{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,27]],"date-time":"2026-01-27T21:12:58Z","timestamp":1769548378592,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":7,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,10]],"date-time":"2021-09-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1631232000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,10]],"date-time":"2021-09-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1631232000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"DFID\/MRC\/Wellcome Trust through the Joint Global Health Trials Scheme","award":["G1100686\/1"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["G1100686\/1"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Res Notes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Induction of labour (IOL), or starting labour artificially, can be a lifesaving intervention for pregnant women and their babies, and rates are rising significantly globally. As rates increase, it becomes increasingly important to fully evaluate all available data, especially that from low income settings where the potential benefits and harms are greater. The goal of this paper is to describe the datasets collected as part of the Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study, a randomised trial comparing two of the recommended methods of cervical ripening for labour induction, oral misoprostol and Foley catheter, in women being induced for hypertension in pregnancy, at two sites in India during 2013\u201315.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Data description<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This dataset includes comprehensive data on 602 women who underwent IOL for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Women were randomly assigned to cervical ripening with oral misoprostol or a transcervical Foley catheter in two government hospitals in India. The main dataset has 367 variables including monitoring during the induction of labour, medications administered, timing and mode of delivery, measures of neonatal morbidity and mortality, maternal mortality and morbidity, maternal satisfaction and health economic data. The dataset is anonymised and available on ReShare.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13104-021-05772-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,10]],"date-time":"2021-09-10T18:03:04Z","timestamp":1631296984000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["The Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study dataset. A dataset of 602 women with hypertensive disease in pregnancy, in India, randomised to either Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labour"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Shuchita","family":"Mundle","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hillary","family":"Bracken","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vaishali","family":"Khedikar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jayashree","family":"Mulik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Brian","family":"Faragher","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"Easterling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Simon","family":"Leigh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Granby","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alan","family":"Haycox","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mark A.","family":"Turner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kate","family":"Lightly","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Miroslava","family":"Ebringer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zarko","family":"Alfirevic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Beverly","family":"Winikoff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1909-337X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrew D.","family":"Weeks","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"5772_CR1","volume-title":"WHO recommendations for induction of labour","author":"WHO","year":"2011","unstructured":"WHO. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011."},{"key":"5772_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1619","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)00084-2","volume":"387","author":"ML Ten Eikelder","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ten Eikelder ML, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, et al. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1619\u201328.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"5772_CR3","first-page":"138","volume":"34","author":"ML Ten Eikelder","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ten Eikelder ML, van de Meent MM, Mast K, et al. Women\u2019s experiences with and preference for induction of labor with oral misoprostol or Foley catheter at term. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34:138\u201346.","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"5772_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-308","volume":"14","author":"H Bracken","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bracken H, Mundle S, Faragher B, et al. Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:308.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"10095","key":"5772_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)31367-3","volume":"390","author":"S Mundle","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mundle S, Bracken H, Khedikar V, et al. Foley catheterisation versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in hypertensive women in India (INFORM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10095):669\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(17)31367-3.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"13","key":"5772_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1734","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15285","volume":"125","author":"S Leigh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Leigh S, Granby P, Haycox A, et al. Foley catheter vs. oral misoprostol to induce labour among hypertensive women in India: a cost-consequence analysis alongside a clinical trial. BJOG. 2018;125(13):1734\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.15285.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"5772_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mundle S, Bracken H,\u00a0Khedikar V, Mulik J, Faragher B, Easterling T, et al. The Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study, 2013\u20132015. [Data Collection]. UK data service. 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5255\/UKDA-SN-854663","DOI":"10.5255\/UKDA-SN-854663"}],"container-title":["BMC Research Notes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05772-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05772-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05772-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,10]],"date-time":"2021-09-10T18:06:06Z","timestamp":1631297166000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05772-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,10]]},"references-count":7,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5772"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13104-021-05772-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1756-0500"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1756-0500","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 April 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 September 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 September 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The Research Ethics Committees at Government Medical College, Nagpur and the University of Liverpool both approved this study. Women provided written and video-recorded oral consent, as per the Drug Controller General of India recommendations, at that time. Study monitoring was undertaken by an independent trial steering committee and data monitoring committee. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01801410).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"The INFORM consent form allowed women to tick an extra box confirming that they were agreeable for their data to be used for future research studies. All women recruited to the INFORM study consented to share their data.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"ADW is a Scientific Advisor to Norgine, a Dutch\u00a0pharmaceutical company. The company pays the University of Liverpool for his time and he receives no personal payments. MAT has provided consultancy services to Chiesi, BMS, Novartis, Shire, Janssen & Grunenthal. The companies pay the University of Liverpool for his time and he receives no personal payments. There are no other conflicts of interest to declare.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"355"}}