{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,5]],"date-time":"2026-11-05T05:15:38Z","timestamp":1793855738799,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]],"date-time":"2025-12-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1764892800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1766966400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":24,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Aerospace Center Hospital Foundation","award":["YN202303"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["YN202303"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009592","name":"Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, Adminitrative Commission of Zhongguancun Science Park","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["No. Z221100007922003"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["No. Z221100007922003"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009592","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Orthop Surg Res"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-025-06458-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]],"date-time":"2025-12-05T07:24:16Z","timestamp":1764919456000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Preclinical evaluation of a 3D-printed porous stand-alone interbody cage for cervical fusion in a sheep model"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Songyang","family":"Liu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qingsong","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kai","family":"Xiao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xing","family":"Wei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yufeng","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"6458_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2012.11.013","volume":"13","author":"MB Kornblum","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kornblum MB, Turner AW, Cornwall GB, Zatushevsky MA, Phillips FM. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws. Spine J. 2013;13(1):77\u201384.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6458_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1186\/s12938-019-0684-8","volume":"18","author":"A Calvo-Echenique","year":"2019","unstructured":"Calvo-Echenique A, Cegonino J, Perez Del Palomar A. Is there any advantage of using stand-alone cages? A numerical approach. Biomed Eng Online. 2019;18(1):63.","journal-title":"Biomed Eng Online"},{"issue":"S1","key":"6458_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S69","DOI":"10.14444\/8238","volume":"16","author":"CM Menezes","year":"2022","unstructured":"Menezes CM, Menezes EG, Asghar J, Guiroy A. When to consider Stand-Alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is there a role for a comeback with new implants? Int J Spine Surg. 2022;16(S1):S69\u201375.","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"6458_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-14-220","volume":"14","author":"KC Choi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Choi KC, Ryu KS, Lee SH, Kim YH, Lee SJ, Park CK. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation\u2014a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:220.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"5","key":"6458_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"394","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568217699211","volume":"7","author":"SC Overley","year":"2017","unstructured":"Overley SC, Merrill RK, Leven DM, Meaike JJ, Kumar A, Qureshi SA. A matched cohort analysis comparing Stand-Alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Global Spine J. 2017;7(5):394\u20139.","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"issue":"7","key":"6458_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1374","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-011-2131-9","volume":"21","author":"WJ Wu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wu WJ, Jiang LS, Liang Y, Dai LY. Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(7):1374\u201382.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"11","key":"6458_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2734","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06561-x","volume":"29","author":"Y Zhao","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhao Y, Yang S, Huo Y, Li Z, Yang D, Ding W. Locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(11):2734\u201344.","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"12","key":"6458_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E191","DOI":"10.1111\/aor.12153","volume":"37","author":"SH Wu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wu SH, Li Y, Zhang YQ, Li XK, Yuan CF, Hao YL, et al. Porous titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium cage has better osseointegration and less micromotion than a poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in sheep vertebral fusion. Artif Organs. 2013;37(12):E191\u2013201.","journal-title":"Artif Organs"},{"issue":"1","key":"6458_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-03625-8","volume":"18","author":"R Kostysyn","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kostysyn R, Ryska P, Jandura J, Selke-Krulichova I, Poczos P, Hosszu T, et al. Speed and quality of interbody fusion in porous bioceramic Al(2)O(3) and polyetheretherketone cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):165.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"6458_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.12.111","volume":"183","author":"Y Duan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Duan Y, Feng D, Li T, Wang Y, Jiang L, Huang Y. Comparison of lumbar interbody fusion with 3D-Printed porous titanium cage versus polyetheretherketone cage in treating lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2024;183:144\u201356.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"6458_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1446792","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2024.1446792","volume":"11","author":"C Velluto","year":"2024","unstructured":"Velluto C, Mundis G Jr., Scaramuzzo L, Perna A, Capece G, Cruciani A, et al. Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after lateral lumbar interbody fusion with 3D-printed porous titanium cages vs. conventional titanium cages. Front Surg. 2024;11:1446792.","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"issue":"27","key":"6458_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4671","DOI":"10.1016\/j.biomaterials.2006.04.041","volume":"27","author":"BR Levine","year":"2006","unstructured":"Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials. 2006;27(27):4671\u201381.","journal-title":"Biomaterials"},{"key":"6458_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2020.103982","volume":"112","author":"H Wang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wang H, Wan Y, Li Q, Xia Y, Liu X, Liu Z, et al. Porous fusion cage design via integrated global-local topology optimization and biomechanical analysis of performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;112:103982.","journal-title":"J Mech Behav Biomed Mater"},{"key":"6458_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7197","DOI":"10.2147\/IJN.S132041","volume":"12","author":"L Cao","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cao L, Chen Q, Jiang LB, Yin XF, Bian C, Wang HR, et al. Bioabsorbable self-retaining PLA\/nano-sized beta-TCP cervical spine interbody fusion cage in goat models: an in vivo study. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:7197\u2013205.","journal-title":"Int J Nanomed"},{"key":"6458_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jot.2022.06.006","volume":"36","author":"K Yuan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yuan K, Zhang K, Yang Y, Lin Y, Zhou F, Mei J, et al. Evaluation of interbody fusion efficacy and biocompatibility of a polyetheretherketone\/calcium silicate\/porous tantalum cage in a goat model. J Orthop Transl. 2022;36:109\u201319.","journal-title":"J Orthop Translat"},{"key":"6458_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9016219","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/9016219","volume":"2020","author":"Y Huo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Huo Y, Yang D, Ma L, Wang H, Ding W, Yang S. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion with Stand-Alone cages for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study with 1-Year Follow-Up. Pain Res Manag. 2020;2020:9016219.","journal-title":"Pain Res Manag"},{"issue":"1","key":"6458_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.4.SPINE12319","volume":"19","author":"L Marchi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Marchi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Coutinho E, Pimenta L. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(1):110\u20138.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"6458_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.3171\/2023.4.SPINE221283","volume":"39","author":"AQ Nguyen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nguyen AQ, Ukogu C, Harvey JP, Federico VP, Nolte MT, Khanna K, et al. Increased cage angle effects on radiographic outcomes after stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023;39(2):254\u201362.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"1","key":"6458_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1007\/s12010-017-2444-1","volume":"183","author":"J Hao","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hao J, Li Y, Li B, Wang X, Li H, Liu S, et al. Biological and mechanical effects of Micro-Nanostructured titanium surface on an osteoblastic cell line in vitro and osteointegration in vivo. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2017;183(1):280\u201392.","journal-title":"Appl Biochem Biotechnol"},{"issue":"6","key":"6458_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0038-1642008","volume":"79","author":"L Mastronardi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mastronardi L, Roperto R, Cacciotti G, Calvosa F. Anterior cervical fusion with Stand-alone trabecular metal cages to treat cervical myelopathy caused by degenerative disk disease. Observations in 88 cases with minimum 12-month Follow-up. J Neurol Surg Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2018;79(6):496\u2013501.","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg Cent Eur Neurosurg"},{"issue":"5","key":"6458_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2004.03.025","volume":"4","author":"RW Haid Jr","year":"2004","unstructured":"Haid RW Jr., Branch CL Jr., Alexander JT, Burkus JK. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages. Spine J. 2004;4(5):527\u201338. discussion 38\u2009\u2013\u20099.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"6458_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmpb.2018.05.022","volume":"162","author":"A Calvo-Echenique","year":"2018","unstructured":"Calvo-Echenique A, Cegonino J, Chueca R, Perez-Del Palomar A. Stand-alone lumbar cage subsidence: a biomechanical sensitivity study of cage design and placement. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018;162:211\u20139.","journal-title":"Comput Methods Programs Biomed"},{"key":"6458_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tvjl.2016.12.007","volume":"220","author":"M Teunissen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teunissen M, van der Veen AJ, Smit TH, Tryfonidou MA, Meij BP. Effect of a titanium cage as a stand-alone device on Biomechanical stability in the lumbosacral spine of canine cadavers. Vet J. 2017;220:17\u201323.","journal-title":"Vet J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6458_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-022-05873-x","volume":"23","author":"C Nan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nan C, Ma Z, Liu Y, Ma L, Li J, Zhang W. Impact of cage position on Biomechanical performance of stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):920.","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"issue":"3","key":"6458_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12339","volume":"9","author":"PP Tsitsopoulos","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tsitsopoulos PP, Voronov LI, Zindrick MR, Carandang G, Havey RM, Ghanayem AJ, et al. Biomechanical stability analysis of a Stand-alone Cage, static and Rotational-dynamic plate in a Two-level cervical fusion construct. Orthop Surg. 2017;9(3):290\u20135.","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"6458_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"928","DOI":"10.3171\/2021.9.SPINE21558","volume":"36","author":"A Kiapour","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kiapour A, Massaad E, Joukar A, Hadzipasic M, Shankar GM, Goel VK, et al. Biomechanical analysis of stand-alone lumbar interbody cages versus 360 degrees constructs: an in vitro and finite element investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022;36(6):928\u201336.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"2","key":"6458_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2244734.367","volume":"20","author":"JM Mok","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mok JM, Lin Y, Tafur JC, Diaz RL, Amirouche F. Biomechanical comparison of multilevel Stand-Alone lumbar lateral interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screws: an in vitro study. Neurospine. 2023;20(2):478\u201386.","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"issue":"11","key":"6458_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000003387","volume":"45","author":"SD Gandhi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gandhi SD, Fahs AM, Wahlmeier ST, Louie P, Possley DR, Khalil JG, et al. Radiographic fusion rates following a Stand-alone interbody cage versus an anterior plate construct for adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(11):713\u20137.","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"6458_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wu MH, Lee MH, Wu C, Tsai PI, Hsu WB, Huang SI et al. In vitro and in vivo comparison of bone growth characteristics in additive-manufactured porous titanium, nonporous Titanium, and porous tantalum interbody cages. Mater (Basel). 2022;15(10).","DOI":"10.3390\/ma15103670"},{"issue":"6","key":"6458_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.12.004","volume":"22","author":"JL Laratta","year":"2022","unstructured":"Laratta JL, Vivace BJ, Lopez-Pena M, Guzon FM, Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A, Jorge-Mora A, et al. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model. Spine J. 2022;22(6):1016\u201327.","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6458_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.07.011","volume":"22","author":"ACY Loenen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Loenen ACY, Peters MJM, Bevers RTJ, Schaffrath C, van Haver E, Cuijpers V, et al. Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model. Spine J. 2022;22(1):174\u201382.","journal-title":"Spine J"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06458-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06458-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06458-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,29]],"date-time":"2025-12-29T06:28:24Z","timestamp":1766989704000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06458-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6458"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06458-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1749-799X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1749-799X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 August 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 October 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 December 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The author(s) have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"1089"}}