{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,4]],"date-time":"2026-08-04T03:10:21Z","timestamp":1785813021773,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1629072000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1629072000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ann. Intensive Care"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Videolaryngoscopes with an operating channel may improve the intubation success rate in critically ill patients. We aimed to compare four channelled videolaryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope used for intubation of a high-fidelity simulation mannikin, in a scenario that simulated critical illness due to acute respiratory failure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Of the 79 residents who participated, 54 were considered inexperienced with orotracheal intubation. Each participant used all five devices in random order. The first-pass success rate was 97.5% [95% CI 91.1\u201399.7] for Airtraq\u2122, KingVision\u2122, and Pentax AWS200\u2122, 92.4% [95% CI 84.2\u201397.2] for VividTrac VT-A100\u2122, and 70.9% [95% CI 59.6\u201380.6] for direct Macintosh laryngoscopy. The first-pass success rate was significantly lower with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy than with the videolaryngoscopes (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u2009 0.0001 for Airtraq\u2122, KingVision\u2122, Pentax AWS200\u2122, and VividTrac VT-A100\u2122).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The Airtraq\u2122, KingVision\u2122, and Pentax AWS200\u2122 channelled videolaryngoscopes produced high first-pass success rates with a lower boundary of the 95% CI above 90%. A multicentre, randomised controlled clinical study comparing channelled videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy should include one of these three videolaryngoscopes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s13613-021-00916-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T05:04:23Z","timestamp":1629090263000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Comparison of four channelled videolaryngoscopes to Macintosh laryngoscope for simulated intubation of critically ill patients: the randomized MACMAN2 trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Paul","family":"Decamps","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicolas","family":"Grillot","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aurelie","family":"Le Thuaut","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Noelle","family":"Brule","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Corinne","family":"Lejus-Bourdeau","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jean","family":"Reignier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3706-078X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jean-Baptiste","family":"Lascarrou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"916_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X1204000113","volume":"40","author":"JF Heuer","year":"2012","unstructured":"Heuer JF, Barwing TA, Barwing J, Russo SG, Bleckmann E, Quintel M, et al. Incidence of difficult intubation in intensive care patients: analysis of contributing factors. Anaesth Intensiv Care. 2012;40(1):120\u20137.","journal-title":"Anaesth Intensiv Care"},{"issue":"2","key":"916_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-009-1717-8","volume":"36","author":"S Jaber","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jaber S, Jung B, Corne P, Sebbane M, Muller L, Chanques G, et al. An intervention to decrease complications related to endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a prospective, multiple-center study. Intensiv Care Med. 2010;36(2):248\u201355.","journal-title":"Intensiv Care Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"916_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1164","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2021.1727","volume":"325","author":"V Russotto","year":"2021","unstructured":"Russotto V, Myatra SN, Laffey JG, Tassistro E, Antolini L, Bauer P, et al. Intubation practices and adverse peri-intubation events in critically ill patients from 29 countries. JAMA. 2021;325(12):1164\u201372.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"4","key":"916_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000002925","volume":"46","author":"A De Jong","year":"2018","unstructured":"De Jong A, Rolle A, Molinari N, Paugam-Burtz C, Constantin JM, Lefrant JY, et al. Cardiac arrest and mortality related to intubation procedure in critically ill adult patients: a multicenter cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(4):532\u20139.","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"916_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1835","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-008-1205-6","volume":"34","author":"DE Griesdale","year":"2008","unstructured":"Griesdale DE, Bosma TL, Kurth T, Isac G, Chittock DR. Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensiv Care Med. 2008;34(10):1835\u201342.","journal-title":"Intensiv Care Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"916_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1213\/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15","volume":"99","author":"TC Mort","year":"2004","unstructured":"Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(2):607\u201313.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"1","key":"916_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1111\/acem.12055","volume":"20","author":"JC Sakles","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(1):71\u20138.","journal-title":"Acad Emerg Med"},{"issue":"8","key":"916_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"832","DOI":"10.1164\/rccm.201210-1851OC","volume":"187","author":"A De Jong","year":"2013","unstructured":"De Jong A, Molinari N, Terzi N, Mongardon N, Arnal JM, Guitton C, et al. Early identification of patients at risk for difficult intubation in the intensive care unit: development and validation of the MACOCHA score in a multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(8):832\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Respir Crit Care Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"916_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199502000-00007","volume":"82","author":"DE Schwartz","year":"1995","unstructured":"Schwartz DE, Matthay MA, Cohen NH. Death and other complications of emergency airway management in critically ill adults. A prospective investigation of 297 tracheal intubations. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(2):367\u201376.","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"5","key":"916_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"483","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.20603","volume":"317","author":"JB Lascarrou","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lascarrou JB, Boisrame-Helms J, Bailly A, Le Thuaut A, Kamel T, Mercier E, et al. Video laryngoscopy vs direct laryngoscopy on successful first-pass orotracheal intubation among icu patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(5):483\u201393.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"4","key":"916_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-019-05529-w","volume":"45","author":"C Guitton","year":"2019","unstructured":"Guitton C, Ehrmann S, Volteau C, Colin G, Maamar A, Jean-Michel V, et al. Nasal high-flow preoxygenation for endotracheal intubation in the critically ill patient: a randomized clinical trial. Intensiv Care Med. 2019;45(4):447\u201358.","journal-title":"Intensiv Care Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"916_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1186\/s13054-019-2487-5","volume":"23","author":"S Jaber","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jaber S, De Jong A, Pelosi P, Cabrini L, Reignier J, Lascarrou JB. Videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):221.","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"916_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1186\/s13613-019-0621-9","volume":"10","author":"M Martin","year":"2020","unstructured":"Martin M, Decamps P, Seguin A, Garret C, Crosby L, Zambon O, et al. Nationwide survey on training and device utilization during tracheal intubation in French intensive care units. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):2.","journal-title":"Ann Intensive Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"916_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aex052","volume":"118","author":"TM Cook","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cook TM, Kelly FE. A national survey of videolaryngoscopy in the United Kingdom. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(4):593\u2013600.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"21","key":"916_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2179","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.6496","volume":"319","author":"BE Driver","year":"2018","unstructured":"Driver BE, Prekker ME, Klein LR, Reardon RF, Miner JR, Fagerstrom ET, et al. Effect of use of a bougie vs endotracheal tube and stylet on first-attempt intubation success among patients with difficult airways undergoing emergency intubation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(21):2179\u201389.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"4","key":"916_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e23886","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000023886","volume":"100","author":"Y Murakami","year":"2021","unstructured":"Murakami Y, Ueki R, Niki M, Hirose M, Shimode N. Three-day tracheal intubation manikin training for novice doctors using Macintosh laryngoscope, McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope. Medicine. 2021;100(4):e23886.","journal-title":"Medicine"},{"issue":"5","key":"916_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"R237","DOI":"10.1186\/cc13061","volume":"17","author":"JM Mosier","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mosier JM, Whitmore SP, Bloom JW, Snyder LS, Graham LA, Carr GE, et al. Video laryngoscopy improves intubation success and reduces esophageal intubations compared to direct laryngoscopy in the medical intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R237.","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"issue":"12","key":"916_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2144","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-013-3099-1","volume":"39","author":"A De Jong","year":"2013","unstructured":"De Jong A, Clavieras N, Conseil M, Coisel Y, Moury PH, Pouzeratte Y, et al. Implementation of a combo videolaryngoscope for intubation in critically ill patients: a before-after comparative study. Intensiv Care Med. 2013;39(12):2144\u201352.","journal-title":"Intensiv Care Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"916_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"R103","DOI":"10.1186\/cc11384","volume":"16","author":"RR Noppens","year":"2012","unstructured":"Noppens RR, Geimer S, Eisel N, David M, Piepho T. Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC(R) video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU. Crit Care. 2012;16(3):R103.","journal-title":"Crit Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"916_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2017.12.041","volume":"120","author":"N Arulkumaran","year":"2018","unstructured":"Arulkumaran N, Lowe J, Ions R, Mendoza M, Bennett V, Dunser MW. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(4):712\u201324.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"2","key":"916_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.5847\/wjem.j.1920-8642.2018.02.003","volume":"9","author":"YX Gao","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gao YX, Song YB, Gu ZJ, Zhang JS, Chen XF, Sun H, et al. Video versus direct laryngoscopy on successful first-pass endotracheal intubation in ICU patients. World J Emerg Med. 2018;9(2):99\u2013104.","journal-title":"World J Emerg Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"916_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chest.2017.06.012","volume":"152","author":"HB Huang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Huang HB, Peng JM, Xu B, Liu GY, Du B. Video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation of critically ill adults: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2017;152(3):510\u20137.","journal-title":"Chest"},{"issue":"1","key":"916_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1007\/s00540-013-1666-9","volume":"28","author":"Y Akihisa","year":"2014","unstructured":"Akihisa Y, Maruyama K, Koyama Y, Yamada R, Ogura A, Andoh T. Comparison of intubation performance between the King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice personnel: a randomized, crossover manikin study. J Anesth. 2014;28(1):51\u20137.","journal-title":"J Anesth"},{"issue":"46","key":"916_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e8713","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000008713","volume":"96","author":"J Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee J, Kwak HJ, Lee JY, Chang MY, Lee SY, Kim JY. Comparison of the Pentax AirwayScope and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with a normal airway. Medicine. 2017;96(46):e8713.","journal-title":"Medicine"},{"issue":"7","key":"916_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.14289","volume":"73","author":"C Mendonca","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mendonca C, Ungureanu N, Nowicka A, Kumar P. A randomised clinical trial comparing the \u201csniffing\u201d and neutral position using channelled (KingVision\u00ae) and non-channelled (C-MAC\u00ae) videolaryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(7):847\u201355.","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"5","key":"916_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"670","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aew058","volume":"116","author":"M Kleine-Brueggeney","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, Savoldelli GL, Nabecker S, Theiler LG. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(5):670\u20139.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"916_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-009855","author":"A Bailly","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bailly A, Lascarrou JB, Le Thuaut A, Boisrame-Helms J, Kamel T, Mercier E, et al. McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in intensive care patients: the randomised multicentre MACMAN trial study protocol. BMJ Open. 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-009855.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"916_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000003656","author":"A Bailly","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bailly A, Ricard JD, Le Thuaut A, Helms J, Kamel T, Mercier E, et al. Compared efficacy of four preoxygenation methods for intubation in the ICU: retrospective analysis of McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope (MACMAN) trial data. Crit Care Med. 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CCM.0000000000003656.","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"issue":"5","key":"916_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/64.5.571","volume":"64","author":"JW McCrory","year":"1990","unstructured":"McCrory JW, Matthews JN. Comparison of four methods of preoxygenation. Br J Anaesth. 1990;64(5):571\u20136.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"2","key":"916_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2017.10.021","volume":"120","author":"A Higgs","year":"2018","unstructured":"Higgs A, McGrath BA, Goddard C, Rangasami J, Suntharalingam G, Gale R, et al. Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(2):323\u201352.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"1","key":"916_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/s13613-019-0483-1","volume":"9","author":"H Quintard","year":"2019","unstructured":"Quintard H, l\u2019Her E, Pottecher J, Adnet F, Constantin JM, De Jong A, et al. Experts\u2019 guidelines of intubation and extubation of the ICU patient of French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) and French-speaking Intensive Care Society (SRLF)\u202f: In collaboration with the pediatric Association of French-speaking Anaesthetists and Intensivists (ADARPEF), French-speaking Group of Intensive Care and Paediatric emergencies (GFRUP) and Intensive Care physiotherapy society (SKR). Ann Intensiv Care. 2019;9(1):13.","journal-title":"Ann Intensiv Care"},{"issue":"6","key":"916_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1278","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-020-06041-2","volume":"46","author":"A De Jong","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Jong A, Rolle A, Pensier J, Capdevila M, Jaber S. First-attempt success is associated with fewer complications related to intubation in the intensive care unit. Intensiv Care Med. 2020;46(6):1278\u201380.","journal-title":"Intensiv Care Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"916_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1186\/s40001-017-0268-7","volume":"22","author":"H Eismann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Eismann H, Sieg L, Etti N, Friedrich L, Schr\u00f6ter C, Mommsen P, et al. Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins. Eur J Med Res. 2017;22(1):27.","journal-title":"Eur J Med Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"916_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1111\/anae.13413","volume":"71","author":"BMA Pieters","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pieters BMA, Wilbers NER, Huijzer M, Winkens B, van Zundert AAJ. Comparison of seven videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope in manikins by experienced and novice personnel. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(5):556\u201364.","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"1","key":"916_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-017-0362-y","volume":"17","author":"S Rendeki","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rendeki S, Keresztes D, Woth G, M\u00e9rei \u00c1, Rozanovic M, Rendeki M, et al. Comparison of VividTrac\u00ae, Airtraq\u00ae, King Vision\u00ae, Macintosh laryngoscope and a custom-made videolaryngoscope for difficult and normal airways in mannequins by novices. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17(1):68.","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"916_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/s00540-014-1936-1","volume":"29","author":"D Okada","year":"2015","unstructured":"Okada D, Komasawa N, Fujiwara S, Minami T. Comparison of tube-guided and guideless videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation during chest compression in a manikin: a randomized crossover trial. J Anesth. 2015;29(3):331\u20137.","journal-title":"J Anesth"},{"issue":"6","key":"916_CR37","first-page":"653","volume":"47","author":"S Jaber","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jaber S, Roll\u00e9 A, Godet T, Terzi N, Riu B, Asfar P, et al. Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients. Intensiv Care Med. 2021;47(6):653\u201364.","journal-title":"Intensiv Care Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"916_CR38","first-page":"131","volume":"14","author":"AH Mart\u00ednez","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mart\u00ednez AH, Garc\u00eda JMA, Rosete VAM. Intubation time between video-laryngoscopes: King Vision versus Vivid Trac. Comp Study Acta M\u00e9dica Grupo \u00c1ngeles. 2016;14(3):131\u20135.","journal-title":"Comp Study Acta M\u00e9dica Grupo \u00c1ngeles"},{"issue":"9","key":"916_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-010-9345-x","volume":"57","author":"AJ Hirsch-Allen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hirsch-Allen AJ, Ayas N, Mountain S, Dodek P, Peets A, Griesdale DE. Influence of residency training on multiple attempts at endotracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(9):823\u20139.","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"issue":"5","key":"916_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aer504","volume":"108","author":"GD Simpson","year":"2012","unstructured":"Simpson GD, Ross MJ, McKeown DW, Ray DC. Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: a multi-centre national study of practice and complications. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(5):792\u20139.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"10","key":"916_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e889","DOI":"10.1097\/CCM.0000000000004497","volume":"48","author":"M Amalric","year":"2020","unstructured":"Amalric M, Larcher R, Brunot V, Garnier F, De Jong A, Moulaire Rigollet V, et al. Impact of videolaryngoscopy expertise on first-attempt intubation success in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(10):e889\u201396.","journal-title":"Crit Care Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"916_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1204","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e318254cf41","volume":"116","author":"K Schebesta","year":"2012","unstructured":"Schebesta K, H\u00fcpfl M, R\u00f6ssler B, Ringl H, M\u00fcller MP, Kimberger O. Degrees of reality: airway anatomy of high-fidelity human patient simulators and airway trainers. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(6):1204\u20139.","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"916_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2010.06567.x","volume":"66","author":"MR Rai","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rai MR, Popat MT. Evaluation of airway equipment: man or manikin? Anaesthesia. 2011;66(1):1\u20133.","journal-title":"Anaesthesia"}],"container-title":["Annals of Intensive Care"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13613-021-00916-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13613-021-00916-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13613-021-00916-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,7]],"date-time":"2026-01-07T06:41:03Z","timestamp":1767768063000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/annalsofintensivecare.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13613-021-00916-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["916"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13613-021-00916-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["2110-5820"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2110-5820","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 May 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 August 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 August 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the <i>Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de R\u00e9animation de Langue Fran\u00e7aise<\/i> (CE SRLF 17\u201311). Each participant was informed at the beginning of each session about the objectives of the trial, the recording of the simulation sessions, and her or his right to access and refuse the use of the data collected for the trial.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"None of the authors has any competing interests to declare.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"126"}}