{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,16]],"date-time":"2025-12-16T12:50:32Z","timestamp":1765889432346,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,18]],"date-time":"2024-12-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1734480000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,18]],"date-time":"2024-12-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1734480000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100014584","name":"Universit\u00e4tsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universit\u00e4t Mainz","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100014584","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J Implant Dent"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To evaluate whether there are clinical benefits by preparing dental implant sites using piezosurgery instead of conventional rotary drills in healed bone crests and if initial crestal soft tissue thickness could have an impact on marginal bone loss.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Twenty-five partially edentulous patients requiring two single implants in molar\/premolar areas had each site randomly allocated to either piezosurgery or to conventional rotary drill preparation according to a split-mouth design. Definitive screw-retained metal-ceramic crowns were delivered after 6\u00a0months. All patients were followed to 5\u00a0years after placement. Outcome measures were: implant\/crown failures, complications, peri-implant marginal bone level changes, resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and time required to\u00a0complete site preparation, recorded, when possible, by blinded assessors.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>No patients dropped-out and no implant failed. Five years after placement, there were no statistically significant differences for complications (only one complication in the piezo group: difference\u2009=\u20090.04; P\u2009=\u20091), for peri-implant bone loss (difference\u2009=\u2009\u22120.11\u00a0mm; 95% CI \u22120.24 to 0.01; P\u2009=\u20090.083), and for RFA changes (6\u00a0months) (difference\u2009=\u2009\u22120.35; 95% CI \u22121.95 to 1.25; P\u2009=\u20090.672 between groups). Significantly more time was needed to prepare implant sites with piezosurgery (difference\u2009=\u2009236.8\u00a0s; 95% CI \u2212286.12 to \u2212187.48; P\u2009&lt;\u20090.0001). Initial soft tissue thickness had no effect on peri-implant bone loss (estimate\u2009=\u20090.05; 95% CI \u22120.03; 0.12; P\u2009=\u20090.239).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>No clinically appreciable differences were noticed when placing implants using piezosurgery or conventional instrumentation with rotary drill, however, the preparation with rotary drills was on average 4\u00a0min faster. No effect of initial crestal soft tissue thickness was observed on peri-implant bone loss.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-024-00582-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,18]],"date-time":"2024-12-18T15:32:23Z","timestamp":1734535943000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Dental implant site preparation with conventional rotary drill or piezosurgery: five-year after placement results from a within person randomised controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"10","author":[{"given":"Adriano","family":"Azaripour","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vittorio Siro Leone","family":"Farina","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Esposito","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jacopo","family":"Buti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bilal","family":"Al-Nawas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Keyvan","family":"Sagheb","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"582_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8208.2011.00341.x","volume":"15","author":"C Stacchi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Stacchi C, Vercellotti T, Torelli L, Furlan F, Di Lenarda R. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery a single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry Related Res. 2013;15:188\u201397.","journal-title":"Clinical Implant Dentistry Related Res"},{"key":"582_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1336","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12278","volume":"25","author":"L Canullo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Canullo L, Penarrocha D, Penarrocha M, Rocio AG, Penarrocha-Diago M. Piezoelectric vs. conventional drilling in implant site preparation: pilot controlled randomized clinical trial with crossover design. Clinical Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1336\u201343.","journal-title":"Clinical Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"582_CR3","first-page":"543","volume":"25","author":"T Vercellotti","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vercellotti T, Nevins ML, Kim DM, Nevins M, Wada K, Schenk RK, et al. Osseous response following resective therapy with piezosurgery. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:543\u20139.","journal-title":"Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent"},{"key":"582_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12082","volume":"25","author":"F Bengazi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bengazi F, Lang NP, Canciani E, Vigano P, Velez JU, Botticelli D. Osseointegration of implants with dendrimers surface characteristics installed conventionally or with Piezosurgery(R) a comparative study in the dog. Clinal Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:10\u20135.","journal-title":"Clinal Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"582_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12783","volume":"28","author":"K Sagheb","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sagheb K, Kumar VV, Azaripour A, Walter C, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer PW. Comparison of conventional twist drill protocol and piezosurgery for implant insertion: an ex vivo study on different bone types. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2017;28:207\u201313.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implant Res"},{"key":"582_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6817154","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/6817154","volume":"2018","author":"C Stacchi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Baldi D, Bugea C, Rapani A, Perinetti G, et al. Immediate loading of implant-supported single crowns after conventional and ultrasonic implant site preparation: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6817154.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"582_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1615\/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2018020398","volume":"28","author":"S Soheilifar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Soheilifar S, Bidgoli M, Houshyar E, Farhadian M, Ghamari A. Comparing the effect of preparation of the implant sites with piezosurgery and conventional drilling on the stability of implants at 5-months follow-up. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2018;28:1\u20138.","journal-title":"J Long Term Eff Med Implants"},{"key":"582_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12620","volume":"27","author":"G Peker Tekdal","year":"2016","unstructured":"Peker Tekdal G, Bostanci N, Belibasakis GN, Gurkan A. The effect of piezoelectric surgery implant osteotomy on radiological and molecular parameters of peri-implant crestal bone loss: a randomized, controlled, split-mouth trial. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2016;27:535\u201344.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implant Res"},{"key":"582_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ma11122516","author":"A Scarano","year":"2018","unstructured":"Scarano A, Carinci F, Lorusso F, Festa F, Bevilacqua L, Santos de Oliveira P, et al. Ultrasonic vs drill implant site preparation post-operative pain measurement through VAS swelling and crestal bone remodeling a randomized clinical study. Materials. 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma11122516.","journal-title":"Materials"},{"key":"582_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e472","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000004490","volume":"29","author":"AN Alattar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alattar AN, Bede SYH. Does mixed conventional\/piezosurgery implant site preparation affect implant stability? J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:e472\u20135.","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"key":"582_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bjoms.2013.10.008","volume":"52","author":"UT da Silva Neto","year":"2014","unstructured":"da Silva Neto UT, Joly JC, Gehrke SA. Clinical analysis of the stability of dental implants after preparation of the site by conventional drilling or piezosurgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:149\u201353.","journal-title":"Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg"},{"key":"582_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcms.2020.05.002","volume":"48","author":"HM Sallam","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sallam HM, Khalifa GA, Khalifa FA. Dynamics of implant site preparation affecting the quality of osseointegrated implants in the maxillary aesthetic zone. J Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2020;48:645\u201352.","journal-title":"J Craniomaxillofacial Surg"},{"key":"582_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.36130\/CTD.03.2020.02","volume":"2","author":"R Pistilli","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pistilli R, Esposito M, Barausse C, Balercia A, Bonifazi L, Buti J, et al. Conventional drills versus piezoelectric surgery preparation for placement of four immediately loaded zygomatic oncology implants in edentulous maxillae: results from a 3-year within person randomised controlled trial. Clin Trials Dentistry. 2020;2:5\u201317.","journal-title":"Clin Trials Dentistry"},{"key":"582_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1046","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12916","volume":"28","author":"A Akcali","year":"2017","unstructured":"Akcali A, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Sun C, Petrie A, Nibali L, Donos N. What is the effect of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone loss around dental implants? a systematic review. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2017;28:1046\u201353.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implant Res"},{"key":"582_CR15","first-page":"279","volume":"13","author":"S Spinato","year":"2020","unstructured":"Spinato S, Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Bernardello F, Messina M, Dovigo S, et al. Influence of abutment height and vertical mucosal thickness on early marginal bone loss around implants: a randomised clinical trial with an 18-month post-loading clinical and radiographic evaluation. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2020;13:279\u201390.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Implantol (Berl)"},{"key":"582_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1111\/jcpe.13505","volume":"48","author":"M Munoz","year":"2021","unstructured":"Munoz M, Busoms E, Vilarrasa J, Albertini M, Ruiz-Magaz V, Nart J. Bone-level changes around implants with 1- or 3-mm-high abutments and their relation to crestal mucosal thickness: a 1-year randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48:1302\u201311.","journal-title":"J Clin Periodontol"},{"key":"582_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12155","volume":"17","author":"T Linkevicius","year":"2015","unstructured":"Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Schlee M. Crestal bone stability around implants with horizontally matching connection after soft tissue thickening: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:497\u2013508.","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"582_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12301","volume":"26","author":"A Puisys","year":"2015","unstructured":"Puisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone-level implants a prospective controlled clinical trial. Clinic Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:123\u20139.","journal-title":"Clinic Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"582_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1228","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12222","volume":"17","author":"T Linkevicius","year":"2015","unstructured":"Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: a comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:1228\u201336.","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"582_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2016.150571","volume":"87","author":"F Suarez-Lopez Del Amo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Lin GH, Monje A, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Influence of soft tissue thickness on peri-implant marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2016;87:690\u20139.","journal-title":"J Periodontol"},{"key":"582_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.12784","volume":"28","author":"P van Eekeren","year":"2017","unstructured":"van Eekeren P, van Elsas P, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. The influence of initial mucosal thickness on crestal bone change in similar macrogeometrical implants: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2017;28:214\u20138.","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implant Res"},{"key":"582_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.5051\/jpis.1904440222","volume":"50","author":"R Di Gianfilippo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Di Gianfilippo R, Valente NA, Toti P, Wang HL, Barone A. Influence of implant mucosal thickness on early bone loss: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020;50:209\u201325.","journal-title":"J Periodontal Implant Sci"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Implant Dentistry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40729-024-00582-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s40729-024-00582-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s40729-024-00582-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,18]],"date-time":"2024-12-18T16:16:12Z","timestamp":1734538572000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journalimplantdent.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s40729-024-00582-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,18]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["582"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40729-024-00582-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["2198-4034"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2198-4034"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 October 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 December 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 December 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study protocol was approved by the University of Mainz Ethics Committee (Ethics Committee No.: 837.1 85.1 5 (9953)). All patients signed a specifically informed consent that was approved by the ethical committee in order to participate in the present trial.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"64"}}