{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,3]],"date-time":"2026-10-03T16:26:58Z","timestamp":1791044818891,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,20]],"date-time":"2014-09-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1411171200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,20]],"date-time":"2014-09-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1411171200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Breast Cancer Res"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                        <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                        <jats:p>Mammographic density is a strong breast cancer risk factor and a major determinant of screening sensitivity. However, there is currently no validated estimation method for full-field digital mammography (FFDM).<\/jats:p>\n                     <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                        <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                        <jats:p>The performance of three area-based approaches (BI-RADS, the semi-automated Cumulus, and the fully-automated ImageJ-based approach) and three fully-automated volumetric methods (Volpara, Quantra and single energy x-ray absorptiometry (SXA)) were assessed in 3168 FFDM images from 414 cases and 685 controls. Linear regression models were used to assess associations between breast cancer risk factors and density among controls, and logistic regression models to assess density-breast cancer risk associations, adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI) and reproductive variables.<\/jats:p>\n                     <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                        <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                        <jats:p>Quantra and the ImageJ-based approach failed to produce readings for 4% and 11% of the participants. All six density assessment methods showed that percent density (PD) was inversely associated with age, BMI, being parous and postmenopausal at mammography. PD was positively associated with breast cancer for all methods, but with the increase in risk per standard deviation increment in PD being highest for Volpara (1.83; 95% CI: 1.51 to 2.21) and Cumulus (1.58; 1.33 to 1.88) and lower for the ImageJ-based method (1.45; 1.21 to 1.74), Quantra (1.40; 1.19 to 1.66) and SXA (1.37; 1.16 to 1.63). Women in the top PD quintile (or BI-RADS 4) had 8.26 (4.28 to 15.96), 3.94 (2.26 to 6.86), 3.38 (2.00 to 5.72), 2.99 (1.76 to 5.09), 2.55 (1.46 to 4.43) and 2.96 (0.50 to 17.5) times the risk of those in the bottom one (or BI-RADS 1), respectively, for Volpara, Quantra, Cumulus, SXA, ImageJ-based method, and BI-RADS (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> for trend &lt;0.0001 for all). The ImageJ-based method had a slightly higher ability to discriminate between cases and controls (area under the curve (AUC) for PD = 0.68, <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.05), and Quantra slightly lower (AUC = 0.63; <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic> = 0.06), than Cumulus (AUC = 0.65).<\/jats:p>\n                     <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                        <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                        <jats:p>Fully-automated methods are valid alternatives to the labour-intensive \"gold standard\" Cumulus for quantifying density in FFDM. The choice of a particular method will depend on the aims and setting but the same approach will be required for longitudinal density assessments.<\/jats:p>\n                     <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,19]],"date-time":"2014-09-19T10:11:21Z","timestamp":1411121481000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":177,"title":["Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case\u2013control study of six alternative density assessment methods"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Amanda","family":"Eng","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zoe","family":"Gallant","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John","family":"Shepherd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Valerie","family":"McCormack","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jingmei","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mitch","family":"Dowsett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sarah","family":"Vinnicombe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Steve","family":"Allen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Isabel","family":"dos-Santos-Silva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"439_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1016\/S1470-2045(05)70390-9","volume":"6","author":"NF Boyd","year":"2005","unstructured":"Boyd NF, Rommens JM, Vogt K, Lee V, Hopper JL, Yaffe MJ, Paterson AD: Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2005, 6: 798-808. 10.1016\/S1470-2045(05)70390-9.","journal-title":"Lancet Oncol"},{"key":"439_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034","volume":"15","author":"VA McCormack","year":"2006","unstructured":"McCormack VA, dos Santos SI: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006, 15: 1159-1169. 10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034.","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"439_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa062790","volume":"356","author":"NF Boyd","year":"2007","unstructured":"Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356: 227-236. 10.1056\/NEJMoa062790.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"439_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1081","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/92.13.1081","volume":"92","author":"MT Mandelson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E: Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 1081-1087. 10.1093\/jnci\/92.13.1081.","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"439_CR5","unstructured":"BI-RADS Mammography Breast Imaging Atlas. 2003, American College of Radiology, Reston, Va"},{"key":"439_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1629","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/39\/10\/008","volume":"39","author":"JW Byng","year":"1994","unstructured":"Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ: The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol. 1994, 39: 1629-1638. 10.1088\/0031-9155\/39\/10\/008.","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"439_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/87.9.670","volume":"87","author":"NF Boyd","year":"1995","unstructured":"Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ: Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995, 87: 670-675. 10.1093\/jnci\/87.9.670.","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"439_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"R114","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr3238","volume":"14","author":"J Li","year":"2012","unstructured":"Li J, Szekely L, Eriksson L, Heddson B, Sundbom A, Czene K, Hall P, Humphreys K: High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012, 14: R114-10.1186\/bcr3238.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"439_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1028","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djs254","volume":"104","author":"JJ Heine","year":"2012","unstructured":"Heine JJ, Scott CG, Sellers TA, Brandt KR, Serie DJ, Wu FF, Morton MJ, Schueler BA, Couch FJ, Olson JE, Pankratz VS, Vachon CM: A novel automated mammographic density measure and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012, 104: 1028-1037. 10.1093\/jnci\/djs254.","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"439_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2715","DOI":"10.1088\/0031-9155\/56\/9\/005","volume":"56","author":"MG Kallenberg","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kallenberg MG, Lokate M, van Gils CH, Karssemeijer N: Automatic breast density segmentation: an integration of different approaches. Phys Med Biol. 2011, 56: 2715-2729. 10.1088\/0031-9155\/56\/9\/005.","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"439_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-09-1059","volume":"19","author":"Z Aitken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Aitken Z, McCormack VA, Highnam RP, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, Mawdsley G, Peressotti C, Yaffe M, Boyd NF, Dos Santos Silva I: Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010, 19: 418-428. 10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-09-1059.","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"439_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-10-1150","volume":"20","author":"JA Shepherd","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske K, Ma L, Duewer F, Fan B, Wang J, Malkov S, Vittinghoff E, Cummings SR: Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011, 20: 1473-1482. 10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-10-1150.","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"439_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.1118\/1.1539038","volume":"30","author":"O Pawluczyk","year":"2003","unstructured":"Pawluczyk O, Augustine BJ, Yaffe MJ, Rico D, Yang J, Mawdsley GE, Boyd NF: A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys. 2003, 30: 352-364. 10.1118\/1.1539038.","journal-title":"Med Phys"},{"key":"439_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1754","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-09-0107","volume":"18","author":"N Boyd","year":"2009","unstructured":"Boyd N, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, Maudsley G, Peressotti C, Yaffe M, Minkin S: Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009, 18: 1754-1762. 10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-09-0107.","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"439_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1109\/TMI.2005.862741","volume":"25","author":"S van Engeland","year":"2006","unstructured":"van Engeland S, Snoeren PR, Huisman H, Boetes C, Karssemeijer N: Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006, 25: 273-282. 10.1109\/TMI.2005.862741.","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Med Imaging"},{"key":"439_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3096","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-10-0703","volume":"19","author":"M Lokate","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lokate M, Kallenberg MG, Karssemeijer N, Van den Bosch MA, Peeters PH, Van Gils CH: Volumetric breast density from full-field digital mammograms and its association with breast cancer risk factors: a comparison with a threshold method. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010, 19: 3096-3105. 10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-10-0703.","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"439_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2012.01.005","volume":"21","author":"S Ciatto","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ciatto S, Bernardi D, Calabrese M, Durando M, Gentilini MA, Mariscotti G, Monetti F, Moriconi E, Pesce B, Roselli A, Stevanin C, Tapparelli M, Houssami N: A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification. Breast. 2012, 21: 503-506. 10.1016\/j.breast.2012.01.005.","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"439_CR18","volume-title":"International Workshop on Digital Mammography 2010","author":"MHJ Jeffreys","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jeffreys MHJ, Highnam R, Davey Smith G: Comparing a New Volumetric Breast Density Method (Volpara TM) to Cumulus. International Workshop on Digital Mammography 2010. 2010, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Girona, Spain"},{"key":"439_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2512081235","volume":"251","author":"S Vinnicombe","year":"2009","unstructured":"Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Shiel S, Perry N, dos Santos SI: Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology. 2009, 251: 347-358. 10.1148\/radiol.2512081235.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"439_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1908","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2014.82","volume":"110","author":"U Sovio","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sovio U, Li J, Aitken Z, Humphreys K, Czene K, Moss S, Hall P, McCormack V, dos-Santos-Silva I: Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 2014, 110: 1908-1916. 10.1038\/bjc.2014.82.","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"439_CR21","unstructured":"Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. 2013, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX"},{"key":"439_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.25053","volume":"127","author":"VA McCormack","year":"2009","unstructured":"McCormack VA, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, Dos Santos Silva I: Changes and tracking of mammographic density in relation to Pike's model of breast tissue ageing: a UK longitudinal study. Int J Cancer. 2009, 127: 452-461.","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"439_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1148","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085","volume":"16","author":"VA McCormack","year":"2007","unstructured":"McCormack VA, Highnam R, Perry N, dos Santos SI: Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007, 16: 1148-1154. 10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-07-0085.","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"439_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1718","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-11-0423","volume":"20","author":"SM Pinto Pereira","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Hipwell JH, Record C, Wilkinson LS, Moss SM, Hawkes DJ, Dos Santos SI: Localized fibroglandular tissue as a predictor of future tumour location within the breast. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011, 20: 1718-1725. 10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-11-0423.","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev"},{"key":"439_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr1829","volume":"9","author":"CM Vachon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, Ghosh K, Pruthi S, Brandt KR, Pankratz VS: Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res. 2007, 9: 217-10.1186\/bcr1829.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"439_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"R25","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr3110","volume":"14","author":"H Darabi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Darabi H, Czene K, Zhao W, Liu J, Hall P, Humphreys K: Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res. 2012, 14: R25-10.1186\/bcr3110.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"439_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djh106","volume":"96","author":"J Cuzick","year":"2004","unstructured":"Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, Warren RM, Duffy SW: Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004, 96: 621-628. 10.1093\/jnci\/djh106.","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"439_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"744","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djr079","volume":"103","author":"J Cuzick","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, Duffy SW, Cawthorn S, Howell A, Forbes JF, Warren RM: Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case\u2013control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011, 103: 744-752. 10.1093\/jnci\/djr079.","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"439_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2796.2012.02525.x","volume":"271","author":"A Howell","year":"2012","unstructured":"Howell A, Astley S, Warwick J, Stavrinos P, Sahin S, Ingham S, McBurney H, Eckersley B, Harvie M, Wilson M, Beetles U, Warren R, Hufton A, Sergeant J, Newman W, Buchan I, Cuzick J, Evans DG: Prevention of breast cancer in the context of a national breast screening programme. J Intern Med. 2012, 271: 321-330. 10.1111\/j.1365-2796.2012.02525.x.","journal-title":"J Intern Med"},{"key":"439_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"R57","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr3451","volume":"15","author":"ME Sandberg","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sandberg ME, Li J, Hall P, Hartman M, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Humphreys K, Czene K: Change of mammographic density predicts the risk of contralateral breast cancer - a case\u2013control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2013, 15: R57-10.1186\/bcr3451.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"key":"439_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2006.06.005","volume":"13","author":"BT Nicholson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M, Bovbjerg VE, Petroni GR, Harvey JA: Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol. 2006, 13: 1143-1149. 10.1016\/j.acra.2006.06.005.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"439_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-007-9581-0","volume":"108","author":"J Gao","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gao J, Warren R, Warren-Forward H, Forbes JF: Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008, 108: 121-127. 10.1007\/s10549-007-9581-0.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"439_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/s13244-011-0139-7","volume":"3","author":"MB Lobbes","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lobbes MB, Cleutjens JP, Lima Passos V, Frotscher C, Lahaye MJ, Keymeulen KB, Beets-Tan RG, Wildberger J, Boetes C: Density is in the eye of the beholder: visual versus semi-automated assessment of breast density on standard mammograms. Insights Imaging. 2012, 3: 91-99. 10.1007\/s13244-011-0139-7.","journal-title":"Insights Imaging"}],"container-title":["Breast Cancer Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,14]],"date-time":"2024-10-14T16:43:45Z","timestamp":1728924225000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,20]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,10]]}},"alternative-id":["439"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13058-014-0439-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1465-542X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1465-542X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,9,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 June 2014","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 September 2014","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 September 2014","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}],"article-number":"439"}}