{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,12]],"date-time":"2026-05-12T17:57:13Z","timestamp":1778608633153,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,28]],"date-time":"2020-04-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1588032000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,28]],"date-time":"2020-04-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1588032000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003725","name":"National Research Foundation of Korea","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["NRF-2017R1A2B4010178"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NRF-2017R1A2B4010178"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003725","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Cancer Imaging"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Computer-aided detection (CAD) can detect breast lesions by using an enhancement threshold. Threshold means the percentage of increased signal intensity in post-contrast imaging compared to precontrast imaging. If the pixel value of the enhanced tumor increases above the set threshold, CAD provides the size of the tumor, which is calculated differently depending on the set threshold. Therefore, CAD requires the accurate setting of thresholds. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size measurement using MRI and CAD with 3 most commonly used thresholds and to identify which threshold is appropriate on CAD in breast cancer patients.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 130 patients with breast cancers (80 invasive cancers and 50 ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) who underwent preoperative MRI with CAD and surgical treatment were included. Tumor size was manually measured on first contrast-enhanced MRI and acquired by CAD using 3 different thresholds (30, 50, and 100%) for each tumor. Tumor size measurements using MRI and CAD were compared with pathological sizes using Spearman correlation analysis. For comparison of size discrepancy between imaging and pathology, concordance was defined as estimation of size by imaging within 5\u2009mm of the pathological size. Concordance rates were compared using Chi-square test.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>For both invasive cancers and DCIS, correlation coefficient rho (<jats:italic>r<\/jats:italic>) between tumor size on imaging and pathology was highest at CAD with 30% threshold, followed by MRI, CAD with 50% threshold, and CAD with 100% threshold (all <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u2009\u00a00.05). For invasive cancers, the concordance rate of 72.5% at CAD with 30% threshold showed no difference with that of 62.5% at MRI (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.213). For DCIS, the concordance rate of 30.0% at CAD with 30% threshold showed no difference with that of 36.0% at MRI (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.699). Compared to MRI, higher risk of underestimation was noted when using CAD with 50% or 100% threshold for invasive cancers and when using CAD with 100% threshold for DCIS.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>For CAD analysis, 30% threshold is the most appropriate threshold whose accuracy is comparable to manual measurement on MRI for tumor size measurement. However, clinicians should be aware of the higher risk of underestimation when using CAD with 50% threshold for tumor staging in invasive cancers.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40644-020-00307-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,28]],"date-time":"2020-04-28T18:04:26Z","timestamp":1588097066000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Preoperative tumor size measurement in breast cancer patients: which threshold is appropriate on computer-aided detection for breast MRI?"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Sung Eun","family":"Song","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bo Kyoung","family":"Seo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kyu Ran","family":"Cho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ok Hee","family":"Woo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eun Kyung","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jaehyung","family":"Cha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Seungju","family":"Han","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,28]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"307_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<259::AID-CNCR2820760216>3.0.CO;2-2","volume":"76","author":"MC Smitt","year":"1995","unstructured":"Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer. 1995;76(2):259\u201367.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"9","key":"307_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1921","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<1921::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-#","volume":"78","author":"I Gage","year":"1996","unstructured":"Gage I, Schnitt SJ, Nixon AJ, et al. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 1996;78(9):1921\u20138.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"307_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"302","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2012.01.004","volume":"38","author":"R Mullen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mullen R, Macaskill EJ, Khalil A, et al. Involved anterior margins after breast conserving surgery: is re-excision required? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(4):302\u20136.","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"307_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-008-9890-y","volume":"112","author":"T Uematsu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112(3):461\u201374.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"issue":"3","key":"307_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2333031484","volume":"233","author":"WA Berg","year":"2004","unstructured":"Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233(3):830\u201349.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"8","key":"307_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2572","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-012-2289-3","volume":"19","author":"HC Shin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Shin HC, Han W, Moon HG, et al. Limited value and utility of breast MRI in patients undergoing breast-conserving cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2572\u20139.","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"2","key":"307_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-017-4252-2","volume":"164","author":"OK Daniel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Daniel OK, Lim SM, Kim JH, et al. Preoperative prediction of the size of pure ductal carcinoma in situ using three imaging modalities as compared to histopathological size: does magnetic resonance imaging add value? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;164(2):437\u201344.","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"307_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s40644-015-0036-2","volume":"15","author":"SE Song","year":"2015","unstructured":"Song SE, Seo BK, Cho KR, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) system for breast MRI in assessment of local tumor extent, nodal status, and multifocality of invasive breast cancers: preliminary study. Cancer Imaging. 2015;15:1.","journal-title":"Cancer Imaging"},{"issue":"5","key":"307_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1457","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3935-5","volume":"26","author":"M Rominger","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rominger M, Berg D, Frauenfelder T, et al. Which factors influence MRI-pathology concordance of tumour size measurements in breast cancer? Eur Radiol. 2016;26(5):1457\u201365.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"19","key":"307_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3248","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2007.15.2108","volume":"26","author":"N Houssami","year":"2008","unstructured":"Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(19):3248\u201358.","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"12","key":"307_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3816","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-4424-4","volume":"22","author":"HW Lai","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lai HW, Chen DR, Wu YC, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with Sonography in the prediction of breast Cancer tumor size: a concordance analysis with Histopathologically determined tumor size. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3816\u201323.","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"307_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1316","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.20768","volume":"24","author":"MJ Beresford","year":"2006","unstructured":"Beresford MJ, Padhani AR, Taylor NJ, et al. Inter- and intraobserver variability in the evaluation of dynamic breast cancer MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24(6):1316\u201325.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"307_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1600","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-011-2091-9","volume":"21","author":"MD Dorrius","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dorrius MD, Jansen-van der Weide MC, van Ooijen PM, et al. Computer-aided detection in breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1600\u20138.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"307_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1064","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2009.03.018","volume":"16","author":"JE Levman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Levman JE, Causer P, Warner E, et al. Effect of the enhancement threshold on the computer-aided detection of breast cancer using MRI. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:1064\u20139.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"key":"307_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.05.0269","volume":"187","author":"CD Lehman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, et al. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:51\u20136.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"307_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2441060634","volume":"244","author":"TC Williams","year":"2007","unstructured":"Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, et al. Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology. 2007;244:94\u2013103.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"4","key":"307_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2008.10.007","volume":"16","author":"PA Baltzer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Baltzer PA, Renz DM, Kullnig PE, et al. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis? Acad Radiol. 2009;16(4):435\u201342.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"307_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1070","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2009.03.017","volume":"16","author":"PA Baltzer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Baltzer PA, Freiberg C, Beger S, et al. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach. Acad Radiol. 2009;16(9):1070\u20136.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"307_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1166","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2009.08.003","volume":"64","author":"T Arazi-Kleinman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Arazi-Kleinman T, Causer PA, Jong RA, et al. Can breast MRI computer-aided detection (CAD) improve radiologist accuracy for lesions detected at MRI screening and recommended for biopsy in a high-risk population? Clin Radiol. 2009;64(12):1166\u201374.","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"307_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-009-1573-5","volume":"20","author":"C Meeuwis","year":"2010","unstructured":"Meeuwis C, van de Ven SM, Stapper G, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) for breast MRI: evaluation of efficacy at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(3):522\u20138.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"307_CR21","volume-title":"American College of Radiology (eds) ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system","author":"EA Morris","year":"2013","unstructured":"Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH. ACR BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging. In: CJ D\u2019O, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, editors. American College of Radiology (eds) ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013."},{"issue":"6","key":"307_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.5858\/134.6.907","volume":"134","author":"ME Hammond","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology\/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134(6):907\u201322.","journal-title":"Arch Pathol Lab Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"307_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.5858\/133.1.13","volume":"133","author":"SC Lester","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lester SC, Connolly JL, Amin MB. College of American Pathologists protocol for the reporting of ductal carcinoma in situ. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(1):13\u20134.","journal-title":"Arch Pathol Lab Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"307_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2008.07.028","volume":"196","author":"JK Onesti","year":"2008","unstructured":"Onesti JK, Mangus BE, Helmer SD, et al. Breast cancer tumor size: correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and pathology measurements. Am J Surg. 2008;196(6):844\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"307_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.197.3.7480749","volume":"197","author":"C Boetes","year":"1995","unstructured":"Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995;197(3):743\u20137.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"issue":"6","key":"307_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-002-1718-2","volume":"13","author":"M Kristoffersen Wiberg","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Aspelin P, et al. Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(6):1207\u201312.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"issue":"7","key":"307_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acra.2005.03.055","volume":"12","author":"WB Demartini","year":"2005","unstructured":"Demartini WB, Lehman CD, Peacock S, et al. Computer-aided detection applied to breast MRI: assessment of CAD-generated enhancement and tumor sizes in breast cancers before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acad Radiol. 2005;12(7):806\u201314.","journal-title":"Acad Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"307_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.3348\/kjr.2011.12.1.34","volume":"12","author":"CY Lyou","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lyou CY, Cho N, Kim SM, et al. Computer-aided evaluation of breast MRI for the residual tumor extent and response monitoring in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12(1):34\u201343.","journal-title":"Korean J Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"307_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.3348\/kjr.2007.8.1.32","volume":"8","author":"DY Kim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kim DY, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. MRI of the breast for the detection and assessment of the size of ductal carcinoma in situ. Korean J Radiol. 2007;8(1):32\u20139.","journal-title":"Korean J Radiol"},{"key":"307_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.3779","volume":"191","author":"S Raza","year":"2008","unstructured":"Raza S, Vallejo M, Chikarmane SA, et al. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:689\u201399.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"3","key":"307_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2453062061","volume":"245","author":"SA Jansen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, et al. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology. 2007;245(3):684\u201391.","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"307_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1450","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.5027","volume":"196","author":"JA Kim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kim JA, Son EJ, Youk JH, et al. MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1450\u20136.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"1","key":"307_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e86676","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0086676","volume":"9","author":"YZ Jiang","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jiang YZ, Xia C, Peng WT, et al. Preoperative measurement of breast cancer overestimates tumor size compared to pathological measurement. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86676. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0086676 eCollection 2014.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"2","key":"307_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2007.04.020","volume":"34","author":"RM Mann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mann RM, Veltman J, Barentsz JO, et al. The value of MRI compared to mammography in the assessment of tumour extent in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(2):135\u201342.","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"307_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1157","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.21570","volume":"28","author":"H Yabuuchi","year":"2008","unstructured":"Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, et al. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusionweighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(5):1157\u201365.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"issue":"1","key":"307_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1002\/nbm.1273","volume":"22","author":"LW Turnbull","year":"2009","unstructured":"Turnbull LW. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. NMR Biomed. 2009;22(1):28\u201339.","journal-title":"NMR Biomed"},{"issue":"12","key":"307_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2834","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-006-0348-5","volume":"16","author":"EA Hauth","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hauth EA, Jaeger H, Maderwald S, et al. Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast enhanced MR mammography. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(12):2834\u2013284.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"}],"container-title":["Cancer Imaging"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40644-020-00307-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40644-020-00307-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40644-020-00307-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,27]],"date-time":"2021-04-27T23:14:37Z","timestamp":1619565277000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/cancerimagingjournal.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40644-020-00307-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,28]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"alternative-id":["307"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40644-020-00307-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1470-7330"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1470-7330","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 December 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 April 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 April 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This retrospective study was approved by institutional review board of the hospital (IRB No.2017AS0037).","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"32"}}