{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]],"date-time":"2026-06-01T12:31:33Z","timestamp":1780317093538,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,3]],"date-time":"2017-07-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1499040000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100005648","name":"American Association of Orthodontists Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Biomedical Research Award"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Biomedical Research Award"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100005648","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Prog Orthod."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]},"DOI":"10.1186\/s40510-017-0171-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,2]],"date-time":"2017-06-02T06:46:12Z","timestamp":1496385972000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Comparison of surgical and non-surgical orthodontic treatment approaches on occlusal and cephalometric outcomes in patients with Class II Division I malocclusions"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Sheila","family":"Daniels","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Patrick","family":"Brady","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arya","family":"Daniels","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stacey","family":"Howes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kyungsup","family":"Shin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Satheesh","family":"Elangovan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Veerasathpurush","family":"Allareddy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"171_CR1","unstructured":"Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. New York: Mosby Elsevier; 2007. p. 1\u20137."},{"issue":"1","key":"171_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.17796\/jcpd.37.1.y75430328427210j","volume":"37","author":"PA Martins-Junior","year":"2012","unstructured":"Martins-Junior PA, Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML. Malocclusion: social, functional and emotional influence on children. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;37(1):103\u20138.","journal-title":"J Clin Pediatr Dent"},{"key":"171_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1179\/14653121141641","volume":"38","author":"J Seehara","year":"2011","unstructured":"Seehara J, Fleming PS, Newton T, DiBiase AT. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion, self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. J Orthod. 2011;38:247\u201356.","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"key":"171_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2012.10.015","volume":"3","author":"G Janson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Janson G, Sathler R, Fernandes TM, Branco NC, Freitas MR. Correction of Class II malocclusion with Class II elastics: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;3:383\u201392.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2010.04.028","volume":"1","author":"E Marsico","year":"2011","unstructured":"Marsico E, Gatto E, Burrascano M, Matarese G, Cordasco G. Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;1:24\u201336.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjq033","volume":"1","author":"L Perillo","year":"2011","unstructured":"Perillo L, Cannavale R, Ferro F, Franchi L, Masucci C, Chiodini P, Baccetti T. Meta-analysis of skeletal mandibular changes during Frankel appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2011;1:84\u201392.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"171_CR7","first-page":"1","volume":"7","author":"D Burden","year":"2007","unstructured":"Burden D, Johnston C, Kennedy D, Harradine N, Stevenson M. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treated with mandibular surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;7:1\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR8","first-page":"46","volume":"66","author":"G Kinzinger","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kinzinger G, Diedrich P. Skeletal effects in Class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA)? J Orofac Orthop. 2005;66:46\u201358.","journal-title":"J Orofac Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjl022","volume":"28","author":"B Lohrmann","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lohrmann B, Schwestka-Polly R, Nagerl H, Ihlow D, Kubein-Meesenburg D. The influence of orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables\u2014a comparative cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:553\u201360.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"171_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/16.4.275","volume":"16","author":"H Pancherz","year":"1994","unstructured":"Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:275\u201386.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"171_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2009.02.014","volume":"6","author":"T Baccetti","year":"2009","unstructured":"Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;6:698\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2006.04.050","volume":"4","author":"EA Sloss","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sloss EA, Southard KA, Qian F, Stock SE, Mann KR, Meyer DL, Southard TE. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;4:509\u201314.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1016\/0889-5406(93)70072-V","volume":"104","author":"DW Cassidy","year":"1993","unstructured":"Cassidy DW, Herbosa EG, Rotskoff KS, Johnston Jr LE. A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in \u201cborderline\u201d adults with class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:455\u201370.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.4041\/kjod.2014.44.3.136","volume":"3","author":"G Cacciatore","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cacciatore G, Alvetro L, Defraia E, Ghislanzoni LTH, Franchi L. Active-treatment effects of the forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive class II correction in growing patients. Korean J Orthod. 2014;3:136\u201342.","journal-title":"Korean J Orthod"},{"key":"171_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1010","DOI":"10.2319\/112613-867.1","volume":"84","author":"G Cacciatore","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cacciatore G, Ghislanzoni LTH, Alvetro L, Giuntini V, Franchi L. Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the forsus appliance: a controlled clinical study. Angle Orthodontist. 2014;84:1010\u20137.","journal-title":"Angle Orthodontist"},{"key":"171_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2010.02.036","volume":"2","author":"TG Wigal","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wigal TG, Dischinger T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Stability of class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: skeletal and dental changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;2:210\u201323.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR17","first-page":"250","volume":"95","author":"JL Berger","year":"2005","unstructured":"Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, George C, Kaczynski R. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;95:250\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1590\/S1678-77572010000400013","volume":"18","author":"G Janson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Janson G, Sathler R, Fernandes TMF, Zanda M, Pinzan A. Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18:397\u2013402.","journal-title":"J Appl Oral Sci"},{"key":"171_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1067\/mod.2003.43","volume":"3","author":"CA Mihalik","year":"2003","unstructured":"Mihalik CA, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Long-term follow-up of class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;3:266\u201378.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/s00056-009-0821-2","volume":"1","author":"G Kinzinger","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kinzinger G, Frye L, Diedrich P. Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery-a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects. J Orofac Orthop. 2009;1:63\u201391.","journal-title":"J Orofac Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/0278-2391(95)90071-3","volume":"5","author":"MR Tucker","year":"1995","unstructured":"Tucker MR. Orthognathic surgery versus orthodontic camouflage in the treatment of mandibular deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;5:572\u20138.","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"171_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.1016\/0889-5406(92)70131-S","volume":"6","author":"WR Proffit","year":"1992","unstructured":"Proffit WR, Phillips C, Douvartzidis N. A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;6:556\u201365.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcms.2012.10.001","volume":"4","author":"L Lir Ade de","year":"2013","unstructured":"de Lir Ade L, de Moura WL, Oliveira Ruellas AC, Gomes Souza MM, Nojima LI. Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of class II and class III malocclusion. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;4:296\u2013302.","journal-title":"J Craniomaxillofac Surg"},{"key":"171_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joms.2010.07.022","volume":"5","author":"EW Ko","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ko EW, Hsu SS, Hsieh HY, Wang YC, Huang CS, Chen YR. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;5:1469\u201377.","journal-title":"J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"171_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2012.03.022","volume":"2","author":"DT Millett","year":"2012","unstructured":"Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, Benson PE, de Oliveira CM. Treatment and stability of class II division 2 malocclusion in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;2:159\u201369.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1084","DOI":"10.2319\/110308-556R.1","volume":"6","author":"A Chaiyongsirisern","year":"2009","unstructured":"Chaiyongsirisern A, Rabie AB, Wong RW. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult class II patients. Angle Orthodontist. 2009;6:1084\u201394.","journal-title":"Angle Orthodontist"},{"issue":"5","key":"171_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"771","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2016.04.024","volume":"150","author":"ED Zervas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zervas ED, Galang-Boquiren MT, Obrez A, Costa Viana MG, Oppermann N, Sanchez F, Romero EG, Kusnoto B. Change in the vertical dimension of class II division 1 patients after use of cervical or high-pull headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150(5):771\u201381.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kinzinger GS., Lisson JA., Frye L., Gross U., Hourfar J. A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: functional mandibular advancer vs. Herbst appliance. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Apr 1. [Epub ahead of print].","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-017-2111-5"},{"issue":"2","key":"171_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.2319\/040315-225.1","volume":"86","author":"M Celikoglu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Celikoglu M, Buyuk SK, Ekizer A, Unal T. Treatment effects of skeletally anchored forsus FRD EZ and Herbst appliances: a retrospective clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(2):306\u201314.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"issue":"2","key":"171_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjt013","volume":"36","author":"A Baysal","year":"2014","unstructured":"Baysal A, Uysal T. Dentoskeletal effects of twin block and Herbst appliances in patients with class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36(2):164\u201372.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"issue":"5","key":"171_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.2319\/090514-624.1","volume":"85","author":"V Giuntini","year":"2015","unstructured":"Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, Masucci C, Defraia E, McNamara Jr JA, Franchi L. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance vs the forsus fatigue resistant device in growing class II patients. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):784\u20139.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"171_CR32","first-page":"209","volume":"7","author":"WR Proffit","year":"1992","unstructured":"Proffit WR, Phillips C, Tulloch JF, Medland PH. Surgical versus orthodontic correction of skeletal class II malocclusion in adolescents: effects and indications. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1992;7:209\u201320.","journal-title":"Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"171_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1007\/s00056-016-0031-7","volume":"77","author":"H Cansunar","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cansunar H, Uysal T. Outcomes of different class II treatments: comparisons using the American Board of Orthodontics Model Grading System. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77(4):233\u201341.","journal-title":"J Orofac Orthop"},{"key":"171_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/70.1.41","volume":"70","author":"PR Rosenbaum","year":"1983","unstructured":"Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70:41\u201355.","journal-title":"Biometrika"},{"key":"171_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1016\/S1073-8746(99)80017-6","volume":"5","author":"C Tulloch","year":"1999","unstructured":"Tulloch C, Lenz B, Phillips C. Surgical versus orthodontic correction for class II patients: age and severity in treatment planning and treatment outcome. Semin Orthod. 1999;5:231\u20139.","journal-title":"Semin Orthod"}],"container-title":["Progress in Orthodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40510-017-0171-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40510-017-0171-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40510-017-0171-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2017,6,2]],"date-time":"2017-06-02T06:46:30Z","timestamp":1496385990000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/progressinorthodontics.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40510-017-0171-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,3]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,12]]}},"alternative-id":["171"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40510-017-0171-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["2196-1042"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2196-1042","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,3]]},"article-number":"16"}}