{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,27]],"date-time":"2026-06-27T23:25:17Z","timestamp":1782602717329,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Case Reports"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"DOI":"10.1186\/s13256-017-1480-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,18]],"date-time":"2017-10-18T19:50:51Z","timestamp":1508356251000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Intrauterine device embedded in omentum of postpartum patient with a markedly retroverted uterus: a case report"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Dana A.","family":"Neumann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph A.","family":"Graversen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Suzanne K.","family":"Pugh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"1480_CR1","volume-title":"Trends in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use Among U.S Women Aged 15\u201344. NCHS Data Brief, No. 188","author":"AM Branum","year":"2015","unstructured":"Branum AM, Jones J. Trends in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use Among U.S Women Aged 15\u201344. NCHS Data Brief, No. 188. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. \nhttps:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/products\/databriefs\/db188.htm\n\n. Accessed 7 July 2017."},{"issue":"1","key":"1480_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/j.contraception.2007.09.012","volume":"77","author":"DA Grimes","year":"2008","unstructured":"Grimes DA, Mishell DR. Intrauterine Contraception as an Alternative to Interval Tubal Sterilization. Contraception. 2008;77(1):6\u20139.","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"10","key":"1480_CR3","first-page":"1020","volume":"61","author":"M Bozkurt","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bozkurt M, Yumru AE, Coskun EI, Ondes B. Laparoscopic Management of a Translocated Intrauterine Device Embedded in the Gastric Serosa. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61(10):1020\u20132.","journal-title":"J Pak Med Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"1480_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1080\/13625180500035082","volume":"10","author":"M Ingec","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ingec M, Kumtepe Y, Kadanali YS, Ozdiller O. A Rare Case of Ileal Embedding by an Intrauterine Device. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005;10(1):29\u201331.","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"7","key":"1480_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-198107000-00001","volume":"36","author":"D Zakin","year":"1981","unstructured":"Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and Partial Uterine Perforation and Embedding following Insertion of Intrauterine Devices. I. Classification, Complications, Mechanism, Incidence, and Missing String. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981;36(7):335\u201353.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"1480_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"150","DOI":"10.1080\/ejc.8.3.150.155","volume":"8","author":"E Caliskan","year":"2003","unstructured":"Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, Dilbaz S. Analysis of Risk Factors Associated with Uterine Perforation by Intrauterine Devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2003;8:150\u20135.","journal-title":"Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care"},{"issue":"5","key":"1480_CR7","first-page":"727","volume":"44","author":"AH Ansari","year":"1974","unstructured":"Ansari AH. Diagnosis and Management of Intrauterine Device With Missing Tail. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44(5):727\u201334.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1480_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"916143","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/916143","volume":"2014","author":"AL Atkinson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Atkinson AL, Baum JD. Missing IUD Despite Threads at the Cervix. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014;2014:916143. doi:\n10.1155\/2014\/916143\n\n.","journal-title":"Case Rep Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1480_CR9","first-page":"31","volume":"61","author":"SF Heartwell","year":"1983","unstructured":"Heartwell SF, Schlesselman S. Risk of Uterine Perforation Among Users of Intrauterine Devices. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61(1):31\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1480_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-7824(98)00029-8","volume":"57","author":"K Andersson","year":"1998","unstructured":"Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I. Perforations with Intrauterine Devices: Report from a Swedish Survey. Contraception. 1998;57(4):251\u20135.","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"key":"1480_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.2147\/OAJC.S85546","volume":"7","author":"S Rowlands","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell DH. Intrauterine Devices and Risk of Uterine Perforation: Current Perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2016;7:19\u201332.","journal-title":"Open Access J Contracept"},{"issue":"5","key":"1480_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-7824(90)90059-5","volume":"41","author":"I Chi","year":"1990","unstructured":"Chi I, Farr G, Dominik R, Robinson N. Do Retroverted Uteri Adversely Affect Insertions and Performance of IUDs? Contraception. 1990;41(5):495\u2013506.","journal-title":"Contraception"},{"issue":"9","key":"1480_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2658","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/des246","volume":"27","author":"J Kaislasuo","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kaislasuo J, Suhonen S, Gissler M, Lahteenmaki P, Heikinheimo O. Intrauterine Contraception: Incidence and Factors Associated with Uterine Perforation \u2013 a Population-Based Study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(9):2658\u201363.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Case Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13256-017-1480-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,18]],"date-time":"2017-10-18T19:50:54Z","timestamp":1508356254000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/jmedicalcasereports.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13256-017-1480-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,25]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1480"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13256-017-1480-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1752-1947"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1752-1947","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,10,25]]},"article-number":"299"}}