{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,5]],"date-time":"2026-03-05T17:23:26Z","timestamp":1772731406683,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]],"date-time":"2026-02-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772064000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,5]],"date-time":"2026-03-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772668800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":7,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Perioper Med"],"DOI":"10.1186\/s13741-026-00657-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]],"date-time":"2026-02-26T00:16:07Z","timestamp":1772064967000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Retrolaminar versus erector spinae plane block for enhanced recovery after cesarean section: a retrospective study"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Serpil","family":"Bay\u0131nd\u0131r","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cengiz","family":"\u015eanl\u0131","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"657_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000798","volume":"43","author":"SD Adhikary","year":"2018","unstructured":"Adhikary SD, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block: magnetic resonance imaging and anatomical study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(7):756\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000798.","journal-title":"Reg Anesth Pain Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"657_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-022-01780-9","volume":"22","author":"KB Anyaehie","year":"2022","unstructured":"Anyaehie KB, Duryea E, Wang J, et al. Multimodal opioid-sparing pain management for emergent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia: a quality improvement project. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):239. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12871-022-01780-9.","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"657_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-022-02073-y","volume":"20","author":"Z Aydemir","year":"2022","unstructured":"Aydemir Z, Canbolat IP, \u00c7oruh A, G\u00fcng\u00f6rd\u00fc U, Co\u015fkun F. Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022;20(1):135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-022-02073-y.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"657_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671","volume":"6","author":"AP Betran","year":"2021","unstructured":"Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005671. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjgh-2021-005671.","journal-title":"BMJ Glob Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"657_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1362","DOI":"10.1213\/ANE.0000000000005257","volume":"132","author":"L Bollag","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bollag L, Lim G, Sultan P, et al. Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology: consensus statement and recommendations for enhanced recovery after cesarean. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(5):1362\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1213\/ANE.0000000000005257.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"2","key":"657_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.4103\/njcp.njcp_1636_21","volume":"26","author":"A Dostbil","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dostbil A, Ince I, Altinpulluk EY, et al. Analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block after cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Niger J Clin Pract. 2023;26(2):153\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/njcp.njcp_1636_21.","journal-title":"Niger J Clin Pract"},{"issue":"5","key":"657_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3599","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000002352","volume":"111","author":"Y Jing","year":"2025","unstructured":"Jing Y, Zhao S, Guo W, et al. Comparison of analgesic modalities after cesarean section: a network meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Surg. 2025;111(5):3599\u2013612. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JS9.0000000000002352.","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"657_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.joacp_71_23","volume":"40","author":"R Joshi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Joshi R, Jeevan R, Amutha SV, Ramakrishnan L, Natarajan NR. Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a prospective randomized non-inferiority clinical trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024;40(3):478\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_71_23.","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"issue":"1","key":"657_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.4103\/IJCN.IJCN_46_20","volume":"21","author":"RB Kutty","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kutty RB, Benjamin EE, Thomas E, Sebastian T. Effectiveness of early initiation of breastfeeding on maternal satisfaction among women undergoing cesarean section and the breastfeeding behavior of their newborns. Indian J Contin Nurs Educ. 2020;21(1):38\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/IJCN.IJCN_46_20.","journal-title":"Indian J Contin Nurs Educ"},{"key":"657_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kyenshilik D, Sar\u0131 S, G\u00fcla\u015ft\u0131 F, Umutlu Y. Comparison of the effects of retrolaminar block (RLB) and erector spinae plane (ESP) block on postoperative recovery quality and pain in lumbar spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-025-09273-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-025-09273-2"},{"issue":"1","key":"657_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.4103\/joacp.joacp_339_23","volume":"41","author":"MI Lestari","year":"2025","unstructured":"Lestari MI, Sari D, Chandra S, et al. Enhanced recovery after cesarean (ERAC) versus conventional care: an expanded systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,368 subjects. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025;41(1):48\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/joacp.joacp_339_23.","journal-title":"J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"657_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.2147\/JPR.S282500","volume":"14","author":"D Liu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Liu D, Xu X, Zhu Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block of multiple injections in retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Pain Res. 2021;14:333\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/JPR.S282500.","journal-title":"J Pain Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"657_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjane.2025.844606","volume":"75","author":"MA Mansour","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mansour MA, Baradwan S, Shama AA, et al. Erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2025;75(4):844606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjane.2025.844606.","journal-title":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition)"},{"issue":"5","key":"657_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"438","DOI":"10.1177\/20494637231181513","volume":"17","author":"M Mostafa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mostafa M, Nasr MA, Fawzy M, Awad AE, Waheeb MM. The analgesic effect of transmuscular quadratus lumborum block versus erector spinae plane block for women undergoing elective cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Pain. 2023;17(5):438\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/20494637231181513.","journal-title":"Br J Pain"},{"key":"657_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2019\/2578396","volume":"2019","author":"E Onishi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Onishi E, Toda N, Kameyama Y, Yamauchi M. Comparison of clinical efficacy and anatomical investigation between retrolaminar block and erector spinae plane block. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:2578396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2019\/2578396.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"issue":"1","key":"657_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-022-02073-y","volume":"20","author":"G Ozkan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ozkan G, Kara U, Ince ME, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022;20(1):155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-022-02073-y.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"657_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijoa.2022.103614","volume":"53","author":"TK Priya","year":"2023","unstructured":"Priya TK, Singla D, Talawar P, et al. Comparative efficacy of quadratus lumborum type-II and erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2023;53:103614. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijoa.2022.103614.","journal-title":"Int J Obstet Anesth"},{"issue":"4","key":"657_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjane.2021.09.015","volume":"72","author":"IDV Ribeiro Junior","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ribeiro Junior IDV, Carvalho VH, Brito LGO. Erector spinae plane block for analgesia after cesarean delivery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition). 2022;72(4):506\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bjane.2021.09.015.","journal-title":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition)"},{"key":"657_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1007\/s00540-020-02789-5","volume":"34","author":"D Shen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shen D, Hasegawa Moriyama M, Ishida K, Fuseya S, Tanaka S, Kawamata M. Acute postoperative pain is correlated with the early onset of postpartum depression after cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. J Anesth. 2020;34:607\u201312.","journal-title":"J Anesth"},{"issue":"1","key":"657_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1007\/s00540-020-02855-y","volume":"35","author":"S Sotome","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sotome S, Sawada A, Wada A, et al. Erector spinae plane block versus retrolaminar block for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2021;35(1):27\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00540-020-02855-y.","journal-title":"J Anesth"},{"issue":"1","key":"657_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000526","volume":"42","author":"H Ueshima","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ueshima H, Otake H. Similarities between the retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(1):123\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000526.","journal-title":"Reg Anesth Pain Med"},{"key":"657_CR22","first-page":"120","volume":"3","author":"MA Yilmaz","year":"2023","unstructured":"Yilmaz MA, Erol MK. Comparison of the effects of erector spina plane block and transversus abdominis plane block methods on postoperative analgesia in elective cesarean section with ultrasonography account. Int J Curr Med Biol Sci. 2023;3:120\u20139.","journal-title":"Int J Curr Med Biol Sci"},{"issue":"24","key":"657_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12247720","volume":"12","author":"BA Zanfini","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zanfini BA, Di Muro M, Biancone M, et al. Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. ultrasound-guided bilateral posterior quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section: an observational closed mixed cohort study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(24):7720. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm12247720.","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"657_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12871-023-02338-z","volume":"23","author":"X Zhu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhu X, Ye W, Chen J, et al. Comparative retrospective review of perioperative analgesia using ultrasound-guided programmed intermittent erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023;23:370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12871-023-02338-z.","journal-title":"BMC Anesthesiol"}],"container-title":["Perioperative Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s13741-026-00657-6","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13741-026-00657-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s13741-026-00657-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,5]],"date-time":"2026-03-05T16:27:29Z","timestamp":1772728049000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1186\/s13741-026-00657-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["657"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13741-026-00657-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["2047-0525"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2047-0525","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 February 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 February 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Decision No: 2025\/16\u201303) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Owing to the retrospective design and use of anonymized data, the requirement for individual informed consent was waived. The protocol is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07181902).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable. No individual person\u2019s data (images or identifiable information) are included.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"18"}}