{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,4]],"date-time":"2026-02-04T03:18:37Z","timestamp":1770175117400,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]],"date-time":"2026-01-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1767657600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1770076800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":28,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Orthop Surg Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Gunshot-related femoral fractures pose significant challenges due to periosteal disruption, contamination, and potential vascular injury. The impact of fixation method and vascular status on union time and functional outcomes remains incompletely defined.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate the influence of vascular injury and fixation technique on fracture union and clinical outcomes in gunshot-induced femoral fractures. We hypothesized that intramedullary nailing (IMN) would demonstrate faster union than external fixation (EF), and that vascular injury would prolonged healing.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A retrospective cohort of 74 patients treated between 2015 and 2024 was analyzed. Group 1 consisted of EF with vascular injury (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200919), Group 2 of EF without vascular injury (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200919), and Group 3 of IMN without vascular injury (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200936). Clinical variables, fracture characteristics, operative details, and radiographic outcomes were recorded. Delayed union was defined as union time\u2009&gt;\u20096 months. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, Tukey tests, Fisher\u2019s exact tests, and multivariate regression.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The mean age was 32.1\u2009\u00b1\u20099.7 years, and 98.6% were male. Most fractures occurred in zone 2 (85.1%). The mean operative time was longest in Group 1 (319\u2009\u00b1\u200961.3\u00a0min) compared with Groups 2 and 3. Overall mean union time was 7.4\u2009\u00b1\u20093.7 months; Group 3 demonstrated significantly shorter time for union (5.6\u2009\u00b1\u20093.2 months) than Group 1 (9.5\u2009\u00b1\u20092.9 months) and 2 (8.7\u2009\u00b1\u20093.6 months) (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Knee ROM was greatest in Group 3 (125.1\u00b0 \u00b1 7.5\u00b0,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.001). Delayed union occurred in 34\/38 EF patients (89.5%) and 11\/36 IMN patients (30.6%). EF was associated with a substantially higher risk of delayed union than IMN (OR 19.3, 95% CI 5.5\u201367.8;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Vascular injury also increased delayed union risk, occurring in 18\/19 patients with vascular trauma versus 27\/55 without (OR 18.7, 95% CI 2.3\u2013149.7;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.0003). Fixation method was the only independent predictor of union time in multivariate analysis (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>IMN results in faster union, better alignment, and superior knee motion compared with EF in gunshot-related femoral fractures. Although vascular injury contributed to prolonged healing, fixation method had the dominant influence on outcomes. Prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-025-06605-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]],"date-time":"2026-01-06T04:57:13Z","timestamp":1767675433000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Fixation method, not vascular injury, is the primary determinant of union in gunshot-related femoral fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"21","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6205-1207","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Enver","family":"\u0130pek","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8561-7736","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yusuf","family":"Altunta\u015f","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4501-9090","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bahad\u0131r","family":"Balkanl\u0131","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7230-1599","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"\u0130smail","family":"Demirkale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"6605_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcot.2020.10.047","volume":"12","author":"DV Congiusta","year":"2021","unstructured":"Congiusta DV, Oettinger JP, Merchant AM, Vosbikian MM, Ahmed IH. Epidemiology of orthopaedic fractures due to firearms. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;12:45\u20139.","journal-title":"J Clin Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"6605_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200303000-00005","volume":"408","author":"CS Bartlett","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bartlett CS. Clinical update: gunshot wound ballistics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;408:28\u201357.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"6605_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3974","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-3058-8","volume":"471","author":"PJ Dougherty","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dougherty PJ, Gherebeh P, Zekaj M, Sethi S, Oliphant B, Vaidya R. Retrograde versus antegrade intramedullary nailing of gunshot diaphyseal femur fractures trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3974\u201380.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"6605_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-199801000-00007","volume":"12","author":"AJ Starr","year":"1998","unstructured":"Starr AJ, Hunt JL, Chason DP, Reinert CM, Walker J. Treatment of femur fracture with associated head injury. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:38\u201345.","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"6605_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-1383(01)00175-9","volume":"33","author":"A Guerrero","year":"2002","unstructured":"Guerrero A, Gibson K, Kralovich KA, Pipinos I, Agnostopolous P, Carter Y, et al. Limb loss following lower extremity arterial trauma: what can be done proactively? Injury. 2002;33:765\u20139.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"6605_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199173040-00018","volume":"73","author":"DA Wiss","year":"1991","unstructured":"Wiss DA, Brien WW, Becker V. Interlocking nailing for the treatment of femoral fractures due to gunshot wounds. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1991;73:598\u2013606.","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A"},{"key":"6605_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-200303000-00010","volume":"408","author":"WT Long","year":"2003","unstructured":"Long WT, Chang W, Brien EW. Grading system for gunshot injuries to the femoral diaphysis in civilians. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;408:92\u2013100.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"6605_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1025","DOI":"10.3928\/01477447-20151020-12","volume":"38","author":"MJ Halawi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Halawi MJ, Morwood MP. Acute management of open fractures: an evidence-based review. Orthopedics. 2015;38:e1025\u201333.","journal-title":"Orthopedics"},{"issue":"SUPPL 1","key":"6605_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S18","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-1383(98)00100-4","volume":"29","author":"J Tejan","year":"1998","unstructured":"Tejan J, Lindsey RW. Management of civilian gunshot injuries of the femur a review of the literature. Injury. 1998;29(SUPPL 1):S18\u201322.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"6605_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-199212000-00020","volume":"6","author":"M Bergman","year":"1992","unstructured":"Bergman M, Tornetta P, Kerina M, Sandhu H, Simon G, Deysine G, et al. Femur fractures caused by gunshot wounds: treatment by immediate reamed I.M. nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:479.","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"6605_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-017-0814-6","volume":"44","author":"G Polat","year":"2018","unstructured":"Polat G, Balci HI, Ergin ON, Asma A, \u015een C, Kili\u00e7o\u011flu. A comparison of external fixation and locked intramedullary nailing in the treatment of femoral diaphysis fractures from gunshot injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44:451\u20135.","journal-title":"Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"},{"key":"6605_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-198466030-00007","volume":"66","author":"EJ Dabezies","year":"1984","unstructured":"Dabezies EJ, D\u2019Ambrosia R, Shoji H, Norris R, Murphy G. Fractures of the femoral shaft treated by external fixation with the Wagner device. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 1984;66:360\u20134.","journal-title":"J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A"},{"key":"6605_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-1383(95)00012-X","volume":"26","author":"RM Nicholas","year":"1995","unstructured":"Nicholas RM, McCoy GF. Immediate intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures due to gunshots. Injury. 1995;26:257\u20139.","journal-title":"Injury"},{"key":"6605_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.54005\/geneltip.1427229","volume":"34","author":"OA Silah","year":"2024","unstructured":"Silah OA, Tedavi Y, De\u011ferlendirilmesi S, \u0130ncelenmesi O, Abdio\u011flu AA, Vari\u015f O, et al. Evaluation of treatment results in orthopaedic firearm injuries: review of 52 cases. Genel T\u0131p Derg. 2024;34:764\u201371.","journal-title":"Genel T\u0131p Derg"},{"key":"6605_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"678","DOI":"10.47582\/jompac.1400344","volume":"4","author":"C Sever","year":"2023","unstructured":"Sever C, Kar\u0131ks\u0131z, M. Clinical and radiological outcomes of gunshot-induced femur fractures: a comparative study of monolateral external fixators and hybrid advanced ilizarov method. J Med Palliat Care. 2023;4:678\u2013683.","journal-title":"J Med Palliat Care"},{"key":"6605_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000124","volume":"28","author":"NM Patel","year":"2014","unstructured":"Patel NM, Yoon RS, Cantlon MB, Koerner JD, Donegan DJ, Liporace FA. Intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures secondary to gunshot wounds: predictors of postoperative malrotation. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:711\u20134.","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"}],"container-title":["Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06605-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06605-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06605-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T13:43:55Z","timestamp":1770126235000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06605-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6605"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-025-06605-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1749-799X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1749-799X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 December 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 January 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of \u015ei\u015fli Hamidiye Etfal Clinical Research with decision number 4752, dated 11 February 2024. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the publication of their anonymized data and radiographic images.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"89"}}