{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T22:37:54Z","timestamp":1768343874560,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,1]],"date-time":"2018-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1543622400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Syst Rev"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]},"DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-018-0885-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,3]],"date-time":"2018-12-03T10:01:51Z","timestamp":1543831311000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Screening for small for gestational age using third-trimester ultrasound markers: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening test accuracy"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"7","author":[{"given":"C\u00e9dric","family":"Gasse","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kim","family":"Paquette","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Suzanne","family":"Demers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"St\u00e9phanie","family":"Roberge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emmanuel","family":"Bujold","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1907-2920","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Am\u00e9lie","family":"Boutin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"885_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-017-4341-9","volume":"295","author":"LM Nardozza","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nardozza LM, Caetano AC, Zamarian AC, Mazzola JB, Silva CP, Marcal VM, et al. Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:1061\u201377.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"885_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1122","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9","volume":"121","author":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists","year":"2013","unstructured":"American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1122\u201333.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"885_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1049","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)91325-4","volume":"173","author":"CM Salafia","year":"1995","unstructured":"Salafia CM, Minior VK, Pezzullo JC, Popek EJ, Rosenkrantz TS, Vintzileos AM. Intrauterine growth restriction in infants of less than thirty-two weeks\u2019 gestation: associated placental pathologic features. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1049\u201357.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"885_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1970090405","volume":"9","author":"P Eydoux","year":"1989","unstructured":"Eydoux P, Choiset A, Le Porrier N, Thepot F, Szpiro-Tapia S, Alliet J, et al. Chromosomal prenatal diagnosis: study of 936 cases of intrauterine abnormalities after ultrasound assessment. Prenat Diagn. 1989;9:255\u201369.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"885_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/S1473-3099(07)70021-X","volume":"7","author":"M Desai","year":"2007","unstructured":"Desai M, Ter Kuile FO, Nosten F, McGready R, Asamoa K, Brabin B, Newman RD. Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:93\u2013104.","journal-title":"Lancet Infect Dis"},{"key":"885_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"628 e621","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.06.043","volume":"215","author":"H Mendez-Figueroa","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mendez-Figueroa H, Truong VT, Pedroza C, Khan AM, Chauhan SP. Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:628 e621.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"885_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1159\/000353631","volume":"36","author":"AA Baschat","year":"2014","unstructured":"Baschat AA. Neurodevelopment after fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36:136\u201342.","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"885_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200606000-00008","volume":"49","author":"EK Pallotto","year":"2006","unstructured":"Pallotto EK, Kilbride HW. Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:257\u201369.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"885_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cppeds.2011.01.001","volume":"41","author":"K Calkins","year":"2011","unstructured":"Calkins K, Devaskar SU. Fetal origins of adult disease. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2011;41:158\u201376.","journal-title":"Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care"},{"key":"885_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)34127-5","volume":"31","author":"Y Cargill","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cargill Y, Morin L, Canadian Diagnostic Imaging Committee. Content of a complete routine second trimester obstetrical ultrasound examination and report. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009;31:272\u20135.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"885_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e241","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001815","volume":"128","author":"ACOG, AIUM","year":"2016","unstructured":"ACOG, AIUM. Practice bulletin no. 175: ultrasound in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:e241\u201356.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"885_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.2217\/whe.15.95","volume":"12","author":"N O\u2019Gorman","year":"2016","unstructured":"O\u2019Gorman N, Nicolaides KH, Poon LC. The use of ultrasound and other markers for early detection of preeclampsia. Womens Health (Lond). 2016;12:199\u2013207.","journal-title":"Womens Health (Lond)"},{"key":"885_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.003","volume":"18","author":"AT Papageorghiou","year":"2004","unstructured":"Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Nicolaides KH. The role of uterine artery Doppler in predicting adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;18:383\u201396.","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"885_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.13275","volume":"43","author":"L Velauthar","year":"2014","unstructured":"Velauthar L, Plana MN, Kalidindi M, Zamora J, Thilaganathan B, Illanes SE, et al. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler and adverse pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis involving 55,974 women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:500\u20137.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"885_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2015.01.059","volume":"212","author":"G Mari","year":"2015","unstructured":"Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Mari G, Norton ME, Stone J, Berghella V, Sciscione AC, et al. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) clinical guideline #8: the fetus at risk for anemia--diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:697\u2013710.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"885_CR16","first-page":"67","volume":"54","author":"D Markov","year":"2015","unstructured":"Markov D, Pavlova E, Atanassova D, Diavolov V, Hitrova S, Vakrilova L, et al. The fetal middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity as a predictor of fetal anemia in Rh-alloimmunized pregnancy. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2015;54:67\u201372.","journal-title":"Akush Ginekol (Sofiia)"},{"issue":"3","key":"885_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.18809","volume":"51","author":"C. A. Vollgraff Heidweiller-Schreurs","year":"2018","unstructured":"Schreurs CA, de Boer MA, Heymans MW, Schoonmade LJ, Bossuyt PMM, Mol BWJ, et 399 al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse 400 perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:313\u201322.","journal-title":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology"},{"key":"885_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.placenta.2017.02.006","volume":"54","author":"L Dunn","year":"2017","unstructured":"Dunn L, Sherrell H, Kumar S. Review: systematic review of the utility of the fetal cerebroplacental ratio measured at term for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Placenta. 2017;54:68\u201375.","journal-title":"Placenta"},{"key":"885_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.003","volume":"38","author":"A Khalil","year":"2017","unstructured":"Khalil A, Thilaganathan B. Role of uteroplacental and fetal Doppler in identifying fetal growth restriction at term. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38:38\u201347.","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"885_CR20","first-page":"47","volume":"67","author":"E Hernandez-Andrade","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hernandez-Andrade E. Optimal strategies for managing fetal growth restriction. Minerva Ginecol. 2015;67:47\u201363.","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"885_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30865-3","volume":"35","author":"A Lausman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lausman A, Kingdom J, Gagnon R, Basso M, Bos H, Crane J, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis, and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35:741\u20138.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"885_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)90000-6","volume":"72","author":"ACOG","year":"2001","unstructured":"ACOG. Intrauterine growth restriction. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;72:85\u201396.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"885_CR23","unstructured":"RCOG. The Investigation and Management of the Small\u2013for\u2013Gestational\u2013Age Fetus. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2014;Green-top Guideline No.31."},{"key":"885_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1018","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.09.023","volume":"42","author":"French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians","year":"2013","unstructured":"French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians. Intra-uterine growth retardation: guidelines for clinical practice - short text. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013;42:1018\u201325.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"key":"885_CR25","volume-title":"Recommandations professionnelles","author":"Haute Autorit\u00e9 de Sant\u00e9","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haute Autorit\u00e9 de Sant\u00e9. Suivi et orientation des femmes enceintes en fonction des situations \u00e0 risque identifi\u00e9es. In: Recommandations professionnelles; 2016."},{"key":"885_CR26","volume-title":"Rapport du Comit\u00e9 National Technique de l\u2019\u00c9chographie de D\u00e9pistage Pr\u00e9natal","author":"CNTEDP","year":"2005","unstructured":"CNTEDP. Rapport du Comit\u00e9 National Technique de l\u2019\u00c9chographie de D\u00e9pistage Pr\u00e9natal. 2005."},{"key":"885_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.11.025","volume":"200","author":"SP Chauhan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Chauhan SP, Gupta LM, Hendrix NW, Berghella V, American College of O, Gynecologists. Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:409 e401\u2013406.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"885_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1289","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13208","volume":"96","author":"E Goto","year":"2017","unstructured":"Goto E. Comparing the accuracy of maternal, clinical, and ultrasound estimations to predict birthweight: a meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:1289\u201399.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"885_CR29","unstructured":"Unite\u0301 d\u2019e\u0301valuation des technologies et des modes d\u2019intervention en sante\u0301 (UETMIS) du CHU de Que\u0301bec-Universite\u0301 Laval. Utilisation de l\u2019e\u0301chographie obste\u0301tricale pour le suivi d\u2019une grossesse normale : recension des recommandations et des pratiques, rapport d\u2019e\u0301valuation pre\u0301pare\u0301 par Sylvain L\u2019Espe\u0301rance, Genevie\u0300ve Asselin, Katia Boivin, Martin Coulombe et Marc Rhainds (UETMIS 01-17) Que\u0301bec, 2017, xiii - 68 p."},{"key":"885_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"f108","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f108","volume":"346","author":"J Gardosi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ. 2013;346:f108.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"885_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1"},{"key":"885_CR32","unstructured":"Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2013. Available from: \n                    http:\/\/srdta.cochrane.org\/\n                    \n                  ."},{"key":"885_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","volume":"155","author":"PF Whiting","year":"2011","unstructured":"Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529\u201336.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"885_CR34","first-page":"S48","volume":"2","author":"CM Rutter","year":"1995","unstructured":"Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. Regression methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test data. Acad Radiol. 1995;2(Suppl 1):S48\u201356 discussion S65\u201347, S70\u201341 pas.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"885_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2865","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.942","volume":"20","author":"CM Rutter","year":"2001","unstructured":"Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20:2865\u201384.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"885_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022","volume":"58","author":"JB Reitsma","year":"2005","unstructured":"Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:982\u201390.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"}],"container-title":["Systematic Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13643-018-0885-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13643-018-0885-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13643-018-0885-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,2]],"date-time":"2019-12-02T19:12:22Z","timestamp":1575313942000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13643-018-0885-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]}},"alternative-id":["885"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-018-0885-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2046-4053"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2046-4053","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 May 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 November 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 December 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Considering data from published studies will be collected and synthesized, this systematic review is exempt from ethics approval.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Publisher\u2019s Note"}}],"article-number":"219"}}