{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,17]],"date-time":"2026-09-17T20:15:53Z","timestamp":1789676153559,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,7]],"date-time":"2021-04-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617753600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,7]],"date-time":"2021-04-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004047","name":"Karolinska Institute","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004047","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Res Notes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The present simulation study aimed to assess positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for our newly introduced Accounting for Expected Adjusted Effect test (AEAE test) and compare it to PPV and NPV for a traditional zero-order significance test.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The AEAE test exhibited greater PPV compared to a traditional zero-order significance test, especially with a strong true adjusted effect, low prior probability, high degree of confounding, large sample size, high reliability in the measurement of predictor X and outcome Y, and low reliability in the measurement of confounder Z. The zero-order significance test, on the other hand, exhibited higher NPV, except for some combinations of high degree of confounding and large sample size, or low reliability in the measurement of Z and high reliability in the measurement of X\/Y, in which case the zero-order significance test can be completely uninformative. Taken together, the findings demonstrate desirable statistical properties for the AEAE test compared to a traditional zero-order significance test.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13104-021-05545-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,7]],"date-time":"2021-04-07T09:06:05Z","timestamp":1617786365000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["The new accounting for expected adjusted effect test (AEAE test) has higher positive predictive value than a zero-order significance test"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9930-057X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kimmo","family":"Sorjonen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gustav","family":"Nilsonne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bo","family":"Melin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Ingre","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"5545_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"868","DOI":"10.1097\/01.psy.0000140008.70959.41","volume":"66","author":"NJS Christenfeld","year":"2004","unstructured":"Christenfeld NJS, Sloan RP, Carroll D, Greenland S. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:868\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.psy.0000140008.70959.41.","journal-title":"Psychosom Med"},{"key":"5545_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwm165","volume":"166","author":"Z Fewell","year":"2007","unstructured":"Fewell Z, Davey Smith G, Sterne JAC. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:646\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/aje\/kwm165.","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"5545_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0152719","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0152719","volume":"11","author":"J Westfall","year":"2016","unstructured":"Westfall J, Yarkoni T. Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0152719. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0152719.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"5545_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045030","volume":"16","author":"BM D\u2019Onofrio","year":"2020","unstructured":"D\u2019Onofrio BM, Sj\u00f6lander A, Lahey BB, Lichtenstein P, \u00d6berg AS. Accounting for confounding in observational studies. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2020;16:25\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045030.","journal-title":"Annu Rev Clin Psychol"},{"key":"5545_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"542082","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2020.542082","volume":"11","author":"K Sorjonen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sorjonen K, Melin B, Ingre M. Accounting for expected adjusted effect. Front Psychol. 2020;11:542082. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2020.542082.","journal-title":"Front Psychol"},{"key":"5545_CR6","unstructured":"R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https:\/\/www.R-project.org\/. 2020."},{"key":"5545_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S. Fourth Ed. New York: New York: Springer; 2002.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-21706-2"},{"key":"5545_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181190","DOI":"10.1098\/rsos.181190","volume":"5","author":"M Ingre","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ingre M, Nilsonne G. Estimating statistical power, posterior probability and publication bias of psychological research using the observed replication rate. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5:181190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1098\/rsos.181190.","journal-title":"R Soc Open Sci"},{"key":"5545_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e124","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124","volume":"2","author":"JPA Ioannidis","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124.","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"5545_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"aac4716","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aac4716","volume":"349","author":"Open Science Collaboration","year":"2015","unstructured":"Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015;349:aac4716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aac4716.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"5545_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1038\/533452a","volume":"533","author":"M Baker","year":"2016","unstructured":"Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533:452\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/533452a.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"5545_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1038\/483531a","volume":"483","author":"CG Begley","year":"2012","unstructured":"Begley CG, Ellis LM. Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature. 2012;483:531\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/483531a.","journal-title":"Nature"}],"container-title":["BMC Research Notes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05545-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05545-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05545-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,7]],"date-time":"2021-04-07T09:28:22Z","timestamp":1617787702000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05545-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,7]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5545"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05545-4","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.31234\/osf.io\/fp8g3","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1756-0500"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1756-0500","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 September 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 March 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 April 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"129"}}