{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,8]],"date-time":"2025-10-08T22:20:47Z","timestamp":1759962047780,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,21]],"date-time":"2021-08-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1629504000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,21]],"date-time":"2021-08-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1629504000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Patient Saf Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To describe our experience with outpatient transperineal biopsy (TPB) without antibiotics compared to transrectal biopsy (TRB) with antibiotics and bowel preparation. The literature elicits comparable cancer detection, time, and cost between the two. As antibiotic resistance increases, antimicrobial stewardship is imperative.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In our retrospective review, we compared the TPB to TRB in our institution for outpatient prostate biopsies with local anesthesia from June 1st, 2017 to June 1st, 2019. Patients had negative urinalysis on day of procedure. Patients presenting with symptoms concerning for UTI followed by positive urine culture were determined to have a UTI.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Two hundred twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Age, race, BMI, pre-procedure PSA, history of UTI, BPH or other GU history were similar between both groups. Two TPB patients (1.8%) had post-procedure UTI; one received oral antibiotics and one received a dose of intravenous and subsequent oral antibiotics. There were no sepsis events or admissions. Six TRB patients (5.4%) had post-procedure UTI; five received oral antibiotics, and one received intravenous antibiotics and required admission for sepsis. One TPB patient (0.9%) had post-procedure retention and required catheterization, while four TRB patients (3.6%) had retention requiring catheterization. No significant difference noted in cancer detection between the two groups.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Outpatient TPB without antibiotic prophylaxis\/bowel prep is comparable to TRB in regard to safety and cancer detection. TPB without antibiotics had a lower infection and retention rate than TRB with antibiotics. Efforts to reduce antibiotic resistance should be implemented into daily practice. Future multi-institutional studies can provide further evidence for guideline changes.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13037-021-00303-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,21]],"date-time":"2021-08-21T17:02:37Z","timestamp":1629565357000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Are outpatient transperineal prostate biopsies without antibiotic prophylaxis equivalent to standard transrectal biopsies for patient safety and cancer detection rates?A retrospective cohort study in 222 patients"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Majdee","family":"Islam","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rodrigo Donalisio","family":"Da Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7555-1590","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alan","family":"Quach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Diedra","family":"Gustafson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Leticia","family":"Nogueira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nathan","family":"Clark","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fernando J.","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"303_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21442","volume":"68","author":"RL Siegel","year":"2018","unstructured":"Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21442.","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"11","key":"303_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.2085","volume":"311","author":"JH Hayes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hayes JH, Barry MJ. Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: a review of current evidence. Jama. 2014;311(11):1143\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2014.2085.","journal-title":"Jama."},{"issue":"13","key":"303_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0810696","volume":"360","author":"GL Andriole","year":"2009","unstructured":"Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1310\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa0810696.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"303_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(17)38664-0","volume":"142","author":"KK Hodge","year":"1989","unstructured":"Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 1989;142:71\u20134 discussion 4\u20135.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"303_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2016.08.003","volume":"71","author":"N Mottet","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):618\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2016.08.003.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"303_CR6","first-page":"1004","volume":"20","author":"Y L-r","year":"2014","unstructured":"L-r Y, C-g Z, Lu L-x, Ruan L, Lan J-H, Feng S-Q, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-guided transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies in clinical application. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2014;20:1004\u20137.","journal-title":"Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue"},{"issue":"3","key":"303_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12536","volume":"114","author":"JP Grummet","year":"2014","unstructured":"Grummet JP, Weerakoon M, Huang S, Lawrentschuk N, Frydenberg M, Moon DA, et al. Sepsis and \u2018superbugs\u2019: should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy? BJU Int. 2014;114(3):384\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.12536.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"303_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-019-1573-0","volume":"17","author":"J Xiang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):31. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12957-019-1573-0.","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"303_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2018.01.021","volume":"115","author":"A Meyer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meyer A, Joice G, Schwen Z, Partin AW, Allaf ME, Gorin MA. Initial experience performing in-office ultrasound-guided Transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia using the PrecisionPoint Transperineal access system. Urology. 2018;115:8\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2018.01.021.","journal-title":"Urology."},{"issue":"1","key":"303_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.03","volume":"40","author":"R Miano","year":"2014","unstructured":"Miano R, Nunzio C, Kim FJ, et al. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for predicting the final laterality of prostate cancer: are they reliable enough to select patients for focal therapy? Results from a multicenter international study. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40(1):16\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.03.","journal-title":"Int Braz J Urol"},{"key":"303_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Evans R, Loeb A, Kaye KS, Cher ML, Martin ET. Infection-Related Hospital Admissions After Prostate Biopsy in United States Men. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(1):ofw265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ofid\/ofw265.","DOI":"10.1093\/ofid\/ofw265"},{"issue":"Suppl","key":"303_CR12","first-page":"S12","volume":"189","author":"RK Nam","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y, Liu Y, Law C, Klotz LH, et al. Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2013;189(Suppl):S12\u20138.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"303_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.06.003","volume":"63","author":"FM Wagenlehner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wagenlehner FM, van Oostrum E, Tenke P, Tandogdu Z, Cek M, Grabe M, et al. Infective complications after prostate biopsy: outcome of the global prevalence study of infections in urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, a prospective multinational multicentre prostate biopsy study. Eur Urol. 2013;63(3):521\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.06.003.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"303_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1093\/jac\/dkq471","volume":"66","author":"O Cuevas","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cuevas O, Oteo J, Lazaro E, Aracil B, Abajo FD, Garcia-Cobos S, et al. Significant ecological impact on the progression of fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli with increased community use of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and amoxicillin\/clavulanic acid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(3):664\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jac\/dkq471.","journal-title":"J Antimicrob Chemother"},{"issue":"6","key":"303_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.02.019","volume":"81","author":"P Pepe","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pepe P, Aragona F. Morbidity after transperineal prostate biopsy in 3000 patients undergoing 12 vs 18 vs more than 24 needle cores. Urology. 2013;81(6):1142\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2013.02.019.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"303_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.1982.tb13637.x","volume":"54","author":"PM Thompson","year":"1982","unstructured":"Thompson PM, Pryor JP, Williams JP, Eyers DE, Dulake C, Scully MF, et al. The problem of infection after prostatic biopsy: the case for the transperineal approach. Br J Urol. 1982;54(6):736\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1464-410X.1982.tb13637.x.","journal-title":"Br J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"303_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-019-0539-4","volume":"19","author":"G Huang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Huang G, Kang C, Lee W, Chiang P. Comparison of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transerineal prostate biopsy approaches \u2013 a single center preliminary study. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12894-019-0539-4.","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"issue":"2","key":"303_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1038\/aja.2011.130","volume":"14","author":"PF Shen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, Yong-Zhong L, Yang J, Li YT, et al. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and metanalysis. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(2):310\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/aja.2011.130.","journal-title":"Asian J Androl"},{"issue":"2","key":"303_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2007.09.029","volume":"71","author":"R Hara","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, Kondo N, Yokoyoma T, Miyaji Y, et al. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy. Urology. 2008;71(2):191\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2007.09.029.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"5","key":"303_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(02)02551-7","volume":"61","author":"P Emiliozzi","year":"2003","unstructured":"Emiliozzi P, Corsetti A, Tassi B, Federico G, Martini M, Pansadoro V. Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy. Urology. 2003;61(5):961\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0090-4295(02)02551-7.","journal-title":"Urology."},{"issue":"2","key":"303_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.pcan.4500985","volume":"11","author":"A Takenaka","year":"2008","unstructured":"Takenaka A, Hara R, Ishimura T, Fujii T, Jo Y, Nagai A, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(2):134\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/sj.pcan.4500985.","journal-title":"Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis"},{"issue":"6","key":"303_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1167","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2006.06578.x","volume":"98","author":"TM Koppie","year":"2006","unstructured":"Koppie TM, Bianco FJ, Kuroiwa K, Reuter VE, Guillonneau B, Eastham JA, et al. The clinical features of anterior prostate cancers. BJU Int. 2006;98(6):1167\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2006.06578.x.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"3","key":"303_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1038\/pcan.2017.13","volume":"20","author":"EJ Bass","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bass EJ, Donaldson IA, Freeman A, Jameson C, Punwani S, Moore C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted transperineal prostate biopsy: a local anaesthetic approach. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017;20(3):311\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/pcan.2017.13.","journal-title":"Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis"},{"key":"303_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2016.04.020","volume":"94","author":"GS Merrick","year":"2016","unstructured":"Merrick GS, Irvin S, Fiano R, Anderson R, Butler WM, Adamovich E. Pathology and quality of life outcomes following office-based transperineal prostate biopsy. Urology. 2016;94:24\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2016.04.020.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"303_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2014.02.008","volume":"83","author":"JB Smith","year":"2014","unstructured":"Smith JB, Popert R, Nuttall MC, Vyas L, Kinsella J, Cahill D. Transperineal sector prostate biopsies: a local anesthetic outpatient technique. Urology. 2014;83(6):1344\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.urology.2014.02.008.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"303_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.11.115","volume":"187","author":"AK Taylor","year":"2012","unstructured":"Taylor AK, Zembower TR, Nadler RB, Scheetz MH, Cashy JP, Bowen D, et al. Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications and cost of care. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1275\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.juro.2011.11.115.","journal-title":"J Urol"}],"container-title":["Patient Safety in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13037-021-00303-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13037-021-00303-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13037-021-00303-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,21]],"date-time":"2021-08-21T17:05:33Z","timestamp":1629565533000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/pssjournal.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13037-021-00303-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,21]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["303"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13037-021-00303-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1754-9493"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1754-9493"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 April 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 July 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 August 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was conducted under ethics approval at Denver Health Medical Center. Further details will be made available upon reasonable request. The authors confirm that all research tasks were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"This manuscript does not contain any individual person\u2019s data in any form.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare there are no competing interest regarding the publication of this study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"28"}}