{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,3]],"date-time":"2025-12-03T17:58:02Z","timestamp":1764784682973,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,14]],"date-time":"2021-06-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1623628800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,14]],"date-time":"2021-06-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1623628800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004047","name":"Karolinska Institute","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004047","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Mol Cytogenet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Fetoplacental discrepancies occur in approximately 1\u20132% of analyzed prenatal cases. They are typically due to confined placental mosaicism, where an aberration is observed in the placental cells but not found in the fetal cells. Confined placental mosaicism usually involves aneuploidies and more sparsely structural chromosomal aberrations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a discrepancy in the analyses of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis involving two different structural chromosomal aberrations of chromosome 21.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Case presentation<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We report a 33-year-old woman who was referred for a non-invasive prenatal testing due to an increased risk of trisomy 21 gleaned from a combined ultrasound and blood test. The non-invasive prenatal testing showed an increased risk of trisomy 21 with a normalized coverage signal that did not match the fetal cell-free DNA fraction. Rapid aneuploidy detection performed on uncultured chorionic villi indicated mosaicism for trisomy 21. The follow-up analyses revealed discordant chromosomal aberrations: 46,XY,der(21)t(10;21)(p11.21;q10) in the analysis of the chorionic villus sampling and 46,XY,\u2009+\u200921,der(21;21)(q10;q10) in the analysis of the amniocentesis. Thus, the analyses indicated mosaicism for a cell line containing trisomy 21 and a cell line containing a partially duplicated short arm of chromosome 10 in the chorionic villi and complete trisomy 21 resulting from an isochromosome 21 in the amniotic fluid. The analyses of the lymphocytes and the fibroblasts of the woman were normal.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>We propose a multiple-step mechanism as a possible theoretical explanation for the formation of these discordant structural chromosomal aberrations in the chorionic villi and amniotic fluid. With this case report, we want to highlight the importance of understanding the possible underlying embryological mechanisms when interpreting results from different prenatal analyses.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13039-021-00549-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,14]],"date-time":"2021-06-14T16:03:09Z","timestamp":1623686589000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Discordant structural chromosomal aberrations in chorionic villi and amniotic fluid leading to a formation of an isochromosome 21: a case report"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7674-8101","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eini","family":"Westenius","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maria","family":"Pettersson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Erik","family":"Bj\u00f6rck","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"549_CR1","unstructured":"The Swedish Pregnancy Register. Annual report from the Swedish Pregnancy Register 2019. https:\/\/www.sfog.se\/media\/337110\/graviditetsregistrets-aarsrapport-2019_20.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2021."},{"issue":"1","key":"549_CR2","first-page":"66","volume":"13","author":"BW Richards","year":"1969","unstructured":"Richards BW. Mosaic mongolism. J Ment Defic Res. 1969;13(1):66\u201383.","journal-title":"J Ment Defic Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"549_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1136\/jmg.33.5.387","volume":"33","author":"D Mutton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Mutton D, Alberman E, Hook EB. Cytogenetic and epidemiological findings in Down syndrome, England and Wales 1989 to 1993. National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register and the Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists. J Med Genet. 1996;33(5):387\u201394.","journal-title":"J Med Genet"},{"issue":"12","key":"549_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1177","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.2003.031765","volume":"89","author":"L Devlin","year":"2004","unstructured":"Devlin L, Morrison PJ. Mosaic Down\u2019s syndrome prevalence in a complete population study. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(12):1177\u20138.","journal-title":"Arch Dis Child"},{"issue":"3","key":"549_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"800","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.a.33295","volume":"152A","author":"M Shin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Shin M, Siffel C, Correa A. Survival of children with mosaic Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A(3):800\u20131.","journal-title":"Am J Med Genet A"},{"issue":"8","key":"549_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2051","volume":"28","author":"S Dreux","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dreux S, Olivier C, Dupont JM, et al. Maternal serum screening in cases of mosaic and translocation Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(8):699\u2013703.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"4","key":"549_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.019","volume":"203","author":"E Bornstein","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bornstein E, Lenchner E, Donnenfeld A, et al. Complete trisomy 21 vs translocation Down syndrome: a comparison of modes of ascertainment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):391.e1-391.e3915.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"549_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00210673","volume":"84","author":"M Grasso","year":"1989","unstructured":"Grasso M, Giovannucci Uzielli ML, Pierluigi M, Tavellini F, Perroni L, Dagna BF. Isochromosome not translocation in trisomy 21q21q. Hum Genet. 1989;84(1):63\u20135.","journal-title":"Hum Genet"},{"issue":"6","key":"549_CR9","first-page":"968","volume":"47","author":"SE Antonarakis","year":"1990","unstructured":"Antonarakis SE, Adelsberger PA, Petersen MB, Binkert F, Schinzel AA. Analysis of DNA polymorphisms suggests that most de novo dup(21q) chromosomes in patients with Down syndrome are isochromosomes and not translocations. Am J Hum Genet. 1990;47(6):968\u201372.","journal-title":"Am J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"8","key":"549_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1218","DOI":"10.1002\/ajmg.1320470818","volume":"47","author":"LG Shaffer","year":"1993","unstructured":"Shaffer LG, McCaskill C, Haller V, Brown JA, Jackson-Cook CK. Further characterization of 19 cases of rea(21q21q) and delineation as isochromosomes or Robertsonian translocations in Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1993;47(8):1218\u201322.","journal-title":"Am J Med Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"549_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1399-0004.1987.tb03328.x","volume":"32","author":"DL Van Dyke","year":"1987","unstructured":"Van Dyke DL, Babu VR, Weiss L. Parental age, and how extra isochromosomes (secondary trisomy) arise. Clin Genet. 1987;32(1):75\u20139.","journal-title":"Clin Genet"},{"issue":"2","key":"549_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970080206","volume":"8","author":"JP Crane","year":"1988","unstructured":"Crane JP, Cheung SW. An embryogenic model to explain cytogenetic inconsistencies observed in chorionic villus versus fetal tissue. Prenat Diagn. 1988;8(2):119\u201329.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"2","key":"549_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137605","volume":"7","author":"G Simoni","year":"1992","unstructured":"Simoni G, Fraccaro M. Does confined placental mosaicism affect the fetus? Hum Reprod. 1992;7(2):139\u201340.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"3","key":"549_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/0143-4004(94)90014-0","volume":"15","author":"DK Kalousek","year":"1994","unstructured":"Kalousek DK. Current topic: confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine fetal development. Placenta. 1994;15(3):219\u201330.","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"issue":"7","key":"549_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1136\/jmg.33.7.529","volume":"33","author":"DK Kalousek","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kalousek DK, Vekemans M. Confined placental mosaicism. J Med Genet. 1996;33(7):529\u201333.","journal-title":"J Med Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"549_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1096-8628(20000306)91:1<39::AID-AJMG7>3.0.CO;2-L","volume":"91","author":"DK Kalousek","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kalousek DK. Pathogenesis of chromosomal mosaicism and its effect on early human development. Am J Med Genet. 2000;91(1):39\u201345.","journal-title":"Am J Med Genet"},{"issue":"6","key":"549_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970050605","volume":"5","author":"WA Hogge","year":"1985","unstructured":"Hogge WA, Schonberg SA, Golbus MS. Prenatal diagnosis by chorionic villus sampling: lessons of the first 600 cases. Prenat Diagn. 1985;5(6):393\u2013400.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"10","key":"549_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970111002","volume":"11","author":"DK Kalousek","year":"1991","unstructured":"Kalousek DK, Howard-Peebles PN, Olson SB, et al. Confirmation of CVS mosaicism in term placentae and high frequency of intrauterine growth retardation association with confined placental mosaicism. Prenat Diagn. 1991;11(10):743\u201350.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"3","key":"549_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970130305","volume":"13","author":"BB Wang","year":"1993","unstructured":"Wang BB, Rubin CH, Williams J 3rd. Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: an analysis of incidence and chromosomes involved in 2612 consecutive cases. Prenat Diagn. 1993;13(3):179\u201390.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"4","key":"549_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970140406","volume":"14","author":"MC Pittalis","year":"1994","unstructured":"Pittalis MC, Dalpr\u00e0 L, Torricelli F, et al. The predictive value of cytogenetic diagnosis after CVS based on 4860 cases with both direct and culture methods. Prenat Diagn. 1994;14(4):267\u201378.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"9","key":"549_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0223(199709)17:9<801::AID-PD153>3.0.CO;2-E","volume":"17","author":"JM Hahnemann","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)\u2014diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986\u20131992. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17(9):801\u201320.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"8","key":"549_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4358","volume":"34","author":"P Battaglia","year":"2014","unstructured":"Battaglia P, Baroncini A, Mattarozzi A, et al. Cytogenetic follow-up of chromosomal mosaicism detected in first-trimester prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(8):739\u201347.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"4","key":"549_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0195905","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0195905","volume":"13","author":"J Toutain","year":"2018","unstructured":"Toutain J, Goutte-Gattat D, Horovitz J, Saura R. Confined placental mosaicism revisited: Impact on pregnancy characteristics and outcome. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(4):e0195905.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"549_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.590","volume":"23","author":"A Soler","year":"2003","unstructured":"Soler A, S\u00e1nchez A, Carri\u00f3 A, Badenas C, Mil\u00e0 M, Borrell A. Fetoplacental discrepancy involving structural abnormalities of chromosome 8 detected by prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23(4):319\u201322.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"issue":"7","key":"549_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970090703","volume":"9","author":"AT Tharapel","year":"1989","unstructured":"Tharapel AT, Elias S, Shulman LP, Seely L, Emerson DS, Simpson JL. Resorbed co-twin as an explanation for discrepant chorionic villus results: non-mosaic 47, XX,+16 in villi (direct and culture) with normal (46, XX) amniotic fluid and neonatal blood. Prenat Diagn. 1989;9(7):467\u201372.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"}],"container-title":["Molecular Cytogenetics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13039-021-00549-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13039-021-00549-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13039-021-00549-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,14]],"date-time":"2021-06-14T16:04:41Z","timestamp":1623686681000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/molecularcytogenetics.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13039-021-00549-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,14]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["549"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13039-021-00549-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-8166"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1755-8166"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 March 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 May 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 June 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"A written consent for participation and publication was signed by the patient. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (reference number 2012-222-31-3).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"A written consent for participation and publication was signed by the patient.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"30"}}