{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T09:57:27Z","timestamp":1791453447803,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1629072000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]],"date-time":"2021-08-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1629072000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Prog Orthod."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Excessive proclination of lower incisors and other undesirable consequences usually result from the use of class II elastics during orthodontic treatment. The purpose of this study was to attempt to limit the adverse effects of class II elastics by the use of mini implants placed in the mandibular arch in adolescent class II female patients.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The sample comprised 28 patients, (a mean age of 15.66 \u00b1 2 years for intervention group and 15.1 \u00b1 2.2 years for conventional group) with one-fourth or one-half unit class II canine relationship. The sample was divided into two equal groups. Randomization was carried out by a computer sequence generator with a 1:1 allocation ratio. In the intervention group, the mini implants were inserted between the lower second premolar and first molar, while the conventional group underwent regular class II elastics therapy. The active elastics treatment time was 8 months for both groups. Results were assessed by measurements from pre- and post-elastics lateral cephalometric radiographs.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The change in L1 inclination (0.97 \u00b1 0.92\u00b0) and L1 AP position (0.31 \u00b1 0.63 mm) did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups, but a statistically significant difference was found in the U1 retroclination (5.23 \u00b1 1.92\u00b0) and U1 distal movement (4.05 \u00b1 1.4 mm) [P \u02c2 0.001] and [P \u02c2 0.05] respectively in favor of the intervention group.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Mini-implants in conjunction with class II elastics had no skeletal effect, mainly dentoalveolar and it did not prevent the proclination of lower incisors. There was more distal movement in the upper incisors in the skeletal anchorage group which helped in enhancing the camouflaging of class II malocclusion.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Trial registration<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Trial registered \u201cFUE.REC (10)\/10-2018\u201d at the FUE registration council for clinical trials\/IOP Orthodontic Program October 2018.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40510-021-00368-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,15]],"date-time":"2021-08-15T23:03:21Z","timestamp":1629068601000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["The efficiency of mandibular mini-implants in reducing adverse effects of class II elastics in adolescent female patients: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Mostafa M.","family":"El-Dawlatly","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohamed A.","family":"Mabrouk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Amr","family":"ElDakroury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yehya A.","family":"Mostafa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"368_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40.e1","DOI":"10.1590\/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl","volume":"23","author":"MS Alhammadi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018;23(6):40.e1\u201340.e10.","journal-title":"Dental Press J Orthod"},{"issue":"6","key":"368_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1590\/2177-6709.20.6.075-081.oar","volume":"20","author":"F Bilgic","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bilgic F, Gelgor IE, Celebi AA. Malocclusion prevalence and orthodontic treatment need in central Anatolian adolescents compared to European and other nations' adolescents. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20(6):75\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/2177-6709.20.6.075-081.oar.","journal-title":"Dental Press J Orthod."},{"issue":"5","key":"368_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9416(80)90299-7","volume":"78","author":"RE Moyers","year":"1980","unstructured":"Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, Wainright RL, Bookstein FL. Differential diagnosis of Class II malocclusions: Part 1. Facial types associated with Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1980;78(5):477\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9416(80)90299-7.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod."},{"issue":"2","key":"368_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.2319\/030607-115.1","volume":"78","author":"G Jones","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jones G, Buschang PH, Kim KB, Oliver DR. Class II non-extraction patients treated with the forsus fatigue resistant device versus intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(2):332\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2319\/030607-115.1.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod."},{"issue":"3","key":"368_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.2319\/070216-518.1","volume":"87","author":"I Aras","year":"2017","unstructured":"Aras I, Pasaoglu A. Class II subdivision treatment with the forsus fatigue resistant device vs intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(3):371\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2319\/070216-518.1.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod."},{"issue":"Suppl 2","key":"368_CR6","first-page":"S216","volume":"9","author":"A Manni","year":"2012","unstructured":"Manni A, Pasini M, Mauro C. Comparison between Herbst appliances with or without miniscrew anchorage. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012;9(Suppl 2):S216\u201321.","journal-title":"Dent Res J (Isfahan)."},{"key":"368_CR7","unstructured":"Luzi C, Valeriano L, Melsen B. The miniscrew-anchored herbst. 2012; Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO, (July 2016)."},{"issue":"2","key":"368_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.2319\/012515-55.1","volume":"86","author":"SA Elkordy","year":"2016","unstructured":"Elkordy SA, Abouelezz AM, Fayed MMS, Attia KH, Ishaq RAR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant-anchored Forsus fatigue resistant device: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(2):292\u2013305. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2319\/012515-55.1.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod."},{"key":"368_CR9","volume-title":"Optimization of orthodontic elastics","author":"M Langlade","year":"2000","unstructured":"Langlade M. Optimization of orthodontic elastics. New York: GAC International Ed; 2000."},{"key":"368_CR10","unstructured":"Bratu CD, Fleser C, Glavan F. The effect on intermaxillary elastics in orthodontic therapy. 2004;54(4):406\u20139."},{"issue":"3","key":"368_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2012.10.015","volume":"143","author":"G Janson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Janson G, Sathler R, Fernandes T, Castello Branco N, Freitas M. Correction of class ii malocclusion with class ii elastics: a systematic review. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(3):383\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2012.10.015.","journal-title":"Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop."},{"issue":"5","key":"368_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"939","DOI":"10.2319\/121009-709.1","volume":"80","author":"MM Fayed","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(5):939\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2319\/121009-709.1.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod."},{"key":"368_CR13","first-page":"70","volume":"167","author":"M Leo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Leo M, Cerroni L, Pasquantonio G. saverio giovanni cond\u00f2, Condo R. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in orthodontics: review of the factors that influences the clinical success rate of the mini-implants. Clin. Ter. 2016;167:70\u20137.","journal-title":"Ter."},{"issue":"2","key":"368_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2018.09.021","volume":"157","author":"A Saga","year":"2020","unstructured":"Saga A, Ara\u00fajo E, Antelo O, Meira T, Tanaka O. Nonsurgical treatment of skeletal maxillary protrusion with gummy smile using headgear for growth control, mini-implants as anchorage for maxillary incisor intrusion, and premolar extractions for incisor retraction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2020;157(2):245\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2018.09.021.","journal-title":"Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop."},{"issue":"5","key":"368_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"617","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2018.11.015","volume":"156","author":"A Manni","year":"2019","unstructured":"Manni A, Migliorati M, Calzolari C, Silvestrini-Biavati A. Herbst appliance anchored to miniscrews in the upper and lower arches vs standard Herbst: A pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;156(5):617\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2018.11.015.","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop."},{"issue":"5","key":"368_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjv081","volume":"38","author":"SA Elkordy","year":"2016","unstructured":"Elkordy SA, Aboelnaga AA, Fayed MM, AboulFotouh MH, Abouelezz AM. Can the use of skeletal anchors in conjunction with fixed functional appliances promote skeletal changes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(5):532\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/cjv081.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod."}],"container-title":["Progress in Orthodontics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40510-021-00368-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40510-021-00368-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40510-021-00368-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,15]],"date-time":"2021-08-15T23:11:32Z","timestamp":1629069092000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/progressinorthodontics.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40510-021-00368-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["368"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40510-021-00368-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2196-1042"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2196-1042","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 November 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 June 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 August 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Ethical approval was obtained from the Future University before the start of treatment. The number of the approval was FUE. REC. (10)\/10-2018.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Consent was obtained from the patient\u2019s parents, as they were adolescents, before their recruitment.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"27"}}