{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T14:27:43Z","timestamp":1790346463697,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":70,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1675209600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004196","name":"Odense Universitetshospital","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["18\/25699"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["18\/25699"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004196","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/100008363","name":"Kr\u00e6ftens Bek\u00e6mpelse","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["R195-A11844"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["R195-A11844"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100008363","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Region Syddanmark, DK","award":["16-13615"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["16-13615"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Trials"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Follow-up programs for gynecological cancer patients are currently under revision. There is limited evidence that traditional follow-up and clinical examinations improve survival in an early-stage gynecological setting. Further, traditional follow-up programs fail to accommodate the patient\u2019s need for psychosocial and sexual supportive care and to actively involve patients and their relatives in the follow-up process. Individualized programs may replace traditional routine follow-up with fixed intervals and length. Focusing on alarm-symptoms and self-reporting may ensure detection of recurrence while allowing a continuous attention to the patient\u2019s well-being and return to daily life.<\/jats:p>\n                <jats:p>In this study, a nurse-led, individualized, and need-based intervention with a specific focus on patient empowerment is tested against a standard physician-led model primarily focusing on the detection of recurrence.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The study is designed as a clinical, randomized trial conducted in one of four national onco-gynecological centers in Denmark. Patients with early-stage cervical or endometrial cancer are eligible for inclusion. The intervention group undergoes individualized, nurse-led follow-up supporting patient empowerment including repeated use of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) before each contact as a dialogue support tool. The follow-up contacts are mainly conducted by telephone. All project nurses attended a special training program before project start and are all well-educated and dedicated onco-gynecological nurses. The control group receives standard, physician-led, follow-up without use of ePROMs or specific focus on empowerment.<\/jats:p>\n                <jats:p>The effect of the intervention is evaluated by questionnaires completed by patients at baseline (3\u00a0months after surgery) and 12, 18, and 36\u00a0months after surgery. Outcomes include empowerment using the Skill and technique subscale of the HEI-Q questionnaire as the primary outcome while fear of cancer recurrence and health-related quality of life as well as the remaining subscales of the HEI-Q represent secondary outcomes. Data is collected by use of the REDCap technology, which also provides a customized visual support function for the dialogue tool.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This study will provide new information about follow-up in early-stage gynecological cancer settings and thereby contribute to improvement of future follow-up programs. Importantly, the study will provide knowledge about the impact of specific focus on patient empowerment in follow-up programs and, further, how to facilitate empowerment among patients.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Trial registration<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: ID no. NCT03838861. Registered on 6 February 2019.<\/jats:p>\n                <jats:p>Protocol version 2, issue date 21 November 2022.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-022-07022-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]],"date-time":"2023-02-01T08:03:59Z","timestamp":1675238639000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["A NEw MOdel of individualized and patient-centered follow-up for women with gynecological cancer (the NEMO study)\u2014protocol and rationale of a randomized clinical trial"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"24","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4506-6399","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stinne Holm","family":"Bergholdt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dorte Gilsaa","family":"Hansen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna Thit","family":"Johnsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bo Snedker","family":"Boman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pernille Tine","family":"Jensen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"7022_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.03.028","volume":"248","author":"L Coleman","year":"2020","unstructured":"Coleman L, Newton C. Patient initiated follow up after gynaecological malignancy: National survey of current UK practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;248:193\u20137.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"7022_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.01.025","volume":"210","author":"SC Leeson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Leeson SC, Beaver K, Ezendam NPM, Ma\u010duks R, Martin-Hirsch PL, Miles T, et al. The future for follow-up of gynaecological cancer in Europe. Summary of available data and overview of ongoing trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:376\u201380.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol."},{"issue":"7","key":"7022_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0412.2011.01123.x","volume":"90","author":"I Vistad","year":"2011","unstructured":"Vistad I, Moy BW, Salvesen HB, Liavaag AH. Follow-up routines in gynecological cancer - time for a change? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(7):707\u201318.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"7","key":"7022_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s11912-019-0805-3","volume":"21","author":"MM Jeppesen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jeppesen MM, Mogensen O, Hansen DG, Bergholdt SH, Jensen PT. How do we follow up patients with endometrial cancer? Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21(7):57.","journal-title":"Curr Oncol Rep"},{"issue":"8","key":"7022_CR5","first-page":"1307","volume":"20","author":"H Lajer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lajer H, Jensen MB, Kilsmark J, Alb\u00e6k J, Svane D, Mirza MR, et al. The value of gynecologic cancer follow-up: evidence-based ignorance? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(8):1307\u201320.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"issue":"3b","key":"7022_CR6","first-page":"1977","volume":"20","author":"A Gadducci","year":"2000","unstructured":"Gadducci A, Cosio S, Fanucchi A, Cristofani R, Genazzani AR. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer. Anticancer Res. 2000;20(3b):1977\u201384.","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"7022_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1080\/0284186X.2020.1859133","volume":"60","author":"LA Rasmussen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rasmussen LA, Jensen H, Virgilsen LF, Jeppesen MM, Blaakaer J, Hansen DG, et al. Identification of endometrial cancer recurrence - a validated algorithm based on nationwide Danish registries. Acta Oncol. 2021;60(4):452\u20138.","journal-title":"Acta Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7022_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e84","DOI":"10.3802\/jgo.2019.30.e84","volume":"30","author":"G \u00d8rtoft","year":"2019","unstructured":"\u00d8rtoft G, Lausten-Thomsen L, H\u00f8gdall C, Hansen ES, Dueholm M. Lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) as a strong and independent predictor for non-locoregional recurrences in endometrial cancer: a Danish Gynecological Cancer Group Study. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30(5):e84.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7022_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.31165","volume":"124","author":"GA Taarnh\u00f8j","year":"2018","unstructured":"Taarnh\u00f8j GA, Christensen IJ, Lajer H, Fuglsang K, Jeppesen MM, Kahr HS, et al. Risk of recurrence, prognosis, and follow-up for Danish women with cervical cancer in 2005\u20132013: A national cohort study. Cancer. 2018;124(5):943\u201351.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"7022_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2016.09.033","volume":"69","author":"MM Jeppesen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jeppesen MM, Jensen PT, Gils\u00e5 Hansen D, Iachina M, Mogensen O. The nature of early-stage endometrial cancer recurrence-a national cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2016;69:51\u201360.","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"7022_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-017-3971-6","volume":"26","author":"VL Beesley","year":"2018","unstructured":"Beesley VL, Alemayehu C, Webb PM. A systematic literature review of the prevalence of and risk factors for supportive care needs among women with gynaecological cancer and their caregivers. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(3):701\u201310.","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"12","key":"7022_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3211","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-012-1466-z","volume":"20","author":"L Ross","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ross L, Petersen MA, Johnsen AT, Lundstr\u00f8m LH, Lund L, Groenvold M. Using mixed methods to assess how cancer patients\u2019 needs in relation to their relatives are met in the Danish health care system: a report from the population-based study \u201cThe Cancer Patient\u2019s World.\u201d Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(12):3211\u201320.","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"6","key":"7022_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1080\/07347332.2019.1580331","volume":"37","author":"BD Korotkin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Korotkin BD, Hoerger M, Voorhees S, Allen CO, Robinson WR, Duberstein PR. Social support in cancer: how do patients want us to help? J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019;37(6):699\u2013712.","journal-title":"J Psychosoc Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"7022_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1080\/0284186X.2018.1543947","volume":"58","author":"H Faller","year":"2019","unstructured":"Faller H, Hass HG, Engehausen D, Reuss-Borst M, W\u00f6ckel A. Supportive care needs and quality of life in patients with breast and gynecological cancer attending inpatient rehabilitation A prospective study. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(4):417\u201324.","journal-title":"Acta Oncol"},{"key":"7022_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101704","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejon.2019.101704","volume":"44","author":"K Beaver","year":"2020","unstructured":"Beaver K, Martin-Hirsch P, Williamson S, Kyrgiou M. Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up for women treated for stage I endometrial cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020;44:101704.","journal-title":"Eur J Oncol Nurs"},{"key":"7022_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1300\/J293v03n02_02","volume":"3","author":"J Rappaport","year":"1984","unstructured":"Rappaport J. Studies in empowerment: introduction to the issue. Prev Hum Serv. 1984;3:1\u20137.","journal-title":"Prev Hum Serv"},{"key":"7022_CR17","volume-title":"Handbook of Community Psychology. Rappaport J, Seidmann E, editors","author":"MA Zimmerman","year":"2000","unstructured":"Zimmerman MA. Handbook of Community Psychology. Rappaport J, Seidmann E, editors. Kluwer Academic: Kluwer Academic\/Plenum Publishers; 2000."},{"issue":"2","key":"7022_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1377\/hlthaff.2012.1061","volume":"32","author":"JH Hibbard","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):207\u201314.","journal-title":"Health Aff (Millwood)"},{"issue":"3","key":"7022_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2009.07.025","volume":"79","author":"RM Anderson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(3):277\u201382.","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"1","key":"7022_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1051\/tpe\/2009002","volume":"1","author":"RM Anderson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Anderson RM, Funnell MM, Aikens JE, Krein SL, Fitzgerald JT, Nwankwo R, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of an empowerment-based self-management consultant intervention: results of a two-year randomized controlled trial. Ther Patient Educ. 2009;1(1):3\u201311.","journal-title":"Ther Patient Educ"},{"issue":"3","key":"7022_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.phr.2004.04.002","volume":"119","author":"H Holman","year":"2004","unstructured":"Holman H, Lorig K. Patient self-management: a key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(3):239\u201343.","journal-title":"Public Health Rep"},{"issue":"20","key":"7022_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4039","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.30827","volume":"123","author":"SEJ Kaal","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kaal SEJ, Husson O, van Duivenboden S, Jansen R, Manten-Horst E, Servaes P, et al. Empowerment in adolescents and young adults with cancer: Relationship with health-related quality of life. Cancer. 2017;123(20):4039\u201347.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"11","key":"7022_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2119","DOI":"10.1002\/pon.5215","volume":"28","author":"CA Cuthbert","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cuthbert CA, Farragher JF, Hemmelgarn BR, Ding Q, McKinnon GP, Cheung WY. Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review and evaluation of intervention content and theories. Psychooncology. 2019;28(11):2119\u201340.","journal-title":"Psychooncology"},{"issue":"4","key":"7022_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-016-3500-z","volume":"25","author":"D Howell","year":"2017","unstructured":"Howell D, Harth T, Brown J, Bennett C, Boyko S. Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(4):1323\u201355.","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"7022_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2008.04927.x","volume":"65","author":"R Lewis","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lewis R, Neal RD, Williams NH, France B, Wilkinson C, Hendry M, et al. Nurse-led vs. conventional physician-led follow-up for patients with cancer: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(4):706\u201323.","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs."},{"issue":"3","key":"7022_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1097\/NCC.0000000000000177","volume":"38","author":"A Smits","year":"2015","unstructured":"Smits A, Lopes A, Das N, Bekkers R, Kent E, McCullough Z, et al. Nurse-led telephone follow-up: improving options for women with endometrial cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38(3):232\u20138.","journal-title":"Cancer Nurs"},{"issue":"9","key":"7022_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2643","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-013-1892-6","volume":"21","author":"J de Leeuw","year":"2013","unstructured":"de Leeuw J, Larsson M. Nurse-led follow-up care for cancer patients: what is known and what is needed. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(9):2643\u20139.","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"key":"7022_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejon.2018.02.005","volume":"34","author":"S Williamson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Williamson S, Beaver K, Gardner A, Martin-Hirsch P. Telephone follow-up after treatment for endometrial cancer: a qualitative study of patients\u2019 and clinical nurse specialists\u2019 experiences in the ENDCAT trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018;34:61\u20137.","journal-title":"Eur J Oncol Nurs"},{"issue":"1","key":"7022_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14000","volume":"124","author":"K Beaver","year":"2017","unstructured":"Beaver K, Williamson S, Sutton C, Hollingworth W, Gardner A, Allton B, et al. Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up for patients treated for stage-I endometrial cancer (ENDCAT trial): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BJOG. 2017;124(1):150\u201360.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"7022_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1097\/IGC.0000000000001179","volume":"28","author":"V Morrison","year":"2018","unstructured":"Morrison V, Spencer LH, Totton N, Pye K, Yeo ST, Butterworth C, et al. Trial of Optimal Personalised Care After Treatment-Gynaecological Cancer (TOPCAT-G): a randomized feasibility trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(2):401\u201311.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Cancer"},{"key":"7022_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101722","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejon.2020.101722","volume":"45","author":"K Beaver","year":"2020","unstructured":"Beaver K, Williamson S, Sutton CJ, Gardner A, Martin-Hirsch P. Endometrial cancer patients\u2019 preferences for follow-up after treatment: a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020;45:101722.","journal-title":"Eur J Oncol Nurs"},{"issue":"3","key":"7022_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1007\/s40258-018-0378-6","volume":"16","author":"P Dixon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dixon P, Beaver K, Williamson S, Sutton C, Martin-Hirsch P, Hollingworth W. Cost-consequence analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial of hospital versus telephone follow-up after treatment for endometrial cancer. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018;16(3):415\u201327.","journal-title":"Appl Health Econ Health Policy"},{"issue":"1","key":"7022_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e11","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.6575","volume":"19","author":"A Cox","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cox A, Lucas G, Marcu A, Piano M, Grosvenor W, Mold F, et al. Cancer survivors\u2019 experience with telehealth: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e11.","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"key":"7022_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-13-211","volume":"13","author":"J Chen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chen J, Ou L, Hollis SJ. A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:211.","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"issue":"8","key":"7022_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2010.30.3909","volume":"29","author":"DL Berry","year":"2011","unstructured":"Berry DL, Blumenstein BA, Halpenny B, Wolpin S, Fann JR, Austin-Seymour M, et al. Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(8):1029\u201335.","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"7022_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.7156","volume":"318","author":"E Basch","year":"2017","unstructured":"Basch E, Deal AM, Dueck AC, Scher HI, Kris MG, Hudis C, et al. Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA. 2017;318(2):197\u20138.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"6","key":"7022_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2015.63.0830","volume":"34","author":"E Basch","year":"2016","unstructured":"Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):557\u201365.","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"12","key":"7022_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1923","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2016.07.026","volume":"99","author":"EM Castro","year":"2016","unstructured":"Castro EM, Van Regenmortel T, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Van Hecke A. Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: a concept analysis based on a literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(12):1923\u201339.","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"key":"7022_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0061-6","volume":"2","author":"J Greenhalgh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Greenhalgh J, Gooding K, Gibbons E, Dalkin S, Wright J, Valderas J, et al. How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018;2:42.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"7022_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h1258","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h1258","volume":"350","author":"GF Moore","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"7022_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e7586","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e7586","volume":"346","author":"A-W Chan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, G\u00f8tzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin J, Dickersin K, Hr\u00f3bjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krle\u017ea-Jeri\u0107 K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 Explanation and Elaboration: Guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"7022_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.2147\/CLEP.S99479","volume":"8","author":"SM S\u00f8rensen","year":"2016","unstructured":"S\u00f8rensen SM, Bj\u00f8rn SF, Jochumsen KM, Jensen PT, Thranov IR, Hare-Bruun H, et al. Danish Gynecological Cancer Database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:485\u201390.","journal-title":"Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"7022_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/85.5.365","volume":"85","author":"NK Aaronson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365\u201376.","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"issue":"8","key":"7022_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1812","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.22217","volume":"107","author":"ER Greimel","year":"2006","unstructured":"Greimel ER, Kuljanic Vlasic K, Waldenstrom AC, Duric VM, Jensen PT, Singer S, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life questionnaire cervical cancer module: EORTC QLQ-CX24. Cancer. 2006;107(8):1812\u201322.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"7022_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2010.08.014","volume":"47","author":"E Greimel","year":"2011","unstructured":"Greimel E, Nordin A, Lanceley A, Creutzberg CL, van de Poll-Franse LV, Radisic VB, et al. Psychometric validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-EN24). Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(2):183\u201390.","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"7022_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"525","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-015-1207-0","volume":"25","author":"LM Schougaard","year":"2016","unstructured":"Schougaard LM, Larsen LP, Jessen A, Sidenius P, Dorflinger L, de Thurah A, et al. AmbuFlex: tele-patient-reported outcomes (telePRO) as the basis for follow-up in chronic and malignant diseases. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(3):525\u201334.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"7022_CR47","volume-title":"Klinisk anvendelse af Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM)- en evalueringsrapport","author":"Society DC","year":"2016","unstructured":"Society DC. Klinisk anvendelse af Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM)- en evalueringsrapport. Copenhagen: Kr\u00e6ftens Bek\u00e6mpelse; 2016."},{"issue":"6","key":"7022_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e035673","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-035673","volume":"10","author":"RB Friis","year":"2020","unstructured":"Friis RB, Hjollund NH, Mejdahl CT, Pappot H, Skuladottir H. Electronic symptom monitoring in patients with metastatic lung cancer: a feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e035673.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"7022_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Friis RB, Hj\u00f8llund NH, Pappot H, Taarnh\u00f8j GA, Vestergaard JM, Skuladottir H. Patient-reported outcome measures used in routine care predict for survival at disease progression in patients with advanced lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer.\u00a02021;22(2):e169\u201379.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cllc.2020.09.014"},{"issue":"1","key":"7022_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1186\/s13048-019-0538-9","volume":"12","author":"AS Kargo","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kargo AS, Coulter A, Jensen PT, Steffensen KD. Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):63.","journal-title":"J Ovarian Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"7022_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1007\/s10728-007-0067-3","volume":"16","author":"P-A Tengland","year":"2008","unstructured":"Tengland P-A. Empowerment: a conceptual discussion. Health Care Anal. 2008;16(2):77\u201396.","journal-title":"Health Care Anal"},{"issue":"1","key":"7022_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0191254","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0191254","volume":"13","author":"K Brenk-Franz","year":"2018","unstructured":"Brenk-Franz K, Ehrenthal J, Freund T, Schneider N, Strau\u00df B, Tiesler F, et al. Evaluation of the short form of \u201cExperience in Close Relationships\u201d (Revised, German Version \"\u201cECR-RD12\u201d) - a tool to measure adult attachment in primary care. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0191254.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"7022_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnston L, Young J, Campbell K. The implementation and impact of Holistic Needs Assessments for people affected by cancer: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl).\u00a02019;28(3):e13087.","DOI":"10.1111\/ecc.13087"},{"issue":"3","key":"7022_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1177\/1460458218820188","volume":"25","author":"H Langstrup","year":"2019","unstructured":"Langstrup H. Patient-reported data and the politics of meaningful data work. Health Informatics J. 2019;25(3):567\u201376.","journal-title":"Health Informatics J"},{"key":"7022_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gon\u00e7alves Bradley DC GC, Ricci-Cabello I, Bobrovitz NJH, Gibbons EJ, Kotzeva A, Alonso J, Fitzpatrick R, Bower P, van der Wees PJ, Rajmil L, Roberts NW, Taylor RS,Greenhalgh J, Porter I, Valderas JM. Routine provision of information on patient-reported outcome measures to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD011589"},{"issue":"4","key":"7022_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2004.06.022","volume":"60","author":"J Greenhalgh","year":"2005","unstructured":"Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory? Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(4):833\u201343.","journal-title":"Soc Sci Med"},{"issue":"9","key":"7022_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2265","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-013-0390-0","volume":"22","author":"MB Boyce","year":"2013","unstructured":"Boyce MB, Browne JP. Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review Qual Life Res. 2013;22(9):2265\u201378.","journal-title":"A systematic review Qual Life Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"7022_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjqs-2013-002524","volume":"23","author":"MB Boyce","year":"2014","unstructured":"Boyce MB, Browne JP, Greenhalgh J. The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(6):508\u201318.","journal-title":"BMJ Qual Saf"},{"issue":"20","key":"7022_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3228","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.28847","volume":"120","author":"E Maunsell","year":"2014","unstructured":"Maunsell E, Lauzier S, Brunet J, Pelletier S, Osborne RH, Campbell HS. Health-related empowerment in cancer: validity of scales from the Health Education Impact Questionnaire. Cancer. 2014;120(20):3228\u201336.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"2","key":"7022_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pec.2006.12.002","volume":"66","author":"RH Osborne","year":"2007","unstructured":"Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, Whitfield K. The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(2):192\u2013201.","journal-title":"Patient Educ Couns"},{"issue":"1","key":"7022_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1186\/s13104-017-2536-6","volume":"10","author":"DH Laursen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Laursen DH, Christensen KB, Christensen U, Fr\u00f8lich A. Assessment of short and long-term outcomes of diabetes patient education using the health education impact questionnaire (HeiQ). BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):213.","journal-title":"BMC Res Notes"},{"issue":"3","key":"7022_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-008-0444-y","volume":"17","author":"S Simard","year":"2009","unstructured":"Simard S, Savard J. Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory: development and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of fear of cancer recurrence. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(3):241\u201351.","journal-title":"Support Care Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"7022_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/jmir.3085","volume":"16","author":"PJ Barr","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barr PJ, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande SW, Ozanne EM, Elwyn G. The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(1): e2.","journal-title":"J Med Internet Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"7022_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1177\/1403494809105287","volume":"37","author":"KU Wittrup-Jensen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wittrup-Jensen KU, Lauridsen J, Gudex C, Pedersen KM. Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scand J Public Health. 2009;37(5):459\u201366.","journal-title":"Scand J Public Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"7022_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2007.00292.x","volume":"11","author":"C Acquadro","year":"2008","unstructured":"Acquadro C, Conway K, Hareendran A, Aaronson N. Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value Health. 2008;11(3):509\u201321.","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"7022_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.3109\/07853890109002087","volume":"33","author":"R Rabin","year":"2001","unstructured":"Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337\u201343.","journal-title":"Ann Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"7022_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00439229","volume":"5","author":"MT King","year":"1996","unstructured":"King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(6):555\u201367.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"7022_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.10.003","volume":"118","author":"JM Giesinger","year":"2020","unstructured":"Giesinger JM, Loth FLC, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Caocci G, Efficace F, et al. Thresholds for clinical importance were established to improve interpretation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in clinical practice and research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;118:1\u20138.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"7022_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1026461310761","volume":"6","author":"M Klee","year":"1997","unstructured":"Klee M, Groenvold M, Machin D. Quality of life of Danish women: population-based norms of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1997;6(1):27\u201334.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"7022_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/j.conctc.2018.03.008","volume":"10","author":"J Twisk","year":"2018","unstructured":"Twisk J, Bosman L, Hoekstra T, Rijnhart J, Welten M, Heymans M. Different ways to estimate treatment effects in randomised controlled trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018;10:80\u20135.","journal-title":"Contemp Clin Trials Commun"}],"container-title":["Trials"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13063-022-07022-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13063-022-07022-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13063-022-07022-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,3]],"date-time":"2023-02-03T17:05:29Z","timestamp":1675443929000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13063-022-07022-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]]},"references-count":70,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["7022"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13063-022-07022-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1745-6215"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1745-6215","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 May 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 December 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 February 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study has been approved by the Regional Research Ethics Committee (RES) (project ID: S-20180058), and the study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (protocol ID: NCT03838861). Further, the project has been reported to the National Data Protection Agency (NDPA) by local application to the Region of Southern Denmark (file no. 16\/43209). A permission to conduct long-term follow-up of all patients in order to retrieve information on late relapses and perform a health economic evaluation 5\u00a0years postoperatively is applied for to the NDPA and to the RES.The project is carried out in accordance with the recommendations regarding individual needs assessment at cancer follow-up of the Danish Health Authority and of the Region of Southern Denmark.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Before inclusion, all patients receive oral and written information about the project and sign a written consent to participate. All participants may at any time withdraw their consent and data without any explanation and with no further consequences.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"74"}}