{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]],"date-time":"2026-07-06T22:55:42Z","timestamp":1783378542901,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]],"date-time":"2025-04-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745539200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]],"date-time":"2025-04-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1745539200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Syst Rev"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-025-02846-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,24]],"date-time":"2025-04-24T23:28:47Z","timestamp":1745537327000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Double versus single blastocyst biopsy and vitrification in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and neonatal outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"14","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2597-531X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alessandra A.","family":"Vireque","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vasileios","family":"Stolakis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thalita S.","family":"Berteli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria C.","family":"Bertero","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jason","family":"Kofinas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"2846_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2023.08.010","volume":"230","author":"D Mao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mao D, Xu J, Sun L. Impact of trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230:199-212.e5.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2846_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Verpoest W. Refreezing and rebiopsy \u2013 are these worth it? Hum Reprod. 2023;38(1) https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dead093.061.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead093.061"},{"key":"2846_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1443","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/del506","volume":"22","author":"G Kokkali","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kokkali G, Traeger-Synodinos J, Vrettou C, Stavrou D, Jones GM, Cram DS, Makrakis E, Trounson AO, Kanavakis E, Pantos K. Blastocyst biopsy versus cleavage stage biopsy and blastocyst transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of beta-thalassaemia: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1443\u20139.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2846_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1331-1","volume":"36","author":"L Guzman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Guzman L, Nu\u00f1ez D, L\u00f3pez R, et al. The number of biopsied trophectoderm cells may affect pregnancy outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:145\u201351.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2846_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.11.013","volume":"107 Suppl 3","author":"SA Neal","year":"2017","unstructured":"Neal SA, Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Werner MD, Morin SJ, Tao X, Treff NR, Scott RT Jr. High relative deoxyribonucleic acid content of trophectoderm biopsy adversely affects pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017;107 Suppl 3:731-736.e1.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.11.019","volume":"42","author":"A Aluko","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aluko A, Vaughan DA, Modest AM, Penzias AS, Hacker MR, Thornton K, Sakkas D. Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42:572\u20138.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2846_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1222","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.01.011","volume":"105","author":"S Zhang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhang S, Luo K, Cheng D, et al. Number of biopsied trophectoderm cells is likely to affect the implantation potential of blastocysts with poor trophectoderm quality. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1222-1227.e4.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14355","volume":"160","author":"X Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li X, Li W, Jia H, Gao Y, Shi W, Bai H. Double vitrification-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, impair live birth but do not affect neonatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;160:806\u201313.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"2846_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoad037","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoad037","volume":"Suppl 4","author":"S Makieva","year":"2023","unstructured":"Makieva S, Sachs MK, Xie M, Velasco A, El-Hadad S, Kalaitzopoulos DR, Dedes I, Stiller R, Leeners B. Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;Suppl 4:hoad037.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open."},{"key":"2846_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shen X, Ding M, Yan Y, Huang C, Wang S, Zhou J, Xing J. Correction: Perinatal outcomes of singletons following double vitrification-warming procedures: a retrospective study using propensity score analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):108. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-023-05413-y. Erratum for: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):30. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-023-05369-z.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05413-y 10.1186\/s12884-023-05369-z"},{"key":"2846_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.03.001","volume":"120","author":"X Wang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wang X, Mao R, Wang M, Long R, Jin L, Zhu L. The effect of recryopreservation on embryo viability and outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2023;120:321\u201332.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2488","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa236","volume":"35","author":"A De Vos","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Vos A, Van Landuyt L, De Rycke M, Verdyck P, Verheyen G, Buysse A, Belva F, Keymolen K, Tournaye H, Verpoest W. Multiple vitrification-warming and biopsy procedures on human embryos: clinical outcome and neonatal follow-up of children. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:2488\u201396.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2846_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-023-01071-z","volume":"21","author":"HCK Kwan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kwan HCK. Reconsideration of the safety and effectiveness of human oocyte cryopreservation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023;21:22.","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"2846_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoad010","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoad010","volume":"Suppl 2","author":"F Spinella","year":"2023","unstructured":"Spinella F, Bronet F, Carvalho F, Coonen E, De Rycke M, Rubio C, Goossens V, Van Montfoort A. ESHRE PGT consortium data collection XXI: PGT analyses in 2018. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;Suppl 2:hoad010.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"2846_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1905","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-023-02875-z","volume":"40","author":"M Nohales","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nohales M, Coello A, Martin A, Insua F, Meseguer M, de Los Santos MJ. Should embryo rebiopsy be considered a regular strategy to increase the number of embryos available for transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40:1905\u201313.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2846_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.08.167","volume":"120","author":"R Zhuo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhuo R, Estevez SL, Ghofranian A, Hernandez-Nieto C, Baird M, Gounko D, Lee J, Copperman AB, Danis RB. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between single-biopsied and rebiopsied euploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2023;120: e51.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2024.104103","volume":"49","author":"B Al Hashimi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Al Hashimi B, Linara-Demakakou E, Harvey SC, Harvey KE, Griffin DK, Ahuja K, Macklon NS. Double vitrification and warming of blastocysts does not affect pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024;49: 104103.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2846_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.033","volume":"298","author":"E Theodorou","year":"2024","unstructured":"Theodorou E, Chronopoulou E, Ozturk O, Brunetti X, Serhal P, Ben-Nagi J. Impact of double trophectoderm biopsy on reproductive outcomes following single euploid blastocyst transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;298:35\u201340.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"2846_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.09.013","volume":"108","author":"CK Bradley","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bradley CK, Livingstone M, Traversa MV, McArthur SJ. Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:999\u20131006.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1839","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey282","volume":"33","author":"D Cimadomo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Romanelli V, Alviggi E, Levi-Setti PE, Albani E, Dusi L, Papini L, Livi C, Benini F, Smeraldi A, Patassini C, Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A. Inconclusive chromosomal assessment after blastocyst biopsy: prevalence, causative factors and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. A multicenter experience. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1839\u201346.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2846_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10016-1160","volume":"8","author":"H Bhadarka","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bhadarka H, Patel NH, Jadeja YD, Patel KB, Patel MN. Int J Infertility and Fetal Medicine. 2017;8:120\u20134.","journal-title":"Int J Infertility and Fetal Medicine"},{"key":"2846_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.07.235","volume":"110","author":"L Sekhon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sekhon L, MacAvey B, Lee J, Duke M, Flisser E, Copperman AB. Evaluating IVF and perinatal outcomes following repeat trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:E77\u20138.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05466-z","volume":"23","author":"H Ji","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ji H, Zhang MQ, Zhou Q, Zhang S, Dong L, Li XL, Zhao C, Ding H, Ling XF. Trophectoderm biopsy is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes rather than neonatal outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:141.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"22","key":"2846_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2047","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa2103613","volume":"385","author":"J Yan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Sun Y, Gong F, Li R, Sun X, Ling X, Li H, Hao C, Tan J, Yang J, Zhu Y, Liu F, Chen D, Wei D, Lu J, Ni T, Zhou W, Wu K, Gao Y, Shi Y, Lu Y, Zhang T, Wu W, Ma X, Ma H, Fu J, Zhang J, Meng Q, Zhang H, Legro RS, Chen ZJ. Live birth with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(22):2047\u201358.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"2846_CR25","first-page":"47","volume":"5","author":"K Van Heertum","year":"2024","unstructured":"Van Heertum K, DeVilbiss EA, Goldfarb J, Mumford SL, Weinerman R. Does embryo biopsy, independent of vitrification, impact perinatal outcomes? An analysis of perinatal outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing biopsy in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2024;5:47\u201354.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.07.016","volume":"44","author":"Y Hao","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hao Y, Long X, Kong F, Chen L, Chi H, Zhu X, Kuo Y, Zhu Y, Jia J, Yan L, Li R, Liu P, Wang Y, Qiao J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following blastocyst biopsy for PGT in single vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44:151\u201362.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2846_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"dead093 .060","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead093.060","volume":"38","author":"S Sites","year":"2023","unstructured":"Sites S. The impact of embryo biopsy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Human Reprod. 2023;38:dead093 .060.","journal-title":"Human Reprod."},{"key":"2846_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-020-05593-4","volume":"302","author":"FTS Elias","year":"2020","unstructured":"Elias FTS, Weber-Adrian D, Pudwell J, Carter J, Walker M, Gaudet L, Smith G, Velez MP. Neonatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived by fresh or frozen embryo transfer compared to spontaneous conceptions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;302:31\u201345.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"2846_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.02.080","volume":"109","author":"SA Neal","year":"2018","unstructured":"Neal SA, Morin SJ, Tiegs AW, Hong KH, Werner MD, Scott RT. Repeat biopsy for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) reanalysis does not adversely impact obstetrical outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2018;109: e41.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.07.773","volume":"116","author":"JG Kim","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kim JG, Jalas C, Zhan Y, Hanson BM, Herlihy NS, Klimczak AM, Margolis CK, Roberts LM, Hong K, Seli E, Scott RT. Neonatal outcomes are not impacted by a second trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2021;116: e288.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2022.01.012","volume":"44","author":"L Navarro-S\u00e1nchez","year":"2022","unstructured":"Navarro-S\u00e1nchez L, Garc\u00eda-Pascual C, Rubio C, Sim\u00f3n C. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies: an update. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44:817\u201328.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2846_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"840","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2021.02.046","volume":"115","author":"C Simon","year":"2021","unstructured":"Simon C. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent blastocyst media will substitute for trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:840.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0197262","volume":"13","author":"V Kuznyetsov","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kuznyetsov V, Madjunkova S, Antes R, Abramov R, Motamedi G, Ibarrientos Z, et al. Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0197262.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"2846_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7244","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-64335-3","volume":"10","author":"V Kuznyetsov","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kuznyetsov V, Madjunkova S, Abramov R. Minimally invasive cell-free human embryo aneuploidy testing (miPGT-A) utilizing combined spent embryo culture medium and blastocoel fluid - towards development of a clinical assay. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7244.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"2846_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.06.013","volume":"120","author":"C Cinnioglu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cinnioglu C, Glessner H, Jordan A, Bunshaft S. A systematic review of noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2023;120:235\u20139.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1","volume":"4","author":"D Moher","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"2846_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-017-0644-y","volume":"6","author":"WM Bramer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev. 2017;6:245.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"2846_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2020.07.005","volume":"127","author":"TF Frandsen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Frandsen TF, Bruun Nielsen MF, Lindhardt CL, Eriksen MB. Using the full PICO model as a search tool for systematic reviews resulted in lower recall for some PICO elements. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;127:69\u201375.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"2846_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-015-0125-0","volume":"4","author":"K Godin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hanning RM, Leatherdale ST. Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst Rev. 2015;4:138.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"2846_CR40","unstructured":"Wells GA, Shea B, O\u2019Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. 2012. Available from: http:\/\/www.ohrica\/programs\/clinical_epidemiology\/oxfordasp."},{"key":"2846_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1111\/jebm.12427","volume":"14","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Huang L, Wang D, Ren P, Hong Q, Kang D. The ROBINS-I and the NOS had similar reliability but differed in applicability: a random sampling observational studies of systematic reviews\/meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med. 2021;14:112\u201322.","journal-title":"J Evid Based Med"},{"key":"2846_CR42","unstructured":"Tyndall J. How low can you go? Toward a hierarchy of grey literature. In: Australian Library and Information Association Biennial Conference. Alice Springs; 2008."},{"key":"2846_CR43","volume-title":"AACODS checklist for appraising grey literature","author":"J Tyndall","year":"2010","unstructured":"Tyndall J. AACODS checklist for appraising grey literature. Adelaide: Flinders University; 2010."},{"key":"2846_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2219","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.918","volume":"20","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2001","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Whitehead A, Turner RM, Omar RZ, Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients. Stat Med. 2001;20:2219\u201341.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"2846_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"902","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.03.015","volume":"119","author":"S Lensen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lensen S. When to pool data in a meta-analysis (and when not to)? Fertil Steril. 2023;119:902\u20133.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2846_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1559","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1187","volume":"21","author":"SG Thompson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 2010;1:97\u2013111.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"2846_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.285063","volume":"311","author":"X Sun","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sun X, Ioannidis JP, Agoritsas T, Agoritsas T, Alba AC, Guyatt G. How to use a subgroup analysis: users\u2019 guide to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014;311:405\u201311.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"2846_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-020-0897-3","volume":"20","author":"H Harrison","year":"2020","unstructured":"Harrison H, Griffin SJ, Kuhn I, Usher-Smith JA. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20:7.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"2846_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6):e1000097.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed1000097.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed1000097"},{"key":"2846_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1","volume":"4","author":"D Moher","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4: 1.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"2846_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"g7647","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7647","volume":"350","author":"L Shamseer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647 Erratum in: BMJ. 2016 Jul 21;354:i4086.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2846_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"2846_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-024-03078-w","volume":"41","author":"C Guarneri","year":"2024","unstructured":"Guarneri C, Reschini M, Pinna M, Perego L, Sanzani E, Somigliana E, Sorrentino U, Cassina M, Zuccarello D, Ciaffaglione M. The impact of a second embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) with inconclusive results on pregnancy potential: results from a matched case-control study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024;41:1173\u20139.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"}],"container-title":["Systematic Reviews"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13643-025-02846-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13643-025-02846-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13643-025-02846-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]],"date-time":"2025-04-25T01:02:17Z","timestamp":1745542937000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13643-025-02846-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2846"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13643-025-02846-8","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-5253174\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2046-4053"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2046-4053","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 October 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 April 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 April 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"93"}}