a local joint replacement centre. J Orthop Trauma Rehabil [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Mar 23];30:215\u201325. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/22104917231166719","DOI":"10.1177\/22104917231166719"},{"key":"5960_CR16","unstructured":"CJRR annual report. Hip and knee replacements in Canada, 2021\u20132022| CIHI [Internet]. [cited 2025 Feb 16]. Available from: https:\/\/www.cihi.ca\/en\/cjrr-annual-report-hip-and-knee-replacements-in-canada-2021-2022"},{"key":"5960_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198526629.001.0001","volume-title":"Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Illustrated edition","author":"A Briggs","year":"2006","unstructured":"Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Illustrated edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006."},{"key":"5960_CR18","unstructured":"Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press; 2015."},{"key":"5960_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Konopka JF, Lee Y, Su EP, McLawhorn AS. Quality-Adjusted Life Years After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. JBJS Open Access [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jun 22];3:e0007. Available from: https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC6242318\/","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.OA.18.00007"},{"key":"5960_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.N.00925","volume":"97","author":"JF Konopka","year":"2015","unstructured":"Konopka JF, Gomoll AH, Thornhill TS, Katz JN, Losina E. The cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in younger patients: a computer model-based evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:807\u201317.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"5960_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"746","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(19)31281-4","volume":"394","author":"DJ Beard","year":"2019","unstructured":"Beard DJ, Davies LJ, Cook JA, MacLennan G, Price A, Kent S, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2019;394:746\u201356.","journal-title":"Lancet Lond Engl"},{"key":"5960_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2008.11.010","volume":"25","author":"SG Memtsoudis","year":"2010","unstructured":"Memtsoudis SG, Della Valle AG, Besculides MC, Esposito M, Koulouvaris P, Salvati EA. Risk factors for perioperative mortality after lower extremity arthroplasty: a population-based study of 6,901,324 patient discharges. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:19\u201326.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"5960_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2018.11.008","volume":"26","author":"OJF Keenan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Keenan OJF, Clement ND, Nutton R, Keating JF. Older age and female gender are independent predictors of early conversion to total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Knee. 2019;26:207\u201312.","journal-title":"Knee"},{"key":"5960_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20100826-03","volume":"33","author":"TK Fehring","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fehring TK, Odum SM, Fehring K, Springer BD, Griffin WL, Dennos AC. Mortality following revision joint arthroplasty: is age a factor? Orthopedics. 2010;33:715.","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"key":"5960_CR25","unstructured":"OHIP Schedule of Benefits. and fees| ontario.ca [Internet]. [cited 2025 Mar 27]. Available from: http:\/\/www.ontario.ca\/page\/ohip-schedule-benefits-and-fees"},{"key":"5960_CR26","unstructured":"Government of Canada SC. Mortality rates, by age group [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Feb 14]. Available from: https:\/\/www150.statcan.gc.ca\/t1\/tbl1\/en\/tv.action?pid=1310071001"},{"key":"5960_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.M.00545","volume":"96","author":"JP Meehan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Meehan JP, Danielsen B, Kim SH, Jamali AA, White RH. Younger age is associated with a higher risk of early periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:529\u201335.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"5960_CR28","unstructured":"Guidelines for the. Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada (4th Edition)."},{"key":"5960_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1007\/s40273-015-0337-0","volume":"34","author":"EH Elbasha","year":"2016","unstructured":"Elbasha EH, Chhatwal J. Myths and misconceptions of Within-Cycle correction: A guide for modelers and decision makers. PharmacoEconomics. 2016;34:13\u201322.","journal-title":"PharmacoEconomics"},{"key":"5960_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.17012","volume":"129","author":"D Husereau","year":"2022","unstructured":"Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Carswell C, Caulley L, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;129:336\u201344.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"5960_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goodell PB, Johansen PM, Bartels DW, Sherman SL, Amanatullah DF. Comparing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for isolated medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. JBJS Rev. 2023;11.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.22.00127"},{"key":"5960_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1177\/0194599820957288","volume":"164","author":"D Forner","year":"2021","unstructured":"Forner D, Hoit G, Noel CW, Eskander A, de Almeida JR, Rigby MH, et al. Decision modeling for economic evaluation in Otolaryngology-Head and neck surgery: review of techniques. Otolaryngol\u2013Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2021;164:741\u201350.","journal-title":"Otolaryngol\u2013Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg"},{"key":"5960_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weir CJ, Butcher I, Assi V, Lewis SC, Murray GD, Langhorne P et al. Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Nov 12];18:25. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-018-0483-0","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-018-0483-0"},{"key":"5960_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"El-Ganzoury IM, Zakaria ZM, Elsayed A, Elwarwary AE. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus High tibial osteotomy in treatment of isolated medial compartment Osteoarthritis of knee: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. [cited 2025 Mar 27]; Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/qjmed\/hcab104.002","DOI":"10.1093\/qjmed\/hcab104.002"},{"key":"5960_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.12.024","volume":"35","author":"H Chaudhry","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chaudhry H, MacDonald SJ, Howard JL, Lanting BA, McCalden RW, Naudie DD, et al. Indications, survivorship, and clinical outcomes of a rotating hinge total knee and distal femoral arthroplasty system. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:1323\u20137.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"5960_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejim.2017.05.015","volume":"43","author":"S Trippoli","year":"2017","unstructured":"Trippoli S. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and net monetary benefit: current use in pharmacoeconomics and future perspectives. Eur J Intern Med. 2017;43:e36.","journal-title":"Eur J Intern Med"},{"key":"5960_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pandey H, Paulden M, McCabe C. Theoretical models of the cost-effectiveness threshold, value assessment, and health care system sustainability. Edmonton, Canada: Institute of Health Economics (IHE); 2018. 2021.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2018.09.2173"},{"key":"5960_CR38","first-page":"473","volume":"146","author":"A Laupacis","year":"1992","unstructured":"Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J. 1992;146:473\u201381.","journal-title":"CMAJ Can Med Assoc J"},{"key":"5960_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2348","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200611000-00005","volume":"88","author":"J Slover","year":"2006","unstructured":"Slover J, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Tomek I, et al. Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in elderly low-demand patients. A Markov decision analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2348\u201355.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"5960_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2017.09.022","volume":"33","author":"GS-H Goh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Goh GS-H, Bin Abd Razak HR, Tay DK-J, Chia S-L, Lo N-N, Yeo S-J. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty achieves greater flexion with no difference in functional outcome, quality of life, and satisfaction vs total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years. A propensity Score-Matched cohort analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:355\u201361.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"5960_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.5792\/ksrr.16.045","volume":"29","author":"Y-J Kim","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kim Y-J, Kim B-H, Yoo S-H, Kang S-W, Kwack C-H, Song M-H. Mid-Term results of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in young Asian patients less than 60 years of age: A minimum 5-Year Follow-up. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29:122\u20138.","journal-title":"Knee Surg Relat Res"},{"key":"5960_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.08.019","volume":"28","author":"K Yoshida","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yoshida K, Tada M, Yoshida H, Takei S, Fukuoka S, Nakamura H. Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Japan\u2013clinical results in greater than one thousand cases over ten years. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:168\u201371.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"5960_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2012.03.004","volume":"19","author":"G Matharu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Matharu G, Robb C, Baloch K, Pynsent P. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: survival and the affect of age and gender. Knee. 2012;19:913\u20137.","journal-title":"Knee"},{"key":"5960_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.98B10.BJJ.2016.0473.R1","volume":"98\u2013B","author":"GG Jones","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jones GG, Kotti M, Wiik AV, Collins R, Brevadt MJ, Strachan RK, et al. Gait comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties with healthy controls. Bone Jt J. 2016;98\u2013B:16\u201321.","journal-title":"Bone Jt J"},{"key":"5960_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-004-0583-9","volume":"28","author":"M Katayama","year":"2004","unstructured":"Katayama M, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi A, Hatayama K, Terauchi M, et al. Proprioception and performance after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Int Orthop. 2004;28:278\u201381.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"5960_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.60B3.581081","volume":"60\u2013B","author":"J Goodfellow","year":"1978","unstructured":"Goodfellow J, O\u2019Connor J. The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978;60\u2013B:358\u201369.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br"},{"key":"5960_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1450","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-009-0731-z","volume":"467","author":"AV Lombardi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J, Cheney NA. Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop. 2009;467:1450\u20137.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop"},{"key":"5960_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1493","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B11.35634","volume":"97\u2013B","author":"H Pandit","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pandit H, Hamilton TW, Jenkins C, Mellon SJ, Dodd CaF, Murray DW. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs. Bone Jt J. 2015;97\u2013B:1493\u2013500.","journal-title":"Bone Jt J"},{"key":"5960_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.5792\/ksrr.2016.28.2.89","volume":"28","author":"SJ Song","year":"2016","unstructured":"Song SJ, Bae DK, Kim KI, Lee CH. Conversion total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016;28:89\u201398.","journal-title":"Knee Surg Relat Res"},{"key":"5960_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-020-3177-9","volume":"21","author":"X Chen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chen X, Yang Z, Li H, Zhu S, Wang Y, Qian W. Higher risk of revision in total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:153.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"5960_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kendoff D, Board TN, Citak M, Gardner MJ, Hankemeier S, Ostermeier S et al. Navigated lower limb axis measurements: Influence of mechanical weight-bearing simulation. J Orthop Res [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2025 Mar 29];26:553\u201361. Available from: https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/abs\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jor.20510","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.20510"},{"key":"5960_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ekhtiari S, Bozzo A, Madden K, Winemaker MJ, Adili A, Wood TJ. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: survivorship and risk factors for revision: A Population-Based cohort study with minimum 10-Year Follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.21.00346"},{"key":"5960_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1653","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.17.00837","volume":"100","author":"GS Kazarian","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kazarian GS, Lonner JH, Maltenfort MG, Ghomrawi HMK, Chen AF. Cost-Effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatments for unicompartmental knee arthritis: A Markov model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:1653\u201360.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"5960_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.2340\/17453674.2023.9411","volume":"94","author":"P Ruangsomboon","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ruangsomboon P, Ruangsomboon O, Pornrattanamaneewong C, Narkbunnam R, Chareancholvanich K. Clinical and radiological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Orthop. 2023;94:60\u201379.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"5960_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-01949-z","volume":"18","author":"P Ruangsomboon","year":"2024","unstructured":"Ruangsomboon P, Ruangsomboon O, Osman K, Pincus D, Mundi R, Tomescu S, et al. Clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Robot Surg. 2024;18:255.","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-025-05960-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13018-025-05960-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-025-05960-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T02:50:13Z","timestamp":1748659813000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/josr-online.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13018-025-05960-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5960"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-025-05960-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1749-799X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1749-799X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 April 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 May 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 May 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto (REB-CR6129). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations for retrospective chart review.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate and consent to publish"}},{"value":"Our work was performed in five institutions; (1) Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2) Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand (3) Upstream Lab, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (4) ICES, Toronto, Canada. 5) McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statement of location"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"554"}}