{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,18]],"date-time":"2026-08-18T02:44:40Z","timestamp":1787021080683,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,3]],"date-time":"2023-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672704000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,3]],"date-time":"2023-01-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672704000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"the EYE & ENT Hospital of Fudan University High-level Talents Program","award":["2021318"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2021318"]}]},{"name":"Clinical Research Plan of SHDC","award":["SHDC2020CR1043B"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SHDC2020CR1043B"]}]},{"name":"Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology","award":["2020-015"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2020-015"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["82271048"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["82271048"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"name":"Shanghai Science and Technology","award":["22S11900200"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["22S11900200"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eye and Vis"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To systematically compare and rank ocular measurements with optical and ultrasound biometers\u00a0based on big data.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the US trial registry (\n                      <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"http:\/\/www.ClinicalTrial.gov\">www.ClinicalTrial.gov<\/jats:ext-link>\n                      ) were used to systematically search trials published up to October 22nd, 2020. We included comparative studies reporting the following parameters measured by at least two devices: axial length (AL), flattest meridian keratometry (Kf), steepest meridian keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), astigmatism (AST), astigmatism vectors J\n                      <jats:sub>0<\/jats:sub>\n                      and J\n                      <jats:sub>45<\/jats:sub>\n                      , anterior chamber depth (ACD), aqueous depth (AQD), central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal diameter (CD) and lens thickness (LT). A network-based big data analysis was conducted using STATA version 13.1.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Across 129 studies involving 17,181 eyes, 12 optical biometers and two ultrasound biometers (with both contact and immersion techniques) were identified. A network meta-analysis for AL and ACD measurements found that statistically significant differences existed when contact ultrasound biometry was compared with the optical biometers. There were no statistically significant differences among the four swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) based devices (IOLMaster 700, OA-2000, Argos and ANTERION). As for Ks, Km and CD, statistically significant differences were found when the Pentacam AXL was compared with the IOLMaster and IOLMaster 500. There were statistically significant differences for CCT when the OA-2000 was compared to Pentacam AXL, IOLMaster 700, Lenstar, AL-Scan and Galilei G6.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>For AL and ACD, contact ultrasound biometry obtains the lower values compared with optical biometers. The Pentacam AXL achieves the lowest values for keratometry and CD. The smallest value for CCT measurement is found with the OA-2000.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-022-00320-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,2]],"date-time":"2023-01-02T22:02:56Z","timestamp":1672696976000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Comprehensive comparisons of ocular biometry: A\u00a0network-based big data\u00a0analysis"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Jinjin","family":"Yu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daizong","family":"Wen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jing","family":"Zhao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yiran","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ke","family":"Feng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ting","family":"Wan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giacomo","family":"Savini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Colm","family":"McAlinden","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xuanqiao","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lingling","family":"Niu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sisi","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Qingyi","family":"Gao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rui","family":"Ning","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yili","family":"Jin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xingtao","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9952-3175","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jinhai","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"320_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2016.09.019","volume":"173","author":"C McAlinden","year":"2017","unstructured":"McAlinden C, Wang Q, Gao R, Zhao W, Yu A, Li Y, et al. Axial length measurement failure rates with biometers using swept-source optical coherence tomography compared to partial-coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence interferometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;173:64\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"6","key":"320_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0128929","volume":"10","author":"C McAlinden","year":"2015","unstructured":"McAlinden C, Wang Q, Pesudovs K, Yang X, Bao F, Yu A, et al. Axial length measurement failure rates with the IOLMaster and Lenstar LS 900 in eyes with cataract. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0128929.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"320_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-015-0014-6","volume":"2","author":"S Arba Mosquera","year":"2015","unstructured":"Arba Mosquera S, Verma S, McAlinden C. Centration axis in refractive surgery. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015;2:4.","journal-title":"Eye Vis (Lond)"},{"issue":"5","key":"320_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.3928\/0191-3913-19960901-06","volume":"33","author":"DK Wallace","year":"1996","unstructured":"Wallace DK, Plager DA. Corneal diameter in childhood aphakic glaucoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1996;33(5):230\u20134.","journal-title":"J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus"},{"issue":"6","key":"320_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1080\/17434440.2018.1481745","volume":"15","author":"T Ferrer-Blasco","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ferrer-Blasco T, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Mart\u00ednez-Albert N, Alfonso JF, Mont\u00e9s-Mic\u00f3 R. Agreement of white-to-white measurements with the IOLMaster 700, Atlas 9000, and Sirius systems. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15(6):453\u20139.","journal-title":"Expert Rev Med Devices"},{"issue":"5","key":"320_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"472","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x","volume":"85","author":"T Olsen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):472\u201385.","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol Scand"},{"issue":"1","key":"320_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sjopt.2011.11.007","volume":"26","author":"W Haigis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Haigis W. Challenges and approaches in modern biometry and IOL calculation. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012;26(1):7\u201312.","journal-title":"Saudi J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"320_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/S0886-3350(13)80737-7","volume":"16","author":"U Giers","year":"1990","unstructured":"Giers U, Epple C. Comparison of A-scan device accuracy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(2):235\u201342.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"320_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(98)00113-5","volume":"126","author":"W Drexler","year":"1998","unstructured":"Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, Rainer G, Vass C, Hitzenberger CK, et al. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):524\u201334.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"6","key":"320_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1159\/000153419","volume":"222","author":"EI Akduman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Akduman EI, Nacke RE, Leiva PM, Akduman L. Accuracy of ocular axial length measurement with MRI. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(6):397\u20139.","journal-title":"Ophthalmologica"},{"issue":"9","key":"320_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2015-307779","volume":"100","author":"A Akman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Akman A, Asena L, G\u00fcng\u00f6r SG. Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(9):1201\u20135.","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"320_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1499","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.10.053","volume":"114","author":"L Attas-Fox","year":"2007","unstructured":"Attas-Fox L, Zadok D, Gerber Y, Morad Y, Eting E, Benamou N, et al. Axial length measurement in eyes with diabetic macular edema: A-scan ultrasound versus IOLMaster. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(8):1499\u2013504.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"320_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.10.041","volume":"3","author":"YA Chen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chen YA, Hirnschall N, Findl O. Evaluation of 2 new optical biometry devices and comparison with the current gold standard biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;3:513\u20137.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"320_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20160712-03","volume":"32","author":"KJ Hoffer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hoffer KJ, Savini G. Comparison of AL-Scan and IOLMaster 500 partial coherence interferometry optical biometers. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(10):694\u20138.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"320_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1691","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e3182772f4f","volume":"89","author":"J Huang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Huang J, McAlinden C, Su B, Pesudovs K, Feng Y, Hua Y, et al. The effect of cycloplegia on the Lenstar and the IOLMaster biometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(12):1691\u20136.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"320_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000000799","volume":"93","author":"MC Shin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shin MC, Chung SY, Hwang HS, Han KE. Comparison of two optical biometers. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(3):259\u201365.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"320_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2017.03.007","volume":"40","author":"S Sel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sel S, Stange J, Kaiser D, Kiraly L. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40(5):318\u201322.","journal-title":"Cont Lens Anterior Eye"},{"key":"320_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43414","DOI":"10.1038\/srep43414","volume":"7","author":"J Huang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Huang J, McAlinden C, Huang Y, Wen D, Savini G, Tu R, et al. Meta-analysis of optical low-coherence reflectometry versus partial coherence interferometry biometry. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43414.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"11","key":"320_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-2385","volume":"162","author":"B Hutton","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777\u201384.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"320_CR20","first-page":"496","volume":"4","author":"XT Zeng","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zeng XT, Zhuang LP, Yang ZG, Dong SJ. Meta Analysis Series 7: quality evaluation tools for non-randomized experimental studies, diagnostic studies and animal experiments. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2012;4:496\u20139.","journal-title":"Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi"},{"issue":"7414","key":"320_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557\u201360.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"320_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1054","volume":"3","author":"G van Valkenhoef","year":"2012","unstructured":"van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, Hillege H, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3:285\u201399.","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"issue":"2","key":"320_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016","volume":"64","author":"G Salanti","year":"2011","unstructured":"Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163\u201371.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"7\u20138","key":"320_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"932","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.3767","volume":"29","author":"S Dias","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29(7\u20138):932\u201344.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"7109","key":"320_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","volume":"315","author":"M Egger","year":"1997","unstructured":"Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629\u201334.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"320_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000000781","volume":"93","author":"A Alvani","year":"2015","unstructured":"Alvani A, Pakravan M, Esfandiari H, Yaseri M, Yazdani S, Ghahari E. Biometric changes after trabeculectomy with contact and non-contact biometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2015;93(2):136\u201340.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"issue":"8","key":"320_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"912","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e31821cc4d6","volume":"88","author":"H Gursoy","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gursoy H, Sahin A, Basmak H, Ozer A, Yildirim N, Colak E. Lenstar versus ultrasound for ocular biometry in a pediatric population. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(8):912\u20139.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"320_CR28","first-page":"594","volume":"16","author":"J Zhang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhang J, Lian JC, Zhang SS, Yu Q, Zhou JB. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using the Lenstar, Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry methods in cataract patients. Int Eye Sci. 2016;16:594\u20139.","journal-title":"Int Eye Sci"},{"issue":"9","key":"320_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20110202-01","volume":"27","author":"R Mont\u00e9s-Mic\u00f3","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mont\u00e9s-Mic\u00f3 R, Carones F, Buttacchio A, Ferrer-Blasco T, Madrid-Costa D. Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(9):665\u201371.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"320_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0b013e3282f1c5ad","volume":"19","author":"AC Lee","year":"2008","unstructured":"Lee AC, Qazi MA, Pepose JS. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(1):13\u20137.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"11","key":"320_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2184","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2013.04.007","volume":"120","author":"I Grulkowski","year":"2013","unstructured":"Grulkowski I, Liu JJ, Zhang JY, Potsaid B, Jayaraman V, Cable AE, et al. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(11):2184\u201390.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"6","key":"320_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000551","volume":"47","author":"R Mont\u00e9s-Mic\u00f3","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mont\u00e9s-Mic\u00f3 R, Pastor-Pascual F, Ruiz-Mesa R, Ta\u00f1\u00e1-Rivero P. Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(6):802\u201314.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"320_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1406","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.08.016","volume":"43","author":"R Ruiz-Mesa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ruiz-Mesa R, Abeng\u00f3zar-Vela A, Ruiz-Santos M. Comparison of a new Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometer and a low-coherence reflectometry biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(11):1406\u201312.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"320_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-018-0927-x","volume":"39","author":"M Maria Muzyka-Wo\u017aniak","year":"2019","unstructured":"Maria Muzyka-Wo\u017aniak M, Oleszko A. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(5):1115\u201322.","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"320_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.044","volume":"37","author":"J Huang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Huang J, Pesudovs K, Wen D, Chen S, Wright T, Wang X, et al. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with rotating Scheimpflug photography and partial coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(2):341\u20138.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"320_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1934","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.06.049","volume":"38","author":"J Aramberri","year":"2012","unstructured":"Aramberri J, Araiz L, Garcia A, Illarramendi I, Olmos J, Oyanarte I, et al. Dual versus single Scheimpflug camera for anterior segment analysis: precision and agreement. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(11):1934\u201349.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"320_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.01.051","volume":"42","author":"F Sabatino","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sabatino F, Findl O, Maurino V. Comparative analysis of optical biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(5):685\u201393.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"320_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2009.161729","volume":"94","author":"LP Cruysberg","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cruysberg LP, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TT, De Brabander J, Nuijts RM. Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(1):106\u201310.","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"320_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.03.016","volume":"45","author":"E Yeu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yeu E. Agreement of ocular biometry measurements between 2 biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(8):1130\u20134.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"320_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2016-309365","volume":"101","author":"C McAlinden","year":"2017","unstructured":"McAlinden C, Gao R, Yu A, Wang X, Yang J, Yu Y, et al. Repeatability and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(9):1223\u20139.","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"7","key":"320_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2008.156554","volume":"93","author":"PJ Buckhurst","year":"2009","unstructured":"Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(7):949\u201353.","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"320_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20190109-01","volume":"35","author":"J Huang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Huang J, Chen H, Li Y, Chen Z, Gao R, Yu J, et al. Comprehensive comparison of axial length measurement with three swept-source OCT-based biometers and partial coherence interferometry. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(2):115\u201320.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["Eye and Vision"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40662-022-00320-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40662-022-00320-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40662-022-00320-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,5]],"date-time":"2023-01-05T09:07:24Z","timestamp":1672909644000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/eandv.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40662-022-00320-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,3]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["320"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40662-022-00320-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["2326-0254"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2326-0254","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 July 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 November 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 January 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"1"}}